/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5365592
>not using E notation

>>5365599
>Using E notation outside of computer systems

>rounding before the final answer

>>5365602
>Doing math that involves actual numbers

>>5365605
>math
>without numbers

0/10

>>5365611
i like my math with letters

>>5365618
Some numbers can't be represented as fractions.

>>5365592
> using decimals instead of fractions

>>5365622

>>>/lit/

what do you guys do with t's and plus signs?

>>5365654
Cross them as well
They end up looking similar to this: ‡

>>5365654
Curved bottom on the variable t, like the text on 4chan.

>yfw crossing Z's was originally the tradition in germany due to Z being a satanic and inauspicious letter and the cross invoking jesus to avoid the bad luck

>>5365659
>>5365660
cool thanks, i can never manage to stick with the same convention for long and before i know it i'm looking at a problem where i'm not sure if t or plus sign

>>5365666
>666

holy jesus I am crossing my Zs from now on, please forgive me god in heaven

>>5365654

>>5365666
MY GOD ITS HAPPENING

>>5365624
then they can't be represented as decimals, either

>>5365740
They can. For example 0.999.... can be written as decimal but not as fraction.

Cross the z when it's a variable (not when writing words) to avoid confusing with 2 and my shitty handwriting.

Same for 7 with 1.

>Not drawing your x's like pic related.
Get on our level, Amerifags.

Also drew psi as pic related for a period, until I realised that was already a different character (capital phi I think) and not just psi in someones handwriting once.

Shame, it was much quicker than making two stokes.

>>5365742
It is equal to the trolling constant, <span class="math">\frac{0}{10}[/spoiler].

IT DOESNT FUCKING MATTER WHAT KIND SYMBOL YOU USE AS LONG AS YOU DEFINE IT FAGGOTS

YOU COULD USE A FUCKIN STICKMAN AS A VARIABLE AND DO THE EXACT SAME SHIT TO IT AS YOU WOULD WITH AN X OR PHI OR WHATEVER

FOR FUCKS SAKE

>>5365743
I joined the god tier of x writing this semester, feelsgoodman.jpg

>>5365755
>Shit tier handwriting detected

What's wrong?

>>5365769

Your x looks like a chi

Your 7 when handwritten in a hurry may be mistaken for a 1

same for Z and 2.

>>5365769

Nothing. Its a great way to write seven, z, and chi.

>>5365797
> ever writing an uppercase i
where does this happen

>>5365802
Writing?
l was just highlighting the difference between uppercase I and lowercase L.

>>5365792
im with you on the x-chi but there is no way that 7 looks like a 1 and no way a z like that could possibly be mistaken for a 2

>>5365802
current?

>>5365802
>where does this happen

Moment of Intertia
DC Current

is there a way to write rho so it's not so damn easy to confuse with p?

>>5365826
Draw from the tail so its easier to make the top part look round. Alternatively, add a little hook (like a fancy backwards q) on the bottom of the tail for good measure.

How can I write my 5's so they don't look like S's

>>5365846
write uppercase gamma and then a backwards c under it

>>5365846
put a hook on your esses.

>>5365846
Never really had that issue. Remember that there should be a right angle at the top of a five.

>Having 2s and zs in an equation and and trying really hard not to fuck up

>leakingspongeonmansface.png

Guys, my professor writes every single fucking r in uppercase. No exceptions. He isn't Russian so he doesn't have any excuse.

What do?

>>5365893
Deal with it. He's the professor, he can do what he wants. If you call him out on semantic bullshit, you'll piss him off for no reason.

>>5365846

Emphasize the corner on the 5.

>>5365826

>>5365922
Nah man, you're doing your rho backwards.

>>5365826
Use this variation of rho: ϱ

Anyone else put diagonal lines through their zeros?

>>5366152

>calling the symbol for the null set "zero"

>>5365707
your t made me rage

>>5365916
this is how my mom taught me to write 5
just write it like you would an S and make sure it has that right angle

>>5366164
> symbols have a fixed meaning
cool religion bro but numerology and astrology might be more up your alley than science and math

I meant something like this.

>not adding a leading zero to decimal numbers
leading zero designates octal numbers, baka

>>5366399
> baka
>>>/jp/