/sci/ - Science & Math

There are many female phds in hard science. Most of the good looking ones aren't american, while the american ones are below average or average. Just join any program at a university.

Source: personal experience from traveling to many conferences around the US

>>4913863
female != science able
only if lesbian = science able, because she has a male type brain chemistry

;_;

>>4913866
>posting an infantile cartoon

SHE IS NOT YOUR WAIFU SHE IS NOT REAL

>>4913870
>replying to an infantile cartoon by posting another infantile cartoon

Your both gonna enjoy a ban.

>>4913866
what a horrible fashion sense

>>4913868

>infantile cartoons

http://www.google.com/search?rlz=1C1ARAA_enUS458US459&sugexp=chrome,mod%3D4&q=infantile+
cartoon&um=1&ie=UTF-8&hl=en&tbm=isch&source=og&sa=N&tab=wi&ei=2FUVUP
G2L--26QGo2YDIBQ&biw=888&bih=438&sei=61UVUNfnKOi-6QHxjYC4Bw

>>4913863

I know a hot zoologist, but her posting her pics would probably get me b&.

bonus points for the name

>>4913886

Wait isn't she that biologist that used to be a model? She owns her own research company now or something.

And she's American.

>>4913882

>>4913889
not quite, but you now have my attention.

>>4913890
She looks like a man.
A sexy, Galois-esque man.

>>4913886
fuck you, the thumb looked like she was topless holding her breasts and i got excited. thank you for wasting my erection for this week asshole.

>>4913894

I remember seeing an interview of a woman who is a specialized biologist. She competed in international beauty pageants and won.

I forget the name of it, but the series was on youtube. They also interviewed a tonne of other scientists, but she's obviously the only one relevant to the thread.

My apologies, I'm really terrible with names.

>>4913886
Lisa Randall

>>4913905
I hadn't heard of her before, actually. Were you already familiar with her work? Just curious.

>>4913908
I knew she did some bullshit with cern a while back from some talk I had seen her in.

fuuuuck. i can't find her. there was a british girl 20-something, physicist. she did a few videos on youtube for her uni. i think she was a phd student. video was something to do with a big laser machine/optics or something.

>>4913899
psychologist, not a scientist. GTFO!

>>4913910
We are done here.

>>4913953
0/10

OK lets drop the bar; to females doing bachelors in a science field!
From 8/10 to 10/10 on the beauty scale. Do these females exist? Pictures? Go!

>>4913974
>female
>beauty

Choose one. Sure is hetero scum in here.

>>4913969
?
You trying to say a psychologist is a scientist?

>>4913980
>implying psychology is not a science

>>4913974
the girls are all indians

>>4913982
the softest of soft-stool science that you can get. a fucking babby can do that shit.

>>4913987
I bet you can't. You can crunch some numbers and play with your undergrad equations, but you'd fail to read and understand psychological texts.

>>4913982
and it's too clumsy to be a genuine science. ever changing mess.

what is the name of the chick who discovered DNA structure ?
Watson & Crick can suck my tiny weeaboo dick.

>>4913990
it's much closer related to philosophy than science

>>4913993
>toot clumsy

Ironically this only shows that you are too clumsy to formulate a precise argument.

>>4913996
>implying science isn't a branch of philosophy

>>4913990
it's much closer related to philosophy than science. it's only recently - the last 50-60 years - that they try to do tests.

It's true. I'm an idiot to not realise this.

>>4914009
lel

>>4914002
>it's only recently - the last 50-60 years

How is that an argument? Many disciplines of science were developped "only recently".

psychology is just observation and opinion. It is and always will be in the "prescience" phase, because of it. Opinion is not part of science, so it can never be true science.

My bet is on the neuroscientist usurping the psychology field anyway.

>>4914030
Testable hypotheses are more than just opinions.

there was a biologist with a black straight hair I saw only once on tv but couldn't get her name ... I was the only really beautiful 'famous' scientist I've ever seen. These lle Lisa are just 'ok', and even a bit ugly.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgQfoXIJiW

A math goddess.

>>4914056
the link is broken

>>4914060
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kgQfoXIJiWI

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr

"Mathematically talented, Lamarr also co-invented—with composer George Antheil—an early technique for spread spectrum communications and frequency hopping, necessary for wireless communication from the pre-computer age to the present day.[4][5]"

>>4914062
cute at best

>>4914056
>>4914060
>>4914062
looks below average.

