/sci/ - Science & Math

They are not.

It's just your opinion and you're a goddamn pedobear.

because fat people are slow, inactive, more prone to disease, not as much fun, and far far worse in bed.

evolutionarily speaking they just make shit mating partners, which is why we have evolved to value the none-fatties more.

fitter

better chances of protecting your offspring

to be accurate:

skinny women are not attractive

fit women are

>>3758304
Yes they are, and you're a faggot.

>>3758300

Because there's no good reason to keep large amounts of fat reserves, which have some bad effects on your general health, if you're living in a civilization where food is readily accessible at all times.
Also, fat people remind me of Americans, and mating with Americans is just wrong.

>>3758308
The real question is: Why is EK so attractive?

It's a sociological phenomenon, not evolutionary. Breeding with large amounts of fat storage is in fact ideal. That means we've culturally developed this idea, and you've learnt it over time and subconscious developments. Our brains are not dictated by evolution, it's too intelligent and has gone a bit hay-wire.

Just look at hospitals. We are trying to cure everything. Every disease, cancer, and even aging; just because we don't want to see ourselves die. That's cultural and emotional, a by-product of the brain we have by chance developed and has resulting led us to the top of the animal kingdom. So you see, our brains and culture and emotions are stopping evolution. People who should be dying by natural selection are not. Our brains are stopping it.

And likewise, our brains are developing other contradictory norms... such as being attracted to a skinnier woman.

>skinner

I think you mean younger

This thread = full tard.

>>3758337
This post, first sentence is important, rest is absolute bullshit.

It was common to consider fat/chubby women beautiful several hundred years ago, today it's not, it's just cultural.

>>3758344
>skinner

Because fat people are disgusting pigs.

It's easier to become fit (which is the ideal form of attractive) if you are skinny, than if you are fat.

There's a range of what kind of women are considered attractive.
In general, it's the extremes which are mostly shunned (except for people with fetishes for them). Clinically anorexic girls are considered just as unattractive as obese ones.
Likewise both slim/fit chicks as well as slightly chubby ones (as long as they are not obese of course) are often considered very attractive.
Nowadays the slim side of that spectrum is more emphasized than it was centuries ago, when chubby women were considered most attractive (one of the reasons was that: chubby = wealthy enough to eat as much as you wanted).

>>3758354
"steam from the steamed clams we'll be having. mmm! steamed clams!"

>>3758367
I love you EK.

I want to squish your breasts in my fat rolls and make nerdy love to you all night.

>>3758367
Please marry me.

>>3758370
>fat rolls
aww, sorry hun. did you not read my first post ITT?

>>3758373
i'll never marry anyone.
marriage is an outdated useless tradition with no purpose.

>>3758375
I'm sorry about that. It was a distastful joke and not even funny. I'm not actually fat. I just get so flustered when I see you post.

>>3758373
You stay away from her!

>>3758332
You know, whether that picture is EK or not, I think I've fallen in love.

If it IS EK, well, even better, because I know she's got the brains to go with her looks.

>>3758363

Not at all. Fit people are most attractive (whether male or female), have always been, and will always be. To group fit girls with thin or "chubby" is just ridiculously wishful thinking.

Fucking christ. Would you lonely fuckers stop inflating her ego? She gets enough undeserved attention as it is, stop contributing to it.

>>3758310
This.
Skinny women look a bit genderless. Bones and whatnot.
Healthy, fit, curvy (but not chubby) women are the best.

>>3758389
it's not me, see: >>3758362

>>3758389

This is Ek

What one finds sexually attractive seems to be able to be changed over just a few short years.

I used to wank to furries. They don't do it for me at all now. Shemales? Took awhile, but there was a time when they got me exceedingly hard.

Now I can only get off to women with a nice hip/waist ratio and a good face.

>>3758393
>opinions

Consider also, that much of our idea of beauty these days is contructed by media and advertisement, as much as we love to deny it.

>>3758399
WHY do you always post her picture? Do you have a dyke crush on her?

>EK posts
>thread derailed

>mfw this thread deserved to be derailed

>>3758395
> undeserved

Fuck off.

>>3758402
FTFY

>>3758402
>this is EK

You mean the one on the left, right?

>>3758406

>Implying fit people aren't literally physically dominant over those who are unfit.
>Implying the media can ever change that.

>>3758408
lol yeh kinda.
(im bisexual)

>>3758428
Fuck, I have to go jack off. Can I get a picture of you (even just your body) to aid my fantasies? I'll keep it tasteful, promise.

A study showed that men were more attracted to large women when they were hungry, and more attracted to skinny women when they were full.

>>3758399
>MFW she is going to receive a pile of creepy letters in the mail

>>3758439
Probably a 'psychological' study. We only accept pure, hard science here. Take that shit elsewhere.

Why are furries more attractive than humans?

>>3758443

Psychology is harder science than biology.

>>3758446

please tell me where you live so I can kill you

>>3758438
what? no!
thats fucking wierd, i really dont need to know about shit like that.

