/sci/ - Science & Math

Fuck off, you post this every day.

>>4960483
Fuck off EK, go shit up other boards with your pseudoscience and metaphysics.

>>4960481
/sci/ has yet to solve it. No need to be upset now.

fuck my life

>>4960478
Let's say there are 15 questions with 4 choices each. Let's also say there are 3 lifelines: call-a-friend, 50-50, and ask-the-audience.

For each of the 15 questions, there is only 1 correct answer, and 3 incorrect answers, so immediately your chances are 1/3 = 33.34%. You can use each lifeline once. Using phone-a-friend, let's say gives you a 95% chance the person you call is correct. So 1 question is 95%. Similarly, we can say ask-the-audience gives you a 95% chance. Finally, 50-50 will remove 2 wrong answers, so you have 1 right answer and 1 wrong answer, so you basically know the answer. To recap:

Question 1: 33.34%

Question 2: 33.34%

Question 3: 33.34%

Question 4: 95% <--- ask-the-audience

Question 5: 33.34%

Question 6: 33.34%

Question 7: 33.34%

Question 8: 33.34%

Question 9: 95% <--- phone-a-friend

Question 10: 33.34%

Question 11: 33.34%

Question 12: 33.34%

Question 13: 33.34%

Question 14: 33.34%

Question 15: 100% <--- 50-50

Total: 690.08%

Divided by 15 questions = 46.00%

So basically, it's more a less a game of chance, but more than half the people on the show will lose, so it's not very fair. That show is making tons of money off of people.

>>4960496
pardon me, but this is seriously complete and utter bullshit.

>>4960510
How so?

>>4960496
i actually saved this pasta first time i saw it
now it just seems so old and overused, the jokes ruined. i think i'll delete it.

I can't fucking believe I am in this thread again.

Did anyone say shitposting thread?

>>4960510
>pardon me, but this is seriously complete and utter bullshit.
nice proof

>>4960529
This is an unsolved problem in measure-theoretic probability theory. It is the polar opposite of shitposting.

Please contribute or leave.

Rather than banning OP, the mods should ban the people replying to these threads. Without a response from /sci/, these threads become uninteresting to post, solving the problem (or they keep posting these, but they don't get bumped because no one replies for fear of the banhammer). Make replying a bannable offense, and be rigorous about it. Do eet.

>>4960548
>>>/q/
and enjoy you're ban

>>4960548
OP will keep bumping. he gets one free bump with the second pasta, and as many as he likes replying to people calling bullshit on it, or claiming its 'an unsolved problem in measure-theoretic probability theory'

thread sticks around whether you reply or not. the last 2 ive seen have both reached >100 posts each.

I fucking fear the mods themselves post this thread every day just to piss me off.

This thread still makes me laugh every time.

Sage since yeah

>>4960561
unlikely. check the image-sig. OP gets banned everyday, and the thread deleted. its just mods are so slow that it can still stack up to >100 replies if /sci/ is in retard-mode.

Sage

>>4960535
I thought no further explanation was needed due to the obviousness of this shitpost.

>>4960574
>/sci/
>ignoring an obvious troll

Comedy gold.

>EK
>Carl
>WWTBAM shitposter
What is this? Fucking gay pride parade?

>>4960614
check the last few WWTBAM troll threads, i ALWAYS post millionairetrollfaggot.jpg in every thread. its usually the first post. its just in case any /sci/tards dont realise this is a troll yet.
yeh, we have newfags. shit sucks.

carl is just her by coincidence.

You are the absolute worst mod ever invisibro.

open janitor spots

>>4960619
>carl is just her

Who am I?

>Carl gets here
>Doubles in both posts
I want to be like you, Carl.

>>4960629
I'm always here to improve the board's quality.

>>4960622
*here

>>4960621
[sracasm] yes, because they'll definitely give the jan positions to mouthy twats who slag off invisibro. [/sarcasm]

>>4960633
>dubs again
sonofabitch! are you actually trying??

>>4960556
>claiming its 'an unsolved problem in measure-theoretic probability theory'
It is. How old are you? You can't even solve a babby calculus problem. I dare you to tackle real maths.

>>4960644

>>4960548
This is a very interesting problem. You seem to just be some sort of arrogant aspie who would much rather prefer to post in pseudoscience/popsci spam threads.

