/sci/ - Science & Math

Because that's a man
>That jaw

>need to see tits to decide

Because "queen of /so and so/" is some straight up derp-tier /b/ shit

because she isn't EK ;_;

is ek a girl? how do you know?

>>4671079

ek is man

>>4671079
we dont know for sure but its wonderful to imagine her tight cunt bouncing up and down on my dick as she pees on me

>>4671084
That's really cool. I would like to know then. EK looks a nice person. If it is a girl it would be funny.

>>4671084
>EK
>tight cunt
pick one

>>4671075
EK is not the queen either.
/sci/ does not need a queen; no board does.

because I don't see any science on that board except childish drawings.

Also so much newfaggtry in here, no one here can seem to remember the day we finally knew who EK is.

>>4671100
Yes she is.

>>4671101
Who it was? How long you all been here?

>>4671101
Why so much hate on newfags? Don't you remember when you were a little one too?

>>4671109
it was found out in july

>>4671111
It wasn't even a year ago if I remember well, that's why it surprises me. It was not hate, it was just me saying it's weird.

>>4671118
Any pics?

>>4671106
No she is not. There was never any sort of election or anything, and this is meaningless anyway.

>>4671119
Here she is
>>4671122
>implying queens are elected
pic related, it's the queen

>>4671122
>monarchy
>election

>>4671119
here you go

>>4671135
that's not the queen

>>4671132
They're elected by god

>>4671138
Who's that then?

Is there any king here? No? So i'm the king! Where's my Queen? Harriet?

>>4671141
FvsR

>>4671119
she regularily uses pics of herself.
pic related, it's her pic captionned from the thread when we discovered who she was.
also the archive:
http://chanarchive.org/4chan/sci/13660

>>4671146
Blackman is king.

>>4671149
That's not her picture. That's fact vs religion

>>4671149
Those are not pictures of EK. She is a fan of that girl on youtube.

>>4671153
sure Harriet, sure.

>>4671149
Wow Harriet why you so butthert abour EK? Well i thought it was just on this thread, but when I saw that >>4671149 on the archieve, you were the first one to respond. What the fuck? Are Harriet a girl as well? Does anyone have any pic of hers?

>>4671157
Harriet is EK's friend IRL. I don't know if we have pics of her though

>>4671160
Harriet looks like this

>>4671156
You disbelieve me?
You can ask EK herself, she will not lie.

>>4671157
I was not the first to respond to that thread. The tripcode is wrong.
My tripcode ends in 'SPY', but I am in that thread further down.

>>4671160
actually, look at post No 3348152 on the archive.

Thanks Harriet for shitting up another thread.

Why do you keep evading your ban?

>>4671167
dunno man...

>>4671167
What ban?
I was only ever banned once, and it was a mistake that was rectified on appeal.

So is that you Harriet?
Why isn't Harriet our queen?

So on an unrelated note:

Sauce on OP pic?

>>4671175

Dat left eye..

Archived thread speaks for itself. Definetly EK. Harriet so try hard

>>4671187
It is not EK.

>>4671175
because she is not smart

>>4671192
Harriet do you have any pics?
Why people hate you so much here and you always arguing with people?

>>4671172
Your IP is banned on a daily basis, along with all of your posts deleted.

I cannot wait until invisibro bans your tripcodes.

>>4671196
No, sorry.
I am not sure why they hate me, but it is only a few people.

>>4671199
No it is not.
What is 'invisibro'?
If the moderators wanted me banned, they would have done so by now, but I have not broken any rules, so I do not think that they will.

>>4671202
How, precisely, do you deny the amazing coincidence, and statistical improbability, of a british female with middle initials EK being friends with a person named Harriet?

>>4671203
I do not know what the probability is, but they are not us.

>>4671203
Harriet is kind of hot.

>>4671205
So you're saying that there are two pairs of two girls in britain who magically happened to be named the same thing?

>>4671191

>neuroscientist
>host of "Talk Nerdy To Me"

What a waste

>>4671210
Harriet is not a rare name.
You do not know EKs first name.

