/sci/ - Science & Math

>>5024454
Wrong board.
>>>/pol/

>>>>>>>>>>/pol/

>>5024459
>>5024461
Why. I'm asking /sci/

>>5024468
This is not science.
But for your information, yes, most of us are liberals.

>>5024473
>most of us are liberals
hahaha it figures.

I vote for Obama to prove i'm not a racist.

Obama accepts global warming, and is more willing to fund education and NASA.

>>5024483
Votes are anonymous.
Voting for Obama does not mean that you are not racist, and voting for Romney does not prove that you are racist.

>>5024481
There seems to be a trend that the more scientifically oriented you are, the more liberal you tend to be.

Similar to how the more educated you are, the less religious you tend to be.

>>5024488
But it eases my sense of white guilt.

>>5024495
Agreed. There's also a trend that the blacker your skin, the more likely you are to commit crime.

>>5024498
White guilt should not exist.
You can only be held accountable for your own actions.
You and I never kept slaves, and never harmed a black person (I certainly did not, I sincerely hope that you also did not)
Therefore we are not guilty of anything.

Even if our ancestors did, that is not our problem

>>5024514
>You can only be held accountable for your own actions
Then why does affirmative action exist?

>>5024495

That's how a surprise considering universities professors practically brainwash students with their liberal agenda.

i'm a single issue voter, so i tend to vote for the pro-gun candidates. i find that the government largely fucks up anything it touches, so i'd prefer to have gun rights largely unmolested however shitty and illogical they may be right now.

with that said, both the candidates suck this year. if i do actually go vote then it will most likely be for gary johnson.

>>5024540
>gary johnson
Anything is better than a nigger

>>5024528
To prevent racist/sexist/homophobic/bigoted people treating other people unfairly.

bump

Clegg fucked me over. Seriously, we would save billions a year if we disbanded Trident.

>>5024577
So basically it's a law against the straight white male?

Obama has already blatantly disregarded the Constitution, so no, Obama won't be getting my vote.

>>5024661
No. It is just to make sure that those who are not straight white males also have a fair chance in life.

>>5024678
>implying white privilege

lel

Personally, I think there should be a mandatory IQ minimum in order to vote.

Is something supposed to happen when I click the Report button? It stays the same for me.

>>5024509 counts hispanic as white raising white crimerate

Sorry cant trust antthing else in picture. As i know independently that hispanics have a very low crimerate

>>5024481
You don't understand.
That is a good thing -- anything negative you think about the word 'liberal' is either wrong, stupid, or just biased.

captcha 'character withiney'

>>5024473
10/10 would lol again

>>5024680
>implying not white privilege

>>5024674
That is just wrong, but if that is your bellwether you need to look back over the last couple decades.

It didn't start recently, and it didn't start with presidents.

>>5024713
>i know independently
No one cares about your opinion. Facts are facts.

>>5024730 facts are facts

And the fact is hispanic crimerate is lowest crimerate. If this picture gets one fact wrong then every fact must be scrutinized

>>5024730
The use of the verb "know" implies he's stating a fact. He would have ised "believe" otherwise.

*used

>>5024752
>hispanic crimerate is lowest crimerate
citation please? If you're going to pretend to correct other people, provide evidence.

>>5024509
While generally I agree that Black people commit more crime, the evidence they show doesn't actually show that Blacks target Whites.

Given that Black people are about 10% of the US population, if victims were randomly selected we would expect White people to be the victim of 90% of crimes committed by Blacks. Since Black people tend to live with other Black people, this figure should be lower, but by an unknown amount. It might be possible in principle to find evidence that Blacks target Whites, but it wasn't presented in that document

>>5024540
If this is a troll, it's a pretty deft one. If not,
>single-issue voter
also how has Obama been bad for gun laws? He's passed what, six of them, with at least three extending freedoms? (I'm probably wrong there but I'm asking for what's correct)
>>5024674
how?
>>5024688
>implying IQ is accurate, precise, and consistent
>implying a measurement to be used scientifically or even logically and objectively doesn't need to be all three
>iodine sulfur hydrogen yttrium gadolinium deuterium tritium

>>5024486
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=x7Q8UvJ1wvk