>>4960649
uhuh. no1 fucking falls for your shit.
drop it and fuck off

>>4960644
lol

>>4960656
Fuck, one off.

>>4960574
This is not for trolling, nor shitposting, nor attention. This is an interesting math problem.

Don't like math? Get the fuck out of /sci/, troll.

now i am
;)

>>4960656
>56
HAH!
fail!

btw, i wasnt actually trying for dubs last time. i swear to god, actually a coincidence.

>>4960582
This is the science and math board. If you want to support your claims, you need evidence or logical inference.

Back to >>>/x/

>>4960641
Get out of this thread, shitposter. Go back to your other 5 EK attentionwhore generals on the front page.

>>4960666
Good one.

>>4960666
My queen, you are an evil, evil person.

>>4960655
>shitposting attention whore who is permabanned thinks he can do math
LMFAO

>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666
>>4960666

>>4960670
<<<
>dont know whether to save image in rose folder or 'thumbs-up' folder

>>4960599
>>4960622
>>4960633
>>4960644
>>4960655
>>4960666
all these gets

>>4960683
>having a rose folder

shiggidy diggidy

>>4960692
>2012
>not having a rose folder

>>4960683
I actually have it in both. Yea, I know. Fuck the police.

>>4960701
so do i! i couldnt decide! :D

Does this board even have mods? OP made 5 posts in this thread tops, the rest was mostly EK posting non-science stuff. Make replying to these a bannable offense, please.

>>4960708
I only posted >>4960478 and >>4960496 lol

>>4960708
>'make replying to shit thread bannable'
>yeh, great logic, ban the responders to a shit thread, not the OP
>i dont think so tim

>>4960708
http://vocaroo.com/i/s0jO8xRn52Xl

EK can you tell Harriet to get a tripcode again? Please?

>>4960713
hahaha. wow, nice

"What the fuck did you just say about me, you little bitch? I'll have you know I graduated top of my class in the Navy Seals, and I've been involved in numerous secretraids on Al-Qaeda, and I have over 300 confirmed kills. am trained in gorilla warfare and I'm the top sniper in the entire US armed forces. You are nothing to me but just another target. I will wipe you the fuck out with precision the likes of which has never been seen before on this Earth, mark my fucking words. You think you can get away with saying that shit to me over the Internet? Think again, fucker. As we speak I am contacting my secret network of spies across the USA and your IP is being traced right now so you better prepare for the storm, maggot. The storm that wipes out the pathetic little thing you call your life. You're fucking dead, kid. I can be anywhere, anytime, and I can kill you in over seven hundred ways, and that's just with my bare hands. Not only am I extensively trained in unarmed combat, but I have access to the entire arsenal of the United States Marine Corps and I will use it to its full extent to wipe your miserable ass off the face of the continent you little shit. If only you could ave know what unholy retribution your little "clever" comment was about to bring down upon you, maybe you would have held your fucking tongue. But you couldn't, you didn't, and now you're paying the price, you goddamn idiot. I will shit fury all over you and you will drown in it. You're fucking dead, kiddo."

1 correct answers
3 incorrect
Answers
A total of 4 answers
>1/3 chance of being right
Didn't realize /sci/ is full of retards

>>4960715
ahahahha! now why the fuck would I do that
do you not appreciate the reduction in shitposts since she left?
shes even worse than i am, you cant fucking deny that
and /sci/ hates her even more than they hate me (in general)

all her posts are shit, im pretty sure she never posts anything science related.

>>4960717
That's wrong. How old are you? 5? 6? This is 2nd grade math.

>>4960726
You are just bat shit insane. She at least made some reasonable contributions to the board.

>>4960726
She was the real queen of /sci/. I liked her more than you.

Also
>faggot trip thinks dubs are anything to take note of
>mfw i have dozens of screenshots of my trips on /k/

>>4960728
>implying i'm wrong
1/4 is not 33.34%, nor is it 33.33%
it is 25%.

>>4960738
Are you fucking retarded?

You have one correct answer, three wrong, four total. You immediately see 1/3 = 33.34%.

>>4960731
Rose would be instantly queen'd if she posted.

