[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 21 KB, 400x301, 1358094937973.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538754 No.5538754[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Is Who wants to be a millionaire just a game of luck?

I mean, there's 33.34% chance of being right unless the person happens to know the right answer, and lifelines can only get you so far into the game.

Let's say there are 15 questions with 4 choices each. Let's also say there are 3 lifelines: call-a-friend, 50-50, and ask-the-audience.

For each of the 15 questions, there is only 1 correct answer, and 3 incorrect answers, so immediately your chances are 1/3 = 33.34%. You can use each lifeline once. Using phone-a-friend, let's say gives you a 95% chance the person you call is correct. So 1 question is 95%. Similarly, we can say ask-the-audience gives you a 95% chance. Finally, 50-50 will remove 2 wrong answers, so you have 1 right answer and 1 wrong answer, so you basically know the answer. To recap:

Question 1: 33.34%
Question 2: 33.34%
Question 3: 33.34%
Question 4: 95% <--- ask-the-audience
Question 5: 33.34%
Question 6: 33.34%
Question 7: 33.34%
Question 8: 33.34%
Question 9: 95% <--- phone-a-friend
Question 10: 33.34%
Question 11: 33.34%
Question 12: 33.34%
Question 13: 33.34%
Question 14: 33.34%
Question 15: 100% <--- 50-50
Total: 690.08%
Divided by 15 questions = 46.00%
So basically, it's more a less a game of chance, but more than half the people on the show will lose, so it's not very fair. That show is making tons of money off of people.

>> No.5538760
File: 51 KB, 210x231, 2spurd4u.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538760

>>>/lit/3479362

>> No.5538779
File: 170 KB, 1118x1061, MILLIONAIRETROLLFAGGOT.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538779

<<<

>> No.5538804
File: 96 KB, 308x205, youmadbro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538804

>>5538779

>> No.5538812
File: 20 KB, 614x352, ENG.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538812

>>5538804
nope, but i'm having that fucking pic.

>> No.5538818

3/10 for making me post
1/588,855
.00017% chance, in case anybody was wondering.

>> No.5538822
File: 48 KB, 720x540, ek.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538822

>>5538812
>infantile cartoon

>> No.5538825

>>5538818
wtf are you working out? coz that aint 1/4^15.

>> No.5538832
File: 33 KB, 600x371, rose_umadbro.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538832

>>5538822

>> No.5538843

>>5538832
Does Harriet still have a black fuck buddy?

>> No.5538848

>>5538843
wat? haz doesnt have fuckbuddies.
also AFAIK she never dated anyone who was black (and yet claims to be completely none racist..hmm, funny that)

>> No.5538856
File: 7 KB, 453x142, evidence for harriet being a slut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538856

>>5538848
Don't deny what you told us. It has been screencapped.

>> No.5538862

>>5538848
lol. everyone is racist and prejudiced, and rightly so. Where would we be without induction?

>> No.5538874
File: 2 KB, 126x103, nope.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538874

>>5538856
that shit again, i already told you it was fucking photoshopped, and it was probably done by you, because i seriously doubt anyone other than the pathetic pleb who made it, would ever post it. because it's a shite fucking obvious sh00p.

also, i told haz it was shopped, so nice fucking fail troll.
0/10, now fuck off.

>> No.5538885

>>5538874
If you actually think this requires photoshop, you are the newest newfag to ever be new on the internet.

>> No.5538894

>>5538885
fine, not photoshop. could easily do it on MS-paint.
eitehr way it's still a shitty troll.

>> No.5538901

>>5538894
It doesn't require paint either. What's your IQ?

>> No.5538906

>>5538894
EK, if you are somewhat attractive and smart, why do you spend your days in this shithole?

also, do you know the rose from /g/? she's your age and from london as well

>> No.5538915

>>5538906
>if you are somewhat attractive and smart

That's a big IF, like the IF in "IF evolution was true".

