/sci/ - Science & Math

that man also promotes atheism so I'm ok with it

>implying engineering is a real field

>implying it isn't

>implying engineering is a real field

Well it is in the sense that homosexuality is a field.

>promoting atheism
>derp

>>3836442
>implying it needs to be promoted

>>3836442
Yes, by making them look like assholes. Sounds good.

>>3836438

No he doesn't.
Never bought a book of his or anything associated with him.

>>3836757
Haha nice comeback. Thats why i love you ek

He's welcome to it. I've given him my money before, and I'll give him more in the future.

>>3836757

>>3837177
thanks hun! :)

also, OP was innacurate anyway as Dawkins doesnt directly make any money from peoples atheism, he makes money because he is an author. Just because atheism is often his subject matter doesnt mean that it is directly how he is making money, all authors can write about anything they like, and if people choose to buy their books, then they make money.
(isn't just an author either, he's a biologist and an ethologist)

>>3837191
contrary to this, the pope DOES make money directly from gullible peoples fear of hell-fire.

>>3837191
>she called me hun and now im dreaming of our life together

>>3837191
You know EK, you sometimes get a lot of hate on this board, but I think it's entirely unjustified. You're intelligent, and whenever someone asks a question on this board, you are usually one of the first there answering it (correctly). A few people just have a bit of a problem with you being a girl/a trip. Dare I say, you're my favourite trip.

Keep up the good work.

inb4 white knight

>>3837198
Back off, brosive

>>3837198
I expect the hate, in fact i kinda deserve a lot of it. i'm hardly the most tactful or polite person, but thanks anyway.
(i also should have probably never mentioned i was a girl, as people tend to focus on that sometimes rather than my arguments, but hindsights a bitch)

>>3837207
If you hadnt mentioned it i wouldnt know to fap over our life together

hahaha. You scientist seem to forget that all your theories would be utterly useless to anyone if it weren't for engineers.

>>3837207
tits or gtfo

>>3837214
thats a bit wierd, dude. just find a nice girl who actually lives near you.

>>3837175 Nobody likes the collage I made :(

>>3837223
>implying i can talk to women without a keyboard

>>3837226
Don't worry bro, I liked it. Illustrates your point perfectly.

>>3837226
I did engineers > scientists.

>>3837230
Why do people keep making comparison's like this. The fact is that neither is better than the other. Both fields are nothing without the other.

>>3837228
what? how is that any different to talking to men?

>>3837226
I liked it

you happy now faggot?

>>3837235
Not same guy, but I can answer his question. Do females have any fucking idea how intimidating it is to just walk up and talk to a girl? The constant fear of rejection looms in the back of our minds, always hoping we don't fuck up. Some guys are 'smoother' than others, but trust me, it is the same (to varying degrees) for every man on the planet.

>>3837240
>>3837230
>>3837229
Thank you :') I needed an image to show people that engineering does not involve fixing washing machines and conducting an MOT

>implying engineers aren't the gay oompa loompas of science.

>>3837235
Becayse they assume i want to sleep with them. Gs just assume i want to talk aout football since im not feminine

>>3837246
>oompa loompas of science

LOL. This is true.

Scientists --------- engineers ------------ architects/designers/ consultants/ policy adisors

Each side of the spectrum is cool. Middle is faggotry

>>3837244
what fear of rejection? talking is just talking. when i talk to guys im never like "oh noes! so nervous! what if he doesnt want to fuck me?"
who the fuck even cares? theres are billions literally billions of guys on the planet, and approximately the same number of girls.
say whatever the fuck you want, be confident, and if they dont like it then to hell with them, theres plenty more fish in the sea, and some of them probably WILL like what you have to say.
better to say something than nothing at all anyway.

>>3837254
Stop fucking derailing threads, EK!

>>3837247
why would they assume that?
most guys tend to have girlfriends, if a guy talks to you you dont immediately assume he wants to fuck, because statistically the majority of guys are taken, and the majority are faithful to their relationship.
if he's being flirty then you might assume, and then we're basically free to choose to either be flirty in return or show disinterest.

>>3837261
oh right, sorry. i'll go.

>>3837264
noooo

It's not EK derailing threads, it's the people who can't get over the fact that she's a girl who do

>>3837260
So youre saying girls arent always expecting every guy who talks to them beng a pathetic lonely virgin?

>>3837272
I can get over it. I just need to learn from her so i can get a girlfriend

>>3837254
>what fear of rejection?

The fear of rejection that is ingrained in our DNA from when we lived in small tribes. Getting rejected by a woman in such a small social circle could have disastrous consequences for a man, as the whole tribe could find out and it is possible he would never pass on his DNA to anyone. Not to mention the fact that if our ancestor's 'hit on the wrong girl' he could get in major trouble with other males. Nothing you can do to get rid of it, just something all men have to overcome in the modern world. What you think when talking to guys, and what they think are two completely different things, you can't assume male and female brains work the same.

How can EK help you? She doesn't understand the male anxiety of approaching women.

