[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 502 KB, 1952x2592, IMAG0001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5568978 No.5568978 [Reply] [Original]

/sci/
I need your fucking help before I punch a goat.

TiCl3 + 6urea +3KI→ [Ti(urea)6]3I +3KCl

Molar amounts:
TiCl3 = 0.1
Urea = 0.105
KI = 0.8

What is the limiting reagent of this reaction?

I get bloody confused when three or more reactants are present, I am fine at working it out with two.

>> No.5569004
File: 49 KB, 208x247, dog.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5569004

>urea

>> No.5569015

>>5569004
>he doesn't love urea
wtf
>>5568978
just fucking look at the molar ratios and compare the moles i mean holy cunts they aren't even making you convert from grams

>> No.5569031

>>5569015
man, I can give you some urea if you wanted, in grams too

>> No.5569033

>>5569015
I did that shitty conversion myself.

The thing is, what do I take as the base value?

Do I say TiCl3 (0.1) is 6x Urea?

Or, say Urea 0.105 is 6x more than TiCl3 in this.

They give entirely different answers so fucking confused fuck fuck fuckity fuck.

>> No.5569069

>math phd
>any job
>300k

>> No.5569075

>>5568978
>tfw you lel@chem/biology majors for having to convert piss for a living
>lol'd 11/10 OP.

>> No.5569086

>>5569075
HAHAH I TROLL U Xdddddd
fuck sake lol..
Can someone just give me some help ye

>> No.5569172

bump for babbytier chem

>> No.5569202

>>5569172
if you write the complete reaction on paper and post pic i'll do the exercise for you.

>> No.5569223

>>5569202

I just gave you the complete reaction didn't I?
Could always skype call me, I'm not a 600 pound landwhale that will scream abuse at you I swear.

>> No.5569232
File: 16 KB, 616x515, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5569232

>>5569223

>> No.5569243

>>5569232
TiCl3 + 6 (NH2)2=O + 3KI --> Ti((NH2)2=O)6(3)I (counter ions) + 3KCL

I believe this is it in full

>> No.5569258

>>5569232
You must have cam sex with this
>>5569223
so it can help you with your piss creations so you can get your degree
Don't you get it faggot?

>> No.5569261

>>5569243
look dude i don't know shit about that brackets and stuff, i'll do it the way i know

>> No.5569279
File: 20 KB, 1644x186, 213123123123.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5569279

So this is what you were looking for.
Sorry, mind is all over the place.

>> No.5569290
File: 43 KB, 972x974, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5569290

>>5569279
I hope you understand it

>> No.5569329

>>5569290
Thanks!
This is exactly what I had in the first place, but a couple of tardspack friends said I was wrong and TiCl3 was the limiting reagent :{{
Made sense to believe them because why would a lab technician give you more of an expensive component than piss-cheap urea.
;) Cheers!

>> No.5569346

>>5569329
Exactly, the limiting reagent is always the cheapest susbtance. Cheers.

>> No.5569353

>>5569346
Hold up.
We are saying that TiCl3 is in excess though, and urea is the limiting reagent. That goes against what you just said.
This is partly why I have been confused throughout all of this.

>> No.5569373

>>5569353
No, i'm taking TiCl3 as a reference since it's the lowest amount.

>> No.5569387

>>5569373
But the lowest amount does not mean it is automatically the limiting reagent, does it?
The values I gave were in mol by the way.
What was your final verdict, you just lost me mate!