/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 37 KB, 375x563, coin-operated-slut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Mon May 6 23:40:10 2013 No.5739405 [Reply] [Original]

How can mathematical induction exist if all math is based on already preexisting set of inducted rules (axioms).

It must be, that math is all deduction.
Science is mainly induction and some deduction, since we're haven't uncovered all the axioms of nature.
So how can there exist mathematical induction?

>>	Anonymous Mon May 6 23:42:54 2013 No.5739412 >>5739405 b/c 'mathematical induction' as a method of proof is not the same as 'inductive reasoning' try harder

>>	Anonymous Mon May 6 23:46:09 2013 No.5739424 >>5739412 oh i see. Because it sounded really weird. Since math isn't a science but based on absolute rules and all you have to do is to deduct on that foundation.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 01:39:25 2013 No.5739709 >>5739412 Okay, wow, no, not at all, when ever you're using a number you're using inductive reasoning simply by the fact of treating with a set of 'coordinates', go ahead, do math with 0/0=1

Anonymous Tue May 7 01:51:25 2013 No.5739738

>>5739424
Mathematical induction is in fact deductive, not inductive. One thing you'll realize is that mathfags don't like philosophy fags and they name several things in ways that piss off philosophy fags. An example is 'mathematical morality'.

>>5739709
Is this supposed to be coherent?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 01:59:25 2013 No.5739758 >>5739738 1=2 0/0=1 0.999...=1 Choose one or account for each independently, todays math is fucking baby tier, only because the practicallity of using those functions as extensions to the dimensions hasnt been correlated yet

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:01:25 2013 No.5739761 >>5739709 >>5739758 In English, please?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:04:25 2013 No.5739765 File: 9 KB, 459x377, reaction frown.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5739758 >>5739709 Been seeing a concerning upsurge of schizophrenics on /sci/ lately.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:11:09 2013 No.5739775 >>5739765 Agreed. Wish they'd go back to r9k.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:12:10 2013 No.5739776 >>5739738 >>5739761 >>5739765 Been seeing a conserable amout of illiterates today

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:16:24 2013 No.5739781 >>5739775 you mean /x/

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:20:24 2013 No.5739784 >>5739758 whats inductive about it?

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:21:24 2013 No.5739786 >>5739781 They're evenly split between /x/ and /r9k/ if you lurk both. But the /r9k/ ones are self aware of their schizo behavior so take that as you will.

>>	Anonymous Tue May 7 02:25:10 2013 No.5739791 >>5739784 That they're simply saying "All of them!" to the extent of when together they are neither and all so simply one! -1 x -1 Fucking MATHFAGS

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]