>>4960730
fuck off, what did she ever contribute??
i never saw her in any fucking psych threads at all. just pissing people off and filing inane bullshit reports about shit no1 cares about. in fact im pretty sure that shes the whole reason rule 7 got ratified.
she never fucking contributed anything
show me one fucking thing she ever did that was good

>>4960731
ahahah! so fucking deluded.

SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE SAGE

>>4960712
- more than 96% of this thread were responders, not OP
- banning responders would rid us of shitposters such as yourself
- all the responses in here were shitty non-/sci/ posts, thus detrimental to the quality of this board

All I see are pros.

>>4960747
This is an unsolved problem in measure theoretic probability theory. It does not deserve "SAGE".

If we have a manifold <span class="math">M[/spoiler] equipped with smooth structure that is also a measure space, suppose <span class="math">v[/spoiler] and <span class="math">w[/spoiler] are sections of the tangent bundle <span class="math">TM[/spoiler]. There is a nondegenerate symmetric bilinear form on <span class="math">S[/spoiler] (some subspace of <span class="math">M[/spoiler]) that looks like
<div class="math">g(v,w)_s := E_s(v(\mathrm{log}~s)w(\mathrm{log}~s))</div>
This is then the 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire' measure space. We have a function on the manifold which looks like <span class="math">x\mapsto v(\mathrm{log}~s)_x w(\mathrm{log}~s)_x[/spoiler]. We are trying to find an <span class="math">E_s[/spoiler] from some measure <span class="math">s\in S[/spoiler] derived from this function.

From >>4960496 ,
We also know that the Radon–Nikodym derivative on <span class="math">M[/spoiler] will produce values of 33.34% for individual questions, and 46.00% when taken over the whole 'Who Wants to be a Millionaire' measure space.

>>4960747
what a summerfriend

>>4960744
there is a 75% chance of being wrong
There is a 25% chance of being right
Did you pass first grade on the first try?

>>4960758
This is a beyond trivial result, that you seem to not be able to comprehend.

>there is a 75% chance of being wrong
No.
>There is a 25% chance of being right
No.

Please see the proof in >>4960496.

>>4960758
Obviously this is assuming a guess with no knowledge of the subject.
If not, then the probability is different for every single question, based on what the contestant knows.

>>4960774
That is still irrelevant. You do not understand the proof. WTF is wrong with you? Why can't you into math?

>>4960771
Any statement beginning with "let's say" and ending with a percentage is a GUESS, not a fact.

>>4960746
>fuck off, what did she ever contribute??
She participated in several notable discussions on psychology. She occasionally had quality postings, unlike you.

>i never saw her in any fucking psych threads at all. just pissing people off and filing inane bullshit reports about shit no1 cares about. in fact im pretty sure that shes the whole reason rule 7 got ratified.
You're too ignorant to even look at the actual science threads, that's why you never saw her post. You instantly swarm over the shit threads. such as this one.

>show me one fucking thing she ever did that was good
Look in the archive.

>>4960496

What the fuck am I reading.

Please tell me this is a troll.

>>4960787
The result is trivial. What's wrong with it?

I can't believe that their are people who would disagree that 1 divided by 4 is .25
Seriously, pull out your calculators.

>>4960784
She doesn't know shit about psychology. She might have made some good posts, but for sure not in psychology discussions.

>>4960782
I do not think you understand how a mathematical proof works. You must prove your claim with an application of logic. You have not done so, the reference post has.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_proof

>>4960795
>dividing 1 by 4

You misunderstood the entire problem. Did you ever go to school?

>>4960795
Nobody is disagreeing with this. "1/4" or its decimal equivalent has nothing to do with this problem.

>>4960784
w/e, i never fucking saw any.
and im not looking through the archive at all her shit! its just meaningless bullshit!
w/e
anyway, shes still posting as anon, so, maybe if theres any psych threads and shit she's still in em? yeh? so she doesnt need to bring back her fuckin trip in any case!

cant believe you;d like her over me. wtf is wrong with you??

>>4960809
She was a better poster than you.

>>4960809
You are a shitposter, she was a semi-serious poster (although being ignorant of psychology)

>>4960803
Explain to me how 4 answers, one of them correct, does not constitute a 25% chance of a correct answer.

