[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 10 KB, 252x217, 1313584179311s.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5648311 No.5648311[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

I think I'll post this gem one last term before deleting it.

>> No.5648316

>>5648311
> if
found your problem

>> No.5648323

>>5648311
Femanon here. I'm more attracted to confidence than intelligence.

>> No.5648326

implying i am not asexual

>> No.5648333
File: 172 KB, 577x890, 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5648333

>>5648311

>> No.5648336
File: 134 KB, 413x395, 1356473345847.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5648336

>>5648333
>There faces

>> No.5648354

>>5648323
Not confidence, faggots can be confident too, some geeks can pull that of too.

Females and males are attracted to "healthy" genes, it's the rule of thumb of evolution.

In females it is expressed as symmetrical, fit and young appearance, so mainly physical.

In males it is expressed as height, "manly" facial characteristics and a dominant personality, "confidence" is a defacto feature of the above.
In a word, power, for the offspring and all that jazz.

Everything else is secondary.

Intelligence is only appreciated by females if:
1. You make lots of money out of it
You don't.
2. You make her laugh with that
You can't.
3. You stimulate her intellectually
Only pretentious art majors can do this, they have the female sense of cosmotheory due to their estrogen and serotonin infested brains.


No, arguing some sci-pop and philosophy semantics on the most basement dwelling corner of the internet isn't what females accept as intelligence.

>> No.5648357
File: 27 KB, 300x300, elemental calcium carbonate.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5648357

>>5648336
>There

>> No.5648380

>>5648354
>let me tell your about your tastes
Hilarious.

>> No.5648389
File: 29 KB, 500x281, Robb2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5648389

>>5648354
I concur, me and my lady companion have multiple stimulating conversations about programming, operating systems, hardware debates(She's an intel girl), Game Of Thrones Books Vs Show and other things such as who is better at Halo(obviously me, but we only play in freetime so it doesn't really matter)
>mfw she doesnt exist and i sit alone for hours in a Halo 3 custom lobby)

>> No.5648390

>>5648354
>I like X
>You like X because Y, Z, W
>Nah, I just like X
>No, you like Z, Y AND W, not X
I had no idea /sci/ could be this pretentious.

>> No.5648391

>>5648389
>anecdotal evidence
HAHAHAHA OH WOW, and /sci/ brags about being smart

>> No.5648397

this thread is dumb, how could you be so dumb /sci/

its all in the FLAGS

>> No.5648399

>>5648380
It is, in a way.
>>5648389
You can wait for realistic dollies
>>5648390
Bake your beloved a qualia cake.

>> No.5648495

Maybe most of us here aren't Intelligent? I don't get what your asking here do you need reassurance that your intelligent or dating advice cause that can be found at /adv/ or /soc/