/sci/ - Science & Math

We all can read wikipedia.

Solid science, not even forced, not even geek chic.

10/10 would be influenced by her.

She isn't kawai nor cute, weird accent, I just can imagine how bad she must smell under those armpits, small tiny frame, forced cuteness, shit-skin eyes, etc.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixkPA-A5D5k&feature=plcp

Annoying accent level 9001.

>>5002592

Yall posting in a troll thread. Stop responding or this will end up staying as long as the others about her (approximately a month).

>>5002598

that vid is the best one so far. the outtake at the end made me rofl.

Girls who dye their hair are almost always smart and have tolerable interests.

I love the way she talks down to me. She reminds me of a qt trap version of Michio Kaku but without the old.

>>5002609
oh god my physics TA has bright blue hair just like that in your pic

>>5002614

Weird, that picture was actually taken in a physics class. Not sure if she still has blue hair, though, it was taken quite a while ago.

>>5002609
>She reminds me of a qt trap version of Michio Kaku but without the old
>qt trap version of Michio Kaku

Thanks, OP.
Now I finally understood Hawking radiation.

>it's this channel again

>>5002592
>shit-skin eyes

Explain.

>>5002609
>>5002631

Do you faggots know anything? That's rose, look her up.

Fuck. I honestly wonder if you think before you open your mouths sometimes.

>>5002564
she thinks gravity is a pulling force

>>5002564
Anyone else think her head is incredibly disproportionate to her body. Actually, I think it's her body that looks particularly... anorexic.

I'm concerned.

This is now a Rose thread

dealwithit.jpg

>>5002851
>>5002852
>>5002564
You guys know rose is a mormon right?

>>5002859
she's english so that's very unlikely

>>5002863
No he's right /v/ got really really butthurt the thread was hilarious.

>>5002851
>>5002852
>>5002863
stop shitposting

>>5002956
You're in a shit thread, and you complain about one specific person shitposting? Stop being a cunt, and just minimize the thread if you don't like it.

>>5002982
I'm not being a cunt. He was shitposting. His posts are now deleted. This is a science thread, not a shit thread.

Can someone link us to more of her amazing videos?

>>5003348

go to the video listed in the first post.

then go to her channel. click on the channel name.

then you can see all her videos.

>>5003804
Thank you.

lol at the virgins of the comments in youtube

i can't stand her voice or her faux-cute posturings

the science is basic wiki shit too

she's cute

>>5004514

her videos are not meant to be doctoral level. they are excellent for introductory material aimed at younger viewers.

>>5002956
What happened?

>>5002564
she's fit, but i hate her fucking voice so much
and you dont have to post on /sci/ everytime theres a new DT video!

>>5006581
lel

>>5006592
>bumping this shitty thread

>>5006621
It's a science thread. Black holes and Hawking radiation are /sci/ topics.

>>5006581
you're just jelly /b/cause she's cuter and more intelligent than you

>>5006628
i dont consider myself 'cute' at all. thats definitely the wrong fucking word to describe me.
and no, she aint smarter than me.
any fucker can google shit and then spout it all off in a 3 min video.

>>5006626
Too bad her shitty videos don't teach anybody anything about either of those topics.

>>5006581
>that feel when EK is right about something

>>5006640
Explain Hawking radation and black holes better than her. I dare you.

>inb4 avoiding the point by inanely linking to other youtube videos

>>5006651
>changing the focus of the argument when threatened

>>5006651
well i could do that, but i'd have to remind/revise it, so i'd still be doing what she does, watching vids, googling, researching etc, then putting it in my own words.

it's trivial to do, but pointless, and proves nothing.
i dont have the time to do that, for no reason, just to appease soem fucking /sci/tard, who i give zero fucks about

>>5006657
So you can't? Just admit it.

>>5006654
The argument is about EK being jelly of someone who is cuter and more intelligent than her.

>>5006659
course i can, if i cared to, i can research and present any topic i like
the information is all there, its a big fucking internet!

but i dont need to, and i dont care.

>>5006673
Prove that you can. Since she already did black holes and hawking radiation, I'll suggest another topic for you. Research and present the mathematical concept of limits.

>>5006694
<<<

>>5006698
Does that mean you give up and admit her being smarter and cuter than you?

>>5006708

EK is by far both smarter and cuter than Daniela is.

>>5006726
Nice try, EK, but NOPE. Daniela is the new queen of /sci/. Deal with it.

>>5006726
>cuter
>implying you've seen me
>implying that isnt patronising and condescending as fuck

>>5006729
>implying you don't post your face in half your responses

>>5006733
FvR aint me
neither is rose
neither is harriet
neither is teacup
neither is scotsman
neitehr is carl
or elizabeth kagume, or nasa girl, or any of that shit.

http://www.youtube.com/user/FactVsReligion

>>5006729

Why would you start blabbing about seeing anyone, I just said you're cute, and the implication that it isn't patronizing and condescending as fuck is in place. Your rowdy posting is appealing.

I belong to the minority that actually enjoys reading your posts. You do seem to have a kink though, as if you liked being treated rough.

>>5006729
Then post a pic of yourself. Without evidence we have to apply Occam's razor and assume she is cuter than you.

>>5006735
Are you the Violent Simians Guy?

>>5006735
so you're a guy then

fantasies ruined

>>5006737
that aint occams razor, dumbfuck
and no
and fine, shes cuter than me
w/e
i dont wanna be 'cute'

>>5006744
no
>>5006745
also no

this shit aint science, get back on topic

>>5006742
>that aint occams razor, dumbfuck
Yes, it is. You make a claim and without evidence we have no reason to believe you.

>i dont wanna be 'cute'
dawwwwwwwww

Stop derailing our science thread, you imbecillic cunt.

