/sci/ - Science & Math

>Spoiler tags
>Failing at getting doubles
>Shitty thread
>Reported

>>4344173
Why do you come to /sci/?
All I see from you is HERP SAGE DERP REPORTED HURRDURR YOUR DUMB.
Can't you contribute to science threads?
If you really dislike /sci/ so much, then why don't you leave?
In case you are a troll: Do you actually think you make anyone mad by annoying shitposting?
I am not mad btw

>>4344193
reported for newfag enjoy your ban

>>4344253
>implying I'm not an oldfag

Actually he is the newfag. He started shitposting with a tripcode about a week ago.

>>4344262
>not realizing no one is committed to using a certain trip or anonymity
Are you new?

>>4344193
Are you implying threads of the such should be welcome on /sci/?

If so, fuck off to /b/.

>>4344270
Anonymouse, you're almost as much of a fag as the OP.
Just for the record.

>>4344279
Why?

>>4344270
>implying people like you belong here

Don't distract from the point which is you being a shitposter.
As a tripfag you are responsible for what you post.

>>4344288
So, if I was anonymous, I bear no responsibility for the content I contribute? The disparity you imply exists seems rather pointless. I could just choose another name and tripcode? What difference would it make?

>>4344295
It makes the difference that there is not always that one annoying fag posting "hurr I report you" in every fucking thread.

>>4344298
Considering those threads are usually already terrible, how does stating that they've been reported make it any worse?

>>4344303
Flawed logic.
Shitposting in a shit thread always makes the thread worse.

>>4344308
Elaborate.
What's the point of caring about the shit thread? Ignore it.

>>4344314
Exactly, what's your point? Why do you post in every shit thread but in no science thread?
Why do you come to /sci/, if you want to behave like in /b/?

>>4344329
>behave like in /b/
Ha. In /b/, you spam something you found funny fifty times to get attention. That's what /sci/ is coming to, simply with the pretense of science.

And I do post in actual science threads. Realize that they are a rarity.

>>4344337
>In /b/ you spam something you found funny fifty times to get attention

Do you mean like your shitty reports and sages?

>>4344341
>funny
>attention
Are you actually paying attention, or should I go slower? And I suggest you sage, I'm sure seeing this thread at the front page is annoying.

>>4344353
The only annoying thing here is you.
Since you refuse to explain any motivation for your immature behavious, I suppose you come here for the only purpose of shitposting.
Please leave /sci/ and go to /b/.

>reported
>implying mods on /sci/

>>4344357
You seem to not be making any points. What is immature about? Why is it shitposting? You've been under the assumption that the definition for the terms above are fine in your head and that you have no reason to tell me.

>>4344365
Just stop it.

>>4344359
It's more to make a point. I'm hoping that in the best case scenario, the OP becomes discouraged and moves on to posting inane shitty trolls on other boards.

The reactions of people like >>4344193 will simply give him the impression that this is welcome.

>>4344369
>Can't support your points
>Tells me to just stop
Funny how all the arguments regarding my posting habits have ended like this.

>>4344370
You are not gonna change anyone's behaviour here.

>>4344379
Is that any excuse to not try?

>>4344382
Yes, it is, because you are wasting your time and annoy the few other legit posters who come here for science and math.

>>4344385
As I said earlier, if they consider it a shitty thread, since it is, can they not ignore it? And by extension me. Really, is it my fault they are paying attention to shitty threads.

>>4344370

the mods dont care enough about the asspies on sci to ban ppl for anything other than cp

if you feel so inclined to continue reporting threads, then by all means continue to do so, but please stop posting "durr reported" as it only comes across as a cheap way for you to get attention

>>4344391
/sci/ is a slow board. Every thread here gets attention. You are not gonna change this fact.

You've all been reported. You will soon be enjoying some bans. Try to stay on topic. Thanks!

>>4344395
>>4344392
But is it "my" fault they are paying attention these shitty threads?

>>4344392
The mod does ban people here. There is some delay, but reports do work (when they are legit and not just spam like the ones made by a certain poster ITT).

>>4344402
I stayed on topic. I got dubs ITT.

>>4344392
>implying people haven't been banned for posting matrices
>implying people haven't been banned for gf

>>4344409
also people have been banned for posting ponies.

>>4344405
It is your fault that you shitpost. That's it. Now fuck off.
Install 4chan x and simply hide threads that you don't like.

>>4344337
>Realize that they are a rarity.
Stupid reasoning:
all threads in /sci/ have to be assumed to be science threads; you can't abuse ANY of them.
You don't get to decide which are worth other people's time.

>>4344417
people have been banned for inane trolling garbage

>>4344424
This is a science thread?

On topic, get.

>>4344432
Not anymore, since you derailed it with your shitposting.

