/sci/ - Science & Math

>mfw i found out most of /sci/ is Harriet or EK

>>4203253
>mfw when they aren't even women

I'm a physical-chemistry major


jk, fuck off.

I'm a physical-chemistry major, ask me anything


jk, fuck off.

EE here.

>>4203407
how accurate are the best ampmeters these days?

>>4203429
bonus question: how accurate is the best one on the commercial market and how much does it cost?

I rest my case and yet business as usual carries on.

>>4203462
http://www.home.agilent.com/agilent/product.jspx?nid=-35558.0.00&lc=eng&cc=US

define "best"

>>4203513
fuck that website, post numbers.

fucking shit how long are you going to make me wait?

google ain't gonna save you mother fucker

>>4203393

know anything about computational chemistry?

>>4203560
nope, but I'll make sure to find out more next episode

>>4203520
Voltmeter accuracy: Up to 0.025% + 50 µV, up to 18 bits
Ammeter accuracy: Up to 0.025% + 8 nA, up to 18 bits

$7,000

>>4203576
you can do a LOT better, for your future contractor's sake

>>4203587
for a 600W device, that's pretty good. I have a device that measures femtoamps, but the fuse breaks at 1W.

>>4203591
I just asked for accuracy

>>4203597
You asked for "best."

Best for wide applications
Best for power range
Best for precision
Best for value

>>4203603
just accuracy

>>4203603
and yes if you need help, I'm looking for the accuracy of the most precise commercially available gear and it's (lowest) price ( +/- $1000 for the bonus points).

no surprises here, just short responses. GOTTA KEEP THAT IMAGE UP!

>/sci/
>a board where the anonymous must prove themselves to each other to boost ego & self-esteem
>also help solving high school kid's math problems

Biology major thank you very much

>>4203836
My initial internal reaction: NO, FUCK YOU
After a moment: acceptance

I'll find a way to forget your assessment soon.

>>4203635

figure it out for yourself you stupid technician

>mfw before i came to /sci/ i was majoring in psychology as i didn't know what else to do
>switched majors to engineering
>it's hard as fuck
>still don't think i even like it
>fuck you /sci/ now im gay

>>4203903
I already know the answer. I don't NEED to know the answer per say but there are just certain protocols you gotta follow to know if you among peers. Now I just need to get a little creative to work outside my major.

>>4203836
Why the fuck do you think we troll /lit/.
Why the fuck do you think we have I.Q. threads.
It's because the majority of neckbears on this board are insecure.

>>4203910
side info: I've been around this board since the beginning but I've hardly posted here seriously because I've always had my doubts and there were more productive resources to have questions answered (reddit is far superior lol) but I decided now was a good time to find out in a definitive way. After watching it for more than a year, at the least, you can see that all the talent has been steadily chased away from it incrementally. Take this as you will but I'm just trying to help other people be productive/consecutive with their time, as I always have been here and any other place I go where politics and science is concerned. I understand that the LIMITED SUPPLY OF MODS are plenty occupied by the other higher priority boards (like /a/ and /v/, huehuehue) but this place has really taken some damage over time. You guys should have really been here when it first started: there's only so much justice words can do. Unlike other boards, this is one which doesn't thrive on original content but rather thoughtful participation, which, to state again, has deteriorated dramatically. You can even see the evidence in the IRC and other side projects which this board has spawned (i.e. rhizome).

Those people who actually STILL 'support' this board suspiciously keep their shit (a.k.a. posting) to a minimum because, in my assessment, they are the modern day charlatans keeping their cards close to their chest. I'm sorry if some of you (newer) people find this confusing but the online word is becoming more and more of a battlefield all fun & game trolling aside. It's getting harder and harder to tell the playful confusion from the chicane equivocations these days.

Take care anon, always be in a state of departure, the internet is and has always been srsbsns.

>>4203939
>consecutive
=constructive

furthermore, to make my message more concise, don't buy into any of the hype here. People are just trying to waste your time. Do something in real life, APPLY ACTUAL SCIENCE, write in a journal about something you've always wondered about, read history like World War I, learn philosophy/logic (most of which learn the logical fallacies), talk with your family about shit they don't know, do anything but hang-out here. PLEASE!

If you need more suggestions just say so here.

I'VE SEEN HOW FEW PEOPLE SCROLL TO PAGE 2 MAN, I'VE SEEN IT!!!!!!!!12@

>>4203969
Oh, man, this makes sense. More advice. Please.

>>4204058
do you have a journal or central collection of notes?

>>4204073
Well I'm going to bed. That last question was indiscriminate but all I can recommend on that basis is that you keep a record for yourself. I'll be back tomorrow with full b-vitamins, omega-3s and caffeine to talk about it all in further and hopefully complete details if you are genuinely interested but of course if you're already making hella money then feel free to disregard anything I, or anybody else for that matter, says so long as you've got a disciplined savings routine.

Who needs commentary on common sense, science, advice or family matters if you've got a good career right?