>>4960824
I'm not going to give you a lecture ITT. It seems you never went to school.

>>4960824
Where's your explanation on why it does?

>>4960829
Just explain it.
Fuck.

>>4960817
no she fucking wasnt!
alright, alright, lets fuckin see the last thing she fuckin posted then!

>https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4957017#p4957070
ah yeh. thats right. a fucking admission of her shitposting in the last WWTBAM trollthread, same as this one!
yeh? yeh!
see what she fuckin wrote??

https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4950687#p4950745
look at that shit!

and shes better than me? yeh?
fucking moron!

>>4960839
Reread >>4960496 again, and I assure you that you will eventually recover your intuition on the matter.

>>4960839
Why do you think I will try to do what your teacher failed? Maybe you are incapable of learning basic probability theory.

>>4960843
Definitely better than all of your posts.

>>4960835
All the math i've learned was with m&m's, so i'll explain my reasoning with that.
You've got 4 m&m's, 3 red(the wrong answers), and 3 blue(the right answer)
You put them all in a bag
You reach in blindly and pull one out(this is the part that corresponds with the "assuming a guess" part of my previous post)
There is a 25% chance of it being red.
Get it?

>>4960855
not even close, you deluded shit

>>4960860
>doing math with m&ms

And you still wonder why you're wrong?

>>4960843
All of your posts are garbage. None of hers involve shitposting, they are generally casual conversation, engagement in a scientific topic, or combination thereof.

The examples you have given are objectively not shitposting. You are deluded as usual, EK.

>>4960861
Show me one non-shit post of yours.

>>4960860
M&Ms have nothing to do with the Who Wants to be a Millionaire measure space. I suggest you learn some real math.

>>4960843
take your pills

>>4960865
Still haven't seen any evidence as to why i'm wrong.

>>4960866
hows was that last example i gave no shitposting??
it was like a fucking 2000 word essay feeding the WWTBAM troll. and yeh yeh, i know it was as anon, but it was obviously her posting without her fuckin trip!

>>4960870
challenge accepted! potential zoology thread earlier tonight:
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4960477

>>4960875
The burden of proof is on you. You have yet to provide a conclusive mathematical argument, and you are unable to understand the one already provided in this thread.

>>4960873
i already took them earlier this afternoon, ive been completely reasonable up to this point, its just that this is like the 3rd time this shit has reached >100 posts
why the FUCK do you guys always do this??

im out

I'm really confused how you could have a 1 out of 3 chance when there are 4 total answers. Shouldn't this be a 1 out of 4 random chance, or 25%? Will someone explain the reasoning behind "1/3" when you have a, b, c, or d?

>>4960878
You didn't post anything non-trival in that "zoology" thread. Posting wiki links to stuff that is known to every highschooler barely counts as science post.

>>4960878
All of those posts are shitposts. They comprise solely of Wikipedia-tier knowledge.

Try harder.

>>4960891
The proof has been posted ITT. Just read it.

>>4960878
Nice high school knowledge. Enjoy your permaban rose

>>4960891
Get a book. It's really simple. You can find many online.

>>4960496
Were you referring to >>4960896 >For each of the 15 questions, there is only 1 correct answer, and 3 incorrect answers, so immediately your chances are 1/3 = 33.34%.
Because if so, I don't accept that as proof because it doesn't actually explain how he arrived at that answer.

>EK
>Sane person who doesn't make these thread constantly
>Pick one
EK, nigger please

>>4960903
It does. It's simple mathematics.

You have one correct answer, three wrong.

1/3 = 33.34%.

I cannot believe /sci/ has bought this shit every day since April of last year.

https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S2877620

Fuck all of you.

>>4960907
do you have a link to some site explaining that? I wouldn't even know what to google for that.
for being a /sci/ thread you guys sure don't seem excited to teach people new things

>>4960905
uhuh, and then post this?
>>4960483
think it through, you fucking kike.

>>4960917
You're retarded. It's been unsolved since that thread. We need to find an appropriate information metric.

>>4960918
There's a nice book intro book in here.

http://www.amazon.com/gp/richpub/syltguides/fullview/R1GE1P236K3YSV

>>4960922
You're too much of a shit poster to understand remedial math.

>>4960922
Fuck off, samefag.

