[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 82 KB, 564x714, 133464113751.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4639563 No.4639563 [Reply] [Original]

0.9999999999... * 0.9999999999... = 1

is this false? why?

>> No.4639575 [DELETED] 

0.9999... = 1
Therefore you are asking: " is 1*1 = 1 correct?"

Yes it is

>> No.4639580

You can't multiply numbers with dots.

>> No.4639592

no because at the end you have an 81, which is obviously not a series of 999999, therefore 0.9999...*0.999... isn't 1.

>> No.4639597

######################troll line###################

>> No.4639602
File: 152 KB, 640x480, girls-laughing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4639602

>>4639592
>at the end

>> No.4639609

>>4639602
>girls laughing at yo penis

>> No.4639617

>>4639609
>sure is summer in here

>> No.4639629

>>4639580
of course you can

>> No.4639633

>>4639629
No, it's not defined.

>> No.4639636

>>4639629
pics or it didn't happen

>> No.4639639

>>4639633
you are such a retard

multiplying two infinite series is babby tier calculus

>> No.4639640

http://us.metamath.org/mpegif/0.999....html

>> No.4639641

>>4639636
THIS

I want to see you multiplying every one of the infinite digits.

>> No.4639648

>>4639636
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Formal_power_series#Multiplying_series

go back to high school

>> No.4639653

>>4639575
She is correct.

She shud have given a ref tho.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/0.999......

>> No.4639655

>>4639641
i want to see you write every last 9 of the infinite 9s in 0.999..., and every last digit of pi, else i don't believe they exist

>> No.4639659

>>4639655
Damn straight. They do not exist.

>> No.4639660

>>4639659
ok bro, you win. math loses

>> No.4639685

>>4639655
Excuse me, what do you mean by this word "infinite"? Could you please write down for me the number of 9s you want me to write down?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Constructivism_(mathematics)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mathematical_induction
http://mathoverflow.net/questions/740/co-induction-understanding