>> No.5538917

>>5538915
lol'd

>> No.5538918
File: 70 KB, 450x360, 1339849349576.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538918

>>5538906
i never met her
also wtf, why u think im from london?

>> No.5538922

>>5538918
:)

>> No.5538929

>>5538918
also, where's that pic from? rose is hawt

she got some new vids btw (like january ish)

>> No.5538948
File: 114 KB, 450x360, 1343684365598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538948

>>5538929
might be from her youtube? or just 4chan in general, IDK, i just saved it from somewhere
and yeh, she is hawt.

>> No.5538958

>>5538948
nah. defo not youtubes

i think she was on 4chan once or twice. why encyclopaedica dramatica has nothing on her is beyond me.

>> No.5538968
File: 471 KB, 785x1000, 1360535779815.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538968

>>5538958
does it not??
wow, that's surprising.

there was this one of her naked, but facing backwards with head turned sideways, so you could only see her ass (and she has a hell of a tatoo) but it might have been a shop, i'm not sure.

>> No.5538970

I like to pretend that EK and Rose is actually the same person. That way I am totally turned on when in threads with EK. Not that I would not be if this fantasy was not in place.

>> No.5538975

>>5538968
huh, just realised the tatoo is definitely real, you can see a bit of it on her arm in that image (the whole thing is a lot bigger and more awesome than that, it's just mainly covered up)

>> No.5538978

>>5538968
It was a shop. I had the original version in my folder, before I annihilated the entire stash.

>> No.5538980

wasn't rose a trap?

>> No.5538986

>>5538975
yeah the tattoo is pretty cool. i think the nude is fake though. i've seen it. even if it's not, it's not that exciting

>>5538970
nah, EK has no style.

>>5538980
no, that was a hoax. no way she's a trap, look at her youtube vids.

>> No.5538993

>>5538929
from the livejournal she had a couple of years ago

>> No.5538990
File: 2 KB, 105x126, awdude.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5538990

>>5538978
>before I annihilated the entire stash.
WHY THE FUCK WOULD YOU DO THAT??

>> No.5538995

>>5538980
nah, that's just one of those joke/meme things to troll newfags. like the whole 'fingerbox' thing.
people who post it dont really believe it, they're just trolling.

>> No.5539002

>>5538990
I was obsessing too much. Also out of respect for Rose.

Anyway, if there was more content of you I would be obsessing too.

>> No.5539014

>>5538995
How many trip personalities do you have?

>> No.5539016
File: 1.93 MB, 3072x2304, newtonianlust.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5539016

>>5538929
dailybooth

>> No.5539015

>>5538995
EK, you should set out to find rose. that would be awesome.

>>5539002
see
>>5538886
facebook com/rose.kellylines
thank me later

>> No.5539027
File: 230 KB, 468x354, 012774364.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5539027

>>5539002
>'more'
>implying there's any
oh god, you're a 7/7/11-fag?

>> No.5539032
File: 36 KB, 604x453, blahblah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5539032

>>5539015
that person is called rose elizabeth kelly lines

rose ek lines

so whoever they are, rose and ek are the same

>> No.5539037

>>5539014
just this one, i dont samefag. (and i'm not really teacup or w/e, that was a hoax.)

>> No.5539040

>33.34%

Work on your calculus. 1/4 = 0.25%

>> No.5539043

>>5539027
I was here that day, but it was nothing special in my opinion. I do not have any alleged pictures of you saved on my computer, either! Same as with Rose. I hope she is proud of me.

>> No.5539045

>>5539032
coincidence.
loads of people with matching letters.
there'd only be 26^2 combinations of 2 letters, and billions of people on the planet (and, for initials, EK is probably much more likely than something like XZ, so it's actually even more common that just the 26^2()

>> No.5539047

>>5539037
But we all know that you have been posting under the name "Terelsecky" in 2011.

>> No.5539052

>>5539047
wat? that wasnt me. i dont even remember them ever posting.