[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 323 KB, 1024x964, sadpanda.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sun Oct 28 23:52:33 2012 No.5203677 [DELETED]

[Reply] [Original]

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 02:53:18 2012 No.5204121 Support our thread for a /sci/ without infantile cartoons. >>>/q/251943

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 02:56:47 2012 No.5204129 File: 381 KB, 993x560, Twilight_looking_through_the_telescope_2_S2E20.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] /pol/'s mascot

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:15:18 2012 No.5204158
File: 709 KB, 1500x1200, Konachan.com - 144447 aqua_hair blue_eyes hatsune_miku krank3232 long_hair thighhighs twintails vocaloid zettai_ryouiki.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

We have bigger problems than infantile cartoons.
And I don't think /sci/ is a good judge on what is and isn't an infantile cartoon.
Seems like the rule would simply be misguided tyranny.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:16:32 2012 No.5204159 lol suck my dick fag xD

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:18:48 2012 No.5204162 >>5203677 I'm not an anime fan at all but i think you have to accept where you are. You are on 4chan, a website created primarily to discuss anime and other Japanese culture. We have bigger problems like homework and religion troll threads

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:22:03 2012 No.5204167 File: 8 KB, 219x207, no 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] No

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:26:48 2012 No.5204172 >>5204162 >created for weeaboo shit Yep, it was. It no longer is. If this truly was a place for weeaboos and weeaboos only, /co/ would have been wiped off the face of 4chan years ago, if it even would have existed.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:27:03 2012 No.5204173 OP, you are the cancer. Please leave 4chan and stop hijacking threads and creating spam like this thread.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:27:32 2012 No.5204174 >>5204158 The term "infantile cartoons" is redundant. All cartoons are infantile and anti-intellectual. >>5204162 Homework and religion threads are /sci/ culture.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:28:17 2012 No.5204175 >>5204162 >implying the biggest problem is pop-sci shoving out the mathgod threads.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:28:47 2012 No.5204177 >>5204175 Isn't I meant.

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:36:33 2012 No.5204192

OP... this is an image board.

People like to post silly images with their posts. Often times these images depict drawn or animated characters.

The posting of such images is not prohibited by the board-specific rules of /sci/, or by the general rules of 4chan.

Fucking

deal

with

it

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:38:02 2012 No.5204194

>>5204192
>http://www.4chan.org/rules
>3. Do not post the following outside of /b/: [...] off-topic replies, [...] macro image replies [...]
>6. The quality of posts is extremely important to this community. Contributors are encouraged to provide high-quality images and informative comments.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:39:03 2012 No.5204197 The OPs image is an infantile cartoon. Shouldn't he be banned?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:41:32 2012 No.5204203 >>5204197 It's not a cartoon. The panda is real. If he was drawn, it would be a cartoon.

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:41:47 2012 No.5204204

>>5204194
>Posts off topic thread.
>Posts off topic thread with poor quality image macro and no text just to complain about something that nobody is bothered by except you.
What a hypocrite.
Besides, quality of posts is subjective and most people aren't ignorant and stupid enough to disregard a post as garbage just because its poster included an anime or comic picture.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:42:17 2012 No.5204208 >>5204174 >All cartoons are infantile and anti-intellectual. Where did you get that information from?

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:44:02 2012 No.5204211

>>5204204
I'm not the OP. And no, you're wrong. Quality of posts is not purely subjective. Blatant anti-intellectualism is always low quality and annoying.

>>5204208
It is self-evident. There's nothing deep about watching cartoons for children. If you're an adult and still watch cartoons, you are willfully engaging in anti-intellectualism.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:45:03 2012 No.5204214 >>5204211 >If you're an adult and still watch cartoons, you are willfully engaging in anti-intellectualism. lol Pretentious ass detected.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:45:47 2012 No.5204212 File: 100 KB, 766x428, ErioCNN2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >making meta threads on /sci/ complaining about anime on 4chan

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:45:47 2012 No.5204213 >STOP LIKING WHAT I DON'T LIKE Sure is intellectual conversations over here in /sci/, huh?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:46:02 2012 No.5204216 >>5204211 Cartoons are no inherently anti-intellectual. You are an idiot. Your baseless assumptions are unscientific and ultimately destructive. Good day, Sir.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:47:02 2012 No.5204219 >>5204203 I've seen "real" images in cartoons. The OPs image has a speech bubble, isn't that enough to make it one? And how do you know it's not a well-drawn image? Rather, "ceci n'est pas une panda" it is a really well drawn image.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:49:17 2012 No.5204223 >>5204214 Just saying the truth. Deal with it, weeaboo. >>5204216 Cartoons are nearly as anti-intellectual as video games. Show me one intellectual cartoon. Spoiler: There is none.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:50:32 2012 No.5204226 >>5204211 >It is self-evident. There's nothing deep about watching cartoons for children. I agree with this sentiment. Shonen should be banned. Seinen image macro master race only.

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:51:17 2012 No.5204230 [DELETED]

File: 18 KB, 250x297, Misao.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Physics thread? Physics thread!

