/sci/ - Science & Math

>mfw I got this chick to start spitting senseless shit about not eating meat a few years ago

This person is amazingly stupid.

>>4879910
no she fucking isnt, prick.

>>4879914
Yes, she is. Her pseudo-intellectual drivel is nearly as bas as yours.

>>4879914

>>4879914

>pls guise im not so dumb stop laugh att me :((

>>4879921
he wasnt talking about me, he was talking about FvR.
neither of us are dumb, try actually fucking watching her videos.

>>4879923
>neither of us are dumb

Does FvR know the mathematical concept of limits?

>>4879923
She just comes of as desperate to sound smart to me. And I can't deal with her doofy awkward grin. Don't know why, just puts me off what she's talking about.

>>4879926
how about you try paying attention to the actual content of the video, then!

>>4877962
vidya is boring. nice screencap tho' :)
------
subject of 'religion vs atheists' is done to death
for a shitstorm try defending non-violent child molesters

I really don't like this girl, she's dumb and all the people in the comments are uneducated fucking morons.

My picture's from this comments on this video though.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LyKdYTzMqWo&feature=plcp

>>4879930
What she's saying is terribly uneducated, rhetorically clumsy and devoid of deeper thought.

>>4879930
I did, but it's so poorly presented I keep going losing track and getting annoyed with her.

>>4879930
I think we can all agree, you are a fucking idiot.

>>4879935
>>4879936
>opinions
fine. no1's forcing you to watch her videos. youtube is a big place, go watch someone else.

what EK stands for?

Daily EK shitposting thread?

>>4879944
exa kelvin

>>4879943
Objectively verifiable criticism is more than just an opinion.

>>4879943
I've spoken to FactVsReligion on several occasions. Her mind's pretty much totaled from all the acid she's dropped.

>>4879944
Her middle initials. Her name is Rose Elizabeth Kelly-Lines.

>>4877962

http://poll.pollcode.com/wcyj

>>4879948
thx

>>4879948
That's pretty hot

...

just like you.

>>4879950
hahahha!, oh wow!
so you can 'objectively verify' the following?

> terribly uneducated
>rhetorically clumsy
>devoid of deeper thought.
>poorly presented

ha, i dont think so

>You will never know what EK looks like

>>4879943
And no one is forcing you to come into a thread talking about her videos and pulling your standard bullshit.
There are plenty of other boards on 4chan, why don't you find one you can actually contribute to?

>>4879960
It's easy to verify. Just watch the video. Duh. You're not very bright, are you?

>>4879963
She poasted a picture of her leg yesterday. Thread's still up. >>4877711

>>4879964
>And no one is forcing you to come into a thread...
wtf are you taling about? the OP doest even make any sense, and this is clearly a cancer-thread.

>>4879965
ah, to verify if my OPINION agrees with what you wrote?
uhuh, great.

also sage.
the vids good, but atheism still aint a /sci/ topic.

>>4879973
>the vids good

No.

>>4879977
still just your opinion!
she has loads of subscribers and her vids get loads of likes

you're on your own, pal.

>>4879930
I've watched about 3 videos of her now.
They aren't the smartest...

In one video she talks about how her "expressing herself" by drawing mohammed is more important than someone else getting their feelings hurt. Then she goes on to say how she doesn't say these without "due consideration" and Muslims shouldn't care and should be the bigger person.

Who fucking died and left her in charge of deciding how people acted. Mohammed is something Muslims hold very dear, it's only natural they would get pissed if you defaced him.

She's insulting people and telling them they're in the wrong if they get mad about it. That's toddler logic at best.


She dumb.

>>4879984
they are wrong to get mad about it
if muslims dont want to draw muhammed, thats fine, no1's forcing them to

do they have the right to demand that non-muslims also follow their rules, and dont depict muhammed?
fuck no!
if buddists started acting like that, there'd be 'draw buddah day'
its not about islam, its not about trying to be offensive, its about free speech and defending our rights!

EK will you go out with me? I think you're intelligent :3

>>4879983
You have to work pretty hard to get more dislikes than likes on YouTube. The fact she has comments and subscribers just means she's slightly less retarded than the average YouTube poster. That's still pretty retarded.

>>4879998
lel, tends not to work out so well over the internet, does it?
sorry hun.

>>4879983
>you're on your own, pal.
Wrong, I support his opinion.

>>4879984
>She dumb.
That's why EK likes her

>>4879994
>they are wrong to get mad about it
Fuck, you're dense.
I mean that intellectually and physically.

can somebody give me an update on EK?
didn't she publish her trip and tell that she would go anon.?