God damn it, I was just coming to /sci/ to start this thread.

>>4960918

>>4960941
oh god, theres more than one of you fucks???

>>4960948
So it seems.

>>4960944
This comic is stupid. Of course you make fun of people who don't know things. That way they will learn to look it up on their own and quit wasting /sci/'s time.

>>4960948
Please EK, I'd love an explanation on how this is a troll thread.

Entertain me.

>>4960941
>>4960950
Good, finally /sci/ is going to have more math discussion.

>4 possible answers
>33.34%

wtfamireading.jpg

>>4960936
don't know if you know, but you just sent me a whole list of books, rather than just the one that explains it the most concisely. Isn't there a wikipedia article on the phenomenon? it sounds so improbable that it would seem to warrant a short article.

>>4960954
are you actually retarded?
as shit as it is, you can actually read harriets fucking trollfeeding post for everything that's wrong with it (albeit, stating the obvious)
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4950687#p4950745

>>4960960
Please read the thread before spewing inane crap.

>>4960907
You're stupid as fuck. I can't even comprehend how many times you would have to be dropped on your head to be so goddamn stupid. Please don't ever breed.

>>4960955
I came to /sci/ and saw this was the first thing under the sticky. I thought it was pretty funny.

>>4960963
You seem retarded. Do you have Downs?

This is simple probability.

>>4960972
>projecting

>>4960963
>You do not do correct answer/incorrect answers; this is incorrect.
As an example, if you flip a coin, and want heads, the chance of a heads is not 1/1, as this is 100% and 100% means a certainty.
Even if it was 1 in 3, this does not come out to 33.34. Why did you round upwards?
THANK YOU! Finally someone makes some sense

>>4960972
I think your stupid as fuck. You have the education of a 5 year old.

Your arguing over a trivial result that you still cannot grasp, yet you have yet to touch the real problem - >>4960755

Go back to whatever uneducated board you've come from.

>>4960981
wtf???
yeh it makes sense, but its FUCKING OBVIOUS!!

only a complete retard or troll thinks its 1/3 chance when you're choosing 1 correct answer out of 4 possible answers!!
fuck, now i see why haz found admirers, because they're fucking retarded!

I hate this place.

>>4960981
>As an example, if you flip a coin, and want heads, the chance of a heads is not 1/1, as this is 100% and 100% means a certainty.
That is using circular logic. You're assuming that there's a 50% chance that one knows the answer. This is unsubstantiated.

>Why did you round upwards?
Are you stupid? 1/3 = 33.34%. We are not dealing with approximations here. See pic.

>>4960993
ITT: people who can't into simple math but still criticizing.

>only a complete retard or troll thinks its 1/3 chance when you're choosing 1 correct answer out of 4 possible answers!!
That's wrong. Where is your proof?

Now you guys are just trolls trolling trolled trolls.

>>4960993
>mfw the guy everyone is calling a shitposting faggot is the only other guy itt who doesn't have a 2 digit IQ
you should come to /k/ and hang out with me and squid.
This place is a shithole.

>>4961005
Nobody is trolling anyone here. It's a huge misunderstanding, apparently. We still have yet to touch the real problem, instead we have arrogant uneducated cretins like >>4960993 arguing over the results obtained in >>4960496. It's hilarious, honestly.

>>4961009
i'd love to, hun, but i dont know shit about weapons
(im a UK-fag, i cant even buy one.)
:(

>>4960621
this.
Stop this shit.

>>4960941

I seriously hope this wasn't you

>>>/v/150723603

>>4961009
You do not understand simple probability, instead you base your reasoning on ad hominem attacks and circular examples. You should consider heading back over to /k/ promptly.

>>4961011
>results
If i fly my truck to the moon, then the martians will become irritated by my obama sticker, and revolt against their venusian overlords, causing obama to lose the next election.
This means that i shouldn't put an obama sticker on mytruck if i want him to win
>results

>>4961014
They don't sell guns to insane people here either

>>4961014
Most of the people that post on /k/ are yuropoor, you'd fit right in. I don't have any guns, and i troll just as good as the trolls who have guns

>>4961022
The tumor grown on /sci/ will be the fucking thing that finally kills 4chan.