>>4914070
"In 2003, the Boeing corporation ran a series of recruitment ads featuring Hedy Lamarr as a woman of science. No reference to her film career was made in the ads."

-http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hedy_Lamarr

>>4914070
GOOD find

>>4914080
What do you expect? She's a woman.

http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2007/writers/aditi_kinkhabwala/01/03/rocket.scientist/

"Summer Williams is a Houston Texans cheerleader. She's also a rocket scientist.

This is a true story.

"Well," Williams said, "I don't actually use the term 'rocket scientist.' "

That's what she is, though. Williams is a 25-year old aerospace engineer for the Jacobs Engineering Group, which is NASA's main scientific support contractor. Williams, a small-town Kansan, is an assistant project manager on the group that figures out how to keep the international space station habitable."

>>4914096
ugly as shit

Danica McKellar did some math (Bachelor summa cum laude from UCLA at least)

>>4914096
Why do most girls in science professions have fathers in science too?

My friend is the only girl I know who's in science yet had no relatives encouraging her. We played with legos a lot as kids though.

>>4914104
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Danica_McKellar
"Danica Mae McKellar (born January 3, 1975) is an American actress, academic, and education advocate. She is best known for her role as Winnie Cooper in the television show The Wonder Years,[1] and later as author of three popular[2][3] non-fiction books: Math Doesn't Suck, Kiss My Math, and Hot X: Algebra Exposed, which encourage middle-school girls to have confidence and succeed in mathematics.[4]"

Is OK.

Sounds like another Science, it's a girl thing → Mega failure.

>>4914110
>Why do most girls in science professions have fathers in science too?

You think it has something to do with sex? It probably hasn't. Many people with parents in science become scientists themselves, regardless of their sex.

Lydia Chilton
http://www.hmslydia.com/
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XqOjfSby1Z4

Here's a REAL counterexample.

Caltech engineering graduate (no, for real!)
Going to MIT this sept for EE grad school.

>>4914133
>engeneering
Well okay, but that implies she likes having sex with man

>>4914133
Is that you?
Please, please, proliferate ad infinitum. Flood the gene pool with that shit.

>>4914133
She has BITCH on her shirt. Goddamnit, how low can female anti-intllecuality go?

>>4914141
No, just somebody I know.

>>4914141
Hell no. Such subhuman scum should be euthanized.

Dr. Alice Roberts

>>4914143
It says "Fitch" it's a popular fashion brand.

>>4914169
>wearing popular fashion

Just as bad. She's a bitch.

>>4914174
The original premise was:
>Hot female scientist - do they exist? Where are they? Post'em!

Is it really that weird for a cute girl to wear mainstream clothes? For christ's sake, do you just wear worn out t-shirts with holes in them or something?

>>4914181
No, I'm not a fucking hipster. She definitely doesn't belong in this thread, because she's a slut and sluts are by definition a turn-off and thus not hot.

>>4914133
One more of her. Let's stir the pot a little...

>Caltech engineering graduate (no, for real!)
> Going to MIT this sept for EE grad school.

>>4914183
>>>/r9k/

>>4914186
Revealing too much skin. She could just like walk around with a price tag. Oh wait, she's worse than a whore because she doesn't even take money for it.

>>4914188
It's you who doesn't belong here. You are disrupting the harmony of science and math.

>>4914192
>posting inane hurr durr I hate all wimmins they're all sluts
>complaining someone else is ruining the science theme of the board
Oh, fuck off.

>>4914209
I didn't post this thread.

>>4914211
No, but you're in it shitposting about how some girl is a whore based solely on that you think she is a whore, despite her attending elite schools for STEM subjects. OP is more science relates than your dribble.

>>4914219
She objectively is a whore despite studying engineering. I explained it more than once ITT and if you fail to see it, you are either trolling or an anti-intellectual douchebag with no standards.

>>4914223
I call troll

all other opinions are false

>>4914225
There are no opnions here. Women being sluts and whores is a scientific fact.

Today I was in the student organization building on campus and I totally caught the hot young chemistry professor checking me out. She was wearing a lot of slutty black eye liner and smiled at me. True story, bro.