>>4671203
Well if that is true, then Harriet is way more aesthetic than EK.

>>4671212
it's way better than lib arts

>>4671216
You didn't answer my question. Do YOU truly believe there are two sets of girls in britain where one is named harriet and the other has middle initials of EK? Yes or no?

>>4671217
hey harriet posting as an anon?

>>4671063
Because of her pierced lip.

>>4671221
Yes. There are tens of millions of people in Britain.
EK will not be a rare set of initials as the big picture.

>>4671232
Harriet could I see one of your pics? Are you a girl? How old? Studying w-what?

>>4671237
I am 21 and studying psychology, but I do not want to post pictures of myself, sorry.

>>4671240
Favorite psychologist?

>>4671260
I do not have a favourite.

>>4671203
And Rose Elizabeth Kelly-Lines studies zoology. What are the odds of that?

>>4671232
British population: ~63,000,000
British females: ~31,500,000
British females between ages of 18-30: ~315,000 (very generous estimate)

Let's assume, that Harriet is wildly popular and fully one out of every thousand british females has the name harriet, we end up with ~315 Harriets between the ages of 18-30. Then you add in the probability of There being a female with a name producing middle initials of EK, which I'm generously giving the probability of saying one out of every million british females has these middle initials, and that would be ~31.5 of ALL FEMALES in britain have those initials. Then take 1% for being between the ages of 18 and 30, gives you 3.15 girls. Even if we assume that every single EK is paired with a Harriet, we'd have a 33% chance of finding the correct harriet/EK pair completely at random, this being EXTREMELY generous in your favor.

You still really believe that we found the wrong pair?

>>4671264
EK studies Zoology.
I have no idea what Rose Elizabeth Kelly-Lines studies.

This thread is not science and it is going on too long.
Time to stop.

>>4671270
you brought this upon yourself.

>>4671265
>British females between ages of 18-30: ~315,000 (very generous)

hahaa what? is the mean life span 1200 yrs old?

lrn2 to math

>>4671270
You study psychology. You don't belong here.

>>4671276
i study english lit. but i'm probably better at maths than you.

deal with it

>>4671265
You can not prove things by just making up numbers and assuming statistics.
There is probably far more than one Harriet per thousand of women.

Furthermore, that is an age gap of 12 years, and you are assuming this makes up only a tenth of the population as a whole; at an age when the people are young and fit and healthy and unlikely to die, compared to spans of 12 years further up the age range.

>>4671275
Hmmm, guess I dropped a zero along the way. The rest of my calculations are so ridiculously generous though that this is negligible. Harriet isn't nearly as popular as I suggested, there's not even close to being that many "EK"s as I said, and clearly not every single EK is paired with a harriet.

>>4671283
>There is probably far more than one Harriet per thousand of women.
>mfw I go england and every girl is named Harriet

>>4671283
Seriously, harriet? You really think we wouldn't notice you without a trip?

>>4671287
Can you name 1000 common female names that are widely used today?
I do not think so.
There are probably less than 100.
Harriet is one of them. (For that age range)

>>4671293
Why do you assume that is Harriet?

>>4671270
We were at EK's facebook page. She got butthurt, and admitted it was her, on the facebook page. It's that simple. Don't make me bring out the pictographic proofs.

>>4671283
Actually one could look p how many women named Harriet there are registered in Britain. But that is just stalking. Let's stop guys...