>>3758450
Well, that's a given, but that doesn't change the fact that psychology is still not a science.

Piss tastes better than shit, but they're both terrible.

>>3758438
Right here, man:
>>3758402

>>3758451
Are you jelly that you'll never have the superior mind of a furry?

>>3758456
It'll have to do for now since she's being a nutjob and won't give me her pic. I'll find it oneday though, and when I do I'm going to x-ray the fuck out of her tits.

>unless she's fat

>>3758455
>Piss tastes better than shit, but they're both terrible.

beargrylls.jpg

>>3758461
Bro... that is EK.

>>3758428
>Implying you're bi
>Implying you aren't just trying to get more attention

>>3758466
Proof? Because... I can fap to that

>>3758468
>implying you didn't fall for it

You people need to read a fucking book. Skinny women are more attractive because you've been conditioned both biologically and culturally to associate low body fat with good genes, and your brain "rewards" your realization of this with the sensation of attraction. This is an Evolutionarily stable strategy because mixing your genes with other good genes grants the highest probability of the survival of your offspring.

>>3758332

I hope you realise that your pic related is not EK.

idk know op. Golden ratios perhaps? Anyway, I just popped by to say I really despise lardy, waddle along, fat cunts.

That is all.

>>3758475
But that's bullshit. I haven't been conditioned.

>>3758475
>book

What is this, the 17th century?

>>3758471
I remember there was a lot of evidence, but I don't care enough about her to save it. Rest assured that is her though, I promise.

>>3758461
[sarcasm] yes, I'M the nutjob because i dont want to give you my pics to fap to [/sarcasm]

>>3758468
i actually am, its nothing to do with getting attention.

>>3758478
they know, we already covered that.

>>3758486
Sorry, but I just can't. I want to, but I can't. I'll save the pics and try /r/ if noone can prove it.

>>3758488
>its nothing to do with getting attention.

>>3758402

EK, you always claim that this is not you.

Let me ask you then, what do you think of her looks?

Rate her upon 10.

>>3758490
Did you notice how she hasn't denied that the photo is her? It's because we all know that it's her now, she's done trying to deny it.

Hey EK, where's Teapot?
I haven't seen him on here for quite some time.

>>3758482

It runs deeper than what you're aware of, and much deeper than your opinions on bullshit.

>>3758493
"you dare use my own spells against me, potter?"

>>3758499
>Teapot

Oh fuck i hope that's not a boyfriend.

Please tell me you're still a virgin EK darling.

EK, is it true you had sex with this guy?

>>3758503
>implying there is any guy in the pic

>>3758499
probably doing 1-5 for hitting a woman in the face with a chair.

>>3758507
Who is Teapot?

>>3758499
its 'teacup'
and i'm not him,

(for all those unaware, it was a popular dumassed conspiracy theorist argument that me, teacup, and harriet are all the same person. we arn't.

>>3758503
HA. Oh god I hope that's true.

>>3758512
Another annoying tripfag who claimed to know EK.

>>3758450

Purity scale:

math >> physics > chem > biology > earth sci > psychology


Man, psychology is soooooo fucking loose on scientific validity. There are so many measurement uncertainties it's fucked, and wayyy too many variables because the brain is super complex. Biology is way more solid because you can experiment with millions of cells no problem, but psychologically experimenting with humans (which are millions of times more complex than cells) on the scale of a couple hundred people is peanuts for any validity. Psychological tests have fucking lame-ass sample sizes. You want validity, get on the scale of a billion people to test from all over the world and maybe you have something.

>>3758518
FTFY:

math, physics, enginiggering, chemistry >>>> social sciences >>> non-sciences >>> pseudo-sciences >>>> biology

>>3758488
How long are you on 4chan at one time?
It seems like you waste all of your free time here.

You could be doing something much more productive than arguing with manchildren about attention, which is hypocritical in itself.

>>3758502
>Please tell me you're still a virgin EK darling.
not even close.

>>3758523
ah, ok, I don't want your smelly, loose vag and ass anymore.

>>3758522
I multitask. (i'm watching cosmos on the other tab and lurking some other sites as well)

>>3758523
a virgin once removed then...

obligatory repost

>>3758523
Ow. Well, I still love you.

>>3758523

EK, you still havent answered me?

What do you think of that fat bitch that everybody keeps saying is you?

This: >>3758402

>>3758502
Are you kidding? EK is a full blown whore.

>>3758402
Please tell me someone has the proof that this is EK.

>>3758533
she isnt fat!
and she isnt me anyway, i think she looks okay. i dunno really. maybe a 7/10

>>3758528
Still seems like an utter waste of time and effort. Is THIS your hobby? I mean the attentions great and all but....really?

>>3758541
It's not EK.

She probably just spread the rumours that it's her to hide her real identity. It's not her though.

I imagine EK is really fat.

>>3758545
science is my hobby. this is just idle chit-chat buts it's entertaining all the same =p

>>3758541

Lemma 1: God exists.
Lemma 2: Atheists burn in hell.

