/sci/ - Science & Math

Its good up until he starts talking about the fourth dimension.

>>5113332
but if string theory is correct and there are really 10 dimesions, wouldn't we be seeing a lot more constantly changing cross-sections from higher dimensions?

>>5113340
String theory suggests that these dimensions are compact.

>>5113359
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YtdE662eY_M

yeah i was just wondering about that thanks. So string theory dimensions and the dimensions considered in "Flatland" are different?

>>51133400

Came to /sci/ to ask a very related question and the first thread is this.

On that flat-lander video, a 3-d person is shown as a cross section, in real life would that be like just the outside, or would they see all the organs and shit?

>>5113361
No.

>>5113364
it would just be the outside of them, because there is no hight. You would just see a line of colors (depending on how light works in only 2 dimensions)

>>5511371

Ok, so if 3+ dimensional creatures suddenly blundered into our field of vison, would they just appear as a mass of shifting organs?

>>5113365
so string theory is a lot more retarded than i originally thought. I always thought that the strings in string theory were the fabric of spacetime in Einstiens theory

>>5113376
no, we would see their skin constantly growing and shrinking as they move through the second dimension. It is impossible to see inside of something from a lower dimension

>>5113376
watch this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UnURElCzGc0&feature=fvst

>>5113377
thats what I thought too.
But I'm pretty sure it is. The strings are essentially matter interacting with the curled up dimensions

Occult Chemistry's model has two elementary particles that act as holes to the fourth dimension: one has force pour out from it and the other has force pour into it.

>>5113544
>Occult Chemistry
>>>/x/

>>5113340
>space having throats

>>5113556
It's just direct observation of particles at the subatomic scale. It all correlates with today's models.