[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 69 KB, 492x718, 1316166870824.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3847486 No.3847486 [Reply] [Original]

>find all the positive divisors of 372, which are prime #s

how would you do this very quickly? is there a method other than just straight up trial and error

>> No.3847504

>>3847499

thanks, makes sense

>> No.3847499

Divide it by 2. Then divide what is left by 2 if you can. If you can not, then divide it by 3 if you can, and if not, then 5 if you can.
Keep moving up the prime numbers dividing what is left by the lowest one you can each time.
When you are left with a prime number as the remainder, you have reached the end.

>> No.3848943

the remainder should always be zero, else the number being tested isn't a divisor

>> No.3848956
File: 132 KB, 686x686, Thisiscorrect.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3848956

>>3847499
Nice!

>> No.3848974

http://rosettacode.org/wiki/Prime_decomposition

>> No.3848977

>>3847499
>basic method
>>3848956
>NICE!!11111
Yeah, way to go, you make it sound like it's something groundbreaking.

>> No.3848986
File: 10 KB, 600x407, wat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3848986

Not even sure if thats right... fuck it.

>> No.3848987

>>3848956
I want to hug Zooey Deschanel. Just once.

>> No.3848990

>>3848987
I want to hug EK. More than once.

>> No.3848994

>>3848990
I want to hug Ek, with my penis....

>> No.3848995

>>3848986
it is right.

>> No.3849001

>>3848977
>adding extra exclamation marks

the simplest correct method is the best one.

>> No.3849003
File: 15 KB, 400x400, 1280685957253.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849003

>>3848990
>>3848994
>mfw your wishes will be granted and it turns out that EK is a repulsive looking, fat neckbeard.

>> No.3849064

what does Ek look like? Ive seen pictures but they all look like different things

>> No.3849085

>>3849064
Shes got huge boobs that are awesome and a round ass but not like fat round like holy fuck round.

I saw this one pic where she had a sharpie in her pooper she doesnt wipe but I dont mind the smell.

>> No.3849088
File: 4 KB, 210x229, 1294017509306.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849088

>>3849064
>Rose
>some fat /v/ tripfag
>a fat scottish kneckbeard
>none of the above

pick one. i'm sure plenty more theories have also been made.

>> No.3849090

>>3849088
can I taste your japsi

>> No.3849100
File: 186 KB, 1280x960, 302.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849100

Well, I'd rather hug Zooey then.

>> No.3849103

>>3849064
Why does it matter?
And why do you keep using your trip if you know the thread is fucked the second you do, EK?

>> No.3849108

>>3849103
She loves doggy style

>> No.3849107

>>3849088

you're not my friend Georgie, are you?

>> No.3849109

>>3849108

who doesn't ... know what I mean... nudge nudge

>> No.3849112
File: 92 KB, 300x300, 1312579631796.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849112

>>3849107

>> No.3849114

>>3849109
BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH BAH RAISE YOUR VOICE.

>> No.3849120
File: 37 KB, 358x459, Zooey-Deschanel-8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849120

Why does EK get so much attention anyways?

>> No.3849128

>>3849112

That's the the guy! But who is his alter ego?

>> No.3849133

>>3849120

Because I imagine EK is really Billy Connelly?

>> No.3849129

>>3849120
>negative attention.
count yourself lucky, the only 'good' attention is shite like this that i dont care about anyway:
>>3838827

>> No.3849134
File: 2 KB, 112x112, lol..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849134

>>3849129
lol, b&?
fuck it.

>> No.3849141

>>3849129
Lets fuck please I live in Norway

>> No.3849145
File: 41 KB, 450x360, wet hair.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3849145

>>3849088

People really think you're Rose?

But Rose is far smarter than you

>> No.3849155

>>3849145
Keep that shit to >>>/g/
I was severly disappointed to see her face on /x/ yesterday.

>> No.3849162

>serious thread
>divulges into tripfag worship

Laters, 4chan.

>> No.3849176

>>3849155
on /x/ you should be disappointed in yourself for going there Faggot

>> No.3849200

>>3849176
I found out that /x/ is better than /sci/.
People who go there already don't take it serious. That's why they don't have butthurt aspies like on /sci/.

>> No.3849208

>>3849176
I go to /x/ to troll with science. (I'm not the guy you responded to)