Corollary: Pic shows EK.

Problem, agnostics?

>>3758543
>she isnt fat!
More proof that it isn't really EK.

She's pretending to get defensive so we'll all say:
>she isnt fat!
oh, sounds like it really is you EK oooh etc.

>>3758534
>>3758540
less than 20 is still accurate, and that isnt particularly bad, i know some other girls who have slept with laods more guys than me.

>>3758550
Are you on here all day?

>>3758543
>7/10
Seriously...? Look that's either you or you have terribly low standards.

>>3758553
And how much do you get paid for it?

>>3758556
no, but usually a couple of hours a day at least.

>>3758553
No need to defend yourself EK.

Sleep with as many as you want, there's nothing wrong with it.

Just don't post it on sci, as it's off-topic.

>>3758563
>huuuuurrrrrrrrrr /SCI/ IS FOR SCIENCE AND MATH

That's what newfags actually believe.

>>3758543

WHAT

You cant be serious.

Shes not morbidly obese, but shes pretty fat, at least from those pics.

Her body looks below average.

Face maybe a 5/10

Why do you think shes a 7/10?

>>3758560
hurr durr!
fuck off, i'm no whore.

>>3758561
oh yeah, definitely a lard-ass then

>>3758553
Just because some people are more of a whore than you doesn't make you any less of a whore.

>>3758541
>>3758541

http://chanarchive.org/4chan/sci/13660/question-for-ek

>>3758566
Is that pic actually EK?

If so
>dat left eyebrow

>>3758561
Not much else to say to you then, have fun

This thread turned out to be better than expected.

>go to /ic/
>KITCHEN
>go to /sci/
>EC

Attention whores, attention whores everywhere.

>>3758571
Holy fuck.

Well EK, you're better looking than I thought.

>>3758586
b- blank space?

>>3758584
did you miss the part about Rose not being me, and them getting the WRONG facebook?
harriet even posted and said so later after that thread.

>>3758586
You idiot.

>>3758582
*EK, but who gives a fuck really

>>3758586
>no pic

>>3758588
Why did Harry never come back?

All evolutionary explications on this subject are pseudo-science and untrue.

The truth is that we like skinny partners more because of advertising and obsession with youth that started in 1960s France, soon to be followed by the USA.

Everyone wants to fuck (pre-)adolescents these days, even priests, and that is because the young and skinny body is a sign of youth, carefree attitude, thrift and ceaseless sexual vigour, and is therefore virtually systemic, capitalism's preferred form.

>>3758443
>/sci/entologist

>>3758571
>http://www.facebook.com/media/set/?set=a.30320290103.106159.618615103
>Nights under l'influence
>l'
>le

Because they have higher status

>>3758597
she did, she posted about a week ago apparently. she just doesnt post much.
(shes a bit more sensitive than me, i dont give a fuck if people wanna slag me off, but i think it bothers her so she rarely comes here)

>>3758599
>>3758602
Noone gives a shit about the question anymore. This is an EK thread and if you don't like it you can FUCK OFF!

-OP

>>3758599
*I meant consumption instead of thrift, my English is not all that good.

pic related, most accurate depiction of /sci/ and EK

>>3758606
So EK, why do you post with a trip?

inb4 hurr idk just feel like it. or some other stupid reason.

>>3758300
Skinny women aren't often skinny rather skinnyfat, as someone else said /fit/ women are hot.

Women with curves are also hot, and when i say curves i mean curves not one curve that is round.

>>3758588
>>3758588

There's no point denying it. We all know it's you.

EK

If 7/10 is your rating for that landwhale and 6/10 is your rating for yourself, then I must say, I am terribly disappoint.

Seems like guys only use you cause youre easy.

Oh well.

>>3758616
A curve is a map R --> R^n
What you mean is a certain range for the radius of curvature.

>>3758613
idk, i just feel like it. or some other stupid reason.

>>3758617
>implying there is only 1 person called harriet in the world who one could be room-mates with

you don't 'know' anything. you just presume.

>>3758527

Biology and chemistry is where it's at these day. Nobody gives a shit about physics and their large hardon colliders or pure maths and it's useless bullshit.

>>3758613
Same reason all trips post with a trip, they are attention seeking faggots.

Its pretty common knowledge.

>>3758623
guys don't 'use me' at all!
i'm very close with my guys, and the relationships go far further than just simple sex.

>>3758631
>EK
>Attention whore
>Not a beautiful, intelligent angel sent from above who garners only a fraction of the attention she actually deserves

>>3758628
haha, good one! you sure are witty XD

Now stop being a retard and give a real answer. Would it be so bad to just admit that you're an attention starved whale preying on the lonely people of /sci/?

>>3758630
>implying physics isn't more than hardon collidors
>implying math has to be pure and not applied
>implying you're not trolling
>implying I seriously want to discuss this shit within an epic EK thread

EK what university/course are you in?