>>5006748
i didnt make any claim at all.
i never said im 'cuter' than her.

its a fucking dumb word, it doesnt mean the same as 'hot' or sexy'
its like how you'd describe a baby, or a small rodent, or some shit like that
something small and weak and defenceless that needs protecting

im not fucking 'cute'!

>>5006752
She's hotter and sexier than you. Why do you want to be seen as "hot" and "sexy" anyway, you disgusting slut?

>>5006757
i never said i did
and im not a slut

>>5006752
>its like how you'd describe a baby, or a small rodent, or some shit like that

You are like a small rodent to me.

>>5006760
>and im not a slut

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA

COMEDY GOLD

10/10

>board about science
>tripfag gets mad about anons disrespecting her
>2012
For shame!

>>5006767
Nobody is disrespecting her. All we did was acknowledging that the OP's girl is objectively cuter and smarter than her.

>>5006768
Does the distinction even matter?
Science, people, the entire argument, no matter who started it, is bullshit and degrading to the idea of the board.

You are all the cancers.

>>5006767
>implying that doesn't happen on every board here
>>5006768
>implying the chick in the video is cute or smart, and not awkward and attention seeking
>implying anyone other than virgins would disagree

Thread needs more Rose.

Ah, that's better. Isn't she great?

>>5006774
Only a bitter neckbeard who has never touched a woman could write a post as upset as you did.

>>5006778
>she

XD

>>5006780
>implying your obsession with this girl is healthy
>implying you aren't as socially inept as her
>implying I'm bitter
>implying I'm a neckbeard
>implying I'm even mad

>>5006802
>implying she is socially inept

Other than you she has alot of friends.

>>5006805
>other than you
But I'm not a friend of hers.

>>5006808
Full retard. Learn reading comprehension.

>>5006813
>thinking is hard
You said 'other than you'. If you'd said 'unlike you', then that would have been completely different, having completely different meanings.
Wanna go back to school buddy?

>>5006818
>hurr durr playing with words makes me so smart and totally distracts from my retardation and my bitterness regarding women

Fuck off.

That video was absolute shit. I knew it was gonna be a goddamn cute science video

You're a faggot, these videos aren't 'attractive'. Get a real teacher or professor who takes it seriously. And doesn't look like a complete slut or tool.

>>5006823
>changes the topic of conversation and insults me
>insults me again when he realises he was wrong, insults me on calling him out on it
You seem like such a nice person. Please tell me all about my hatred for women.

>>5006829
The topic of discussion is your misogyny. Take it to >>>/r9k/

>>5006830
>The topic of discussion is your misogyny
>>5006813
Full retard. Learn reading comprehension

>>5006833
Your point being what? Oh wait, I don't care. Go be a miserable asshole somewhere else.

>People mixing up their recreational activities and science.

Seriously you guys. Don't mix them.

Not only will your education and knowledge be better, but the girl you choose will be better too.

A mixture is a compromise. She's not all that cute (assuming it's the girl in the image), and she sure as hell doesn't know what she's talking about. She gives worse than a 2 minute scan of the wikipedia page.

>>5006835
>I don't care
Thanks for all the responses then. Have a nice day.

>and it shrinks infinitely.

Stopped here.

By the way what's her accent? I can't place it. Sounds sorta Eastern European.

>>5006842

Huh, she's from Greece apparently.

Shows how bad I am at placing accents.

Sage for non science

>>5006842
Well, Greece is one of the most eastern countries in Europe :P

>>5006837
I agree wholeheartedly.

The only "exception" is if your girl is like kurisu, who is fictional and whose personality and character will never be real.

What happened ITT? Who deleted all the posts?

>>5007391

>>5006824
Can you explain black holes as intuitively as her?

>>5002631
>>5006778
>>>/hm/

>>5007733
>Can you explain black holes as intuitively as her?

So, like, there'z this stuff, up in spaaaaaace!
And and it's reeeeeeeally heavy, like over 9000kg, tee hee!

>>5007823
What's awesome about it is that it sucks up everything that gets too close, becuz it has gravity that pulls a lot.
Not even light can get away, becauze it sucks with the force of 1000 suns! Poor light ;_;

>>5007826
And Steven Harving, that guy in the wheelchair, he had a nifty idea, cause he's smart and stuff.
So there's this thingy, called the Eventual Horizon, aaand some zany quantum stuff happens there, obviously.

>>5007832
So, like, becuz of that wacky quantumy thingy, black holes aren't forever and we're not gunna die, lol!
And that's the nature of the radiating process and why black holes blow out radioactivation! :3

>>5007823
>>5007826
>>5007832
>>5007835
Wut!?

I WANT A SHARK HAT TOO

>>5008026
It's called parody. Perhaps you've heard of it.

Love these videos

>>5002592
>weird accent
That's actually quite charming

>my /sci/-fu

>>5002564
sage for mod thread


moot needs to fire this shitty mod engineering faggot

So /sci/ which is her best video?

>>5008646
you will enjoy a ban for this

>>5008646
>>5008930

Carl, why do you try to make it look like people on /sci/ have a problem with the mod? It's you we have an issue with, you deranged troll.

>>5009027
Carl isn't a troll. Also, the mods are great.

>7/10
>wouldn't fuck

Seriously, 4chan

Didn't the risky landing affect some of Curiosity's functions?

>>5008922
Her videos are so great it is impossible to place one above another.

>>5008922
>>5009572
>it is impossible to place one above another
Very true, because they are all nailed, stapled and glued to the bottom of the barrel, Carl.

If you havent' seen this video, at least watch the final 30 seconds or so where she acts like a real shark.

