[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 241 KB, 800x1005, alanturing.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933714 No.3933714 [Reply] [Original]

hello,

I invented Computer Science.

>> No.3933718

I did it Turing the second world war

>> No.3933716

Hi

No

>> No.3933721
File: 6 KB, 251x168, 1309753634285.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933721

Hello

I invented mathematics

>> No.3933724

That's not Konrad Zuse.

>> No.3933734

> implying all this wasn't anticipated by Leibniz

>> No.3933736

> implying science can be invented

>> No.3933741

>>3933736
> computer science
> science
choose 1

>> No.3933745

>>3933741

hurrrrrrr

> Computer science or computing science (abbreviated CS) is the study of the theoretical foundations of information and computation and of practical techniques for their implementation and application in computer systems.[1][2] Computer scientists invent algorithmic processes that create, describe, and transform information and formulate suitable abstractions to model complex systems.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_science

>> No.3933752

>>3933745
Fuck where is my Abelson gif...

>> No.3933778

Charles Babbage and Ada Lovelace had Turing beat by almost a century.

>> No.3933795
File: 44 KB, 456x356, ada-lovelace.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933795

>>3933778
<3

>> No.3933828

>>3933745
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zQLUPjefuWA

>> No.3933881

>>3933778

Pascal was first

>> No.3933908

>>3933828

How old is that video?

Computer Science developed, that's why I included that quote. It is definitely a science now, as it includes for example the study of information itself, which is actually a branch of physics.

Nice trolling attempt though 2/10

>> No.3933962

>>3933908
> unfamiliar with SICP
> opinions on computer science
Does not compute.

>> No.3933965
File: 10 KB, 240x333, dennis..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933965

Hi. I invented the language of modern computer science.

>> No.3933969

>>3933965
I didn't know Ritchie developed the lambda calculus! Wow, he was really prolific.

>> No.3933977
File: 139 KB, 399x398, 1317844680243.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933977

Hi, I invented... oh well never mind

>> No.3933983
File: 8 KB, 254x240, reaction9.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3933983

OP is a faggot

>> No.3934012

>>3933962

> programming
> computer science
> pick one

derp, are you even trying?

>> No.3934015

>>3933969
>>3933962

Someone's smelling his own farts here.

>> No.3934019

>>3934012
0/10 you're just butthurt

>> No.3934022

>>3934019

butthurt because you failed? Nah

> talk about information itself
> come back with programming
> serious

u mad

>> No.3934029
File: 7 KB, 216x274, chaitin.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3934029

>>3934022
> thinks the study of information is trivially separable from programming

>> No.3934034

>>3933828
>has a lot in common with magic
yeah, nice way to prove your a faggot.

>> No.3934041

>>3934029

That's not what I said, derp.

Truth is, they're different things. Algorithm engineering or programming itself relying on parts of information theory doesn't mean they're the same.

Nice trolling though 2/10, although you're probably too stupid to realise what information theory is.

>> No.3934064

>>3933778

Ada Lovelace didn't create the computer. But she may have created the first computer program.

>> No.3934065
File: 24 KB, 243x298, derp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3934065

>>3934041
Oh no, not the "you're too stupid" challenge! I better hurry up and prove myself.

>> No.3934071

>>3934065

No need to, you already proved you didn't have any clue about computer science.

>> No.3934075

>>3934071
> already proved

> he can't even recognize a proof from a lack of proof

>> No.3934079
File: 29 KB, 450x610, dirac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3934079

Hello. I pretty much invented QED and laid the foundations for computers.

>> No.3934084

>>3933828
>mfw this guy is completely wrong about some shit
Almost always, computational complexity is the restraint to think about, in interesting problems; not my imagination.

>> No.3934085

>>3934075

Comparing programming and information theory without even being cautious is a proof of being either stupid or trolling.

There's no lack of proof.

Go learn some real stuff, kid.

>> No.3934130

>>3934085
At first I thought this was just a playful troll, but now I realize you really are upset. I'm sorry. The SICP thing which set this off is just a joke, you see, well-known in some circles, but apparently not yours. Hopefully this path will not have to be tread again for you, since it is a topic so close to your heart, and getting upset about something like this is not productive.

>> No.3934133

>>3934084
> co-authors one of the most popular introductory books to computer science ever
> is completely wrong about shit
It's like I'm really getting trolled.

>> No.3934201

>>3933908
flaming idiot

>> No.3934233

>4chan
>OP is actually a fag
>Nobody points this out

>> No.3934241

>>3934233
> can't even read the thread

>> No.3934248

>>3934233

redundant redundancy is redundant

>> No.3934272

Great discussion guys.

>> No.3934331

>>3934130

> posts joke
> nobody gets it
> says it's other people's fault

Not upset, why would I? I'm not the one looking stupid here.

>>3934201

hurrrrrr

>> No.3934344

>>3934331
Oh, I'm pretty sure people got it, bro. Someone posted the youtube link, after all. But if it's what you need to calm down, ok, it was a horrible joke, no one got it, I am totally embarrassed.

Feel better?

>> No.3934348

>>3934331
>Thinks he's better than Abelson


>>Underlying our approach to this subject is our conviction that ``computer science'' is not a science and that its significance has little to do with computers.
http://mitpress.mit.edu/sicp/full-text/book/book-Z-H-7.html

hurrrrrrrrrrr

>> No.3934365

>>3934344

> Someone posted

You mean you.

>>3934348

>>Thinks he's better than Abelson

Where did i say so?

Stupid troll is stupid and uncreative. You're even citing the same source than that other guy.

>> No.3934368

>>3934365

> than that other guy.
that other dude already posted.

fix'd

>> No.3934401

charles babbage:

I was sitting in the rooms of the Analytical Society, at Cambridge, my head leaning forward on the table in a kind of dreamy mood, with a table of logarithms lying open before me. Another member, coming into the room, and seeing me half asleep, called out, "Well, Babbage, what are you dreaming about?" to which I replied "I am thinking that all these tables" (pointing to the logarithms) "might be calculated by machinery".

>> No.3934408

>>3934365
I didn't post the youtube link.

>> No.3934423

>>3934133
>He is a very knowledgable man, who has well though through opinions.
>EVERYTHING THIS MAN SAYS IS TRUE
I can make that distinction, can you?