>>3758635
>the relationships go far further than just simple sex.

lol
thanks EK, it's not hard to convince someone of what they want to believe.

Is it just me, or have all other threads slowed down since this one started?

>>3758638
>EK
>Attention whore
>Not a beautiful, intelligent angel sent from above

See you get it now, That is exactly right it jsut applies to every tripfaggot.

>>3758644
*sigh*
ive already covered this on multiple occassions, the point of the tripcode is that its useful for keeping converstions going in the threads, and to know who you are replying to, which posts are yours, which posts are mine, etc.
i also like my housemate to be able to see which posts are mine when she lurks, and i like to be able to quickly find my posts in the archives if i ever need to bring up an old post in an argument, or search for something i remember from earlier.

Damn it, I should have been studying for my test tomorrow.

Fucking EK. Why you gotta post mang.

>>3758670
>i also like my housemate to be able to see which posts are mine when she lurks

Why?

>>3758674
she's interested, apparently.
when i stopped using my trip for a few days, she (as well as others) requested that i start using it again.
i decided to go along with it.

>>3758670
Oh I see, that sounds a lot like A FUCKING FORUM. THIS IS AN ANONYMOUS IMAGE BOARD, GO JOIN A FUCKING FORUM IF YOU WANT TO BE A SPECIAL UNIQUE SNOWFLAKE. Nobody needs to know which posts are and aren't yours. You seriously don't understand the point of 4chan.

>>3758670

Please post a picture of yourself. Please. The more you hide your identity, the more people will try and find out, invading your privacy and perhaps the privacy of innocent parties.

If you just admit thats you then people will lose interest instead of trying to dig deeper to prove that it is really you.

>>3758654
oh, you think they are decieving me?
i've been friends with most of them for years, and in all cases its a very strong long-term friendship, theres just occassional sex as an added extra, and theres nothing wrong with that.

>>3758696

>delusions

>Science and math
>science thread: 8 replies
>EK thread: 200 replies

>>3758684
Now how the hell would they know that you weren't using your trip unless while you were posting as anonymous you stated that you are EK. Why would you do that?

Actually recent scientific studies using the internet shows that sexually at least , men like fatter women more often then skinnier women.

It makes sense, that for 100's of thousands of years being fatter was more attractive to males as it meant better chances of survival to both her and your off spring. A hundred years (at best) of cultural evolution would not override that.

The general population just dose not like to admit it.

>>3758692
>implying 4chan has a point
>implying MOOT doesnt approve of tripfags.
>implying he wouldnt have just removed the name field if the possibility of having a name was not important.

>>3758703
Nobodies going to read that nerd shit. This is an EK thread.

>>3758696

no. but objectively speaking, it makes you loose and/or easy. cant deny that

>>3758702
they guessed it was me when i used a few reaction images..

>>3758712
This is a load of shit. You're lying.

>>3758711
not really.
theres only 3 guys that i regularly see, and do you really count as being a good and loyal friend for several years as 'easy'?

>>3758703
>2011
>posting on topic

ishygddt

>>3758701
Only because EK likes to same fag 199 posts.

>>3758717

EK, either you're an extremely successful troll, or you have personal identity issues, and feel the need to defend yourself on an anonymous image board.

I know you'll try to deny this, but you know I'm right.

attraction is relative.

>>3758715
no i'm not.

come to think of it, i'm pretty much the only person to regularly use FvR reaction images, so guessing it was me would not have been too difficult...

>>3758727
It's a load of shit that your friends come to /sci/ specifically to read a few of your posts.

>implying EK isn't an alien

>>3758717

>theres only 3 guys that i regularly see

objectively speaking, thats pretty loose by most standards

not trying to antagonise you or anything, but you have to admit, from a neutral stand point, the facts you have provided favor the proposition that you are loose and easy

>>3758731
not specifically to JUST read my posts, but it makes it more interesting if some of the other posters you see on here you also know IRL.

>>3758727
>EK !EKFQOBUFnQ
>EK
>!EK
>Mos visage

Coincidence of the year, all years.

>>3758646

> Implying biology doesn't contain both physics and chemistry

I remember my first year at university!

>>3758703
Theres nothing wrong with a chubby/curvy girl, its the fat as fatass bitches who eat 3000-7000kcal a day, rolling around the streets like fucking katamari with there mouth wide open consuming all in their path.

>>3758737
would you like to meet me in real life, Clarice?

>>3758739
Thanks to you my newfag detector is broken now.

>>3758736
what definition of 'loose and easy' are you useing??
if i regularly went out to clubs and picked up any random guy i didnt care about, to just use as a fucktool then that would be easy, but to restrict it to specific friends means it is anything buy easy.

>>3758742
>rolling
>implying they don't ride scooters everywhere

>>3758741
1. basic introductions don't count
2. most biologists fail these already

>>3758747
Not easy, but loose.

>>3758752

>>3758696

>and theres nothing wrong with that.