Smart Girls are so random.

>Smart Girls are so random.
>so random.
>random
13 year old girl detected.
Please move this fandom to a facebook page or keep it on youtube.

shark girl is smart girl.

bow before her, earthlings.

I deeply hope /b/ becomes infatuated with her and goes on the hunt so I don't have to see this Shit anymore.

>>5011189

/b/ would love her.

/b/ is not afraid of smart females, unlike /sci/ which is terrified of them.

>>5011189

and furthermore, she would love /b/, because she is strong and brave.

what is the problem here on /sci/, hating smart, brave, beautiful women?

nerds who hate females should take a long look at themselves.

fact: males are better at math and science than females.

fact: females are better at verbal skills than males.

can't you retards realize that she LOVES YOU???

jesus fucking christ on a stick with cheese, you guys are clearly excellent at math and science, but you are breathtakingly stupid when it comes to social skills.

>>5011197
Then post these over there. I'm sure you'll find that /b/s love is more caustic, perverted, and horrifying than /sci/s hate.

>>5011215
>can't you retards realize that she LOVES YOU???

Unlikely, females are incapable of love, or any sort of feeling for that matter.

>>5011217

You missed the point. Again.

Sigh.

>>5011221
There is no point. There's never any fucking point.

There are only two reasons why you would spam sci with this:
1. You are breathtakingly stupid, unable to accept that others don't share your tastes, and oblivious to the fact that we hate the spam more than the person.

2. You are Carl, spamming sci because you are a disappointment to your father and this is how you vent.

>>5011232
That poster wasn't me. But please tell me, why should my father be disappoint? He is in fact very proud of me, for I am a successful scientists.

>>5011271

What's your field and current area of expertise?

>>5011271

>i am a very successful scientists
>i am scientists

>>5011215
>nerds who hate females should take a long look at themselves.
Idiots that make exaggerated claims and expect to be taken seriously shouldn't post.

>can't you retards realize that she LOVES YOU???
>implying she knows about /sci/ and perhaps visits
If that's the case, ahem...

HEY, Diarrhea Typhoon, or whatever your name is.

Call off your mentally challenged spammer/s. Everyone is aware of your lame channel already. If you want to keep wasting space on a site that doesn't belong to you, do the honorable thing and pay moot for the exposure you're getting. If you yourself are the aforementioned spammer with mental deficiencies, kindly an hero, because you are beyond help and society doesn't need you.

May your remaining days be few and your life miserable.
Sincerely, anonymous.

>>5012463

Serious question: this video is clearly about science, and is high quality. on the front page as i type, are several off-topic posts, such as "how do you start your day".

the off-topic posts get plenty of polite comments.

why do you hate this person and/or her videos? because she is female? because she is confident? because she is good at presenting material?

seriously guys, females are not the enemy. go talk to one, the same way you would talk to a guy, and you might grow up a bit.

>>5012608

>>implying /sci/ cares about your shitty cute science
>>implying this is on the front page because of genuine interest rather than samefag bumps
>>implying this isn't shit posting after your 4 other inane cute science threads

>>get butt hurt when anyone calls you out on your bullshit
>>cry misogyny and ignore arguments
>>make completely irrelevant ad hominem attacks

And you wonder why people hate your shit, OP.

And before you go bitching "GTFO /r9k/. Fucking misogynist," no one here gives a fuck about your cute science videos. No one would give a fuck if it were a man, either.

>>incoming samefag whiteknight bumps

>>5012608
We all know about youtube. I have many great youtube channels subbed but I don't spam this board with videos from the cern channel or deepsky videos every time they pop one out. People who are interested in this youtube science channels have already subbed.
This is not a fan site for one youtube channel. There are many places on the tubes for such fandom, go and make a facebook page or keep your fandom on youtube. OK so every 12 months or so once the /sci/ population has changed post a link to some of your favourite youtube channels, but don't spam us every time one channel you are obsessing over pops up a new vid.
Fuck if everyone did this for their favourite youtube channels you would soon be why am I seeing another integralmath video thread every fucking day. (shameless plug for integralmath but don't worry I wont do it again).

>>5012608
>Serious question:
I doubt that, but I'll humor you. Had to split my reply, because it gave me a field to long error when I tried to post. So on we go.

>this video is clearly about science, and is high quality.
If you mean that it wasn't filmed on a shitty webcam and has very little in the way of information or proper explanation of the subject matter, then yes.

>the off-topic posts get plenty of polite comments.
I'll explain why further down, but if you expect the same politeness in every thread on 4chan, you might want to reconsider visiting.

>why do you hate this person and/or her videos?
Because unlike other off-topic bullshit threads that come and go, hers stays up way too long.
Look at this shit and how long it lasted:
21 days - https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4928286
28 days - https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4915035

>>5012608
And explain to me why she needs 3 threads? How long do you think they'll keep cloging the board? Like you've mentioned, we already have enough shitposting in the form of religion, homework threads and so on. We don't need more crap on the heap, it stinks bad enough as it is.
Moreover, the other shitposting that happens on /sci/ can't be classified as advertisement. Diarrhea Typhoon's threads apparently fall in some gray area, because they contain "science". Even with the quotation marks, the last three words in the previous sentence are generous.

>because she is female?
No.
>because she is confident?
Who gives a shit how confident she is? Kent Hovind is confident too, but it doesn't matter. He's still a moron.

>because she is good at presenting material?
If she's aiming at kids under 10, maybe. Otherwise, she's annoying. Her mannerisms, voice, overly simplistic explanations, everything is cringe worthy.

>seriously guys, females are not the enemy. go talk to one, the same way you would talk to a guy, and you might grow up a bit.
Nothing gets through to you, it would seem. Your assumptions are misguided and it appears as though your head is as thick as battleship armor plating.