>>4914227
Did you throw up all over her? Because that's what she deserves.

>>4914223
>anti-intellectual
>not hating a girl who is a STEM major just because she's a girl

I give up, pretend you won, if that makes you shut the fuck up.

>>4914186
she's an asian girl though. almost all asian girls go into engineering and some top tier school.

>>4914230
You're saying its hard-coded in their genes? mmm, I *might* buy that...but I've met some pretty damn frigid hotties, and I'm sure you have too. And how about fuglies?

>>4914233
I can't win this way. The only way I could win would be by converting you to become an intellectual human being (something that women will never be).

>>4914237
All of them are whores. No exception. Even if they don't publicly fuck around, it's in their mindset.

Man, this thread makes me so sad. I post a cute STEM girl in a /sci/ thread:
>>4914186
>>4914133

And then a bunch of retards just shitpost the thread:
>>4914138
>>4914143
>>4914147
>>4914174
>>4914183
>>4914192
>>4914223
>>4914227
>>4914230
>>4914232
>>4914233
>>4914235
>>4914251
*sigh*... I guess I'll go hang out with real people instead.

>>4914251
I'm a man, majoring in chemistry and minoring in physics. I hate premeds, most of which are pretentious counts who prioritize partying then get pissed when they get shit marks and whine about how not curving grades is unfair.
I don't like typical women, but this /r9k/ style blind hatred is fucking asinine. Nevermind, I hate all women for no reason now too, you won, your work here is done and you can ride off into the sunset?

>>4914263
engineers

>>4914263
She is not cute, she is a disgusting slut. But given that you think she's cute and that you have "real people" to "hang out" with, I guess you're an anti-intellectual douchebag.

>>4914265
Show me how hating women is not justified. Show me one woman that isn't a disgusting whore.

>>4914266
I'm an engineer who know's Schrödinger's equation and Fermat's last theorem, can I play?

>>4914279
The "I have arbitrary knowledge of random principles, this means something" mindset is half the reason why people look down on engineers.

>>4914268

>>4914268
Every woman posted in this thread.

Can you go back to /r9k/ now? You're a really great troll, everyone but me is part of your cause.

>>4914284
Well I buy that partially but then many of the great intellectual developments of the late 20th/early 21st centuries have been made by none other than companies (i.e. engineers).

The scientists are falling behind...

>>4914104

Fun fact: I once cited a paper she co-authored in a journal submission, it wasn't until months later I learned who she was.

>>4914288
That's not a woman anymore. She's dead now and when she started acting non-selfish, she was already too old to be fertile or desirable.

>>4914294
Not trolling, just saying the truth.

>>4914300
That was gibberish.

>>4914268
troll

may I refer you to
>>4913890
>>4913882
>>4913863

>>4914306
*Started* acting non-selfish? You think she was hooker in her youth or something? Read moar.

>>4914312
Why do you think them having published a little bit of science makes them suddenly non-whores? They are still women. Get your logic straight.

>>4914313
Prove to me that she wasn't a whore when she was young.

>>4914317
What on earth is your criteria for "whore?"

>>4914317
"According to a biography by Joan Graff Clucas, in her early years Agnes was fascinated by stories of the lives of missionaries and their service in Bengal, and by age 12 was convinced that she should commit herself to a religious life.[12] Her final resolution was taken on August 15, 1928, while praying at the shrine of the Black Madonna of Letnice, where she often went on pilgrimage.[13]
She left home at age 18 to join the Sisters of Loreto as a missionary. She never again saw her mother or sister.[14]"

>by age 12
>AGE 12

>>4914133

asians girls are not hot, they're just your last resort if you've reached rock bottom

>>4914326
all people are attracted to the same things, got it.

>>4914319
Being female at all.
Do your part and stop responding and report him.

>>4914330
I don't see what the harm of letting him continue is.

>>4914329
eww fucking nasty

>>4914319
A shallow anti-intellectual being who values values douchebaggery, social status and "alphaness" higher than intelligence.

>>4914323
>praying
She was a christian, i.e. a fucking retard. Come back when you found an intelligent woman. Oh wait, there are none.

>>4914329
Disgusting picture.