>>4961025
>>4961030
How about you refrain from posting inane trolling garbage and consider working on a proof for your outrageous claims?

>>4961024
Says the guy who hasn't presented one shred of evidence as to why i'm wrong.
You're retarded. Do not breed.

>>4961022
>>4961033
>>>pol/4779033

I'm going to go do something else for a while.

>>4961048
There is a proof given in >>4960496. Please tell me what you do not understand.

>>4961064
You are a faggot.

>>4961074
You are shitposting. You should consider going back to where you came from instead of ruining the math and science threads here.

Do you have any idea how SCIENCE and LOGIC work? No, you don't. You keep spouting inane crap like the imbecilic kid you are.

But a pretty cool faggot, like freddy mercury.
Most successful troll of the day award goes to you.

>>4961078
>everyone's least favorite mod
>the best troll on all of 4chan
Conflicted...

>>4961088
>>4961079
You continue to be upset without providing contributing whatsoever to the problem.

>>4961079
I doubt anyone actually got trolled. People just go with the flow.

>>4961088
>>4961079
You continue to be upset without providing any contributions whatsoever to the problem.

>ITT, high school students attempting to tackle an unsolved problem in measure-theoretic probability

>>4961105
hai
xD

Everyone in this thread knows the answer is 1/4 xhamce of getting it right. Anyone who says otherwise is a troll.

>>4961158
You're the troll. Where is your explanation?

>>4961162

Where,s your explanation on that it is 1/3? Don,t give me the shity response in that "lrntoprobability". No. Give me a non,bull'shit answer on why 1/4 is wrong.

otherwise, fuck you for wasting mytime for making me reply

>>4961173
its been posted like 6 times.

1 answer is right, 3 are wrong. 1/3 chance for the correct one. there arnt any more steps to show.

>>4961181

first off, 1/3 = 33.333333333.... %
second, 1 good answer out of 4 answers is 1/4 = 25% or P=.25 you guess right if you are totally clueless which seems to be your case.
the rest of your post doesn't make much sense either.
P to guess N consecutive right answers isn't (.25 * N)/N
learn about probabilities kid.

thks for making this thread a bit less boring though.

>>4961213
>P
>N

This has nothing to do with the P=NP problem.

>>4961218
Yes it does. The burden of proof is on you to prove me wrong

>>4961181
If probability worked like that then for example: Two cards, 1 is the right choice, 1 is the wrong choice therefore 1/1 chance of picking right aka 100% chance. Gud1

PENIS

DICK

COCK

>>4961181
holy shit, are you guys dense.

just take a look at your own logic for a second. what you're saying implies that if there were two correct answers and two incorrect answers (2/2 = 1), you'd have a 100% chance of guessing correctly.

Its 25%

You take the ratio of correct answers to total answers, not correct answers to wrong answers.

SHLONG

DONG

>>4961348
Also if troll, 12/10 fantastic job, yes i frustrated.

Look how long this has been on!!
Look at it!
HOW CAN YOU BE THIS BAD AT BEING A MOD???

OPEN JANITORSPOTS

>>4961359
U mad? XDDD
Are your jimmies rustled?
Are you anally frustrated?
Butt devastated?
Rectally ravaged?
LEL
Your so fucking infuriated.
You're anus is bleeding.
LMAO faglord
King of the autists

>>4961348
since im getting tired of this (that was actually my post you linked) the 2 posts >>4960478 and >>4960496 are saved by almost everyone on sci and gets posted every day, yet every day new people try to argue with it and get trolled into oblivion. congratulations, now that you know about this you are an oldfag on sci.

>>4961213
>first off, 1/3 = 33.333333333.... %
That is an approximation. We are dealing with exact results here. See pic.

The rest of your post is faulty probability that does not apply in this case. You do not understand the measure space we're dealing with.

>>4961294
You do not understand this case. You are applying irrelevant statements which are obviously incorrect in your favor. Reread >>4960496 and try again.

>>4961383
well shit, that's all it takes huh..

>>4961348
This is hopelessly wrong. Get out of /sci/.

>>4961383
This is an unsolved problem in measure-theoretic probability theory. /sci/ has yet to solve it. It would help if the uneducated aspies stopped sperging over the trivial details and focused on the actual problem.