[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 162 KB, 624x529, 1316263062134.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3752474 [Reply] [Original]

explain this

>> No.3752484

Can I see the original please?

>> No.3752496

>>3752484
http://www.tineye.com/search/772b5b71c10d0edadc54b2eb71ce3b29caa96d5a/?pluginver=firefox-1.1

This was all i could find

>> No.3752497
File: 84 KB, 299x288, 130221984383.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>> No.3752502

photoshop, there arn't really yellow lines on the moon

>> No.3752513

Shadow from the lander is actually going the same direction as the one from the rocks, it just looks horizontal due to the angle and the distance it's at.

>> No.3752532

the cast shadow of the astronaut looks more horizontal than it really is

it's the distance that distorts the perception of the angle of the shadow

troll/10

>> No.3752545 [DELETED] 
File: 159 KB, 435x419, 1309146980347.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752532
>mfw i thought the lunar lander was an astronaut crouched down to the ground

>> No.3752563

>>3752545
you're tired, bro. Get some rest.

>> No.3752581

>>3752545
The first man to take a dump on the Moon. Glorious.

>> No.3752609

>>3752474

Why are the tops of the shadows being joined to the bottom of what's casting them? Shouldn't the line be drawn from the top of the shadow to the top of the object casting it?

>> No.3752634

Stupid ass question from someone with no spatial coordination.

The rocks' shadows slant because of the dip of a slope, is the answer to this dip-shit of a question.

>> No.3752654

>implying the moon isn't a big reflective satellite and you can have light coming from multiple directions due to the irregular surface.

>> No.3752660
File: 32 KB, 470x376, awesome.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

I was going to answer this but for once /sci/'s got my back!

>> No.3752674

Go to Mythbusters episode on moon conspiracies

>> No.3752677

>>3752609
Yep.

But that wouldn't fit with "it's just a stage", so...

>> No.3752764

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mefEKqzq8cg&feature=related

do yourself a favor and watch it. They cover that exact photograph

>> No.3752775

>>3752474
you do realize the moon is not a flat surface?

>> No.3752810

>>3752775
for all intensive purposes it is. the earth isnt flat either, but it is so big that at it appears flat in many places.

>> No.3752811

>>3752810
Oh my god the fucking retard is here.

Shut down the threads, guys! Stop posting! Intelligent conversation time is over!

>> No.3752815

>>3752810

>for all intensive purposes it is. the earth isnt flat either, but it is so big that at it appears flat in many places.
>for all intensive purposes it is.
>all intensive purposes
>intensive

nigga you just went full retard

>> No.3752817

>>3752810
On a large scale it's effectively flat. Duh. Moron.

But on a small scale, like this one dealing with surface features like rocks and hills and shadows, it's not at all flat. Fuck off you goddamned retard, you've never said a single thing that wasn't a complete misunderstanding of the pertinent point.

>> No.3752827

>>3752810
I don't think he was referring to the curve of the moon due to it being roughly a sphere, but to hills etc. We're not the little prince's planet where equilateral triangles have all angles equal to 120° (exercise: deduce the diameter of his planet from that property), usual geometry applies on the moon.

>> No.3752828
File: 173 KB, 718x800, Astaroth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752810
Intents and purposes, love.

I found another pic of you, by the way.

>> No.3752833
File: 21 KB, 336x367, myth_busted_walrus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752764
thanks 4 the vid
xx

>> No.3752835
File: 1.57 MB, 1500x1500, apollo14.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752484

>> No.3752836

>>3752827
By the way I meant 90°. Now that I think about it, I'm not sure if it's possible with 120°. Also I'm realizing that I probably don't remember the exercise well, cause obviously smaller equilateral triangles have angles closer to 60° as they are on a surface closer to a plane. Forget about that. Finding the diameter of a sphere such that equilateral triangles of side 1 unit draw on that sphere have angles equal to 90° is probably a correct exercise.