>>4914330
What's your problem? If you want to be an "alpha" male fucking dirty whores, you can continue doing so outside of /sci/. Just leave.

>>4914335
This isn't the only thread he's shitposting in and he's been at this for days. If someone want to troll /sci/ I prefer it to be at least science related trolling.

>>4914329
I want to fuck Azn Gurl SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3 SO BAD :3
i am a snow niggger thought

>>4914343
Just ignore the misogynist. Oh yeah, and take longer to respond ROFL

>>4913890
Delicious reverse trap, would bang.

>>4914344
Is this (>>4914348) better"science related trolling" for you? Trolling doesn't belong here, you retard, and I am not trolling. Face the truth and stop being an asshole.

/end of thread

>>4914358
>wants to ignore the truth

Get the fuck out of /sci/.

>>4914370
What truth? All I see are judgements, no presentation, no facts, no statistics, I think you are either jealous that you can't find a gf hotter than your hand, or the bitch that broke your heart doesn't give a fuck about you any longer. That's it, I'm out of here.

>>4914379
Show me evidence of women who aren't shallow whores. \There are none.

>>4914398
This thread was made on /sci/. I do not have the privileges to shift it to /r9k.. Anyway I've never been to /r9k/ and I don't intend to go there.

>>4914394
Not him but you can go to >>>/r9k/ and discuss this all the day there.

>>4914343
Oh, so you're just mad that most women don't find you attractive?

>>4914401
This thread topic wasn't about bitches and whores.

>>4914404
Of course I'm mad that women are repelled by intelligence and that they are only attracted to "alpha" douchebags with a two digit IQ.

>>4914410
Yes, it was. Read the OP.

>>4914411
Right, but you do realize that "has sexual preferences that I disapprove of" isn't in and of itself a negative thing, right?

>>4914418
It is. It's a failure of evolution when on global scale the female sex causes the extinction of intellgent genes.

>120 posts omitted

HA

HAHA HA

AHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH

why do you guys even respond to this faggot.
everything he posts indicates that he's trolling.
so why do you even give a fuck?
responding to this kind of provocation is what turns /sci/ into a shithole

>>4914425
Why do you call me a troll? I'm not trolling and you fail to provide any counter-arguments.

>>4914425
B-but I have to prove I'm smarter then him! Otherwise he wins the argument!

>>4914423
I didn't realize everyone had an overwhelming moral obligation to optimize the trait you find most desirable.

Also, there's not many talented, heterosexual scientists over the age of forty that don't have wives or girlfriends. It's especially true for The Greats.

>>4914443
But their wives don't really love them. Women are not capable of love. They want to show off with their husbands status and achievements and want to waste their money.

>>4914460
Strike the money part, because most professors are very poorly paid.

You can just assert their motivations? So what would a counterexample to your claim look like?

>>4914479
>implying a counter-example exists

>>4913870
I'm 26 now. Too bad I didn''t hear that when I was 16.

>>4914329
>>4914186
>>4914133
niice

also Megan Grey at Nottingham Uni. (Sixty Symbols / Deep sky videos), so womanly.

>>4914539
yea allright

And this math chick from Numberphile
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mLQNvuZH3GU&list=UUoxcjq-8xIDTYp3uz647V5A&index=1&feature
=plcp

UK Physics student.

>>4914575

>female

>>4914579
You can't be serious. If you are, please get out of /sci/.

>>4914575
She's a youtube camwhore, i.e. a slut.

>>4914486
A counter example doesn't need to exist for you to answer his question, are you retarded?

>>4913896
only an erection a week?

>>4914595
In this case counterexamples are so non-existent that it's really hard to imagine how one would look like.

>>4914590
She was having fun on the internet. And was actually entertaining. When creeps knew of her and start giving her lots of attention she disappeared from the internet. I wouldn't call that a 'camwhore'.

>>4914621
She posts videos of herself on youtube. Please explain how this isn't camwhoring.

>>4914603
You might want to google the principle of falsifiability.

>>4914603
If it's impossible even in principle to prove a theory wrong then it isn't a theory. Confirmed for being a close-minded depressed highschooler.

>>4914625
So every person that post a video of themselves on youtube is a camwhore? I don't even know why I'm responding to you.

