[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 96 KB, 398x405, thor2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3726899 [Reply] [Original]

Thorium, bitches. How soon can we set this up?

http://www.forbes.com/sites/williampentland/2011/09/11/is-thorium-the-biggest-energy-breakthrough-si
nce-fire-possibly/

>> No.3726930
File: 2.46 MB, 938x4167, 1311010641509.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

When people who have influence become rational.

>> No.3726938

China, India and Russia are working on it.

>> No.3726953

>>3726930

.... So, never?

More seriously, though, people are working on it.

>> No.3726956

I want this to happen.
My faith in humanity is somehow restored.

>> No.3727413

How plentiful is thorium? I see the efficiency comparisons but what is the cost of 1 ton of thorium vs. 1 ton of say uranium or coal?

>> No.3727420

i have to invest in this shit.

>> No.3727468

This seems too good to be true.

How far away are we? Is this similar to our struggle for economic fusion power?

>> No.3727480

>>3727413

Fairly. Certainly a fuckton more common that fissionable Uranium. Or Uranium in general. It would be a massive step up.

>>3727468

It probably is. A LOT of people have claimed to have the perfect Thorium reactors for ages now, and though certainly public ignorance in assuming nuclear tech is always Hiroshima waiting to happen, there are a number of European countries which use quite a lot of nuclear power (particularly France) who would have been on this shit like white on rice if it were as viable as they had claimed.

>> No.3727485

inb4 someone refutes it and everyone forgets about it in a few scientifically ordinary years

>> No.3727493

>>3727485
nvm, article comments already did that