Yes, deviating from monogamy is both morally wrong and does not lead to long term happiness. We've been through this before.
By slutting around you're changing your reward system and making it harder for you to maintain a monogamous relationship when you decide to.

>yfw you hit menopause and the only guys who will want you will be utter freaks

>>3758603
>>3758603
>>3758603
>>3758603
>>3758603
>>3758603
>>3758603

>>3758764
I'm not going NEAR that thread.

>>3758753
so by loose you mean 'not monogamous'?
i'm fine with that, i dont see why i should be forced to be. nobody tries to force you to just have 1 friend, but apparently with lovers the majority of people require you to only have 1.

seems close minded to me.

>>3758764
lol

4 for 4

will he quit while he's ahead?

>>3758762

Clearly a chipmunk.

>>3758758

'morally wrong'... GTFO /sci/ you faggot.

>>3758752

So, you've basically just confirmed that you've never achieved anything greater than level 100/HS knowledge of biology. Cheers, mate!

>>3758742

Well yeah obviously, too much fat and she can't run away from predators/take care of your children.

Just saying naturally guys like chubbier girls more then skinny girls (of course there's always exceptions to the rule) and it's been this way for probably as long as the human race has existed.

>>3758775
>biology
>an achievement

>>3758523

>not even close
>close to virginity

what that's supposed to mean?

>>3758782

>spending every day of your life on 4chan, trying to troll legitimate biologists who have achieved more in the first 20 years of their life, then you ever will, all the while being a fat, socially retarded neckbeard

>an achievement

>>3758782

Don't be jealous chem and bio have all the best shit. Biotech is my personal favorite.

>>3758300

I find skinny women disgusting. If anybody has ever seen Esperenza Gomez, she is hot as fuck. Muscular but not too much, strong looking in a sexy way.

>>3758788

>>3758770
No I think he means your cavernous vagina.
>i dont see why i should be forced to be. nobody tries to force you to just have 1 friend, but apparently with lovers the majority of people require you to only have 1.
Would you like to know why? Because "normal" people don't want to share their woman. Men are territorial and possessive. Well, they are with things they actually care about. Which leads me to believe that your "friends" really don't give a shit about you beyond ravaging your body. If they did, they wouldn't do a stupid thing like have a 'friends with benefits' relationship with you. You do realise that they almost always end badly right?

> mfw idiots on sci still think science can be cleanly divided into biology, physics, and chemistry.

SURE IS HS AS FUCK IN HERE.

>>3758792
What are you fucking retarded? She is skinny.

>>3758797
how can it 'end badly'?
nothing started, i'm still technically single, i'm not in any official relationship. if any of them decided they'd rather stop the sex and just be friends without it, and do other activities instead then i would be fine with that.

>>3758795
I agree. Science is all physics; the rest emerges from that

Alright, alright, that's enough for me for he night.

Good night everyone.

And cya around EK honey. I'll be dreaming of you <3

>>3758523

So you're a massive whore that thinks she is smart because she cheats on guys all the damn time, all the while diminishing her reputation with all men yet she thinks she is superior because you may have gotten something out of them first?

Strong independent woman general?

>>3758792

>>3758816
i'm not a whore at all, and i've never cheated on any1 in my life.

If doubles then EK is my waifu

>>3758830
>any1
>1

>>3758838
that is shorthand text for 'anyone' you fucking retard.

>>3758808
>nothing started
Really? You never started sucking their dicks and engaging in anal sex?
>i'm still technically single, i'm not in any official relationship
Technically you're fucking 3 guys a regular basis, I'd call that a sexual relationship.
>if any of them decided they'd rather stop the sex and just be friends without it, and do other activities instead then i would be fine with that.
Now why the hell would they do that? You're giving them free sex.
>how can it 'end badly'?
Well, a lot of the time one party begins to having feelings beyond the sexual. What would you do if your 3 fuck-buddies suddenly all want a relationship?

>>3758836
A post like that will never get doubles because EK is too much of a whore to be anyone's waifu. She's rather have her fat, loose asshole used and abused by horny men who only want her to take their semen.

>>3758843

Why do you carry on doing this? Do you have problems?

>>3758844
>Well, a lot of the time one party begins to having feelings beyond the sexual. What would you do if your 3 fuck-buddies suddenly all want a relationship?

Or worse yet: Don't have the money to afford it?

>>3758843

>implying 4chan is a fucking sms

>>3758844
i've been completely honest with them all, they know the rules and so do i (heheh..)
just friends, no relationship, no marriage, no bullshit.
we all agreed it was the best system.

Do you like it up the pooper, EK?

>>3758845
If doubles then I will use EK's fat, loose asshole as a receptable for my semen

>ohgodwhathaveidone.jpg

>>3758855
Why do you continue to post under that trip if everyone hates you?

You say it's simply for reference, but surely you wouldn't continue to do it seeing as how often it derails a thread.

Unless you're an attention whore and enjoy it.