>>4914629
>>4914631
I do know what falsifiability is and it would be possible to make up a theoretical counterexample but that would be so far away from reality that we don't need to think about it. A theory that is 100% true, whenever tested, can be considered a fact.

>>4914637
That's the definition of camwhore, you idiot.

>>4914642
"There are small blue fairies behind everyone. Whenever you look, they hide."

You can't be proved wrong as long as you keep this insane idea that you have some magic insight that lets you assert what everyone else's motivations are.

>>4914657
I don't care about motivations. I just observe behaviour. It's science, empirical.

>>4914657
He's an asshole.

>>4914662
No, I'm a nice guy. Women are assholes.

>>4914664
Your whore criteria spoke solely about motivations. And no, making unfalsifiable assertions does not make you a scientist.

>>4914679
There is nothing unfalsifiable in asserting that women are shallow whores. What part of it don't you understand? Are you trying to troll me?

>>4914683
Then you should be able to give a criteria for which it can be falsified.

>>4914621
the way he takes photos of himself is what makes him a camwhore

>>4914719
I gave you criteria. Didn't you read the thread?

>>4914739
Your criteria was a collection of motivations and unknowable preferences that you feel entitled to assert people have.

8/10 would have banged

>>4914765
Nope. We can objectively observe that women are repelled by intelligence and attracted to douchebaggery. Just watch their behaviour. Or are you one of those "hard science" trolls who don't accept any empirical science that doesn't involve lots of number crunching?

>>4914787
LOL
It's not "intelligence" they find unattractive. It's a lack of social confidence. But the fact that you confuse the two speaks volumes.

>>4914792
What you call "social confidence" does actually mean being loud, rude and anti-intellectual. Things which an intelligent person avoids.

>>4914799
hahahahaha autism much?

>>4914799
>What you call "social confidence" does actually mean being loud, rude and anti-intellectual.
False dichotomies everywhere.

>>4914806
Why do you keep calling intelligence "autism"? That's exactly the attitude that ruins our society.

>>4914808
How is it a false dichotomy? I doubt you know what that means.

I have fapped to Abigail Doyle

rich jew

she went to an exclusive private high school that costs >$30k/yr

>>4914821
and she has no tits

>>4914814
You're packaging people into two camps, pretending that all the differing traits of each are inseparable.

This leads you to believe that all people with social confidence are "loud, rude and anti-intellectual", and that this is the only class of people that girls like. It's just not the case.

>>4914799
>>4914814
by your definition Neil deGrasse Tyson is anti-intellectual

>>4914825
But that's how it is. You were the one who said women are attracted to social confidence. Social confidence and intelligence are mutually exclusive.

>>4914826
Of course he is. He promotes pop sci.

TL, DR

recently attended a comp chem summer school with 20% women, mostly scandinavian. Yes, there were hotties.

>>4914832

>>4914821
>>4914821
>>4914821

shit
forgot the Web site:

http://www.princeton.edu/chemistry/faculty/profiles/doyle/

Abigail Doyle
hot rich ivy league cunt chemist

>>4914832
>Social confidence and intelligence are mutually exclusive.
This is why I said "false dichotomy".

This is a false dichotomy.

>>4914832
>Social confidence and intelligence are mutually exclusive
by your definition Neil deGrasse Tyson is unintelligent
and carl sagan and hitchens and dawkins and hawkings...

Proof: that hot asian girls exist.

>>4914847
that made me vomit a bit. fucker!! urgh asian females wuuuaargh

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DR2p07k8x_A&feature=plcp


???????

>>4914843
Of course they are. They are fucking retards who failed to do real science and went into pop sci instead.

>>4914844
Calling fallacies is not an argument. I think you're trolling. There is no false dichotomy.

>>4914849
she looks good, but civil engineer and now studying global management 8/10

>>4914859
>Calling fallacies is not an argument
Uh, what? I'm pointing out the specific way in which your thinking is flawed. I did it in detail. I think YOU'RE trolling.

> There is no false dichotomy.
Yes there is. You said
>Social confidence and intelligence are mutually exclusive.
This is not true. It is a false dichotomy. You think it's a choice between stereotypical fratboys and stereotypical nerds, and that no other types of people exist. It's not true.

Did you get all of your reasoning from watching "Revenge of the nerds" or something?