Inconceivable.

This thread got more replies than most science threads, just because some gullible retards think they can convince a spammer to stop.

this thread is scientific in that we are determining what makes a science thread a science thread

>wat

>>4344466
Not really. We are arguing with a guy who pathetically wastes his time spamming our board while he actually believes he can make anyone mad this way. Okay, actually we are not arguing, we are just pitying him.

On the front page, there are currently two homework threads, a shitty dubs thread turned discussion about my posting habits, a captcha spam thread, and a "HURR EARTH IS FLAT" thread.

Two threads, three if you consider a thread asking a trivial googleable question, that in any way comply to /sci/'s guidelines.

>>4344425
>implying people ever get banned for anything BESIDES "inane trolling garbage"

That's literally the only ban message I've ever seen any of the thousand times I've been banned from /sci/, modulo small variations.

At a certain point, you stop even trying to figure out why the hell you get banned before changing your IP. You just accept that getting randomly banned for no real reason comes with posting on /sci/.

Got banned 4 times in one day a few days ago.

>>4344476
>"make anyone mad"
>Thinks I come here to make people mad

If anything, I have a better shot with the 12 year olds on /b/

>>4344417

>>4344477
So what?
Do you think you have special rights here to see only science threads when you are online?
Fucking deal with it.
If you lack the education to change it constructively by posting new science threads, then at least refrain from posting shit.

>>4344484
I'm not the guy you all are arguing with. I couldn't care less about what he does.

>>4344480
Just a geuss, but maybe it is a hint for you to not post inane trolling garbage.

>>4344489
>implying "inane trolling garbage" has any kind of precise interpretation and isn't just code for "whatever annoys the mod at any given moment"

>>4344481
You are not interested in resolving the problem. Thus my conclusion is that you consider yourself a troll, altough in reality you are far away from being a troll since your shitposting lacks any originality.

>>4344491
Then fucking don't annoy the mod. Don't annoy anyone.

>>4344500
My conclusion is that you're shit at deriving conclusions from observational evidence

>>4344477
Not enough smart people on /sci/ to have any serious science discussions beyond high-school level.

Real smart people have either been chased away by the 4chan atmosphere or the stupid modding (such as banning entire universities just to get rid of one slightly annoying troll)

All considered, the only POSSIBLE science threads that could sustain a conversation given the people here are high school or freshman college homework questions and completely uninformed discussions about whatever popsci news showed up on CNN.com that day.

>>4344513
Thanks for confirming my statement. I am expecting your next immature reply.

>>4344501
Your use of the word "fuck" (on a SFW board, no less) annoys me greatly.

Ban this fucking piece of cunt cocksucker for "inane cursing garbage" right fucking now.

>>4344518
Or the smart posters get distracted by shitposting assholes like >>4344173

>>4344519
Fine. How do you propose we solve the problem?

>>4344525
If they're so smart, why do they get distracted?
Checkmate atheists.

>>4344521
I lol'd.

>>4344523
Quite simple: If you feel the need to report, do it silently and don't brag about it.
Instead help making /sci/ a nicer place by contributing science whereever your education allows it.

>>4344532
;)

>>4344525
IXfX XtXhXeX XoXcXcXaXsXiXoXnXaXlX XdXoXuXbXlXeXsX XtXhXrXeXaXdX XiXsX XeXnXoXuXgXhX XtXoX XhXoXpXeXlXeXsXsXlXyX XdXiXsXtXrXaXcXtX XyXoXuX,X XyXoXuX'XrXeX XnXoXtX X"XsXmXaXrXtX"X.

Another example of retarded modding: Some part of the last sentence is banned, so remove all the "X"s to read it.

>>4344538
If you were smart, you would have read and understood my post that says it wasn't the d**bles thread but the constant spamming of "Anonymouse" which distracted me.

>>4344547
>not knowing how to filter a namefag

Verified for Not Smart.

>>4344558
I do not filter anyone. Especially namefags are usually prone to respond when being called out, so not all hope is lost. Anonymous on the other hand is of course still the worst shitposter like your post confirms.

>>4344535
Alright. I'll do the aforementioned and drop my trip.

Everyone else, let this thread die.

>>4344571
Thanks for your cooperation.

>>4344567
>actively choosing to see a namefag's posts and bitch about them endlessly when they could easily be filtered.

Complain more, faggot.

>>4344581
>caring about other people
>hating namefags just for being namefags
>not ignoring this thread instead

Can you be more pathetic?

>>4344580
I'M POSTING INANE TROLLING GARBAGE AND NOONE CAN STOP ME

>>4344588
You are doing something wrong. I don't feel trolled by your inane garbage.

>>4344592
well that's just like your opinion, man

>>4344600
*you're

>>4344604
my bad :X