>>5002564

DAMN YOU ARE HOT GIRL

>>5012913
Fuck off, Carl.

I keep getting banned for reporting these threads, the mods are huge fucking faggots.

>>5012956
I reported a thread for spam and didn't get banned. You sure you didn't abuse the report function somehow, by sending multiple notifications for example? As mentioned, it's possible that this kind of spam falls in a gray area, as far as the rules are concerned, and that's why the mod isn't taking any action.

>>5012997

IT'S BECAUSE THIS THREAD IS 100% ON TOPIC.

you are an example of "stop liking something i don't like."

do you realize how spoiled you appear? this board is crammed to the gills with garbage. I don't expect you to like this girl and her videos, but jeez you sound like the wackjobs on /b/ crying endlessly about pictures of ponies.

laughable.

First the millionaire shit and now this... I don't know what this guy's problem is, but I do know the more reports it gets, the faster it gets deleted. Start reporting DAMMIT!

>>5012956
>>5012997
It's because you are reporting science threads, retards

Oh god, that voice, I watched this video once some weeks ago but now I cringe at the first 3 seconds and turn it off.
"HEWO EVVYWUN AHM DANIA TITN!"
I just watch it this this to get my daily dose of mad.

>>5002564
Please God if you exist, please, please don't let it be a trap because I love her and I swear I'll stop pretending I'm an atheist soon enough.

>>5013059
>you are an example of "stop liking something i don't like."
You know what you are, shitstain? You are an example of "if you don't like what I like, I'm going to keep shoving it in your face until you're sick of it".

>this board is crammed to the gills with garbage.
This thread and the 2 others like it not excluded.

>>5013276
Troll harder, Carl.

>>5013246
quit being sexist

>>5013276
This was VIP quality. 10/10

ITT: the old spaghetti factory

>>5002575
/thread

>>5014407
What do you mean?

>>5014407
I fucking love that restaurant.

>>5015403
I used to take the name literally. It took me years to figure out that the place is not a fucking factory.

>>5015411
What is it then?

>>5015388
Whoever made this animated LOL picture, you made my day.

>>5017048
fuck of Carl

>>5017055
Why?

>>5013329
I'm not even Carl! For all I know you're the real Carl!
>>5017055
Everybody, why do you hate Carl?
>>5017056
Carl, why does everybody hate you?

>>5017071
I have no idea why they hate me. Maybe they are jelly of my science education. ._.

>>5017071
Carl is basically a standardized troll. I call him 'standardized' because if you pay attention to his posts, he has literally two modes.

The first is semi-polite mixed with holier than thou, and usually involves him at one point or the other asking 'are you butthurt because I schooled you in a science thread earlier?'. Carl has never actually posted in a science thread, or at least beyond a basic mangling of a wikipedia article.

The second is this sort of pseudo-shitposting where he doesn't really provide any sort of content with his posts until someone calls him on it. Once he's been called on it he just sort of pushes the conversation until the other guy to say something he can claim is a fallacy (it usually actually isn't one), at which point he uses it to question every other post the other person has made.

As of now it's slowly but surely becoming a meme to accuse anyone who is trolling (intentionally, unintentionally, overtly or otherwise) of being Carl.

Shut up, Carl.

>>5017107
But that's wrong and you know it. Why do you do this? Why do try to discredit me as a "troll"? ;(
It is you who is trolling. I have participated in many science threads and I'm appreciated for being helpful. What did I do to upset you?

>>5017114
See this right here is the holier than thou mode. He'll do this for a bit, then ask if I'm jelly because of science or being schooled or some other random tripe. I am becoming more and more certain that Carl is just some sort of admittedly excellently programmed troll-bot.

If you ask him what field he is in and what degrees he holds then he either says 'all fields' or just exits the conversation.

>>5017114
So, Carl. What is your expertise?

>>5017123
What is wrong with you? Why are you so hateful towards scientists?

>>5017107
>>5017123
Not the one you're explaining to, but...

Thank you sage, I learned something amusing today.

>>5017131
I'm educated in many fields. My person is not important. Read my contributions to the science threads and see how you like em.

>>5017123
He's a barely Turing-complete underage piece of shit high school student.

>>5017144
Wrong. Why do you feel the need to insult me?

>>5017141
See? 'All fields'. Like clockwork.

>>5017148
I answer questions truthfully. Why do you have a problem with honesty?

>>5017148
Maybe he's a botnet based off of the Watson code that /g/ created to troll the living shit out of all of us

>>5017155
If he is, then I really hope they tell us. I would seriously be impressed. Admittedly they could have simulated a bit more depth, but honestly if he really is a troll-bot then they have done a fantastic job.

>>5017153
The thing that kills this 'mode' is the fact that you will never be able to find any sort of evidence carl has posted meaningfully in a science thread, so you can tell that it's just empty repetition of defence statements.

>>5017153
Prove that evolution is unfalsifiable.

>>5017155
This is possible, yes. Though I doubt they got Carl to be fully functional, seeing as they are too involved with all those desktop/battlestation threads.

>>5017172
You have seen the evidence multiple times. You refuse to accept it. For some reason you want to hate me. Is it your insecurity that fuels your hatred?

>>5017174
Burden of proof is on you.

>>5017184
A theory requires empirical evidence. Empirical evidence dictates falsifiability.

>>5017184
Changed over from defending statements to trying to deflect onto another person, while dodging the actual issue, followed by a substantially less artful dodge of another anons post.

>>5017194
This is wrong. Evidence and testable predictions are different things. But please keep it to another thread. This thread is about black holes and hawking radiation.

