[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 25 KB, 260x225, 2124512.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

4135609

Anonymous Tue Dec 13 02:16:01 2011 No.4135609 [Reply] [Original]

ITT: energy from thorium

Where are the fucking thorium reactors we been building? China?

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:00:18 2011 No.4135807 where is my fusion!?

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:18:25 2011 No.4135831 its radiation is too intense

>>	Photon !g2Boson6mM Tue Dec 13 04:22:49 2011 No.4135838 >>4135807 Fucking. This.

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:23:57 2011 No.4135841 >>4135807 Don't know how to do it, as opposed to LFTR. Also LFTR is cheaper, and yet we're wasting money and time on fusio.

>>	Photon !g2Boson6mM Tue Dec 13 04:24:05 2011 No.4135846 >>4135841 >Don't know how to do it The fuck is wrong with you? Ever heard of ITER?!

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:24:57 2011 No.4135845 >>4135831 the radiation from a thoroum reactor is comparable to the same milisieverts one gets from sunlight. These reactors would threaten the bottom line of "big energy" firms.

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:26:21 2011 No.4135851 >>4135846 Let me know when they actually get positive power output. We've been here for like 20 years now, and still no closer.

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:50:01 2011 No.4135881 http://www.world-nuclear.org/info/inf62.html Read this

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 04:59:14 2011 No.4135897 >>4135851 Fucking this. Fusion may be the energy of the future, but we need an energy of the NOW.

>>	Anonymous Tue Dec 13 05:00:14 2011 No.4135899 >>4135897 but we still need work on the fuel of the future