>>4671294
MARY 2.629 2.629 1
PATRICIA 1.073 3.702 2
LINDA 1.035 4.736 3
BARBARA 0.980 5.716 4
ELIZABETH 0.937 6.653 5
JENNIFER 0.932 7.586 6
MARIA 0.828 8.414 7
SUSAN 0.794 9.209 8
MARGARET 0.768 9.976 9
DOROTHY 0.727 10.703 10
LISA 0.704 11.407 11
NANCY 0.669 12.075 12
KAREN 0.667 12.742 13
BETTY 0.666 13.408 14
HELEN 0.663 14.071 15
SANDRA 0.629 14.700 16
DONNA 0.583 15.282 17
CAROL 0.565 15.848 18
RUTH 0.562 16.410 19
SHARON 0.522 16.932 20
MICHELLE 0.519 17.451 21
LAURA 0.510 17.961 22
SARAH 0.508 18.469 23
KIMBERLY 0.504 18.973 24
DEBORAH 0.494 19.467 25
JESSICA 0.490 19.958 26
SHIRLEY 0.482 20.439 27
CYNTHIA 0.469 20.908 28
ANGELA 0.468 21.376 29
MELISSA 0.462 21.839 30
BRENDA 0.455 22.293 31
AMY 0.451 22.745 32
ANNA 0.440 23.185 33
REBECCA 0.430 23.615 34
VIRGINIA 0.430 24.044 35
KATHLEEN 0.424 24.468 36
PAMELA 0.416 24.884 37
MARTHA 0.412 25.297 38
DEBRA 0.408 25.704 39
AMANDA 0.404 26.108 40
STEPHANIE 0.400 26.508 41
CAROLYN 0.385 26.893 42
CHRISTINE 0.382 27.275 43
MARIE 0.379 27.655 44
JANET 0.379 28.034 45


1/203

>>4671298
Bring it on

>>4671294
CATHERINE 0.373 28.408 46
FRANCES 0.370 28.777 47
ANN 0.364 29.141 48
JOYCE 0.364 29.505 49
DIANE 0.359 29.864 50
ALICE 0.357 30.221 51
JULIE 0.348 30.568 52
HEATHER 0.337 30.905 53
TERESA 0.336 31.241 54
DORIS 0.335 31.577 55
GLORIA 0.335 31.912 56
EVELYN 0.322 32.233 57
JEAN 0.315 32.548 58
CHERYL 0.315 32.863 59
MILDRED 0.313 33.176 60
KATHERINE 0.313 33.489 61
JOAN 0.306 33.795 62
ASHLEY 0.303 34.098 63
JUDITH 0.297 34.395 64
ROSE 0.296 34.691 65
JANICE 0.285 34.975 66
KELLY 0.283 35.258 67
NICOLE 0.281 35.539 68
JUDY 0.276 35.815 69
CHRISTINA 0.275 36.090 70
KATHY 0.272 36.362 71
THERESA 0.271 36.633 72
BEVERLY 0.267 36.900 73
DENISE 0.264 37.164 74
TAMMY 0.259 37.423 75
IRENE 0.252 37.675 76
JANE 0.250 37.925 77
LORI 0.248 38.173 78
RACHEL 0.242 38.415 79
MARILYN 0.241 38.657 80

2/203

>>4671300
>>4671303
Enough.
We get the point; there are a lot of names.
Not all of these are modern names that are still in use.
It would be very unusual for young people nowadays to be called Dorothy, Brenda, or Joan.
And many others.