>> No.3752837

>>3752815
>>3752828
i'm not actually retarded, its a meme/copypasta

"Allow me to play double advocate here for a moment. For all intensive purposes I think you are wrong. In an age where false morals are a diamond dozen, true virtues are a blessing in the skies. We often put our false morality on a petal stool like a bunch of pre-Madonnas, but you all seem to be taking something very valuable for granite. So I ask of you to mustard up all the strength you can because it is a doggy dog world out there. Although there is some merit to what you are saying it seems like you have a huge ship on your shoulder. In your argument you seem to throw everything in but the kids Nsync, and even though you are having a feel day with this I am here to bring you back into reality. I have a sick sense when it comes to these types of things. It is almost spooky, because I cannot turn a blonde eye to these glaring flaws in your rhetoric. I have zero taller ants when it comes to people spouting out hate in the name of moral righteousness. You just need to remember what comes around is all around, and when supply and command fails you will be the first to go.
Make my words, when you get down to brass stacks it doesn't take rocket appliances to get two birds stoned at once. It's clear who makes the pants in this relationship, and sometimes you just have to swallow your prize and accept the facts, instead of making a half-harded effort. You might have to come to this conclusion through denial and error but I swear on my mother's mating name that when you put the petal to the medal you will pass with flying carpets like its a peach of cake."

>> No.3752846
File: 1.55 MB, 1023x766, 94949939e4.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752837
Then why didn't you put it in quotations? Nice try, sophist.

>> No.3752861

>>3752810
for an INTENTS AND PURPOSES

you illiterate fuck

>> No.3752871

>>3752846
well, to be honest it was a half hearted trolling attempt, i knew that some people ITT wouldnt be aware of the copypasta and might mention that the sentence was incorrect.

>> No.3752876
File: 7 KB, 211x175, 4colourtheoremtroll.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752861
oh lol!

>> No.3752877

>>3752837
You fucking faggot, I bet you don't even know when that was made.

>> No.3752881
File: 23 KB, 499x324, unscientific..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

hurr lets prove that the moon landing photo wasn't taken in a studio by producing a copy of it in a studio

I know TV is just supposed to be mindless entertainment but could they at least do it without legitimizing conspiracy theorists? fucking hell

>> No.3752880
File: 245 KB, 471x346, 13645646.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752877
lol, correct i don't. does that matter?
countersage =p

>> No.3752879

>>3752871
Yep, I've seen this before, someone elucidates an error, and the person in error says they were merely being facetious. Ain't working on me, darling.

>> No.3752882
File: 265 KB, 450x359, 126549.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752879
erm, the fact that I immediately uploaded the copypasta straight afterwards kinda proves you wrong, darling.

>> No.3752887

>>3752881

And how do you propose they prove it without going to the moon

>> No.3752888

>>3752876
Well, it's good to know that the only thing you have to contribute to any discussion is halfassed trolling attempts, if that really was a trolling attempt, which it wasn't.

>> No.3752889

>>3752881
“thats not the point, the point is that we’re addressing the specific claim by conspiracy theorists that this photo has only one explanation and that’s 2 light sources. We’ve demonstrated here 2 shadows which are parallel from a single light source which we’ve made look far off parallel using only the topography that they’re sitting on. “

>> No.3752890
File: 11 KB, 320x350, photo19.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752882
Not when there's Google.
Also, have you sucked FVR's dick yet, Rose?

>> No.3752892

>>3752888
it was more of a in-joke than a trolling attempt. i thought a few of the people ITT might appreciate it and remember he copypasta, and i was also making a point at the same time.

>> No.3752893

>>3752887
By pointing out the impossibility of faking the scientific data produced by it, or the nigh-impossibility of gaining the complicity of the tens of thousands of people involved in the projects?
Or that the russians had the capability to track the flight and wouldn't have let us pretend we did it if we hadn't?

>> No.3752895

>>3752882>>3752882
Not when there's Google.
Also, have you sucked FVR's dick yet, Rose?

>> No.3752899

>>3752892
The copypasta was the culmination of a meme of abusing idiomatic expressions on /v/ that started with "intents and purposes" late last year. It wasn't funny then and it's a lot less funny now.

>> No.3752903

>>3752890
i'd still have to be aware of the copypasta to know what to search for on google.
do you honesly think my pattern of thought was: 'shit, ive gone and made a fool of myself, i'm gonna try and lie and try to make out that i did it on purpose. oh fuck, i'll just type 'intensive purposes' into google and hope it comes out with something which i can pretend i was referring to'

also FVR is a chick, and presumably doesnt have a dick.
...which i would not suck anyway

>> No.3752905

>>3752892
Way to contradict yourself.
Was it a trolling attempt to get people to attack you or an inside joke? Either way you're a whore that needs to leave.

