/sci/ - Science & Math

I think homo neanderthalis will win if given the right tools

The meanest animal?
women

>>5334308
No. Even the most advanced weaponry produced by the neanderthals could have reliably enabled them to go a 1v1 with most of the animals OP listed.

Imagine squaring off with a hippo with a fucking atlatl. You could be a master with it and the hippo still won't give much of a fuck while it's trampling your corpse.

>be pregnant queen ant
>keep underground, none of the animals see me
>get lots of children ants
>we army now
>keep reproducing
>eventually the other 'strong' animal dies

>>5334310

>>5334316
>he thinks hiding underground constitutes a fight

>>5334308
>science dudes

>>5334319
>if given the right tools
By wich i meant: an assualt rifle

>>5334447
Which is cheating.

>>5334310
>spoilers
>on /sci/

>>5336132
no its not

depends, if its in an empty room and the animals have nothing to use as weapons or no where to hide etc, its just a big empty fucking room. in this case, id put money on something like a poisons frog, snake, mabye a bold eagle. why because they will be able to get out of the way of the bigger ''dumber'' animals.
lions, tigers etc

but when faced a monkey or gorilla, it will be a 50/50. but then say the frog it poisons if the gorillia gets any of that shit in him he will die, so.. i guess it would be a draw

but i definitely think frog, snake or big eagle would be the most likely successors.

Shrimp Mantis, hands down. That shit kills everything.

>>5337101
A cat could easily kill one.

Any land animal in shallow water versus a fucking Orca. Oh I don't know who's gonna win this.....

Orca, obviously.

I remember I saw a video with a lobster or shrimp or something that could shoot air at bullet fast speeds or something underwater.
My vote is on that

>>5337131
this is also true.
but it would be unfair, land animals can operate in water, and vise versa for the whale.

Bear would win. Nothing could kill a bear in a pit.

Perhaps a bull could charge him on open field, but no charging in pit.

>>5337491
Oh and that is grizzly bear not brown bear. Brown bears are small.

Bears, alligators, python, orcas.

Probably the big 4 that will fuck everything up in sight. But orcas will rape the other 3.

>>5337516
>alligators
crocodiles are clearly superior

What could take down an elephant?

>>5337747
This. Alligators are the more deadly of the two if they are the same size, however Crocodiles can grow to be much larger.

>>5337786
i guess alligators are more aggressive. i wouldn't say more deadly, crocodiles are definitely more dangerous. the size thing is correct, crocodiles grow a lot larger, (salt water crocs anyway) but i think its because the big crocodiles in Australia live in the middle of nowhere and less people to attack, where alligators live in populated areas in the US and other countries (this is from what ive heard)

>>5337770
king cobras can take them down

>>5334303
Why has no one done this for real yet? I have money.

>>5337837
>i guess alligators are more aggressiv

Crocs are.

>>5337844
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Animal_Face-Off
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Monster_Bug_Wars

>>5337904
debatable.
i think alligators attack more people on a yearly basis that's why they are considered more dangerous.
but i think crocodiles are definitely more dangerous, and deadly etc

sorry for bad English

>>5334303
wolverines /thread

People are seriously underestimating the hippo here. It's really dangerous and aggressive. It has motherfucking HUGE teeth and the jaw strength to use them. It's surprisingly fast on both land and water. They routinely kill crocodiles by biting them in half, just to give you some perspective.

giraffe

>>5334303
Honey badger don't give a shit.

squirtle

Megaladon.

/thread

a pitbull