>people praising EK
>people calling EK intelligent
>people thinking EK is a woman

So the other /sci/ elders were right, /sci/ has turned to shit.

Well, I am off, bye /sci/~

>>3837291
haha, never wanted help from her. Just trying to get her to comprehend the male psych when talking to females. Alas, she is a female, so I don't think she'll get it.

>>3837293
EK is typing as an anon from another IP address?

>>3837300
Yeah, EK samefags all the damn time, but a good amount of these posts aren't EK.

I also noticed EK's stalker still roams the boards.

I cannot stand that pseudo-intellectual voodoo loving troll, he should have left /sci/ forever pretend to be off for a few weeks while posting frequently as his 'harriet' persona.

>>3837317
Ek has a stalker other than me?

>>3837175
>No mention of refrigeration

It's okay bro, I'll just be over here keeping your beer cold. Don'.... Don't worry about me.

>>3837317
i dont samefag ever!, and i left the thread about 10 posts ago because that anon told me to stop derailing, and when i look at the thread again it is still derailed because you faggots arnt getting back on topic!
And harriet doesnt samefag either, and since when did she like voodoo?
fuck it, you're retarded, get back on topic or fuck off!!
i'm staying out the thread now, get the fuck back on topic!

engineer

medic

the only /sci/ classes in team fortress.

>>3837382
>telling people to get on topic
>in the same post which is nothing but self-absorbed tripe

>>3837382
I admire your honesty but you need to stop swearing so much. Play nice.

>>3837382
Well the issue has pretty much been resolved, they both need each other, so I guess it's back to derailing the thread EK.

>>3837398
erm, fine. i kinda wanted to reply anyway but didnt wanna de-rail if people still wanted to use this thread for something other than mindless chit-chat.

>>3837276
of course not

>>3837284
most girls are not so blunt to simply reject someone outright, we are subtle. no girl is ever going to say "oh by the way, just so you know, there is no chance of us ever having sex"
you dont get rejected, you just didnt succeed at pulling her on 1 particular occassion.

>>3837291
<<<

>>3837300
no

>>3837388
because an anon was talking bollocks about me, i aught to respond. and me leaving didnt stop the thread being derailed anyway 10 or so posts down the line.

>>3837436
Yeh, and a guy would never flat out ask a girl that he just met for sex, but that doesn't mean he can't be rejected. All human's are subtle when it comes to the mating game, but the outcome is still the same. Most guy's definitely know when they've been rejected even if she doesn't flat out say it, and people in the vicinity definitely notice. You don't seem to understand that the fear is instinctual, and there is nothing really logical about it.

>>3837461
>a guy would never flat out ask a girl that he just met for sex
lol wut? yeah they fucking do. well sometimes, most guys arnt quite that blunt, but if both parties have consumed plenty of booze then honesty tends to rise to the surface and the facade of keeping up appearances rapidly breaks down.
yay for booze...
and yeah, i get what you are saying, people USUALLY are not so direct, they might ask to dance, or ask to buy a drink, or ask for a phone number, and its still very obvious what they actually want, they are just being coy.
and then a refusal is still pretty obvious in any of these cases, and you both still know where you both stand.

>>3837473
Ok. Now can you understand the position of a guy who doesn't have a lot of experience with women making the effort to come and talk to you? He has just overcome a major mental hurdle. As for douchebags who straight up ask you for sex, they have the same fear, they are just trying to overcompensate by acting borish and like they don't give a fuck (they actually do). Pay no attention to them, but definitely give guys who may seem awkward at first more of a chance (spread the word to all women!).

>>3837207
THEN JUST CHANGE YOUR TRIP YOU DUMB BITCH

>>3837489
I do, in fact i find the awkward ones cute as fuck, its completely adorable, its so obvious how nervous they are, and i like to mess them about a bit and fuck with their heads for my own amusement.
the overconfident jock types are far more boring and less interesting to pull that shit with.

>>3837497
you are presuming i give a fuck that a lot of anons hate me
i dont.

>>3837510
do you give a fuck when I say i love you

>>3837510

hey Rose, ummm, I was um wondering if you would.... y'know...uh show me your tits?

How's that?

>>3837531
not really.
me and my housemate were having a discussion about love the other day, and 99% of he time, when it is said they dont really mean it, or it is just said by people who dont even realise what love is.
loads of our mates who suck at holding relationships together are all like "hurr durr, im so in love [person A] is so amazing and great at everything i love him so much"
and then 2 weeks later they break up, and after a while she'l get a new boyfriend, and be like "hurr durr, im so in love [person B] is so amazing and great at everything i love him so much"

love is not so fickle, you cant just stop it and start it that fucking easily if its true love.
ive not ever been in love
my hosuemate has though, or so she says.

>>3837544
I would never do that. I"m clingy and desperate which means even if I did 'break up' with you i'd still be infatuated with you and would never be able to say 'i love you' to another person. i dont even care that you don't give a fuck. I still love you.

>>3837510

how much awkward?

someone just shy or kinda autistic like the driver of Drive?