>>4880004
no it fucking isnt. at least she's using her channel to talk about important topics, and not the usual random shit that youtube tards put up.

>>4880023
>inane religion trolling garbage
>important topic

choose one

>not jerking off to the mental image of EK fingering herself while performing cunnilingus on FvR

>>4880022
yeh i did:
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/thread/S4234898

that lasted quite a while. at least a month, but i ended up making a new trip; some anons requested that i come back. :)

>>4880029
/sci/ is not youtube.
she's perfectly free to talk about atheism there.
it aint 'trolling garbage'

>>4879994
Just because you have freedoom of speech doesn't mean you have to exercise it by using it as an excuse to insult people.

That's like punching someone in the face just because you can.

It's dumb. My point still stands.

>>4880033
This post made me gay.

>>4880034
We missed having a laughingstock.
You know, someone every one can hate.

>>4880042
Tell me how spouting inane and uneducated drivel about religion is not trolling garbage.

>>4880034
does this trip still work?

>>4880043
it isnt insulting people! its just making a drawing of someone.
in some cases it was even just a stickman, or suchlike. nothing insulting at all.

the fact is they SHOULDNT be insulted by that, the fact that they are clearly shows that they're too sensitive, and need to chill teh fuck out and deal with it.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGjCrPk5y_Q

>>4880050
Enjoy your autoban

>>4880050
of course; trips are eternal.
:)

Okay, lemme break this down.

'Do atheists believe something can come from nothing?'

They do if they understand cosmology, and the words 'something' and 'nothing.' I still have a lot to learn here.

'What do you think happens to people who torture each other?'

Can we please not have this on /sci/? I think I'm starting to see why people want a >>>/phi/ board.

'How do atheists deal with the uncertainty that hell might exist?'

How do theists deal with the uncertainty that a narwhal might bacon at midnight and impale them doing so? Yay more loaded >>>/phi/ questions.

'What do yo u, if you don't pray?'

We do shit. Shit gets done. Praying is for people, like country singers, who want to feel like they are doing something. If you wanna make a difference, get off your ass and make it. Donate to that charity. Fix that fence. Help those in need. That's how we do shit.

Geezus, that video hurt my head. Geezus.

>>4880055
>trips are eternal
>trips
>GETs trip dubs

>>4880049
>spouting
>inane
>uneducated
>drivel
>trolling
garbage
jajaja, more buzzwords, plz.

you clearly dont like her, you're entitled to your opinion. your also entitled to fuck off and not bother watching her vids, if all you do is complain.

>>4880052
Hey EK, y'know evolution really is just a theory? More than 40% of Americans don't believe in that theory, and I'm one of them. Can you prove evolution is true?

>>4880057
I remember that tripfag. You are the guy who talks about things he doesn't understand. For example manifolds.

>>4880052
This picture is an insult to them!

If I call a white man a nigger it's not insulting to him but the same doesn't apply to every person on earth.

Holy fuck. Still dumb!

>>4880060
You know, the other day I was wrong about what manifolds were. I admitted when I was wrong. I didn't know about them. Not that they had anything to do with anything in that thread. I was wrong, on that point.

Can't you let things go when you get them wrong, too?

>>4880060
People like her shouldn't be allowed to make videos. What we need is more education and not more retardation.

Here are some EK trips, enjoy:

#Ls|b5^Da
#Nz@Uk`PJ
#?l@QpmxZ
#~e@@_0:l
#tIoNjN[2
#s2X?toDP
#z^uCVv70
#11b8B|%$
#PS./86B]
#`3:2H-u\
#[ZXUVKeJ

>>4880063
please see:
>>4880066
Perhaps you missed the other thread. I took my blame. I am made new again. I am a reborn mathematician, so to speak.

>>4880066
And you totally didn't troll and shitpost about what manifolds are not before admitting that you don't know them, right?

>>4880066
EK had the same problem. For her it was limits of sequences.

>>4880054
[sarcasm] yes, because autobans clearly come with some arbitrary time limit programmed into them [/sarcasm]
it aint an autoban, its just that 1 mod has it out for me, and if he confuses my old trip with me, he might ban you.

>>4880061
i guess not, creationism sounds far more likely, IMO.

>>4880064
i dont care, i still have the right to fucking draw anyone i want.
anyone who tries to say otherwise can eat shit and die
my life, my freedom.