>>5017196
What is the actual issue? The actual issue is you derailing threads to express your hatred towards my person. I don't expect you to explain your motives in detail, but please think about what went wrong.

>>5017197
No, they are not. Predicting natural phenomena is worthless unless it can be confirmed or disproved with either experiment or observation. This is a 2nd grade lesson on the scientific method. That's too bad, as if this thread was on topic anyhow.

>>5017155
Hypothesis:
"tripfag Carl" is an advanced version of the Watson bot that's being tested on the net
"namefag Carl" is /g/'s shitty ripoff of the 'Carl code'

When you actually stop and think about it - it makes no fucking sense at all.

>>5017204
From here out he is just going to try to engage me in an actual conversation, so he can lead into the 'jelly argument'. I could go ahead on this, but I've schooled him in the past and it never ends particularly impressively.

I suppose that might be the biggest difference from counter-trolling a troll-bot. They actually can't get mad, so they just stop talking when they aren't getting anywhere. You can already see him scraping too, so it would barely be a four post roll.

Take this as a PSA. Don't let Carl troll YOU..

>>5017206
At least the second sentence of your post is correct. Please look up the terms "evidence" and "prediction" in a dictionary.

>>5017220
I do not troll. Stop accusing me of trolling. You are the troll. Go do something useful and post some science or math.

>>5017224
I haven't been speaking to you.
I've been holding a conversation with other anons, and linking to your posts to provide examples of troll-bot behaviour. You keep interjecting, quite rudely I might add.

>>5017216
Evidence
>Evidence is an observation, fact or document that tends to make more likely the conclusion which the evidence is offered to prove. When offered as proof of a conclusion, evidence should be reliable and meet a rigorous burden of proof. Evidence, as used in medicine and similar fields, refers to objective findings that help make predictions. This includes weighing the quality of the evidence itself.

Prediction
>A prediction or forecast is a statement about the way things will happen in the future

Falsifiablility
>Falsifiability is the ability of a theory—a working framework for explaining and predicting natural phenomena—to be disproved by an experiment or observation.

Please tell me how my post, or any of these definitions, conflict with each other.

>>5017207
This seems plausible considering they would name him "Carl" after our beloved Carl Sagan to troll us.

I would suggest creating a Stahlman based bot, but they already have several in a fit of self trolling.

>>5017233
Whatever you are trying to do, it is neither funny nor will it have any effect. You are wasting your time with inane shitposting.

>>5017234
You made a claim. You claimed "evidence" and "predictions" were exactly the same. From the definitons you posted it is obvious that this is not true. You disproved your own claim.

>>5017242
No, I did not. I stated
>Empirical evidence dictates falsifiability.

You stated
>This is wrong.

>>5017246
You just explained in your own definitions why it is wrong. I don't see any need for further discussion. You are either trolling or seriously ignorant of semantics.

she's sort of cute but she's probably not that quirky in real life, if she was it'd probably get old quick
>would still plow

>>5017242
It is neither intended to be amusing, nor is it shitposting. I am attempting to discuss the nature of the troll-bot Carl, in a thread that was largely spam anyway.Your input is not required for this discussion.

List your areas of expertise and degrees.

>>5017239
It would fit with their sense of humour. Still though, I would expect a bit more bragging.

>>5017258
lel

What half-assed troll attempt is this? You don't make me mad, you just make yourself look stupid.

>>5017261
List your degrees.

>>5017263
Why?

>>5017269
Why not...

>>5017277
The killswitch isn't working. /g/ must be onto us.

>>5017277
Try harder. lel

>>5017253
You claimed yesterday that evolution is unfalsifiable.

You have now claimed that falsifiability is independent of empirical evidence, which is the same argument. If true chimeras were to be empirically observed, evolution would be considered falsified.

>>5017282
Twice wrong. If you take it to another thread, I will explain why. This thread does not deserve further derailment.

>>5017288
Yes it does. There are three other identical threads to this one. They are spam, and the only way to remove them is to get to the bump limit. Therefore it is useful to argue with you over pointless things.

>You claimed yesterday that evolution is unfalsifiable.
http://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S5006929#p5006942

>You have now claimed that falsifiability is independent of empirical evidence
>>5017197 This is wrong.

>>5017296
What part of >>5017288 did you not understand?

>>5017299
Would you just comment on his observation.

>>5017301
No.

>>5017302
Why not?

>>5017303
Gooby pls

>>5017305
You will have to somehow decompose this into a logical premise written in English otherwise it's incomprehensible

>>5017309
How can you not understand two simple words? I thought you were educated.

>>5017311
Gooby pls

What ever happened to the pedo who used to post topics on here about about drowning hamsters?

>>5017315
lel

>>5017316
You mean the Violent Simians Guy?

>the pedo

Lies propagate much faster than the speed of truth.

>>5018282
Is this the first thing on your agenda after you wake up bumping these threads, Carl?

>>5017316

Stuff like that drove him off. He never posts anymore because of it.

>>5018311
For a scientist active in multiple fields of expertise it does seem to have a lot of free time.

>>5018327
>it
I'm a bit amused by how you guys don't even consider Carl a person anymore. Is the bot hypothesis really that plausible?

>>5018341
Yes, it is.

/g/ will admit it eventually.

Just wait.

>>5018345
>/g/ will admit it eventually
Not if they don't have to. Plus it might just be 1 guy. Now that I think about it, it's not that far fetched. Program a bot to to submit several replies, which you prepare for it before hand. Make it so they get posted at set intervals of time, so you don't have to monitor the thread yourself and keep it from 404ing. Reminds me of what the presenter of one of the DEFCON 19 talks did on IRC.