>>4914868
You keep asserting your claims but you fail to post any evidence.

>>4914868
you're being trolled to shit, can't you tell?

>>4914868
NERRRRRRRRRRDS

>>4914837
Let's just say she wins and /thread

>>4914894
Wins what? The flat chest and face that could cut a roast award of the year?

>>4914856
Come on, isn't the choice obvious? Asian girls ftw!

>>4914787

Remember this post you made?
>>4914460

>>4914799
Feynman? Oppenheimer?

Tycho Fucking Brahe?

>>4914967
So what?

>>4914979
Those are names. What are trying to say?

>>4914967
That guy is a douchebag and probably underage or a manchild. Anyway I do believe women are not capable of loving only one man, but I also believe men are not capable either. It's not that women are the bad ones, the whole marriage and monogamy shit is a lie. But it definitely is not a "women are attracted to loud and rude people and not to the intelligent ones" thing.

>>4914989
Show me one woman that is attracted to intelligence. There is none.

>>4914989
My problem is exactly that I'm not a douchebag and cannot be a douchebag because I'm intelligent. If I was a douchebag, I'd have no problem with getting lots of women.

>>4915001

>>4914967

Someone pointed out that nearly all people in the upper reaches of human intelligence that have the appropriate desire are able to find mates. You ended up having to just assert that despite the conspicuous evidence, they "only wanted their status or [usually nonexistent] money." i.e, you're using your own oracle to tell you that your hypothesis is right, i.e, you're not really opening yourself up to falsifiability.

>>4914987

They're all people that fall on both sides of your false dichotomy.

>>4915003

Oh believe me, you play off being one pretty damn well.

>>4915009
>nearly all people in the upper reaches of human intelligence

Wrong. There are only a very few examples.

>>4915014
They don't "fall on both sides". Stop making assertions that you can't back up.

>>4915071
And for sure he wasn't intelligent.

>>4915022
Do you know anything about Brahe? He was extremely loud and extroverted. He had nightly parties.

>>4915088
I am neither trolling nor ignorant. Are you projecting?

>>4915076
Are you just trying to troll?

Because if you are then it's working as your ignorance and autism, wether faked or real are making me....upset.

>>4915091
Oh, you sure as fuck are ignorant then, and continue to hold your warped views, despite having the option of checking your facts, therefore I'll simply invite you to look up the subjects we were discussing and hope you can realize your mistakes, false dychotomies and general ignorance of the subject of the correlation of intelligence with social skills and success at finding an attractive partner, and point you towards a board with content and views I believe you will find more...suitable to yours

>>>/r9k/

>>4915076

He created the incredibly complex and incredibly accurate Tychonic system, he proved that stars were not atmospheric phenomena by novel use of the parallax principle, and vastly improved our understanding of lunar phenomena. He's widely regarded as one of the most gifted astronomers of all time, what on earth leads you to believe he wasn't intelligent?

Also, Feynman then. Fratty as fuck as an undergrad, enjoyed smoking weed and partying later in life, extremely social.

>>4915103
Now you are too obvious, troll. You don't have any arguments, keep making obviously wrong assertions and now you go ad hominem. I told you multiple times why my position is right and yours is wrong. Btw I still don't intend to visit r9k.

>>4915015

Find five important scientists that were perpetually single, I'll find five that weren't. We can continue to exhaustion if you like, I'm sure you'll run out before I do.

>>4915117
An intelligent would never smoke weed or go to a party. Your pop sci hero is retarded, which is also backed up by his poor performance on IQ tests.

>>4915015

I don't think that's true, but regardless you're missing the point. To handle the counter examples you needed to invoke a pure assertion that their wives *must* have been looking for prestige or wealth, you're using your conclusion to argue for itself.

>>4915119
If I were trolling I'd simply have resorted to say:

LOLOLOLOLOLOLO LOOK AT THIS POOR FATLOSER WHO WANTS TO FORCE EVERYBODY TO THINK LIKE HIM BECASUE HE DOESNT HAS ANY FRIENDS OR GF AND IS UGLY AND SHORT AND HAS A SMLL DICK AND NO FRIENDS U MAD BOI? U MAD?

However, I am not, and thus, such verbal declarations will be left unspoken.