>>3758855
Wait so let me get this straight. You guys all actually fucking gathered around and came up with the terms for you being their group fuck-doll?
... the fuck is wrong with you? You claim you're not a whore?

Anyway, you seriously think that agreeing to some fucking rule can stop a person from developing feelings for someone? You can't be that naive. Friendships are destroyed by this kind of thing, and if one or more of them starts having feelings, no amount of "b-but you agreed to the terms" is going to make it go away.

>>3758855
>we all agreed it was the best system

you're on a roll here girl. the only guys that would agree to sharing a woman are ones that're horny and not particularly picky. If they see you as an object to be fucked but not cared about they're not your friends. It's a respect thing, it's not easy to be friends with something you have absolutely no respect for.

>>3758859

maybe it's just a fat neckbeard massive troll that made all believe he's that Rose girl.

>>3758866
they do have feelings, and so do i, but we are self aware enough to realise it is intense feelings of lust, not love.
we fully understand it so we know how to act on it.

>>3758875
well i denied i was her on multiple occassions...so no.

>>3758830

Okay, I am going to come to you with a proposal. Stop talking shit on /sci/ like you own the place. Everybody fucking despises you because of the way you act. Stop with the shit talking and those reaction images and contribute rather than arguing.

>>3758876
I don't think you understand... feelings CHANGE, feelings DEVELOP. Just because the feelings aren't there initially doesn't mean shit.

>>3758866
also it wasn't quite that simple, it didnt all happen at once and its just how things ended up after we realised we were all okay with it and here was nothing wrong with it.
trust me, its very very hard to find guys open minded enough to go for something like this. most guys would just like a girlfriend to own, and for her to be his alone.

>>3758883
>EK
>Contributions

>>3758883
fine, that sounds reasonable.
i'll do my best.
now i have to go and sort some things out so i'll be back later

>>3758880

>implying you didn't denied it just to make it more realistic.

>>3758897
I've been reading her for something close to a year now.

she really isn't that clever.

>>3758885
>trust me, its very very hard to find guys open minded enough to go for something like this. most guys would just like a girlfriend to own, and for her to be his alone.
HAHAHAHAHA, oh wow. Of course they're okay with sharing you, they don't care enough about you to want you to be 'his and his alone', they just want some easy, free sex. But that could and probably will change. Eventually someone is going to develop feelings for you. I've seen this happen time and time again with friends in my life. I always tell them the same thing i'm telling you, and they always tell me what you're telling me.

Threads like this are the reason why I love /sci/.

>>3758717
EK cannot into men minds

>>3759054
They're complex.

>>3758367
>9:26
>>3760064
>15:32

Holy fuck EK, take a rest.

Hehehehe. I remember fapping to that episode when I was a kid.

>>3760078
i only just got back, i've only been posting for about 10 minutes.

>come to /sci/
>"Oh, hey, this discussion with 200+ posts seems like it'll be interesting!"
>open the thread
>it's just arguing over some random fucking tripfag nobody should give a fuck about

Goddammit, /sci/.

It could be implied that generally speaking, women who do care about their weight may also care about their outward appearance otherwise.

I know that it's applicable to myself.

>>3760211
Welcome to the world of EK, the cancer of /sci/

Most ancient fertility statues or figurines are of fat women.

It's all psychological. Fat used to mean you were succesful. Now that food is plentiful in developed countries we dislike fat because many people are obese and being fit shows discipline.

>>3758468
chances are you are not bi and are just confused about your sexuality.

>>3760298
chances are you're not a psychologist and you have no idea what you're talking about.

>>3760311
can you picture yourself in a relationship with a girl long term just you and her?

>>3760298

If someone is experiences sexual arousal from both sexes.. they are bisexual. This is not rocket science.

>>3760356
I think that's a poor definition, theres needs to be a continuous scale of some sort from straight to bi to gay. just being turned on by the same sex doesnt mean you are bi imo. you need to be able to actually have a relationship with the same sex to quality for that label

>>3760340
no

This thread is now a bunch of angry betas raging because EK doesn't listen when Jesus tells them to be monogamous.

Wake up and smell the anthropology; humans, like all other apes and most other mammals, are designed to be polygamous, we're currently 2000 years inbred because of your ascientific christian morals.

>>3760369

Is this one of the "three guys" you use to have sex with?
>>3758503

>>3760369
k confirmed not bi but sexually confused. in a few year u will realize you just want penis more than anything.

In case anyone is curious about the answer to OP's question.

Studies found an inverse correlation between body mass and food availability. Keeping in mind that the WHR (waist-to-hip ratio) of .7 remains to be the most attractive regardless of body mass.

Anyway,

McDonalds every 2 feet = low body mass desirable
(i.e. America, Britain, etc.)

Having to grow your own food = higher, but still not excessive, body mass is desirable

(i.e. olden times england, modern day africa, etc.)

>>3760374
>like all other apes and most other mammals, are designed to be polygamous
>are designed

>>3760391
no, mainly because i'm not the girl in that picture so i dont know the guy.
even if he was, does it matter? i presume you dont know him.