>>5018350
Writing a troll bot who replies with generic troll responses really wouldn't be hard. You could do it within one afternoon. The hardest part would be to type in the captchas.

>>5006745

Any more sexy pics of EK dressed all slutty? I fapped to that one already.

>>5018917
that aint me, you fucking creep

Pretty sure you're all forgetting about Hannah Fry, who should be beloved by all of you

http://www.ted.com/talks/hannah_fry_is_life_really_that_complex.html

>yfw Daniela Titan will be co-host minutephysics or other science short youtube users

>yfw cute girls does physics and science

>yfw Daniela Titan is actually really cute that you would date her and marry her

My feel when, Daniela Titan exists in this world, I would never had a chance to find someone like her....

>>5018971
Buddy if all you require in a partner for life (or at least like 5 or 10 years) is a relatively cute appearance and a vague interest in science then you've got problems beyond attracting women.

>>5018971
There are lots of other cute girls who like science, you know.

Daniela Tan sound like boxxy

Oshitttt i can feel my /b/ spirit again,,,,,

It has somehow mutated to pay attention to the name field of posters. Its attention while haven been a most general one, now, displays a very specific hostility against name/trip/fags. I can not conclude if it is for the better or for the worse.

>hot cute girl, with an accent i like the sounds of, in a shark hat, talking about science

just take everything i want in life and roll it into a youtube video why don't you

>>5018917

>>5019191
EK looks like a very dumb moron. Thank you.

>>5019037
Sharks have not been sighted north of the Pacific coastline in California since the year 2009, during which isolated incidents were reported.

>>5019199
Don't you insult my waifu.

>>5002631
faggot, you don't know rose ;_;

>>5019199
She doesn't. She looks like the intelligent person she is.

life is a highway.

understand that, and you understand life.

So... Is Daniela the Boxxy of /sci/?

>>5022641
If she is, does that make her the queen of /sci/?

>>5021699
That was <span class="math">\fbox{VIP~Quality}[/spoiler]

>>5022656
I'd say yes.

>>5022641

The difference is that Boxxy peaked and then fizzled. Look at any Boxxy thread - 100 old pics, 1 or 2 current ones, and the current ones are usually presented in a negative manner.

Daniella, on the other hand, should age gracefully, like a fine wine.

Would you mind going back to /b/ where you belong? This is getting old. Relentless shitposting is not quality trolling, I am disappoint.

>Getting your science from a 14 year old girl

>>5023706
Take your own advice.

>>5023801
How do you know her age? Or was it just a geuss?

>>5024380
A guess, I think.
She looks a lot older than 14.

>>5024390
yeah and it would be surprising to see a 14 year old knowing physics at phd level

>>5024394
Do you think she taught herself or pursued education at a university?

>>5024390
How so?

Quality thread.

It's a tarp

>>5024394

the smartest people know quite a bit by age 14. look at mozart for example.

>>5024394

>PhD level

She just parrots Wikipedia pages she is hardly PhD material

>>5026484

one of the reasons she sounds scripted is that she does not speak english well, and prepares each line or segment and tapes it, then reviews the next part before taping it. She said she is Greek, btw.

She seems brilliant to me. But women typically have better verbal skills than males, so it's hard to be objective.

>>5026489

>But women typically have better verbal skills than males

>mfw

>>5026503

It's a fact that females have better verbal skills than males, IN GENERAL, much the same way that males typically are better at math, visual-spatial relationships, and masturbation.

If you spend much time at all around children, you would never deny this. the average 5 year old girl can hold a better conversation that many adult mouth-breathing males.

try to be objective please.

>>5026510

>'try to be objective'

>uses anecdotal evidence

>>5026510

>If you spend much time at all around children...

>>5026516

anecdotal evidence is not exclusive of objectivity, if chosen properly.

do you honestly believe that males and females have equal verbal skills, in general? have you ever talked to a woman?

>>5026522

>talking to women
>2012

>>5026520

that chris hansen guy is creepy

>>5026522
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anecdotal_evidence

>In science, anecdotal evidence has been defined as:
>"information that is not based on facts or careful study"
>"reports or observations of usually unscientific observers"

>>5026520
Who are you quoting?

Irritating bump.

sage

>>5029652
What a stupid spam comment. Learn to ignore things you don't like.

define 'prepubescent'

>>5029659
We're trying to, but you assholes keep bumping 4-5 of these threads to the front page every day.

>>5030037

why is that a problem? this broad has dozens of troll/homework threads daily, and they don't make your herpes flare up.

Why do you guys post this everyday? Is it because you don't have girlfriends?

>>5030272
Buy Monsanto-brand food.

It's safe.

>>5030276

correlation is not causation.

philosophy 101. take it. learn it. live it. be happy

What a hottie

She is as close to "cute science nerd girl" as girls get.

Unfortunately, she still acts like she has daddy-issues, bipolar problems and she is not cute compared to real females.

>>5030291
So yes?

Nice science related content, OP. Thanks!

>>5030296
>she is not cute compared to real females.
I lol'ed because it's so true.

Oh, I get it.

She is Jewish, or she was raised on and has faith and belief in Jewish propaganda.

>>5030298

yes.

>>5030325

she's greek, you stormfag. hitler killed all the jews in greece. she's either catholic or atheist, AND WHO CARES ANYWAY??

she is smart and she loves the science. like you wish.

>>5030353
>hitler killed all the jews in greece
Do you even study history?

>>5030353
Oh, look. Another shitfucking faggot that needs to defend his religion on the /sci/ board.

Yes, yes. "God exists, prove you wrong.", \/\/hatever.

>>5030375
Oh look, another newfag retard who puts sage in the name field.

>>5030380
If you were worth the effort, I'd put it in every field.