>>4880066
of course i can, but this is about opinions, not right/wrong
i like her, you dont
end of.

>>4880071
>here are trips that are similar, but were never actually used by EK
FTFY
and good for you, hun. good for you.

>>4880073
I admitted I was wrong. Is it better to troll, or troll about trolls? how many other people on this board admit to being wrong, and still keep their trips? you know, I can be anon, too.

>>4880079
You never typed peanut butter or weaboo back in the day, did you?

>>4880079
>all that mad

>>4880072
>I am made new again.
No, you're not. You're a confirmed shitposter and a giant faggot. A reasnoable poster would have told us right from the beginning that he doesn't know the topic.

>>4880078
my core argument as still correct (a spiky circle isnt a true circle)
it's just that some of the math/explanation in between, i fucked up a bit on.
and i admitted it.

>>4880079
It's not about opinions if we are talking, as in the first question, about science. Science is about observations.

>>4880089
No, you fucking retard. Your argument is entirely wrong.

Stop pretending to be a youtube girl.

>>4880008
How about just a blowjob then?

>>4880095
[sarcasm] yes, you're correct, i cant believe i didnt see it before, OF COURSE circles are spiky, it seems so obvious now [/sarcasm]

>>4880081
The problem is, even when you do know what you're talking about you come off as an unbelievable ass.
We don't want to forgive you because despite you admitting being wrong we know you're just going to make an ass out of yourself again.

>>4880089
>spiky circle
>spiky
>circle

By that logic, a triangle is a spiky circle.

Why do we still have trips? It does nothing but create drama and derail threads.

>>4880097
ah yeh, thats totally different, they do work over the internet, of course.

>>4880096
im not, which is pretty clear seein gas:
A.) im not OP
2.) i referred to her as FvR, in 3rd person, not as EK.
D.) i cant count and i'm inconsistent.

>>4880079
Some one should eat shit and die because you can't deal with not being able to draw a picture of mohammed?

It's not even as if you have a passion for doing that thing, you could go your whole life without doing it and it wouldn't effect you at all!

STOP BEING SO EGOTISTICAL AND STUPID, GET THE FUCK OF /SCI/ ARRHRHFRHIUOEFHGIUEHIU!!!

FUCK.
YES I'M MAD AND YOUR STILL DUMB!

>>4880101
I know.

We are legion
We do not forgive
We do not forget
Expect us

etc etc etc.

now go all script-kiddy and make sure the pool is closed, because anons are all samefags.

>>4880105
>a
>2
>d
A.D.D.?

>>4880110
>Some one should eat shit and die because you can't deal with not being able to draw a picture of mohammed?
i can draw/write/create whatever i like, as long as i dont plagiarise.
if i want to draw anything, even a religious prophet, then i fucking will!

>>4880100
>still doesn't understand limits

>>4880116
So, if we are allowed to draw anything, like conclusions about who you are (youtube girl, for example), then why are you getting mad about it?

As you said, something about eating shit?

>>4880121
yeh i do, i read up on them the other day.
test me, faggot

>>4880116
but why would you want to?
You don't even need too, plus you know when you do do it it would upset others.

This isn't you "stand up for freedom of speech".
It's you abusing it to have an excuse to hurt others.

>>4880122
i dont get mad about it, nobody said i was 'a youtube girl' or FvR, or anything like that, 7/7/11-fags are saying something completely different (and still wrong)

>>4880112
And there is problem number two with you. You have this weird constant assumption that there is only one person aside from you in a thread, so if two people disagree with you then they are clearly samefagging.

And also, I have no idea what toy are talking about with anonymous and scripting. I'm just straight up telling you dude, you're a jackass. So you're damn right no one is gonna give you a second chance, anyone who does is too good for this board.

>>4880125
holy shit! my housmate said the exact same thing when i tried to get her to participate.
thats almost word for word, that is so fucking creepy...

and anyway, i said that its not about deliberately offending people, it's about not giving into to muslim threats of violence, and not letting them push us around and dictate what we can and cant do.
it could have been anything, the point is still the same

>we demand nobody wears the colour orange on a thursday!

and i'd wear orange, just to prove i dont have to put up with their bullshit.

HEY EK REMEMBER ME?
THIS WILL GIVE YOU A CLUE
WHEN I WAS A YOUNG BOY.
FUCK YOU STUPID BITCH, STOP ATTENTION WHORING AND RUINING THIS BOARD.
YES I MAD

Wait, what is it about trip fagging that attracts cunts?

