[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

View post   
File: 40 KB, 700x480, I see what you did there.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4349552 No.4349552 [Reply] [Original]

>2012
>Not questioning the Big Bang Theory
Plenty of other scientific models out there, folks. The only reason we stick to Big Bang is because stupid people think "Multiple theories"="Scientists don't know what they're talking about".

I, for one, am in favor of Chaotic Inflation Theory.

>> No.4349553

>>4349552
>The Chaotic Inflation theory is a variety of the inflationary universe model, which is itself an outgrowth (or extension) of the Big Bang theory.

>> No.4349557

>>4349553
Gross over-simplification.

You may as well argue that Bananas and Apples are the exact same just because they're both fruit.

>> No.4349558

>>4349557
>implying I didn't copy and paste that from wikipedia. Go masturbate elsewhere.

>> No.4349559

>>4349558
>Wikipedia
I repeat:
Gross over-simplification.

>> No.4349560

>>4349557
>implying bananas aren't a fruit

>> No.4349561

Is this one of those /sci/ threads where the OP learned something five minutes ago, then pretends to be the world expert on it by arguing with everyone in the thread?

sage'd for obnoxious, arrogant teenager.

>> No.4349562
File: 629 KB, 300x232, 1293289113602.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4349562

>>4349561

>> No.4349567
File: 9 KB, 226x199, whaaat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
4349567

>>4349560
I implied that?

Odd. I think I'd remember doing something like that.

>> No.4349568

>>4349552
And who the fuck are you to give opinions? What related expertice to you have that gives you the right to take a side on this? I rather go with what the experts say. Also this >>4349561

>> No.4349572

>2012
>Questioning the Big Bang Theory half a century after the discovery of CMB

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=35TbGjt-weA

>> No.4349575

>>4349568
>>4349568
>inb4 op claims an argument from authority is always a fallacy. Always.

>> No.4349579

Chaotic Inflation Theory is completely compatible with Big Bang Theory. This isn't an either-or situation.

>> No.4349588

>>4349579
Wow, it's like someone said that in the first fucking post. But no, I'm sure you restating it was really fucking necessary.

>> No.4349593

>>4349567
big bang = fruit
chaotic inflation theory = a particular kind of fruit, for example banana or apple

>> No.4349638

>2012
>not considering pre big bang theories
icygddt

>> No.4349812

>>4349552
>The only reason we stick to Big Bang is because stupid people think "Multiple theories"="Scientists don't know what they're talking about".

No, the only reason we stick to the Big Bang theory is because it's the only theory for which there is substantial evidence, you dimwit.

>> No.4349855

Who cares how we got to this point, what people should be worrying about is where we're going.