[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 25 KB, 300x404, JACOB+BARNET.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5777374 No.5777374[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Ask Pedro Barnet anything.

>> No.5777380

>>5777374
Do your parents know you're gay?

>> No.5777386

snickelfritz

>> No.5777391

How do you feel now that Jacob is a published physicist?

>> No.5777399

Yes,
what happens at 1:20?

http://www.youtube.com watch?v=Uq-FOOQ1TpE

(How he sees the number 32)

>> No.5777427

>>5777380
I am heterosexual, being homosexual is against God.
>>5777391
Great, I am a genius and I'm happy to see the big bang theory disproved, currently emailing the producers of the big bang theory to have them change the name to something less rude to creationists (I disproved the whole theory anyway!)
>>5777399
When I see that number, I see it as a power of two, two to the power of 7 to be exact, and when I see that I picture the 7th dimension, with a 7 dimensional sphere with a perimeter of 32.
At that moment I understood the universe.

>> No.5777434

>>5777427
>When I see that number, I see it as a power of two, two to the power of 7 to be exact, and when I see that I picture the 7th dimension, with a 7 dimensional sphere with a perimeter of 32.
At that moment I understood the universe.

I'm literally crying, please continue.

>> No.5777615

>>5777434
When I'm out of Differential Math class in an hour I'll answer any question I have been given.

>> No.5777617

>>5777427

Shiva doesn't mind you being gay. You told you otherwise?

>> No.5777621

What is your opinion on imaginary numbers? Will we ever find a way to do math without them?

>> No.5777654

>>5777621

Easy peasy. Just call them something else.

>> No.5777706

>>5777621
I almost quit disproving the big bang theory when I discvered I had to use imaginary numbers to disprove it, if we just redefined negative times a negative to a negative all of math would be solved and we wouldn't have to use false, imaginary placeholders to solve simple equations like x^2=-1

>> No.5777712

>>5777706
just imagine a little dot on a line going backwards, what is backwards of backwards? well forwards silly!

>> No.5777721

>>5777712
Numbers are numbers. They don't move on a line, you silly troll.

>> No.5778185

>>5777721
Number lines = numbers, listen to me, I know what I'm talking about.
Anymore questions?