/sci/ - Science & Math

meh, i'm a racial realist. sometimes what might be considered 'racism' is actually just blatantly true scientific facts.

>>3876354
let's do this sci

problem scifags?

>a difference range between 89 and 106 IQ

>welp these sub-human slimes are obviously inferior, they're almost 20 IQ apart!

The difference from the world's smartest man and the world's dumbest idiot (non-brain damaged) is less than the difference between the dumbest idiot and the smartest chimpanzee.

The very first claim about "black genotypes" is wrong.

You are half black or quarter black. There's no dominant "race gene"

>>3876354
>your welcome
>that feel when blacks abandon you for "trying hard" during pre-algebra

What a strange childhood America granted me.

come on most of us know liberalism is moral bankruptcy sieg hail!

>>3876379
*you're

>>3876354

I consider myself a "racial realist," as it were, and that picture just screams of the fact that you're actually a racist.

I would hardly say that Africans, and Africa for that matter, were "left alone" to develop their own culture and technology. They were systematically pillaged for their natural resources by Europeans.

>>3876378
>can't into one drop 'theory' (a gauss)

>>3876378
yeah there is. Ever hear of resessvie and dominant alleles?

>>3876392
truefax

>>3876397

Actually it's more like they have no drive to research technology. They have all they've needed to survive for generations.

Technology is just a natural branch of evolution. You won't get it if you honestly don't need it.

>>3876372
blacks are not sub human just a sub species that some white people think should be eradicated.

wtf is this i don't even>>3876421

right >>3876417

saging this faggotry

>>3876395
Those are individual traits. Blackness doesn't come in a dominant package like this implies. What genes you get are randomly mixed. You are half-black or a quarter-black, not black or white.

>>3876348
>Implying that bioengineering won't eradicate all undesirable racial traits, congenital diseases.
>Implying everyone wouldn't have white babies if they could.

OP, in 100 years, this conversation won't even make sense.

you're missing the point man. I'm racist that means I take valid scientific/genetic data then make some decisions that could be considered arbitrary then kill off a bunch of blacks/mexicans

>>3876354
>i'm a racial realist.
>post misleading picture that implies that Africans left in Africa were left completely to themselves, untouched by European colonialism, etc.
Keep being a moronic, inbred, zoologist fuck cunt.

>>3876449
>>implying people won't modify their genes to make new races like teal, lime green, fluorescent yellow, and glow in the dark orange
heck if we figure out gene therapy, people might be able to change races DAILY!

>>3876449
you are right but only b/c the language will digress into a bunch of grunting and nigger mannerisms

>>3876472
i didn't imply that at all
>moronic, inbred, zoologist fuck cunt.
>string together every swear word you can think of, regardless of the nonsense it forms, like a god-damn 12 year old
stay classy

>>3876348
>>3876358
>>3876368
Oh look. More stormfronters who pick and choose graphs to loosely support their bullshit and who don't even grasp what the fuck those graphs are saying or how to interpret them. Nothing new here. Just stormfronters and eugenicsfags proving once again that they are, for all intents and purposes, illiterate.

>>3876479
>race
>lists colors

>>3876480
>I didn't imply that at all
>Post picture basically saying exactly that
>Post response of yourself being a complete camwhore
Get the fuck off of /sci/. You have no place here you ignoramus.

>>3876479
>>implying people won't modify their genes to make new races like teal, lime green, fluorescent yellow, and glow in the dark orange
>heck if we figure out gene therapy, people might be able to change races DAILY!
We can do that already you simp, it's called "getting a tan".

>>3876481
So you're saying people WON'T have designer babies, and remove low intelligence, ugliness, genetic diseases, and generally unwanted racial characteristics from the gene pool, and that those who don't won't become a permanent genetic underclass?

yeah OP mixed race people are so degenerate

>>3876395
>resessvie and dominant alleles?
That's cute. Did you just learn about that in high school biology?
It's okay kid. I remember when Mendelian genetics seemed like hot shit at the time.

>>3876524

>Obama
>Not a degenerate

>>3876524

case in point

>cameronface.jpg

>>3876541

And yet he's the exemplar of your people.

>>3876348
>mixed race people
>pics of people with Vitiligo
>pics of albino people

Hohhohohohoho.

I would say I'm a racialist and I don't know which race is brainier or whatever...
It's a touchy subject and I don't think the world would be a better place if we were to say "x race is shit tier and that's a literal fact".

>>3876480
>>3876480
You didn't but your picture did.

I think that everybody isn't considering environmental factors that do have a powerful determinant in your success. Unless you have some incredibly disabling congenital disease your pretty much on the same starting line. Even then sheer will and determination could help you overcome your circumstance. That being said I love my Nazi Aryan Princess Elle Fanning.

>Aryan
Am I to understand that these "racialist" don't know the origin of this word they so dearly use and love?

>>3876524
LOL picks an outlier from data and extrapolates from one data point. Okay man good logic!

Also obama is a very popular president right now with his great economy