>>3837539
What is the best you could get out of that comment, knowing EK would never show her tits on this board.

>>3837555
wtf is this faggotry

>>3837555
This guy is a serial killer

>>3837555
thats not a good thing! trust me, an 'i dont give a fuck' attitude towards relationships is far preferable.

>>3837556
i never saw that film, and no, not autistic, just a fairly normal guy who is a bit quiet/shy is preferable.
one is an irritating freak, and one is potentially worth fucking.

>>3837557
>2011
>still thinking that any fems are even trolled anywhere by the whole 'tits or GTFO' thing
we just ignore them.

>>3837562

>>3837570
>implying trolling
>implying we don't actually want to see tits

>>3837555

>>3837570
> an 'i dont give a fuck' attitude towards relationships is far preferable.

No it's not. you have to invest if you want any significant returns

>>3837582
Nope, we want to see yours specifically.

>>3837570
>i never saw that film

oh you should

>>3837576
then you'd go to /s/, or a porn site, or simply google 'tits' with safesearch off.

>>3837580
probably. i guess thats why i dont do relationships.

>>3837583
lol EK is female equivalent of lonely beta male trying desperately to convince herself loneliness suits her

EK got b&!

>all of EK's posts are gone

>>3837594
Just because her posts are gone, that doesn't mean she's banned.

clingy guy here. where did EK go? ;_:

>>3837600
haha, I think the mod's got pissed off with her derailing threads and not showing tits.

>>3837604
You are fucked up bro.

wtf? my computer just crashed, and all my posts just disapeared.

...testing.

>>3837606
that maybe but at least i know my feelings are genuine unlike you deceitful troll

>>3837610
That's not how the internet works bitch.

>>3837610
lol those two things would never be causally linked. mod deleted your posts. you just dont want to admit the mods hate you

>>3837615
I never saw a ban screen, but /sci/ is running very very slowly at the moment.

>>3837610

>computer crashed
>posts disappeared
>implying someone could believe such a thing

>>3837610

lol EK you better leave the real science and thinking to the men. your "me too!" mentality won't pass here, maybe on reddit

>>3837612
well the fact that you have genuine feelings for a tripfag you have never met or had a real conversation with is the fucked up part. I assure you, EK would be a dissapointment to you if you ever met in real life.

>>3837623
no i wouldnt!

>>3837620

>implying all women must be like EK

>>3837629

>that implication was never made, and i don't see how what was quoted can even be construed to entertain that implication

>having said that, what you did imply is actually true. women trying to step up to the big leagues (men's world) and failing miserably

>>3837629
i dont think he implyed that

>>3837624
Yes, yes you would. You think you could ever live up to the goddess status this guy has elevated you to in his head? Dissapointment would definitely ensue if you two ever met.

>>3837649
oh.
fine, ok.

>>3837624
thank you :3

>>3837653

can someone explain to me what emotion or face :3 conveys? ive never been able to make a face like that, but that may because im not maliciously deformed

>>3837658
its like this
<<<

>>3837649
refer to what i said before. my love is dependent on her faultlessness. the sleeping around, the smoking. its not my think but i adore her for it.

>>3837658

>>3837662
it isnt the same as sleeping around! they are lifelong friends its just that there is more than one of them!

>>3837664

lol i like how they attribute coy-ness and its corresponding irritability to women

>>3837663

you're not a cat

>>3837669
>you're not a cat
...as far as you know.

>>3837669
>lol i like how they attribute coy-ness and its corresponding irritability to women


All smilies are sinister and manipulative. That why more women use them than men. you can always tell if its a man because they overuse them and aren't nearly as creative, usually limiting to one basic type :) or :D . they dont think about it because they usually only do it because they know women love it

>>3837666

>implying sleeping around your friends is different from sleeping around.

>>3837682
erm, yes.
slags are known for being slags because they fuck random strangers they have met that day, just for the sake of sex, while feeling virtually nothing for the other person except temporary lust.
my way is very very strong friendship with permanent lust.
its completely different from how true slags behave.

>>3837666
i meant to say not dependent. i always forget important words. and it doesnt matter whats its called. im okay with it

>>3837664

>>3837692

>no true slag woman

>>3837687
it's a baby face

>>3837692

I saw what you did there, and oh god did I laugh.

>>3837699
EK just schooled on an argument she was using only minutes before. HA!

>>3837637
>>3837642

well I just used the "must" wrong.
I meant
>implying all of them are like EK, AKA saying daily bullshit like the computer crash one.

>>3837692
>permanent lust

Nope.

>>3837731
why nope?

>>3837699
>>3837725
whatever, theres nothing wrong with my approach and to hell with anyone who thinks there is. how would you feel if people were like "oh by the way, i know tennis is one of your hobbies and all, but from ow on you can only play tennis with one person, otherwise you're a bad person"
and i'm like "what? why? whats wrong with playing tennis against different people at different times?"
"...i dunno, lol!"

>>3837747
because not horny all the time, so he's right i guess. but the point is that the other person matters, and you still both care about each other.

>>3837763

I got your point, cool.