>>4671284
why don't you freind them and ask

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=618615103

http://www.facebook.com/profile.php?id=516687569

ANDREA 0.236 38.893 81
KATHRYN 0.234 39.127 82
LOUISE 0.229 39.356 83
SARA 0.229 39.584 84
ANNE 0.228 39.812 85
JACQUELINE 0.228 40.040 86
WANDA 0.226 40.266 87
BONNIE 0.223 40.489 88
JULIA 0.223 40.711 89
RUBY 0.221 40.932 90
LOIS 0.220 41.153 91
TINA 0.220 41.372 92
PHYLLIS 0.219 41.591 93
NORMA 0.218 41.809 94
PAULA 0.217 42.026 95
DIANA 0.216 42.242 96
ANNIE 0.216 42.458 97
LILLIAN 0.211 42.669 98
EMILY 0.208 42.877 99
ROBIN 0.208 43.085 100
PEGGY 0.208 43.293 101
CRYSTAL 0.207 43.500 102
GLADYS 0.205 43.705 103
RITA 0.204 43.908 104
DAWN 0.202 44.111 105
CONNIE 0.200 44.311 106
FLORENCE 0.200 44.511 107
TRACY 0.197 44.708 108
EDNA 0.197 44.904 109
TIFFANY 0.195 45.100 110
CARMEN 0.195 45.295 111
ROSA 0.194 45.489 112
CINDY 0.192 45.681 113
GRACE 0.189 45.869 114
WENDY 0.185 46.055 115
VICTORIA 0.180 46.235 116
EDITH 0.179 46.414 117
KIM 0.178 46.592 118
SHERRY 0.178 46.770 119
SYLVIA 0.177 46.947 120
JOSEPHINE 0.177 47.123 121
THELMA 0.175 47.298 122
SHANNON 0.175 47.473 123
SHEILA 0.175 47.648 124
ETHEL 0.174 47.822 125
ELLEN 0.173 47.995 126
ELAINE 0.173 48.168 127
MARJORIE 0.173 48.341 128
CARRIE 0.171 48.512 129
CHARLOTTE 0.169 48.680 130
MONICA 0.166 48.847 131
ESTHER 0.166 49.013 132
PAULINE 0.165 49.178 133

3/203

>>4671300
>>4671303
I'm starting to get where I'll spend all night doing statistics guys. Harriet your pic will be posted here by tomorrow whether you like it or not.

>>4671311
These names are listed in order of frequency. That means Dorothy, Brenda, and Joan are among the more popular ones.

harriet was 64th most popular female birth name in 2000

http://www.behindthename.com/top/lists/ew/2000

>>4671317
For the population as a whole, not for a young age range.

>>4671063

Why the fuck does science need a ruler???

Go back to /b/.

>>4671321
Yes, because clearly she is 12 years old. Excellent work, Sherlock.

>>4671324
Of course we do not, that is why we have moderators.

>>4671325
They did not imply that the name originated in 2000.

>>4671327
Why are you even pretending to not be Harriet?

>>4671325
these number don't change that much in 9 years

1998 it was 58th, so trend is increasing

can find nothing earlier

>>4671325
i think you herped

>>4671333
If we were dealing with toddlers you'd be a great help.

>>4671333
The trend is decreasing, not increasing.
58th most popular in '98
64th most popular in 2000
It has moved down 6 places.
The name is becoming less popular. (Based on just these two figures)

>>4671340
thanks

14 yrs old is not a toddler

name trends don't change much in 7 years

>so mad it's making you stupid

>>4671346
>14 yrs old is not a toddler
Thanks for the update, Einstein!
>name trends don't change much in 7 years
Nigga u fucking srs?

>>4671344
number 1 is most popular and we are trending back to 1991, harriet's possible birth year

you are kind of proving yourself very retarded

>>4671350
>einstein

so why did you, or some anon, mention toddlers?

and yes, in 9 years, outside of the top 10, name popularity does not change much, as can be learned by following the link

can't tell if troll or just stupid

>>4671360
Yes I know.
That is why I was saying that the 58th most popular name is more common than the 64th most popular name for the year.

And the 1st most popular name is the most common.

I said that in the year 2000 the name Harriet was less popular than in 1998.
was I wrong?

>>4671366
>outside of the top 10, name popularity does not change much
This. Outside of 'trendy names', general trends are slow.

>>4671366
>and yes, in 9 years, outside of the top 10, name popularity does not change much
>Oh shit, I'm clearly wrong, better add a modifier post ipso facto to pretend like I wasn't retarded the whole time

>>4671360
Nevermind, I see what you are saying.
The name is less popular now, but would have been more popular in 1991.

>>4671371
not wrong just missing the point. we are trying to extrapolate to 1990/1991

so the trend, in that direction, is up.

>>4671374
a qualifier that is applicable, when discussing someone with 50th-70th most popular name.

and there is no need to be upset. just learn to context and you'll get along fine in life

>Because it's like you know and umm air head, and that. and umm shit in my face, and umm oh right liberal or something I forget.
Listen to her youngturks shit then find
QueenAbby.jpg

i came back looking for pics and :(