/sci/ - Science & Math

0/10

yeah, a guess.

just read this and you will be 1/1000 closer to understanding
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evolution

Is that you OP in the pic?

op is rigth

>>4705563
A theory does not just mean a guess.
When scientists use the word theory, they mean that they have a lot of facts and evidence, and the theory has been rigorously tested.

But, it IS a house!

ohlookthisthreadagain.jpg

>>4707292
replying to copypasta

>>4707292
>>4707292

Harriet you are fucking dumb.

>>4707312
No I am not.
An untested guess is known as a 'hypothesis' in the scientific community.
If that hypothesis has a lot of evidence indicating that it is correct, then it becomes a theory.

Evolution is a theory just like the theory of gravity is a theory, and both are true.

>>4707338
Harriet, you are fucking dumb dumb.

>>4707346
Stop insulting my waifu.

>>4707346
No I am not, a scientific theory does not mean the same thing as when people say they have a 'theory' in everyday discourse where they mean that they just have an idea.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scientific_theory

>>4707356
>>4707356
It's not an insult if it's true. I'm just calling a spade a spade. If she's dumb enough to fall for this troll after it having been around a thousand time, then she's a dumbass, plain and simple.

Harriet and EK make me believe women should be forcefully kept away from anything relating to science.

>>4707292
>>4707338
>dat tenuous grasp of 'scientific theory'

>>4707365
It is not a troll, it is a common misconception, and the word theory is often misused.
The OP does not properly understand the word when it is used in the context 'theory of evolution'

>>4707374
lel

3/10

>>4707374
>it is not a troll
pffffffffffAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA, OH WOW!!!!!

NOT A TROLL....HAHA....FUCKING A....LOL'D SO HARD.

Whooo....you are fucking retarded.

>>4707374
jesus fucking christ! you dont get it do you!??
let me do you a favour:
https://archive.installgentoo.net/sci/image/TSupQ1EMo1u-haow_AuVlQ

>>4707374
They think ur dumb becus u reply to troll threads that gets posted here pretty much every day, not becus what u wrote is false.

Altho given that ur a regular, it is strange that u shud fall for this. So, i'm thinking it might be a fake Harriet. I dunno.

>>4707386

Harriet has always been an elaborate troll. Fakes some kind of aspergers which becomes clear as she fails to understand simple jokes. When an OP starts a controversial thread, she is always the first to post with an opinion that the majority of /sci/ does not hold.

...So I am now forced to consider the possibility that Harriet is actually an extremely elaborate troll who pretends to genuinely be the shittiest poster on /sci/ and to think she's actually helpful while actually laughing her (well, his) ass off at all the people who get buttfrustrated trying to reason with her.
Or maybe she really is just EK's trolling persona.

>>4707409
Which might be a somewhat valid theory, if we didn't already know Harriet and EK's identities.

>>4707409
>>4707409
As crazy as it sounds, she's real and she's as dumb as she appears (no matter how impossible that may seem).

Above pic related, the beefy cunt chugging some piss.

>>4707415

I am forever skeptical about this, they look too well adjusted to waste time trolling on a science board.

Why are we completely certain thats them again?

>>4707427
That's the thing though. They're not trolling, just hilariously stupid.

One's a psychology student, and the other miraculously manages to beat her stupidity by being a zoology student.

>mfw I kinda see your point because this shit seems like a sitcom that would write itself

>>4707427
The pic is not them, you gullible 7/7/11 fag.

>>4707448
EK doesn't study zoology and Harriet doesn't study psychology. Naming these soft / pseudo sciences is part of their troll and they actually don't know shit about them.

>>4707427
I'm pretty damn certain it's her. You should have seen the thread where she was tracked down, barring some sort alien intervention it's a certainty.

Evolution is just a guass.

>>4707453
>7/7/11 fag.
EK, you're the only one who actually uses this term. You're not clever by going anonymous because no one would ever support you. So as soon as you say anything in defense of yourself, it's obvious that it's you posting.

>>4707464
lel u've been trolled

>>4707415
Dear Americans. Not all British females are this repulsive. Some British females are actually rather attractive, I swear on my life.

>>4707465
>implying you're not EK or harriet

Fuck off, you're not fooling anybody. That thread lies in the glorious archives as a monument to your colossal stupidity.

There's no evidence for 7/7/11. Keep your conspiracy theories to /x/.

>>4707500
>>4707500
Defend your fellow triphomo all you, doesn't change the facts.
>http://chanarchive.org/4chan/sci/13660/question-for-ek#3347752

>>4707521
I'm not defending anyone. I'm just saying that baseless beliefs don't belong on a science board.

>>4707525
My tulpa disagrees.

>>4707531
1. Tulpas are nonsense.
2. Opinions are irrelevant to science. Provide evidence.

Evolution doesnot exist.

we are all created from the ejaculation of Anubis.

>my panda's face when EK and Harriet don't leave /sci/ forever

why is ASR in the back of his car

>>4707521

Thread does not lie

>>4707539
HI I'M A TULPA THERE'S THE PROOF SCIENCE 4THAWIN LELELEL

>>4707389
>EK cant prove that its a troll with limits
lol, EK cant into babby mathz

but the empircal data makes the chance of theory being incorrect close to zero