/sci/ - Science & Math

>>4275989

>platonic philosophy
>implying mathematicians don't already believe this

>>4276002

Mathematicians are the worst!

They quantify the most! Numbers! So many numbers!

>Science quantifies everything and eliminates the qualification of things.

This is why people who don't know shit about science shouldn't be allowed to rant about it.

>>4276011

Are you suggesting I don't know anything about science?

I know much more than yourself. I read articles, you know.

Yes, scientists hate quality and nice things.
That is why most of them stay virgins.

Quality when dissected is really a macroscopic, quantitative phenomenon. That's why.

We really ARE fucking smarter than you, punk.

ib4 whycantiholdallthesewhys.jpg

>>4276016
>I read articles, you know.
So you're not a scientist, you didn't work with actual scientists, you're not even a student - as it wasn't obvious from the fact that you really think science quantifies everything; the last time I heard this was from a philosopher teacher. Please come back when you actually know your shit.

>implying I can't qualitatively discuss the general solutions to equations without solving for them
>linksniffinghand.mp153

>>4276024

I DO know my shit, sir.

Every scientist is trying to quantify our bodies, our minds, our souls. They think everything comes down to numbers.

But it doesn't, does it? What about God? What about sunshine on a beautiful morning? What about love?

NOT QUANTIFIABLE! They may try, but they simple tread water with their faces shoved in the water.

I can't believe you fuckers still fall for such obvious trolling.

>>4276028
Wait, not the same guy but you're a faggot. Science doesn't quantify everything. In the case of your dumbass equations, you can't solve the vast majority of them algebraically so you still have to stick with a qualitative study. This happens all the time in physics, with special ODEs, PDEs and shit like that.

>>4276032
how the fuck am I trolling?
you can't quantify art or music
http://www.youstupidrelativist.com/
that website will tell you why you're all idiots
newtons equations pretend like eveythings a point
you can't quantify real objects into your equations

Because ..autism is advancing.

>>4276030
>come to /sci/
>ask explanation about a god

Seriously?

>>4276040
>>4276030
>>4276040
Wow, you're retarded. It is so painfully obvious that you have no clue of what you're talking about. Please read some actual science instead of shitting up this board. That or you're just trolling. Anyway, I'm done with you.

>>4276048
THIS.

Only an autistic person takes science as his religion and disregards the actual religion and philosophy.

>>4276053
This is what happens when an autistic "scientist" is confronted with the boundedness of scientific knowledge. Instead of accepting philosophy and religion, he resorts to weird insults, unsuccessfully trying to hide his insecurities.

>>4276054

>actual religion
Which one was that again?

also

>philosophy

>>4276064
>Which one was that again?

We can at least conclude that science is not a good religion. Science is lacking the concept of a god.

>>4276069

No shit, Sherlock. Who said it was?

>>4276071
All the "science" fanboys ITT who sage and call OP a troll are mistaking science for a religion.

>>4276072

I'm not seeing that. Can you direct me to a related post?

>>4276030
>What about love
>What "is" love
>O_NO_YOU_DIDN'T.jpg

>>4276061
I didn't say anything about philosophy and religion you dumbfuck and that's entirely besides the point. But this guy keeps spouting bullshit about science, I'm just reminding him that it's bullshit.

>Physics
>Logical

Pick one.

This is what every male should do with their disgusting penis.

Society would improve.

>>4276085

Troll thread general?

>>4276077
Troll detected. Read the thread again, dimwit. Anyone attacking OP's point is an autism who understands neither science nor religion.

>>4276081
He is saying the truth. Your shitposting doesn't defeat him, it only shows your lack of education.

>>4276085
were you raped?

>>4276090

An autism?

Huh. Didn't know you could have those. How much is there, like 15 grams of autism? More? Science wants to know!

Also, weak trolling attempt, OP. Showing up later in the thread with a tripcode just makes it worse.

>>4276140
I am not OP. Your accusation of samefagging is your last resort, when you are out of arguments and your delusional belief in science is destroyed.

>>4276151

>delusional belief in science

You're not really good at this, are you? I ask myself on a regular basis "Why do I believe what I believe?" I'm always constantly re-evaluating what may be true. And I can do that without my entire belief system falling apart. In fact, I am obligated to do so.

Can you? Because religion is a pretty strict A > B > A reasoning loop.

>>4276172
You confirmed for being asperger or troll. Actual scientific research is impossible without keeping religion in mind. Replacing religion by belief in allmighty science is a step to imbecility.

>>4276179

>>4276219
You don't understand it? Get the fuck out. Scientists are people who can into logic, you can't.

>>4276179
That's cute.
You do realize the deeper into the hard sciences, the less religiousity among experts there are...

WTF do your rambling statements even mean?
Are you implying only newagefags and religionfags can do science?

This is the worst shitpost trolling I've ever seen...
Especially your rant about Pop Sci in the other thread...
All the while using a Pop Sci trip...the faggotry is truly immeasurable (no pun intended).

­

>>4276242
You cannot do scientific research without asking for the WHY and this is the range of religion.

you are free to post here and even trolll if you guys but please dont call yourself Carl Sagan...

>>4276254
I am not trolling, I am keeping up the memory of Carl Sagan who would have defended science the same way I do.

>>4276261
You are not defending Science.
You are defending religion in an age of Science, you twat.

>>4276322
Yes, because they are inherently correlated.

>>4276261
The religious mindset has retarded progress if anything...it ends investigation at "god did it, lol".

>>4276332
Provide evidence for that claim.

>>4276261
Did you know him personally perhaps?

And somebody is deleting posts here.

>>4276336
You are horribly misunderstanding the deep correlation of religion and science. They are not contradictory, they go hand in hand.
What incites a scientist to do research? He wants to know how and why stuff works. This is not different from religion. It is about explaining the causes of things that you cannot explain.

>>4276343
Of course I knew him personally. We smoked weed together. Shit was pretty cash.

>>4276348
Yeah whatever.
Why would you say scientists hate quality and nice things? Please say you are trolling for at least THAT post
(>>4276018)

>>4276344
No, religion claims the have "Truth" (capital "T") which is irrefutable.

Science begins from scratch and building knowledge from the ground up with no biases.

The fact you are ignoring the glaring error proves you are a troll.

BTW, what religion and what interpretation?
I thought so.

>>4276355
Scientists hate quality and nice things because they don't understand them. Their assburgers doesn't allow them to feel positive emotions.

>>4276361
Science also claims to have the "truth". Where's the difference? (I know there is none, but I'm asking anyway)

>>4276389
>I know there is none, but I'm asking anyway
Nice attitude. You're clearly a "scientist" with that "open" mindset. /sarcasm

"truth" in science is tentative at best...how did you not understand what I meant?
Other than ignoring the point entirely, of course.

You still haven't answered my religion question...
You also never provided evidence for your claim here:
>>4276332

If you're not a troll, prove it by answering instead of dodging questions.

His posts go deleted, was it a mod or himself? EK used to do the same...

>>4276412
Posts were deleted?
I use 4chan+, so I can't tell...

>>4276412
Its not possible to delete that many posts that quickly, he must have had them all deleted by a mod.

>>4276442
>It's not possible
Check the boxes and hit the delete button.

>>4276361
"Science begins from scratch and building knowledge from the ground up with no biases."
Oh you, youre so funny.
(assuming humans do anything without bias)

>>4276361
Also, science is simply religion in a new costume, it claims to have the "Truth" you mention, but it believes it will eventually be found and explained by our conventional methods and processes. This pretty dooms science to fail, its too one-dimensional.