>>4880124
Let <span class="math">(a_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/spoiler] be a sequence with <span class="math">a_1 > 0 [/spoiler] and <span class="math">a_{n+1} = \frac{a_n}{1+na_{n}^{2}}[/spoiler]. Find the limit of <span class="math">(na_n)_{n\in \mathbb{N}}[/spoiler] as <span class="math">n[/spoiler] goes to infinity.
This is really an easy one and a math freshman is supposed to solve it within 15 minutes at most.

>>4880143
aww, 15 minutes? cant you just give me a quick one?
also, i didnt see it in this format before, wtf are you actually asking?

>>4880146
I'm asking for the limit of the sequence. You should be able to solve this.

>>4880137
It's you upsetting them which is making them violent.
It's not a threat it's a retaliation.
You are the one in the wrong here, not them.
Why can't you see that?

Also tell your room mate he/she is awesome!

>>4880137
But then, the violence is part of their freedom of speech, by that logic, because if you don't agree, then they will literally make you eat shit and die. It's the same attitude, it's just not as passive-aggressive as you.

>>4880134
And there is problem number two with you. You have this weird constant assumption that I have to assume that every anon is a different anon. Why can't y'all just use insecure (#) tripcodes and be done with it? I kinda wish all boards were forced anon, but until then...? Why should I worry about which of you is which when I have no reason to do so? Quit pushing the burden of proof to me. I'm not asking you to prove god doesn't exist, don't ask me to prove the anons aren't the same.

Also, if you all aren't the same, then you are hardly legion.

>>4880153
No one is legion here. This is /sci/, not /b/.

>>4880156
Then quit being anonymous.

>>4880159
No, it's an anonymous image board...
You go to a username forum.

>>4880150
erm, i might do a bit more reading first. ask me again in a few days or so. i'm sure you'll still be here...fucking limits-fag anon. you seem to be here even more than me.

>>4880152
>Also tell your room mate he/she is awesome!
haha, fuck no.

and so you're saying they DESERVE to be upset about people drawing a fucking picture??
yeh? and we should just totally bend over and let them make their demands on us, what we can and cant draw/create whatever, and they can make us do whatever they like, just by getting so fucking 'offended', rite?

and then what? hmm? you think they wont fucking abuse that power?
maybe they get 'offended' if 'history of islam' isnt taught in public schools, or whatever.
should we give them that as well/
maybe they get offended by hearing the word 'christmas'
should we stop saying it? shall we start calling it 'super happy generic winter holiday incorporating various faiths and beliefs'
huh? yeh?

>>4880159
Holy fucking shit, you just got right out of /b/.
Seriously get the fuck out.
"Legion" hasn't existed for year and never will again.

>>4880153
>>4880153
... What are you even talking about. who even said "legion"? burden of proof?
Are you holding a conversation with me and two of the voices in your head or something?

>>4880159
Seriously? You expect all of /sci/ to adapt to your convention of taking on a name rather than conforming and dropping yours? Fuck off.

>>4880169
>>4880163
>>4880167
>>4880168

Sure is samefag in here. And here I thought I was only arguing with one anon. Or am I?

>>4880153
>But then, the violence is part of their freedom of speech, by that logic
violence isnt speech
they can say what they like, they just cant DO what they like, especially if what they're doing is brutally murdering innocent people

(and yes, they do. more than 100 people were murdered by muslims in the aftermath of the first draw mohammed day)

>>4880169
If we drop ours, then we just become common rabble like the rest of you.

rabble rabble rabble

>>4880166
Noooo, you're not getting it.

It would be wrong if they imposed not eating meat on everyone because, that actaully effects everyone.

However if it's something as trivial as drawing their profit then it shouldn't actually matter to us too much should it?

Be the bigger person.. Like whatever her face said in that video.

>>4880170
You arent, I am not the first guy, check for samefag.
Oh right, you dont know how to.
Heres a tip.
>>>google.
>>4880173
And the alternative is to be a humongous tripfaggot, G I wonder which I will chose
SAGE.

>>4880170
Maybe you just said something really stupid and a lot of people are all falling out of there chairs and get annoyed with your nonsense and have a strong desire to point out that your nonsense is, in fact nonsense.

>>4880172
Only in America and most western countries do my rights end where yours begin. With great power comes great responsibility. If you have the ability to create less suffering, and you want others to create less suffering, and your free speech creates more suffering, then can't you see how that feeds on and fuels the process?

amidoingitright.png

>>4880166
Nothing like a good old slippery slope fallacy.

