/sci/ - Science & Math

I mean a PROPER lecture thread.

OP delivers
http://www.perimeterscholars.org/266.html
http://www.perimeterscholars.org/253.html
http://www.perimeterscholars.org/317.html
http://www.perimeterscholars.org/396.html

Obligatory MIT CS
http://www.academicearth.org/courses/introduction-to-computer-science-and-programming

>>5053186
>What is happening to you, /sci/?
some troll spammer is posting every single fucking jewtube video about schrodingers cat, just to piss off /sci/

https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S5039911#p5042009

probably the same fucktard who posts DT all over the fucking place, and makes WWTBAM trollthreads.

>>5053208
Why are you here?

>>5053256
just bored, i guess.
you are suffering from le probléme?

>>5053267
No, but you will enjoy a Rose permaban

>>5053278
OP of shitty cute science posts is butt hurt?

>>5053317
I have nothing to do with those. I'm one of the people who actively reports them for spam and winds up getting banned for it.

EK is a ban-evading shitposter.

>>5053321
dumass
the mods are fans of DT. dont even bother reporting.
even when we get jans, they'll have to fall in line with the mods DT-waifu faggotry or they'll get stricken off
deal-with-it.jpg

>>5053327
I will not deal with it. When the threads are bumped to the front page, they leave no room for other threads. I have to go to the second page to see anything because I have all of them hidden.

>>5053332
<<<
not my ban, btw, and that aint my IP
someone posted it in a /q/ thread complaining about DT
(theres quite a lot of people complaining about DT on /q/, but as usual, mods dont give a shit)

you've honestly got no choice but to deal with it.
how hard is it just to click to the second page if theres DT spam on the first?
takes just a second, hun.

>>5053339
Why do you even care? Why don't you go post some math/science instead of carrying on these troll-esque meta discussions?

>>5053339
U sound mad. Is it because DT is smarter and cuter than you? I bet DT knows how to calculate limits.

>>5053344
i dont care, he just sounded mad.

i hide and sage DT spamthreads as well.

>>5053349
nah, i've nothing against her, the vids are ok, it's just that we dont need a fucking hundred of them here clogging up /sci/ it's just spam.

>>5053355
> it's just that we dont need a fucking hundred of them here clogging up /sci/ it's just spam.

That's how most of us feel about your posts. You are the queen of shitposting on /sci/ and you don't even realize it, much as you fail to realize how limited you are in so many obvious ways.

The day someone finally gets reliable info on you, I am going to have such a big grin on my face. It may well never happen, but the possibility gives me hope.

>>5053386
Those videos are shit, and the posts of them are spam.

>>5053386
I'd like to second this poster. I don't know if you're always trolling or just genuinely stupid, but godammn, EK, you make some bad posts.

>>5053392
such as?
hey, at least i try

>>5053397
When will you do your first DT style youtube video explaining limits? I'm sure we'd bump it for years.

>>5053397
The most memorable occasion was when you couldn't solve tic-tac-toe.

>>5053413
erm? wat? i know perfect strategy for tic-tac-toe.
i literally am unbeatable at it, always.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Leonard_Susskind#Lectures

also coursera.org for actual courses with assignments and exam for free on very broad subjects

>>5053416
Why are you here? You are permabanned.