[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 38 KB, 358x540, physicists.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463056 No.4463056 [Reply] [Original]

That feel

>> No.4463070

source of these comics?

>> No.4463089

>>4463070
seriously? you dont know ecks kay sea dee

>> No.4463093

>>4463070

LOOK AT HIM

LOOK AT HIM AND LAUGH

>> No.4463097

>>4463089
nope, I'm new to /sci/ and I am currently in my lurking phase.
Thanks

>> No.4463105

http://xkcd.com

it's in the sticky, in the webcomics section

>> No.4463107

>>4463070
intimate knowledge of these comics is a prerequisite of geek arguments. The ability to properly cite a supporting comic is grounds for automatic victory in any nerd-sparring.

>> No.4463126
File: 341 KB, 612x3629, 20111207.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463126

SMBC is better.

>> No.4463152

>>4463126
Yes, I doubt anyone would seriously argue that.

>> No.4463154

>>4463126
It's good, but hat guy wins.

>> No.4463160

>>4463107
>NERD CULTURE GUISE XD

where is this influx of aspies on /sci/ coming from

>> No.4463167

>>4463160
>Anal retentive about content on 4chan
>calls people aspie

>> No.4463180

People seem to forget that scientists have a sense of humour as well and that some of us like reading webcomics, and that people that enjoy talking about science will also enjoy talking about nerdy webcomics.
Such as Dr McNinja.

>> No.4463193

>>4463180
LOL
your name is anal

>> No.4463195

Fact: In the last few years XKCD has been getting worse.
Fact: In the last few years SMBC has been getting better.

>> No.4463299
File: 609 KB, 612x3890, 20110826.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463299

this made me giggle a bit inside

>> No.4463316

>>4463299
It's like Who's on First for chemists.

>> No.4463320
File: 22 KB, 400x400, reactionbutthatswrong.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463320

>>4463195
>I parrot opinions so I can seem cool on 4chan

>> No.4463336
File: 105 KB, 388x587, 1324870607329.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463336

>>4463195
>SMBC
>good

>> No.4463339

>>4463320
except its pretty obvious. smbc is consistently funny and original despite competing with xkcd's legacy. xkcd on the other hand has just stagnated in contrived references with little semblance of humor.

though you are free to have your opinion.

[blacktext] its just wrong olololo [/endblacktext]

>> No.4463346

SMBC used to be awesome. Then like, 3 years ago he got into science and shit and he became horrible.

Its like he got so blinded that he couldnt make jokes anymore, just science references.

>> No.4463354

I think we need a webcomic tier list right about now.

>> No.4463360

>>4463354
XKCD god teir.

>> No.4463373

>>4463360
More like "I want to appear nerdy" tier.

The only two science-related comics I find consistantly amusing are SMBC and PhD Comics (although updates on the latter are pretty damn rare)

>> No.4463378
File: 7 KB, 239x211, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463378

http://www.youtube.com/watch?NR=1&feature=endscreen&v=57vCBMqnC1Y

>> No.4463379

>>4463360
>teir
>xkcd capitalised
>obscene sweeping statement

I'm in /sci/ alright.

>> No.4463381

>>4463360
xkcd was great when I started reading it. Now, 5 years later, its awful. Maybe I just got more mature, but I feel like there really were some gems back then. Little bobby tables and such

>> No.4463460

>>4463378
That's why SMBC is better:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xJX_hE5eYwA

XKCD does not do shorts.

>> No.4463727
File: 46 KB, 601x271, orion_nebula.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463727

We should rename it to Priapus.

>> No.4463747

I lol'd a little when I figured this one out.

>> No.4463752
File: 52 KB, 740x427, communication.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4463752

>>4463747

Fucking shitballs

>Picture related