[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 18 KB, 480x320, 1347046991842.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5260045 No.5260045 [Reply] [Original]

anyone else get a science boner for magnetized target fusion?

>> No.5260048

>inb4 MUH THORIUM

>> No.5260073

Is it just me or does that look like a prototype for the Project Excalibur device?

Pretty sneaky claiming it's fusion research.

>> No.5260083

>>5260045
I like the fonts they use

>> No.5260110

>>5260045
>magnetized target fusion
what the is this all about???

>> No.5260118
File: 111 KB, 414x317, 1344556909462.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5260118

>>5260110
Combines magnetic confinement and internal confinement and captures the energy and neutrons released.

>> No.5260122

>>5260118
>captures the energy and neutrons released.
what for?

>> No.5260128

>>5260122
POWAH?

>> No.5260129

>>5260122
fucking electricity production?

>> No.5260133

>>5260122
lol
>energy? i don't see any possible applications for that.

>> No.5260149

Bump for interest, I want to learn more about this, teach me /sci/

>> No.5260166
File: 34 KB, 566x366, genfusion2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
5260166

>>5260149
Well you know the basic principles of fusion yes? Push hydrogen plasma together?
I reckon we can make a vortex with an inflow and outflow of liquid lead, running it through a boiler.
We return to steam trains, send them to the moon, all kinds of crazy shit will happen if we can engineer a mass producible one.

>> No.5260170

Muon catalyzed fusion is more promising.

>> No.5260171

>>5260149
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnetized_target_fusion

>> No.5260187

>>5260170
How so more?

>> No.5260193

>>5260187
Not him, but the whole "fusion at room temperature" thing seems to be pretty damn promising.

>> No.5260301

>>5260187
Fusion at room temperature. Right now we put more energy into fusion than we get out of it, which is obviously inefficient. If we can get/make a good enough source of muons this will effectively solve our energy problems forever.

>> No.5260500

>>5260170
Except for the whole muons-take-a-lot-of-energy-to-produce-and-decay-too-fast thing.

Sure, if we found a cheap way to produce enough muons or found a way to stabilize them somehow, then sure.

Can't see it happening, though.

>> No.5260543

>>5260045
No... until I saw that image. Fuuuuuuark

>> No.5260591

>>5260187

It's what the sun is actually doing because it's too small to directly fuse hydrogen.

ie: It's easier than forcing bare nuclei to fuse.

>> No.5260626

>>5260591
Balderdash.