>>4880172
Yes and that's unfortunate, but the people who started "Draw mohammed day" are as much to blame as the muslims since they didn't fucking think about the consequences of their actions.

Those people died because some faggots wanted to piss of muslims because they could.

>>4880178
No, I don't reckon, because putting #example isn't exactly inconvenient, especially when your browser remembers it. Does it make you less anonymous? You can change it, and it isn't even secure. ##example would be secure.

>>4880174
>It would be wrong if they imposed not eating meat on everyone because, that actaully effects everyone.

>However if it's something as trivial as drawing their profit then it shouldn't actually matter to us too much should it?
*shudder* again, nearly word for word.

it doesnt matter what they're demanding, its the PRINCIPLE of it.
sure, i dont NEED to draw their prophet, but then, you could say that nobody NEEDS to eat meat, so maybe if veggie-fags get 'offended' by meat eaters, is that a fair demand?
of course not.

if you show weakness, and you show even a tiny bit, that you'll let their religiosu beliefs have control over none believers, then yyour starting off a viscious cycle, where they'll push yo uto see just how far they can make you go; what otehr freedoms they can make you give up, and in what otehr ways they can hold islam to a higher priority and value over otehr peoples lives.

you gotta fight it tooth and nail. every single step

>>4880182

No one would ever put his cock into this bullshit-spewing orifice

>>4880193
Do you have an argument that's not a slippery slope? Because its getting old.

>>4880193
Yes, and you are demanding, arbitrarily, that they not get upset about what they consider your obscenities. It's roughly the same thing. If you know it's acerbic, then it's generally not a good thing to do, and can get you in trouble sometimes.

If I put 'fuck all communists' on a bumper sticker on my car, and then someone spray paints over it, I can't be blameless for that.

That said, speech or print should not ever be met with violence, in my opinion.

>>4880189
you cant be fucking serious!!??
>oh no, dont blame the murderes! its not their fault, its the people who provoked them!
>oh no, dont rape the rapist! it was her fault for dressing sluttily, he had no choice!
>oh no, dont blame the pedophile, it was that kids choice for just looking way too sexy

>>4880204
Okay then. Don't hit back. They can't help it they hit you, it's just how they are.

>>4880192
You know what? I'm just going to go ahead and let you think that only one person in the whole works thinks you're an idiot. Asst first it bugged me, but now I think it might shatter your psyche to find out otherwise.

>>4880205
yeh? really? be weak and let faggots walk all over us?
not my way, sorry hun.

>>4880193
No!
Who cares about the principle of it?
They aren't going to take advantage of it, you're projecting your own ego onto the religion.

If they do take advantage of it then you do what you're talking about.
It doesn't make sense to punish them incase they might maybe do something when they're going to react worse because of it.

Also you're holding your freedom of speech over other peoples lives as demonstrated by the 100 people who died in draw mohammed day...

You're doing the same thing!

Also the reason me and your room mate are saying near the same thing is because there are glaring holes in your argument maybe?

>>4880204
Provoking people who have a notoriously short fuse and are known to lash out with pretty drastic measures is still not a very smart move, though.

>>4880206
Put on a tripcode and say that to my face.

>>4880210
And don't forget, it's legal in their part of the world. Not in the part where the artist resides, but in the parts where people showed the blasphemous thing against their country's religious law.

Look guys! An EK general!

Amazing!

We haven't had one for a week!

What a FUCKING record!

>>4880209
really? what are the holes then? hmm? and why did FUCKING THOUSANDS of people participate? hmm?

those 100 people who died didnt even have anything to do with it, almost certainly none of them even took part or drew muhammed.
they were just unlucky enough to be none-muslims in highly islamic areas, during the time in which all the muslims were really pissed off.

its really sad that they died, but its no1's fault except the people who murdered them.

people have the right to draw a picture, no1 has the right to FUCKING MURDER people about a picture.

>>4880204
Yes but you're not assuming responsibility if the whole thing could have been prevented if someone didn't draw a fucking cartoon of all things.

Personally I think the people who start situation are just as to blame than people who react to it.

>>4880216
I sometimes wish she'd get stomach cancer and die. I hate these threads. There should be a sticky or something warning people of responding to an EK post, she won't get the attention she's craving for so she'll go to reddit or something.

>>4880215
their religious laws are bullshit. they'd kill me just for being bi if i was in an islamicly controlled country
if their god exists, it makes people gay, or makes them bi, it creates them that way, and knows hey are that way, in all his fucking omniscience,
so making a commandment for his creation to be killed just because he made it that way, is fucking stupid.

