/sci/ - Science & Math

Don't be a bitch and crank that thing out yourself.

>>5676296
You don't need to actually solve it, just say the form. You'll get a summand from each factor of the denominator.

>>5676296
It's pretty much in the image
The first and the last parentheses are divisible (obviously), so they are like:
<span class="math">{A \over {x^n+\alpha}^2} + {B \over {x^n+\alpha}}<span class="math">
The two on the middle are like
{Cx+D} \over {x^2+\beta x+\delta}[/spoiler][/spoiler]

I seriously don't know how to do this

it looks to me like I'm going all the way up to H

Am I supposed to multiply them out?
The denominator I mean?
Then divide the polynomials?

Alright, so I multiplied out the denominator

looks like I'm supposed to divide now

>>5676409
That's a good first step.

Next, notice that 7 and 5 appear most often as coefficients, so you should evaluate the polynomials in the numerator and denominator for the value x = 7/5. Once, you have worked out that fraction, post it in this thread, and we will tell you what to do next.

>>5676420
not sure what you meant by that
so I tried to divide them

this look like I'm getting somewhere?
I think I'm going to try and factor out the denominator

>>5676481
You need to find a different area of study.

You already had it factored, and were told not to multiply it out. You tried anyway, and got the wrong answer. The denom has degree 10, not 8.

Now you want to factor it out? Go to bed!

>>5676500
aw damn... fuck it

I quit

I'd gladly help you but my english lets me down.
What does "Do not solve for the coefficients" mean?
Give me an example for a much simpler function

>>5678050
Safe for work board.

>>5678058
so a naked woman (cant ever see her tits) is not as sfw as saying : cock bitchs ass nigger dick?

>>5678104
> uneducated NEET/high schooler detected

>>5678111
tell me more please

>>5678104
https://www.4chan.org/rules#global3

>>5678115
you should read it too

>>5678115
That's the rule you're always breaking.

>>5678115
oh wait you're too busy posting off-topic my bad

>>5678120
I have read all of the rules.
I obey them all.

You do not.
/b/ would be a more appropriate board for you, I think.

>>5678129
no you're not kiddo
https://www.4chan.org/rules#global2

stop with the off-topic bro you annoying

>>5678129
>you cant prove you're 18
>you be breaking https://www.4chan.org/rules#global6 also; I was offering to help and was actually trying to contribute before you showed up

>>5678132
You do not know how old I am; you have no idea if I am breaking rule 2 or not, just as one can not tell if anybody is ever breaking rule 2.

I have never broken that rule; I am currently 22.

>>5678147
>I was offering to help and was actually trying to contribute before you showed up
Good.
Then do so.

Pornographic images and racism are not necessary for you to 'contribute'.

>>5676296
Please look on wikipedia, the trick will get obvious. One thing that took me a few minutes to notice is that in the numerator, they try a polynomial of degree n-1, where n is the smallest degree occuring in the factors in the denumerator. Also, just list all combinations of factors in the denumerator.

Look and it'll become clear, hopefully.

>>5678166
What's pornographic about that image?

And I'm trying to contribute and help this guy out but some angry unloved nerds like you cant go to sleep before showing off their nerdiness to get some attention

>>5678182
>What's pornographic about that image?
It is an image of a naked person. How do you think that it is not pornographic?

I am neither angry nor unloved, and I do not need any attention.
If you wish to contribute, then do.
But I am finished talking to you.

>>5678196
this also pornographic

>>5676296
ez problem lmao

>>5678207
Well he is not naked, but it is not exactly 'safe for work', is it?

"All boards that default to the Yotsuba B or Burichan (blue) theme are to be considered "work safe." Violators may be temporarily banned and their posts removed. Note: Spoilered pornography or other not safe for work content is NOT allowed."

>faggot tripcoders that didnt even solve this ez problem and wanna complain about an image that isnt even pornographic

>>5678234
search up the term pornography please. you get to see more pornography in an MTV musical video of an african-american interpret .
In my picture: you cant see boobs/asshole/pussy. There's no humping involved or anything else. Is just a girl sitting with her private areas covered. Hell I see more boobs on news on national TV. (without being marked age inappropriate)

>>5678236
>>5678245
i'm this guy

>>5678271
I think you're not supposed to solve it this way "do not solve for coefficients"

>>5678271
<span class="math">x^2+3x-4 = (x+4)(x-1)[/spoiler]

>>5678281
coefficients being A,B,C,D,E,F,G,H,I,J

i am positive this is the answer
and i dont mind your stash of asian pics trip fag

>>5678284
ah youre right..

>>5678286
haha you the man

fixed

>>5678316
GJ now you can pass the 9th grade

>>5678316
gotta know this stuff for differential equations buddy

>>5678316
I prefer Ex+F / x^2+4x+8 as E*x+F / (x+2)+4

>>5678357
I think you forgot to square (x+2).