You are an angry "faith and belief" shitstain, so I will only pasta "sage" in the first 3.

I didn't even type "sage" in this post, I just pasta'd it.

>>5030399

i love you and i want to have your baby

I watched to about 0:40 where she talks about how a star getting cooler makes its gravitational field stronger and gave up.

>>5030454

she got it right.

>>5030502
How so? The cessation of fusion processes results in the collapse of the surface as the radiation pressure s no longer there to support it. As it collapses, it heats rapidly.

>>5030502
Not because she understood what it means.

>>5030551
>JEW SCIENCE
He is talking about that episode of "Stargate", where Carter was able to explode a sun by dropping a stargate linked to a black-hole, slurping the mass of the sun.
>JEW SCIENCE

cute

>>5031565
Super cute.

I <3 her sharky hat. :3

There does seem to be a few of these cute science threads around. Somebody should do something about it.

Does she tell you where to get those hats from?

Congrat dumbfucks, you convinced me to never ever watch one of her video. Stop spamming sci.

>>5031770
>autistic tantrums

>>5031770
but srsly, watch this shit.

Her voice is horrible and her videos aren't even interesting, try covering something that hasn't already been done 1000 times.

>>5031806
I respectfully disagree. I think she's an angel, sent from the heavens by God's team of scientists.

>>5031846
Eat shit and die.

>>5031853
Why are you so mad about this? She's the new queen of /sci/.

>>5031853
Yes. Death is inevitable.
patience child, patience.

on a fun note, alcohol is just microbe shit....so, yeah...probably will

don't you lose any sleep over it, something finally went YOUR way.

>>5031876
>implying anybody really gives a fuck.
Cute Science!

:3

sage

>>5032023
do you mean J. D. Bernal?

>>5032092
Where'd the other cute science threads go?

>>5032094 Where'd the other cute science threads go?
They are on the second page.

>>5032094

the two newest ones were deleted, probably by the owner.

>>5032092
What does he have to do with cute science?

>>5032094
>>5032140
>>5032152
The archive was down. What happened? What did I miss?

>>5033789

one was the fusion/fission vid, and the other was the mouse vid, which already has an active thread.

no big deal. it's just one guy doing all the hating on daniella. everybody else likes these videos, or knows how to hide threads that don't appeal to them.

lol. all this time it was just one guy trying to stir up controversy on /sci/ and /q/.

yes

>>5034625
>it's just one guy doing all the hating on daniella.
Bullshit.

>>5035037
It's true and you know it.

THIS IS FROM MOTHERFUCKING AUGUST? Why won't it die? Why

>>5035776

august was last week, according to mayan calender.

>implying popularising science is bad

>>5037540

popularizing science has been a pipe dream since public education began.

if we went back to private schools for the wealthy and talented, there would be no problem.

but the liberals are in bed with the education lobby. nobody actually believes everyone is capable of doing high school work, but we pretend it is true so nobody gets offended.

>>5035037
ofcourse it's bullshit. we all know it's only EK, who is a girl.

>>5038838

EK got banned a few days ago.

i might have been partly to blame.

i was bad and i feel bad.

EK. come back. you were the only female on /sci/

we need you.

>>5038877
are you retarded?

>>5038893

what do you mean? of course i am not retarded.

ask an intelligent question and i will answer it.

>>5038832
>Almost 11 hours without a post
>Well OBVIOUSLY they all desperately want to pay attention to me and just didn't know where the thread was! I'll bump it to the front page just to make sure they can find it!

>>5038911

why are you saging? do you hate DT?

misogynists like you hold back science and humanity.

>>5038903
how do you not know that bans mean nothing to all but a few people on 4chan? she's constantly evading bans.

>>5038942

so? why does that bother anyone?

/sci/ is for science and math.

focus on the good threads, and ignore the trolls.

is that so hard?

>>5038920
I think it would be fine if it were just one thread.

Not one thread for every single episode constantly being bumped long after everyone's stopped giving a shit

>>5038961
the point was that you are retarded for thinking you had anything to do with her being gone, or that a ban would keep her away.

>>5038966

use the hide function. moot gave us a powerful gift, so use it.

the oldest rule of the internet is, DO NOT FEED THE TROLLS.

/sci/ is supposedly full of smart people who can observe and learn.

hide, and move on

hide, and move on

hide, and move on

is everyone here fucking retarded?

>>5038971

you do not know all, little one.

and neither do i.

she probably has a life.

let it go. so shall i.

>>5038961
>>5038981
>>5038985
I hope you know that avatarfagging is against the rules.

>>5039902
You should probably look up the definition of avatarfag, and then remind yourself that you're on an imageboard.

>>5039927
you should probably remind yourself of which board you're on

>>5039930
I hope you know I don't give a flying fuck

When she says,"Happy news for Whayalz!" I get a boner every single time in her video about lab mice.... I don't know whats wrong with me....

>>5039936
then you should probably GTFO and never come back

>>5039927

It's avatarfagging

>>5041233

serious question here. i don't know what avatarfagging means. i can see how it is annoying for someone to use the same image for every post, which is the way avatars work on other sites.

on /sci/, i take it that avatarfagging means any image that isn't needed to support your comment.

>>5041338
No.
It means posting from a set collection of images of the same character/persona.

For example, some people post a lot of different pictures of Daniella Titan.
The tripcode user 'EK' posts a lot of pictures with the youtube user 'FactvsReligion', Physicsguy used to post a lot of pictures of Albert Einstein, and some users post pictures of a girl names Rose who has blue hair.

All are not allowed under the new rules.

>>5041363
Thanks, now I know.

>>5042007
>replying to a deadpost 5 hours later, also bumping
>mfw they mention me
also, how the fuck was that even banned?

is even mentioning 'EK' a bannable offense now??
WTF??