Consider the quadratic form on omega[/spoiler] of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler], where X[/spoiler] is a metricless n[/spoiler]-dimensional smooth manifold.

Quantize the natural projection of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler], and show that it acts on the deRham complex \Omega^*(X)[/spoiler].

Now let v[/spoiler] be a vector, and \gamma[/spoiler] a 1-form, and let v\oplus a[/spoiler] be a section of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler]. Prove that v\oplus a[/spoiler] has action on some differential form \beta[/spoiler] by \beta\to i_{v}\beta + a\wedge \theta[/spoiler]

Give a metric to X[/spoiler]. Show that \Omega^*(X)\cong\mathrm{Spin}(X)\otimes\mathrm{Spin}(X)[/spoiler].

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:51:17 2012 No.5204229 >>5204226 But those aren't genres.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:51:32 2012 No.5204231 >>5204223 >wasting time complaining about other people "wasting" their time good luck

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:52:02 2012 No.5204232 >>5204223 >Show me one intellectual cartoon. Haibane Renmei.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:53:03 2012 No.5204235 >>5204229 No, they are demographics. Your point?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:53:03 2012 No.5204237 OP IS AN OBVIOUS TROLL WHO IS JUST TRYING TO PISS PEOPLE OFF. HE IS 15 AND THINKS THAT TROLLING IS EPIK SUPER KOOL & 1337 XDDDDD. JUST IGNORE HIM AND HE WILL DIE QUIETLY, SOBBING IN HIS ROOM ABOUT HOW NOBODY LOVES HIM.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:53:17 2012 No.5204238 >>5204223 Keep being butt devastated

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:53:47 2012 No.5204234
File: 18 KB, 250x297, Misao.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Physics thread? Physics thread!

Consider the quadratic form \omega[/spoiler] of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler], where X[/spoiler] is a metricless n[/spoiler]-dimensional smooth manifold.

Quantize the natural projection of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler], and show that it acts on the deRham complex \Omega^*(X)[/spoiler].

Now let v[/spoiler] be a vector, and \gamma[/spoiler] a 1-form, and let v\oplus a[/spoiler] be a section of TX\oplus T^*X[/spoiler]. Prove that v\oplus a[/spoiler] has action on some differential form \beta[/spoiler] by \beta\to i_{v}\beta + a\wedge \theta[/spoiler]

Give a metric to X[/spoiler]. Show that \Omega^*(X)\cong\mathrm{Spin}(X)\otimes\mathrm{Spin}(X)[/spoiler].

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:57:02 2012 No.5204246 File: 155 KB, 548x215, no.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204223 Fuck off Carl, go back to shitposting on /q/

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:57:32 2012 No.5204247 File: 60 KB, 563x593, thatfuckingfeel.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204237 >tfw no gf

>>	Carl Mon Oct 29 03:59:02 2012 No.5204250 File: 22 KB, 400x251, aintevenrusteled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204246

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:59:48 2012 No.5204249 >>5204237 >JUST IGNORE HIM AND HE WILL DIE QUIETLY, SOBBING IN HIS ROOM ABOUT HOW NOBODY LOVES HIM. I kind of feel bad for him now... I mean I'd want him to get banned for shitposting, but maybe he's just a troubled individual.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 03:59:48 2012 No.5204252 File: 1.82 MB, 765x1250, panda puffs.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204250 0/10 shitpost harder

Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:00:02 2012 No.5204253
File: 15 KB, 400x481, daffy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>5204211
>If you're an adult and still watch cartoons, you are willfully engaging in anti-intellectualism.
My E&M professor watches cartoons during his lunch hour. He's a 54 year old theoretical physicist who specializes in quantum gravity and chromodynamics.

I'll be sure to let him know how 'anti-intellectual' he is.

>>	Carl Mon Oct 29 04:03:17 2012 No.5204256 File: 272 KB, 478x631, 99 jimmies.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204252 I didn't even do anything, hun. No need to be upset. :3

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:04:32 2012 No.5204257 >>5204253 Must be a shit tier uni, if anti-intellectuals are allowed to become professors.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:05:33 2012 No.5204258 >>5204257 Can you leave /sci/ please? Or at least use a trip so we can all filter you?

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:06:33 2012 No.5204260 >>5204258 Why? I want to discuss science and math. I don't need a trip.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:07:17 2012 No.5204262 File: 83 KB, 295x214, no 3.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204257 0/10, shitpost harder

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:08:32 2012 No.5204265 File: 27 KB, 366x300, no 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204258 He has many! mathgenius femanon Carl Sagan IQ-Fundie

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:08:32 2012 No.5204266 >>5204260 We all hate you, and want to filter you. That was clear.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:12:33 2012 No.5204273 >>5204265 What's wrong with Carl? I thought he usually posts pretty good stuff - like that amateur astronomy thread the other day.

>>	Anonymous Mon Oct 29 04:14:33 2012 No.5204278 File: 7 KB, 180x205, ralph 43.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>5204273 Not him, Carl Sagan !SAGAN7mVOk

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]