>>3760409

Yup, designed by their DNA

DEAL WITH IT, you shitty excuse for a human being

>>3760417
>designed by their DNA

>>3760419

U mad you pathetic piece of shit?

>>3760426
mad that you're an ignorant fuck?
no, just disapointed.

>>3760434

u mad that your shitty woman brain can't comprehend basic metaphorical connotations?

>>3760440
that was in no way metaphorical, hun. and you know it.

>>3760446

Sorry your too autistic to comprehend human language, why don't you go be retarded somewhere else Rose.

>>3760434

disappointed

Designed was a poor word choice, but it doesn't detract from the truthfulness of the statement, it's obvious that it was meant as a synonym for evolved.

I don't think (hope) their aren't any intelligent design "scientists" on here.

Inb4 trolls pretending to be creation scientists.

>>3760451
Sorry your too retarded to correctly construct a sentence, why don't you go be retarded somewhere else, Anon.

>>3760464
i knew what he meant, i presumed he wasn't ACTUALLY a creationist, after that dig at jesus and christian morals.

>>3760466

I'm not even the anon that used it, I'm not a huge fucking moron like you who can't see why it would be appropriate to use such a term.

Design (adj) - "Do or plan (something) with a specific purpose or intention in mind."

Obviously DNA doesn't have a mind, but it can seem like because it creates structures with specific purposes.

Ergo metaphorical connotation.

Seriously, just kill yourself.

>>3760368

your definition is retarded. I reject it. Stop talking to me.

WHY is this thread still alive?

>>3760466
>>3760466
>Sorry your too retarded
>your
Was that on purpose? Seriously, just after posting that pic, too...

>>3760470

It's ironic you assumed it was a "he", in fact, given his use of "them" instead of "her", it's almost the best bet to assume otherwise.

trollface.jpg

>>3760475
>I'm not even the anon that used it
yes you fucking are.

>DNA doesn't have a mind, but it can seem like because it creates structures with specific purposes.
you see, i can tell you're the same guy because you obviously know what you're trying to say (again) but you fucking fail at writing it down in any coherent manner whatsoever.
DNA itself doesn't 'create' anything, it is (to put in simple language YOu might understand...) the 'blueprint' or 'template' for the construction of new proteins.

>>3760374
>2011
>implying this level of cooperative civilisation could have developed without monogamy
>i seriously hope you guys don't believe this

>>3760490
fuck.
actually i copypasted anons message and slightly altered it to send it back to him, and i genuinely did not spot the grammar mistake this time around...
just another excuse for me to hate him tho, thanks for pointing that out.

>>3760497

>may God have mercy on your soul

Rose confirmed for retarded creationist!!!

>>3760466
>your

>>3760374
>>3760464

Samefag

>>3760526
"u mad that your shitty [male] brain can't comprehend basic metaphorical connotations?"

>>3760497
Kill yourself.

>>3760547

So, has EK/Rose ever won an argument?

>>3760552
Jesus fucking Christ EK, slow down on the images.

>>3760553

No, she's just better at shitposting.

>>3760553
>Fat Man reads his birthday card.jpg

>>3760542

>Use my own argument against me unironically
>Don't realize how monumentally retarded you are

>>3760531
see >>3760507

also, you are probably the same guy who wrote >>3760451 so shut your god-damn whore mouth because you made the same fucking mistake
(which i didnt actually make myself, i just copied the mistake through when i CTRL-C and didn't proofread...)

Hey guise I have EK's number!

A real girl with a real phone number, and i didn't pay to get it!!!

>It starts off 078 5073
>there are 4 more digits after that
>waits for anon to dial all 9,999 possible numbers

>>3760578

>mfw they are different people
>mfw u mad as fuck

>>3760587

>>3760578
>not proofreading
>calling others a whore
>using so many reaction images
>defending yourself on an anonymous image board
>using a trip on an anonymous image board
>having your identity revealed on an anonymous image board
>losing every debate you're in
>derailing threads and replying to almost every post for hours yet simultaneously saying that your trip is only for reference purposes
>attention seeking on an anonymous image board
>year of the cat

>EK
>attractive

Obvious filthy whore running around in lingerie with a disgusting muffin top.

>>3760598

>pretending to not be mad when you just got buttravaged

Oh god, stay classy EK.

>>3760619
>buttravaged

So, do they all stick it in there at once or do you make them take turns?

>>3760632
not that it's any of your business, but i've only ever been with 1 person at 1 time.

>>3760374
>inbreeding
>not good

look at the jews

>>3760619
Clearly EK enjoys being buttravaged.

http://chanarchive.org/request_votes

Ek is going to need her own archive soon.

>>3760637

>she still thinks she has any dignity left
oh man, that gets me. right in the gut.

Situational comedy at its finest.

>implying saying people are polygamous is any more scientific.

Why they flying fuck should we be when we know that tournament breeding is a whole load of fuck that would destroy society.

