[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 34 KB, 492x429, 47993277-f9f2-4d7d-8940-63da1a06d628.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4419127 No.4419127 [Reply] [Original]

It's ironic that I've seen several posts about logic on here tonight. Today my theology teacher tried to use logic to prove his point. I will post the link to the material he printed out. Would anyone like to share thoughts on the logical fallacies contained with. A link to something useful would be nice so I can have some fun destroying him in class tomorrow.

>> No.4419132

religion goes to >>>/lounge/

>> No.4419149

>>4419132
Logic stays in /sci/

>> No.4419162
File: 10 KB, 556x188, implication.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4419162

>>4419149
Here's some logic for you. In case you wondered why A implies A.

>> No.4419174

If you think that the motive behind 9/11 was mainly to do with religion then you're an ignorant retard.

>> No.4419201
File: 152 KB, 500x282, 3cd8a33a.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4419201

>>4419174
Of course we all know it was an inside job.
>insert dumbass conspiracy theory<

>> No.4419223

>>4419127
In all fairness the moon landing had nothing to do with scientific endeavor, and was only enabled by it. Just like 9/11
;_;

>> No.4419231

>>4419201
9/11 was politically motivated. Religion was peripheral.

>> No.4419232

>>4419174
>implying that the motive of your conspiracy hypothesis is not religious.

>> No.4419234

>>4419174
the actual terrorists did it because of religion, now the actual reason behind it is politics

>> No.4419237

>>4419223
You are correct. Science is a tool that is neither intrinsically good or evil, it depends on the use (such atomic weapons or flying planes into buildings to cause great harm or things for good such as medical technologies). Perhaps my picture was a little too controversial. I have nothing against religion. I simply wanted to discuss the logic behind the belief and disbelief. I was hoping the pic would relate that.

>> No.4419239

>>4419132
I commend you for actually knowing text boards are a thing.

Best troll ever

>> No.4419245

>>4419234
>2012
>someone finally makes valid point
>mfw /sci/ many not be completely composed of dumb fucks

>> No.4419250

>>4419127
http://carm.org/logic-apologetics

>Warning, link contains illogical logic

>> No.4419256

>>4419245
>valid point
They claim to magically know the motive of the hijackers. Pure speculation does not constitute a "valid point".

>> No.4419272

>>4419256
It does when proving god exists.
Theism = Speculation
Theists = ignorant cunts

>> No.4419277

>>4419272
Why did you remove the "OP" from the name field?

>> No.4420861

>>4419127
tl;dr
Evidence is against miracles, and thus against theist gods, and thus anyone with beliefs for theist gods are stupid or ignorant.
Evidence is neutral on deist gods, and thus anyone for or against deist gods are stupid or ignorant.