>>4880217
Okay guise. I got this.

Why did thousands participate in Hitler's army? Thousands of people think you are wrong. Do numbers really make people right? There are more Muslims than there are atheists, does that make us wrong? Is that really your argument? I wonder how many people participate in the journey to Mecca from the three prime religions?

I agree that no one has the right to murder, over anything. People still do it. Provoking people whom you know to be violent is not the best strategy to avoid violence.

Ghandi is rolling in his grave, somewhere.

>>4880211
Wouldn't help, you would just rationalize it away as me being the one person in the world alternately using a trip and samefagging anonymously.

>>4880217
Because thousands of people, like you, are idiots.

Also the holes are the posts i've been responding to you with for the last 20 minutesish.

>>4880221
If you are an atheist, why do you care what their 'god' thinks. It is people, not god, perpetrating the wrongs. There is no logic to be had here, and your argument is somewhere around....

http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/appeal-to-emotion

among others.

>>4880224
No, because I know you aren't me, because I use a secure trip, and I know you aren't EK, because you are apparently arguing against him/her.

>>4880218
who's responsible then, hmm? it was a collective event with thousands of people
what difference could it have made if i didnt draw one?

9484 pictures instead of 9485? (random numbers, made up for sake of argment)
yeh? who cares?
they'd still be pissed off, and people would still die.

>Personally I think the people who start situation are just as to blame than people who react to it.
how can you even say that? its like saying people who dress sluttily, or are outwardly gay, or act unusually deserve whatever suffering the bigots bring upon them.
starting 'a situation' which you should have every right to freely do, is not an excuse for anyone to kill you, or hurt you, or whatever.

>>4880222
>comparing DMDers to 'hitlers army'
<<<

>>4880229
their god isnt real, so yeh, i don tcare what a FUCKING FICTIONAL being thinks about me.
muslims are real though, and some of them do kill people.

>>4880234
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/slippery-slope
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/tu-quoque
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/personal-incredulity
http://yourlogicalfallacyis.com/special-pleading


Shall I go on?

>>4880242
>comparing them to hitler's army
No. I was comparing the concept. I think you need to look up use-mention errors. I think. I could be wrong. It's happened before.

>>4880232
Three, see? You did it again. Haven't been arguing with ek.
You keep assuming there is you, ek, and one anon in the thread.

If I used a trip and disagreed with you, you would probably decide it is you, ek and one other trip that's also samefagging in the thread.

>>4880234
>Who's responsible?
Everyone who drew a picture and the muslims.

Do you know why EK?

Because if the people who drew the picture never drew a picture no one would have died.

I would elaborate but at this point I think I'm repeating myself..

>>4880078
>>4880224
>>4880245
you aren't the same? Or you meant you weren't arguing about limits with EK?

how can I know, is my point.

>>4880248
No, I think people would still have died. Suicide bombers and fundamentalists would have found another reason, eventually, to perpetrate the same crimes, for the same illogical reasons. I think the event perhaps just exacerbated that, not created it. It's a minor difference, but important I think.

>>4880246
well the concept is wrong anyway.
and yeh, there are more muslims and atheists, and yeh, far more none DMDers than DMDers, but being in the majority doesnt mean you're necessarily correct!

>I agree that no one has the right to murder, over anything. People still do it.
anything? so, you oppose the death penalty in all cases, then?

>Provoking people whom you know to be violent is not the best strategy to avoid violence.
the fault is theirs for being violent. someone drawing a fucking cartoon is not a crime, and its not wrong.

>>4880258
>so you oppose the death penalty
Yes. Didn't I make that clear?

>drawing a fucking cartoon is not a crime.
Actually, drawing cartoons of people fucking can be a crime, and would be equally obscene in this case. Loli porn, like you can find on /b/, is part of what got Ted Stephens in hot water a while back.

But like you say, drawing pictures of kids fucking is just alright, because hey, just don't find it offensive, okay?

...Is EK finally banned!?

Or did she just fuck off and delete all her comments?...

>>4880251
You can't, but the fact that you automatically assume every post disagreeing with you shows pretty clearly you have some issues.
You even go to the extent ofaccusing people of samefagging when writing style alone is enough to tell them apart. When given a easy way to check for same fags you counter with the response that people can avoid it, and therefore everyone does and therefore there is only one person that disagrees with you, all without even checking.

You got problems dude, either with criticism or with self esteem.