>>3760637
>None of your business
>Still answers

What is with this a compulsive need to defend yourself all the time?

>>3760637
>sage

Finally hit a soft spot ay? Sounds to me like you have been with all 3 at once. You loose assed whore.

>>3760608

>Obvious filthy whore running around in lingerie with a disgusting muffin top.

>>3760673
fuck you!
if i had, i'd admit it.
i dont consider group sex to be morally wrong, i just havent personally done it.

Obvious patriarchal misogynist believing only men can do science, call me when you stop with your autismal beliefs on eugenics, self agrandization, and resource based economies.

>>3760689
>implying you have any credibility whatsoever
Can I tell you something, woman to woman? You are filthy and a disgrace to this board. Please kill yourself.

>>3760689
so you would do it?

>>3760708
probably not.

>>3760701

99.99/100 I hate anyone who mentions they are a female on this board, but you...

You. You get sooo many bro points.

>>3760701
oh really?
do explain.

>>3760717
Just looking out for everyone's best interests. She obviously dismisses anything men say as misogyny, and nobody here is horrible enough to have to associate with such scum.

>>3760716
why not, it isn't immoral to?

>>3760701
>>3760732

Attention Men!

CAAAAAAAAAAAAATFFFIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIIGGHHHTTT!!!

>>3760732
It's been explained to you many, many times. Read the posts in this thread. Not only are you completely devoid of class, you somehow have the idea that you're intelligent when you clearly are not.

I have no problem with attention whores, but when they start to think they're actually worth something, it gets on my nerves -- just a little quirk of mine.

>>3760735
yes, i just dont particularly want to. i have no problem with the thought of other people doing it.

>>3760753
i'm not devoid of class!
i am very classy, and YOU are not the one who judges what's classy and what isnt.

>>3760750
I'll get the lube.

>>3760754
>i have no problem with the thought of other people doing it.

I bet you don't
>shik shik shik

btw, EK. Serious confession here. I have a strong desire to become your friend (even though i live in a different country) and idk lead you on or something.... like i wouldn't go out with you but...idk i have this habit of collecting "backup girls" while i wait for the woman of my sexual/romantic fantasies.

Is this normal/moral?
I so confus :(

>>3760765
>i'm not devoid of class!
Is that so? I was evidently unaware that having no semblance of respect and posting smutty pictures of oneself on the internet was classy. My apologies!

>i am very classy, and YOU are not the one who judges what's classy and what isnt.
Very well. Who determines classiness and why do you consider yourself to be above the level of a degenerate harlot?

>>3760785
erm, no.
it isn't normal or moral.

>>3760750
>>3760772
I regret having to disappoint the pair of you, but you have no actual evidence that I'm a woman...

>>3760794
i never posted any pictures of myself you ignorant trollop!

and i think you'll find that the fucking DICTIONARY defines words.
...cunt!
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class

>>3760803
they dont for me either, the pictures were never confirmed to definitely be me.

>>3760803
Or any other living creature really... or dead.

>>3760811
>i never posted any pictures of myself you ignorant trollop!
Oh?

>and i think you'll find that the fucking DICTIONARY defines words.
>...cunt!
>http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_class
Darling, that's Wikipedia.

>>3760830
yes, sorry did you think FvR was me? moron.

i'm not your darling, hun. and wikipedia works as a dictionary as well you twat!

>>3760845
...
I can't do this any more

>>3760856
lol, good.
buh-bye.

>>3760658

I voted.

>>3760863

Damn EK, she makes you look like regurgitated dog shit.
Classy as fuck. You could learn a thing or two from her, namely how to be less brash, uncouth, and obnoxious.

I have nothing but straight up respect for that other chick, but as for you... I would be ashamed to be your father.

>>3758553
...how fucking old are you?

why do you go through so many men?

>>3760880
20.
and i havent actually had that many men, i just dont like relationships, so i've had the occassional ONS

>>3760878
There's really no need to white knight, but I appreciate it all the same.

>>3760899
he meant FvR not you, you arrogant little shit!

>>3760907

Actually I did mean her, dumb bitch.

>>3760919
>>3760899

Also, I should add stating facts is not white knighting.

Trust me, if you dun goof'd you wouldn't be getting any help from me.

But you do seem to have a certain savoir faire I find appealing. Not that it's relevant...

>>3760919
so she's classy as fuck and you can judge that from like 2 or 3 posts on an image board?
fucking thick bellend.

>>3760945

Yes, you're obviously too retarded to figure simple shit out for yourself.

Anyone who isn't as retarded as you, could see a she has a much more tactful way of speaking.

>>3760962
who said i need to be tactful?

>>3760968

cool strawman.

society

>>3760943
In that case, I'm flattered! That's very sweet of you.

>>3760943
>>3760980
get a room, you sickening pair of faggots.

>>3760980

you earned it.

>>3760989

u mad.

>>3760989
This thread did get derailed, didn't it? Sorry, OP (if you're still around).