/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5520045
Because of big bang

You should find out

>>5520045

what is the Schwarzschild radius of the universe?

>>5520050

According to Nasa, somewhere between 10 and 100 billion light years.

>>5520056

good. and the actual radius of the Universe is.?

That's vague as sh!t

10-!00 B!ll!on

>>5520059
exactly as many b!ll!ons of "!ghtyears across as l!cks !t takes to get to the center of a toots!e pop

>>5520059
The radius of the OBSERVABLE universe is 46-47 billion light years.

So, what, we may or may not already be inside a black hole?

>>5520068

on the nosey!

>>5520075

Pic related.

>>5520045

Black hole appears when spacetime is curved too much. For that you need a density gradient, but there wasnt a gradient in the early universe because whole spacetime was filled with stuff homogenously.

>>5520059
>the actual radius of the Universe is.?

That is not knowable. We can know the radius of the "observable" universe, but the actual universe may be vastly larger. Imagine floating on a boat in the ocean, you can see to the horizon, but you have no idea how far the ocean goes on past that.

Also, observable would be a relative thing. Someone 10 billion light years away could see stuff that we can't, and vice-verse.

tl;dr existance is actually shrinking in accordance with a pre-scripted outline

>>5520099
it could be knowable. just not now.

>The Big Bang theory says that at t=0
>The Big Bang theory says that at
>The Big Bang theory says that
>The Big Bang theory says
>The Big Bang theory

penny penny penny

>>5520075

>>5520148

>>5520149
bazinga bitch

>>5520154
dat filename

What if our universe is not a black hole, but actually a white hole ever expanding as pass is fed into it by an incomprehensibly large black hole?

What if our universe is not a black hole, but rather a white hole ever expanding as mass is fed into it by an incomprehensibly large black hole?

>>5520068
That's only valid if the universe were flat.

what if we were in the matrix the whole time :O

>>5520166
And when all matter has been fed through to the white hole, entropy causes the mass to coalesce, collapse into a black hole, and reverse the process.

>>5520148
this

>>5520080
no, wrong.

Even a completely homogenous distribution of energy will result in curved spacetime

>>5520099
i think i remember a study that found it through analyzing dark matter

All energy was in a hot dense space, not matter. Also, black holes aren't formed by getting enough mass together. If you were to be crushed small enough, you'd be a black hole. If your spoon was crushed small enough, it would be a black hole.

>>5520173
Which it is...

bc of another black hole crushing into the first creating whopermega bigbangedybang

>>5520068
Sooooo Hologram Theory.

>>5520173
Why?

>>5520148
Zimbabwe

>>5520183
holy shit

what would happen if two black holes if equally mass collide? (because i think otherwise the bigger one will absorb the smaller)

>>5520331
Good question, there was an article on NASA's website about this there was some dispute though as space is deceptive to the observer.

>>5520331
A bigger black hole, probably.

>>5520183
waaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaat

>>5520166
>>5520183
Posting in epic discovery of the origin of the universe thread. Knew it would happen here.

>>5520183
How does entropy make things come together?

>>5520045
>Why isn't the whole universe a black hole?
It is.
The computer that runs reality is a singularity of literally zero diameter, OR infinite diameter. It just so happens that when you go to describe that shape you are left with the same whether you describe it from the small end or the large end.
All of this stems from the FACT that you cannot create space, because there is no where to put it. You can however PERFECTLY simulate space. So when people ask things like how big is the universe? It's silly. That's like asking, how big is Super Mario Land?
Well, you can SIMULATE it as any size, but the information representing that simulation takes up no space. The singularity/Black hole didn't collapse or form. Talking about it as having a beginning and an end is silly a well. It doesn't need a beginning or and end because it's just true. It's always true.

>>5520183
Err but we have many black holes so.... holy motherfucking shit

>Black holes before spacetime

> The Big Bang theory says that at t=0, all the mass in the universe was in the same place.
More accurately, it says that at t=0, all places were the same place.

>>5520629
>Big Bang was ftl

or shrunk away from the black holes...

>>5520648
>holes condensing made waves?

>>5520541
This guy has it figured out.

>>5520045
Who's to say that all matter in our Universe was here in the first place? There's evidence suggesting that it all came from outside.

>>5520768
sauce

>>5520846
Relativity

>>5521833
that doesn't explain anything

>>5520045
No answer, there never will be one either

Your weak attempt to debunk a theory shows your basic misunderstanding of the word "theory"

A theory is something which can't be proven - this is all

The big bang theory will never be proven or disproven, it is merely the basis for further discussion of deeper things

Nothing more to say

>>5520541
So basically
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_universe_hypothesis

>>5521902
>Your weak attempt to debunk a theory shows your
go fuck yourself

>>5521902
>A theory is something which can't be proven - this is all

what if the first black hole pulled space so much that there was no space to put put itself in? this made it unstable and explode

seem legit?

>>5522038
Black holes do not "pull" space, they bend it.

Is the universe expanding?

>>5522017
IS THAT REAL

this thread has been derailed a long time ago so i want to ask an unrelated question: does speaking with complicated words make me seem more intellegent?

Because at a certain point in time God happened, and decided everything should explode.
And now every year we watch a new Michael Bay movie to commemorate the event.

>>5520541
> How big is the universe?
> Yes.

>>5520480
Consider for simplicity's sake: Once everything has "stopped" the only active force left is gravity. It may take a long time, but eventually everything will drift back together, clump, collapse, etc.

>>5520629
Similar to above. Consider for simplicity sake, that all matter, black holes, neutron stars, whatever, all attract another when there is no other force. The black holes eat all the normal matter, and eventually combine into supermassive black holes, ongoing until only one, singular hypermassive black hole remains. As it collapses within itself, it spews matter back through a white whole, within some other membrane of the universe. The cycle starts again.

>>5521902
>A theory is something which can't be proven
>A theory is something which
>which

Fuck your grammar and your faggot misrepresentation.

A theory is something THAT has not been tested in such a way as to produce consistent results that affirm the initial predictions of the hypothesis.

there's this hypothesis that the big bang is the result of an entire universe being sucked into a black hole and spat out of a white hole