>>4915119
How stupid are you? Dropping names is just a way to distract from the actual topic.

>>4915121
>IQ Tests
>Indicative of actual intelligence or of how much you will contribute to science and our understanding of the universe

>>4915124
Except that this would have been more true than your pretentious pseudoarguments.

>>4915131
Full retard? We are talking about intelligence and not contributions to science. Any idiot can contribute to science just by hard work.

ITT: shitposting

>>4915124

I don't think that's meant for me.

>>4915125
>>4915125

You said "there are only a few examples." I offered to list examples of the case and wagered that I could do so for longer than you could list examples to the contrary. If you can think of a cleaner way to test your claim I'd be glad to hear it.

>>4915133

Any idiot can make groundbreaking to QM and QED through sheer diligence?

If intelligence isn't necessary to advance science, why do you value it so highly?

Also, I notice you never explained to him your basis for dismissing Brahe.

>>4915138
You can't list examples. That would be biased, you moron. Most intelligent people stay forever unknown and most of the examples you'd give wouldn't be intelligent people but douchebags who got famous for achievements they made by hard work instead of intelligence.

My claims don't need to be tested, they are nothing but descriptions of observable reality. You are making unrealistic claims, so it's up to you to prove them. Show me one woman that is not a shallow whore.

>>4915143
I explained it, retard. Can't you read?

http://personal.lse.ac.uk/Kanazawa/pdfs/I2011.pdf

Woooooooooooh

>>4915152
Totally irrelevant. Just like intelligence physical attractiveness means nothing to women, when you're not a loud and anti-intellectual idiot.

>>4915149
I've reread all the posts 3 times and still can't figure out where you did.

>>4915164
Someone who repeatedly behaves anti-intellectually can't be intelligent.

>>4915159
W-what?

So you won't be happy until we accept anyone who has a shot at getting a pretty girl has to be an anti-intellecutal fuck and all other attractive traits are meaningless and, that having a superior intelligence is better than working hard for a goal even if you don't do jack shit with said intelligence?

>>4915168

Sure they can, it'd be what we call a "counter example."

>>4915173
No, that would be a contradiction. Are you retarded?

>>4915176
Exactly, this is what I'm saying.

>>4915184
Wow, I sincerely pity you. What a sad human being.

>>4915184

1) you assert that "anyone who acts 'anti-intellectual,'" whatever on earth that means, can't be intelligent
2) examples of intelligent people that do so are presented.

One of these needs to be dismissed, that's why it's a counter example. Parsimony and common sense both suggest that the problem lies with #1. You can dismiss #2 instead if you want, but it'd require a good deal of argument BEYOND pure assertion that #1 is "just the way it is"

>>4915190
Of course I'm sad. I'm surrounded by retards who can't value intelligence.

>>4915192
Goddamnit, you are really stupid. What more arguments do you need? It's all in the thread. Learn to read.

>>4915200
Why would they value intelligence? You've already said that it's not necessary for scientific progress.

>>4915200
You actually haven't yet provided any reason to think that "anti-intellectual behavior" (again, poorly defined) and intelligence are mutually exclusive.

>>4915215
Go watch some jersey shore. That's more on your level. I give it up. You're hopeless.

>>4915217
It's not necessary but it makes it much easier not only to contribute to science but also to achieve nearly every other goal in life.

>229 posts and 31 image replies omitted. Click Reply to view.
Dear god.

>>4915217
Come on, don't give up on me now! If you've already said it so many times would it really be that much effort to copy/paste one of your explanations?

>>4915224
Weird that so many of the greats are idiots (by your standard) then.

>>4915229
>god

Keep your imaginary friend out of /sci/.

>>4915243
>Doesn't understand the simple concept of "figures of speech"

>>4915284
>doesn't understand that there is no magic man in the sky

Samantha Carter.

>>4915243
My bad.

Dear Satan*

>>4914161
the only really pretty so far ...
and, as expected, not from math, physics or the like ..

>>4915234
>>4915232
Holy shit, I think you finally won. Your perseverance astounds me.

>>4913863
None of you are scientists. You hate women because you're angry little virgin boys. This thread is pathetic. I'm leaving /sci/ forever.

There's one person in this thread that was heavily bashing women.