>>5042016
Fuck off, EK

>>5042016
Go away EK

>>5039927
Who are you quoting?

>>5042016
oh fuck i remember that person.... religionvsfact right?

>>5044302

yes, but this is science, on a dumbed down level

>>5044302
Who are you quoting?

>>5002631
>>5002609
Girls with blue hair
yum

>>5046205

my nana has blue hair. would you like to meet her?

>>5002564

i finally watched this video. the best part is at the end where she pretends to be a shark.

if you didn't know it, you would think it is a real fish.

>>5047414
That was pretty good, indeed.

>>5045231
It's not really dumbed down. For a short video it's optimally loaded with information.

>popsci
>not sagan
Hmmm....

>>5048931
>impying she isn't much better than sagan
Sagan was just science.
Daniela is science + cute.

>>5048978

you don't think carl sagan is attractive?

>>5050245
Who would?

>>5002859
Where is your proof?

>>5050282

i meant that he has charisma and an interesting persona, not so much physical attraction.

>>5002564
>>5008072
>>5024926
Marketing, on /sci/ I thought you were you smarter than this

>>5050301
He has no proof. What he said is wrong.

>>5052123
I see that now, thanks!

Can't wait for a new DT video thanks again OP

so.. how are the conversations with yourself?

jyjytjjhgfj

>>5053169

sage and move on. I'm pretty sure everyone already knows about the samefaggotry; OP just likes to circle jerk alone.

>>5053169
Sir, are you a wizard?

>>5053203
unfortunately you can't sage with a picture.
sorry for bumping

>>5053376

go away, rose. make your own videos, after you earn a phd like dr. titan.

>>5054323
Is it lunchtime already? Seems Luke I just got to work.

Thanks for the reminder spambot.

>>5054328

i am neither a bot nor a spamener, and my comments always add to the discussion, except when i am schooling trolls such as yourself.

/sci/ is a communitiy of thinkers. try to comply with the rules, please.

>>5054345
You bump these threads every day at 12:46 (mountain standard time).
Looking a the content of your posts, you contribute nothing, usually posting reactions to the video.

If you aren't a spambot, then you are a uniquely pathetic troll. I can respect someone like Carl who dedicates half an hour or so to really pissing someone off, but all you are is mildly annoying.

>>5054369

if i am "mildly annoying", why do you respond?

i am not a troll. i love science and helping to learn young ppl about it.

you on the ohter hand are hate-filled and must be stopped.

>>5054395
I won't deny that a trolls "victory" is getting a reaction, but normally pity isn't what trolls shoot for.

I mean, I usually keep these threads hidden with the new UI like most of sci, but whenever I peak in one I just kinda feel bad for you.
What must your life be like to have a schedule that says "twelve forty five, bump troll spam on sci". I mean... Man.

You need to get out some dude. Personally I really enjoy playing pool with my friends. You should try to find a billiards club.

>>5054417

lol do you realize that you contradicted yourself?

you love us.

i think you are one of us.

use the force, lisa, use the force.

>>5054395
>>5054427
Why do you use a different writing style to pretend you aren't Carl?

>>5054427
No, I see no contradiction. It's possible for someone to feel both pity and annoyance for a person.
Honestly I would mark most of my annoyance to the fact that you are so willfully pathetic.
You choose to be this way for reasons beyond me. That... Bothers me.
If you don't like billiards, then you should find an arcade to spend time at, or take up a sport.

>>5054439

to put it in plain english, you are a fucking idiot.

>>5054447
Nope

https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/5038310#p5038408

Using the same image in a thread where Carl namefags/tripfags/samefags is a dead giveaway

>>5054451

i love you and want to have your baby.

You people are fucking retards. You know she gets paid every time you see her video, right? Bunch of fucking morons.

>>5054460

youtube partners don't make real money until they get hundreds of thousands of views.

DT does it because she loves science, just like you do.

get over the fact that she has a vagina. god, are you all 8 years old?

>>5054460
You don't have to pay anything. Viewing youtube is for free.

>>5054453
Who are you?

>>5054472
Except that literally the ONLY reason anyone watches her videos it's because she's female. And advertising the videos on /sci/ out of all places is just pathetic. But not more pathetic than giving her money for attention whoring.

>>5054453
>>5054491
>that obvious samefag

>>5054500
shut up, adults are talking

>>5054491

i am your secret lover.

pic not related.

>>5054504
What is your name?

>>5054395
>>5054427
>>5054447
>>5054453
Are you avatarfagging? That's against the rules now. I didn't report you but you should delete the pictures before someone does.

>>5056081

don't you like any of them?

>>5056091

any of what? the videos or the avatarfagging?

>>5056150

all of it. i hate all of it. i don't hate DT, just her fan club.

>>5056921
What is it that you hate?

>>5056921
Why? What's wrong with DT's fans?

>>5054427
What is this picture supposed to be?

>>5058602
Looks like the "new meme" guy.

>>5058621

that's correct. it's one of the many new meme faces from /b/. and one of the more artistic ones, not that meme faces are valued in that way.

>>5058621
I've never heard of this meme. Is it from reddit?

>>5058577
Bump on this.

>>5002599
How is this trolling?

>>5061144
It's not. He is the troll.

DT fans get in here!

>>5061194
>DT
>fans

sure is lonely mod

>>5061194
Me!

>>5061194
me too

>>5061201
Many people like her. Why do you think I'm a mod?

This explains politics for me...now it all makes sense :-)

>>5061194
I love her.

>>5061301

if she bit you, you might change your tune.

>>5062454
I'm okay with that as long as I get to bite her back.