/sci/ - Science & Math

>image saved

Eikös olisi aika mennä nukkumaan? Huomenna sitten ehtii uusilla silmillä tarkastella näitä!

>>5518056

That is one of the most beautiful woman i've seen in my whole life.

>>5518095
tee se nyt, olet laiska idioottiastella nä

>>5518056
I would suggest, if you don't know anything on the subject, any college or AP textbook on quantum physics or chemistry should do the trick.

>>5518107
EK please stop and for crying out loud eat your medicines

>>5518121
I'm a chemical engineer, so i can tell you that i know enough to know that what you sugest is too basic for my purpose, since I've already read that stuff.

What I'm trying to read is the pub's, so I can see the develop of the work, rather than having the simplified revision of a book.

>>5518056
"atomic theory and it's relation with quarks and relativity"

Atomic theory deals mainly with the electronic structure of the atom. Then there's Sub-atomic physics which deals with the structure of the nucleus. This is where's you'll find your quarks, building up the hadrons. Also, you mention relativity. Yes, particles do on occasion move with speeds close to light and so a relativistic quantum theory is employed. This is quantum field theory.

"I'm new to science and stuff, so don't be too hard on me guys."

And yet you are jumping into the later tier of physics? Nigga do you even school?

Thank you OP. I had long deleted that picture of my ideal 20/10 waifu long ago. I had been seeking it for ages, like it was the one ring to rule them all.

You have returned my precious, and for that I thank you.

>>5518451
Well, at your level, I know no science, since all that I'm taught about is merely a fraction of what you do, meaning by you "the science people".
Never the less, I've studyed in a decent university that allows me to try the leap. Since my youth chem has been my special curiosity, but I have never made a scientific carreer of it, personal issues.
But I still want to understand what happens. And best way to understand is instructing one self.
I'm new to making science, not to reading it, so don't worry, I'll do fine.

Any ways, it's not that hard to understand if you put an effort.

C'mon guys, I really don't want to use my google fu looking for separate stuff just to know when I'm done that you had the collection already made.

>>5518467
Hey hey hey, it's ok, but take your eyes out of my girl. By the way, did you ever heard about where the pic came from?
Take a loli waifu and leave my woman alone.

>>5518608
same girl?

>>5518608
Hey again. Well it sounds like the bulk of what you're interested in is particle physics. I say this because you say to already have some understanding of the chemical properties of atoms (which is the study of their electronic structure i.e atomic physics). I'd then figure you'd want to venture further down in scale to the nucleus. Here, the theory of the nucleus starts out looking kinda like the electronic structure of atoms, with the electrons being replaced with nucleons (protons/neutrons). But as expected the nucleus is more complicated than that and one runs into a richer but a tad bit more difficult physics (as it is formulated at least :)). You seem to be seeking a "collection" of information regarding these matters of atoms and their constituents along with a relativistic formulation. I don't know of any godlike collections except books. Yes, books. They are good. Read them. One book in particular comes to mind, one which covers both nuclear physics (concerning the nucleus as a whole) and particle physics (the constituents) and also in the later chapters they go into the field description (relativistic formulation). This book has minor (relativley at least) prerequisites, but it is also a quirky read (somewhat difficult to read that is). Maybe it interests you.
http://www.amazon.com/Nuclear-Particle-Physics-W-Burcham/dp/0582450888

>>5518056
>Now that I've got your atention
10/10

>>5518056
i fucked her

>>5520179
no you fucking didnt lying fucking bastard