>> No.3752908

>>3752903
"do you honesly think my pattern of thought was: 'shit, ive gone and made a fool of myself, i'm gonna try and lie and try to make out that i did it on purpose. oh fuck, i'll just type 'intensive purposes' into google and hope it comes out with something which i can pretend i was referring to' "

Yes.
"also FVR is a chick, and presumably doesnt have a dick.
...which i would not suck anyway"
Then stop posting pictures of her, she's almost as stupid as you are.

>> No.3752909

>>3752905
kinda both.
a trolling attempt for those unaware of the meme who might attack it grammar-nazi style, and just for its own sake for those who actually understand the meme.

i think your making too big a deal of this... i didnt mean much by it.

>> No.3752911

>>3752909
I understood the meme and it pissed me off because it's a stupid one which I hoped was dead.

But you're a stupid bitch, so it's no surprise you'd do that.

>> No.3752912

I'm sorry, but did the conspiracy theorists already lose? Oh, that's right. The debate isn't even over yet. In fact, it's only just begun. Does not having the lead at in a debate count as a loss? Is that what you're saying? Because if you're saying that I can assure you that you're wrong. Why would you make this topic when the debate is still on? The conspiracy theorists are still working right now and they have been the best debaters in the world for how many years now? They're debating some of the worst “scientists” in the world who just happen to have a lead because they're feeding off the energy of a Mythbusters episode. But you know what? They still fucking suck. The theorists are some of the best fucking experts in the world, and would have won the 9/11 debate if the Taliban didn't choke. Maybe you should shut the fuck up before you make retarded topics like this. You know why? Because you're going to be embarrassed when the theorists wins and someone bumps this topic. Are you a fucking drunk? Are you retarded? Are you autistic? You are a fucking idiot and you should never make a topic on this board again and I'm fucking serious. I almost have a feeling you're the only guy making all these anti-theorist topics because you're a faggot hater who doesn't like the theorists because they're smart. Fuck you, be good at something in YOUR life and then maybe try to troll these fucking people on the board, like I give a fuck. It's so easy to spot out your threads now, you're a retard. Always doing stupid shit like this. Why don't you try to be a good poster? Just for once? For once in your fucking life try not to make a topic like this. That's just you, you're always right at getting it wrong. Fuck you. You are nothing.

>> No.3752915
File: 213 KB, 465x683, 1301601961530.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752911

>> No.3752918
File: 137 KB, 600x600, 600px-OB-Img-ShrineofHircine.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752909
I think you need to learn how to distinguish possessive pronouns/adjectives from a contraction.

Maybe instead of posting here, you should read a book.

>> No.3752922

the slopes above the astronaut shows the direction of the sun.

>> No.3752926
File: 18 KB, 340x250, moran.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752909
also, >>3752872 did pretty much the same thing as me (meme reference/mis-spelling) and i dont see you giving him any stick for it.
<<<

>> No.3752930

>>3752926
Because he's not a shitposting idiot who constantly ruins threads.

>> No.3752931

>>3752926
That's because none of them have a reputation for being a massive cunt.

>> No.3752935
File: 51 KB, 396x385, Sad-Frog-Color.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752930
>>3752931

>> No.3752938

>>3752931

you mean, besides YOU?

>> No.3752945

>>3752938
Way to lose your tripname, Rose.
Your attempts are so infantile.

>> No.3752954
File: 36 KB, 399x404, 1305143321959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752945
i wasnt samefag, that was posted at the same time as my sad-frog-face.
also, why would i send that reply to one of them and not both?

>> No.3752960

>>3752945

hahahaha! This is 4chan! Random assholes will pop and insult you... just because we can......
you Assclown.

>> No.3752971

Why have the mods not permab& EK's trip yet. She's broken like every rule there is, including evading a ban (which is supposed to result in a permaban).

I would say the mods are shit, but that's against the rules.

And crimes is for niggers.

>> No.3752976
File: 47 KB, 319x243, umad.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752971

>> No.3752980
File: 77 KB, 781x418, philopermaban.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752971

>> No.3752986

>>3752980
I shouldn't seriously reply, but I think permaban is meant to be a hard punishment for stupid amerifats who have a static IP.

>> No.3752989
File: 245 KB, 387x436, umad.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3752971
also, umad
=p