[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 19 KB, 624x588, 1336332791262.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654176 No.4654176 [Reply] [Original]

Can someone please explain this shit?

>> No.4654179

non lebesgue measurable sets

>> No.4654181
File: 156 KB, 926x1055, missingsquareproof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654181

<<<

>> No.4654183

>>4654181
Fuck off, EK

>> No.4654184
File: 8 KB, 669x192, Triangles.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654184

OP here.

Surface areas doesn't add up...

>> No.4654185

Notice the different slopes.

>> No.4654186

Sure. Those aren't triangles. Look at the slopes of the red and green triangles. They're different.

>> No.4654189
File: 82 KB, 300x300, 1297596231406.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654189

>>4654183
shut up, dickhead

>> No.4654193

>>4654183
He's not EK. Look at the tripcode.

>> No.4654197

shit didn't notice the slopes were different.
this image is rigged!

>> No.4654200
File: 271 KB, 1062x1715, falseareaproof.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654200

>>4654197
theres a similar puzzle
again, the slopes are slightly different.
<<<

>> No.4654210

>>4654200
take your pills

>> No.4654213

>97.7% can't pass the illusion test!

>> No.4654222
File: 65 KB, 600x600, Johnny Walker Black.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654222

>>4654200
Troll-puzzle is trolling.

>> No.4654890
File: 394 KB, 640x480, flaming_baby_head_by_immortal79-d3h2oa8.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654890

>>4654176
Well not to hit people in the "NO" gland but if they are the same shapes then the perimeter is the same and the area is the same...because it is two dimensional math and so it kind of just settles itself based on constants so if they are the exact same shapes and there are no 3rd dimension attributes to the sum equation then they would mainly be the exact same perimeter and area just aligned in a different way its what they call an optical illusion...

>> No.4654946
File: 25 KB, 624x588, Untitled.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4654946

Compare the yellow portions in the purple boxes

>> No.4655013
File: 62 KB, 817x546, mihoshi058.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4655013

>>4654946
IF they are the exact same shapes then they are taking up the exact same "area" and the exact by default of the goddamn definition of area in geometry they have the exact same perimeter if they are ruled exactly the same in both diagrams...
1.Being high totally f--ks sh!t up the other thing is that if you are doing on cid' then yes man the world played a trick on you and the exact same pieces that have a specific area in two dimensional math there is no time just space no other variables we did this stuff in 1st 2nd and 3rd grade, unless one of the shjapes got a boner and then one of them totally said put it inside me then there would be the exact same perimeter and area for every shape in diagram one and diagram two so no matter what combination there was other than saying look I rearranged them and they look cool like this wouldn't it be neat if math were an ever changing process that revolved around me and all those old guys that were hella of old and dead and not fabulous were retarded...LAWS RULES AND CONSTANTS!!!!
Even Mihoshi the undercover SS knows this she was raised by space monkeys and wolves that worship bears with AIDS...
Fail...Epic fail go back to the cage and await execution we must make a new batch...

>> No.4655264

Wait a minute, what?

I feel retarded but since both triangles have the same "a" and "b" and both have right angles, how the slope/length be anything but the same? Pythagorians, etc etc

>> No.4656393
File: 185 KB, 654x651, 1336341227816.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656393

Your figure is scrambled, the slopes are not the same so the triangles areas are neither the same. Redraw the lines and see for yourself. Pic related.

>> No.4656545
File: 638 KB, 624x588, triangle hole 2.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4656545

>>4654176

>> No.4656568

>>4656545
How do you make the picture move?

>> No.4656574

>>4656545
This is awesome, thanks!
>>4656568
>How do you make the picture move?

By using a .gif creator?

>> No.4656578

>>4656574
How do I get one?

>> No.4656579

>>4656578
Not sure if u're a fake Harriet or not.

www.lmgtfy.com/?q=gif+creator

>> No.4656584

>>4656578

Photoshop you dumb broad

>> No.4656587

>>4656584
Photoshop just changes static pictures. It does not make them move.

>>4656579
OK, thanks. I will try that.

>> No.4656601

>>4656587

>photoshop just changes static pictures, it doesn't make them move

I work as a freelance graphics designer in my time outside of college. You can animate .gifs with photoshop.

>> No.4656606

>>4656601
So you just make lots of pictures, and then they can all stick together and play as a movie?

>> No.4656614

>>4656606

Essentially. You can manipulate layers in most cases to save time rather than recreating every part of an image. If you already have photoshop, go to Window - Animation. The rest is easy to figure out.

>> No.4656623

>>4656614
Have you made one?

>> No.4656627

>>4656623

I made a few obnoxious banner ads for a client a while ago, similar to those J-List ones where everything appears one by one.

>> No.4656631

>>4654185
>>4654185
>>4654185
>>4654185

>> No.4656638

>>4656627
Oh, you can make them for profit and sell the animations?
How much did you make?

>> No.4656646

>>4656638

Not a lot, I charged £10 per banner ad and made around half a dozen. That's a relatively low fee compared to most designers, though.

>> No.4656655

>>4656646
I hope they were not those really annoying ones that bounce around and distract you from what you are actually trying to watch?
http://www.cracked.com/article_15239_the-5-most-annoying-banner-ads-internet_p5.html