[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 19 KB, 263x327, 1277317759015.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR] No.3687933 [Reply] [Original]

"A psychologist at a girl’s college asked the members of his class to compliment any girl wearing red. Within a week the cafeteria was a blaze of red. None of the girls were aware of being influenced, although they did notice that the atmosphere was more friendly."

>2011
>Not realizing Psychology is the most useful science

>> No.3687940

> uncited anecdote
> "science"

>> No.3687942

>woman logic
>science

>> No.3687944

>>3687933
>psychology
>a science at all

lolitrolu.jpg

>> No.3687949
File: 14 KB, 359x300, jedi mindtrick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>2011
>Still referring to psychology as "science" and not "analytic trolling"

>> No.3687955

>college
>cafeteria

Nope.jpg

>> No.3687956

>>3687933

>Implying Psychology isnt just applied Sophistry under the guise of Science

ISHYGDDT

>> No.3687958
File: 261 KB, 150x107, 1305938753905.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>tricking women with compliments
>hard
>a science

>> No.3687961

>>3687949

>Still referring to psychology as "science" and not "analytic trolling"
>analytic trolling
>analytic
>anal

You Anal-Retentive bro?

>> No.3687971
File: 57 KB, 320x240, 5949.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3687955

Do you even go to college?

>> No.3687986

>psychology
>stanford experiments
>electroshock therapy
>blue eyes/brown eyes experiment

Yeah, it sure is useful.

>> No.3687992

>>3687933
The funny thing about that is that a sociologist could have told you that outcome without having to even do anything.

Psychology is, and has always been, fail.

>> No.3687993

>>3687986

>chemistry
>turning lead into gold
>summoning demons
>eternal life

Yeah, it sure is useful.

(How is judging a field by it's early endeavors in anyway a good argument? Kill yourself.)

>> No.3688003

>>3687993

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Furtive_fallacy

Live a long life.

>> No.3688008

>>3688003

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mental_retardation

If what you listed were still common practice today, you might have a point. However, you're obviously full retard.

>> No.3688016

>>3688008

>Implying there were any lists mentioned by me

Why dont you try to read my post at least a couple more times?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hasty_generalization
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Name_calling

>> No.3688025

>>3688016

Why would you respond to an argument that didn't involve you with something that didn't make any sense in the context of the situation?

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superiority_complex
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Off_topic
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asperger_syndrome
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Men_who_have_sex_with_men

>> No.3688033

>>3688025

>Why would you respond to an argument that didn't involve you with something that didn't make any sense in the context of the situation?

>something that didn't make any sense in the context of the situation?

And it didnt make sense because of your unsupported assertion?
Or because you lack reading comprehension as you have revealed twice so far?

>> No.3688038 [DELETED] 

>>3688033

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nigger
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Functional_illiteracy
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Asshole

Read the thread, then you might understand.

>> No.3688045

>>3688038

>Is exposed for his illiteracy and incompetence to understand the fallacies he has commited
>Resorts to insults to salvage surviving particles of his devastated sensitive ego

How pathetic.

>> No.3688051
File: 48 KB, 319x243, 56sd4f65as6989w.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3688045

>> No.3688053

>>3688045

Since you're obviously retarded and lazy let me point it out for you.

Someone committed the fallacy you accuse me of committing, I responded by sarcastically committing the same fallacy to show why it was a bad argument, you accuse me of the fallacy because you're a retard who can't read.

I even said:
"How is judging a field by it's early endeavors in anyway a good argument?"

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Douchebag
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Idiot
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cocksucker

>> No.3688061

>>3688053

>Still commits additional fallacies
>Resorts to insults hysterically as he finally realizes that his ego is entirely shattered with no hope of salvaging it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Two_wrongs_make_a_right

>> No.3688066

>>3688061
>>3688053
>>3688038
>>3688025
>>3688016
>>3688008
>>3688003

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Faggots

>> No.3688069

>this thread

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOL

>> No.3688071

>>3688053

So much butthurt.
Just wow.

>> No.3688073

>>3688061

>I have to rely on my half understanding of logical fallacies I read on wikipedia because I have no idea how to make a cogent argument by myself

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Outcast_(person)
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social_rejection
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Virgin

>> No.3688079

>>3688073

>Still resorts to insults like a lunatic in hope that it would ever restore his confidence and ego

>> No.3688081
File: 53 KB, 300x300, 1311365278093.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>trolls trolling trolls
>think posting wikipedia links are witty retorts

>> No.3688086

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You're_All_candy-asses_but_this_Wikipedia_Thing_is_Pretty_Funny_Hey

>> No.3688088

>>3688025
Ok, I admit I lol'd

>> No.3688097
File: 33 KB, 330x250, 1292794392488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3688081

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anger

>> No.3688107
File: 8 KB, 255x194, 4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
[ERROR]

>>3688073

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/You_Are_Extremelly_Buttmad

>> No.3688115

>>3688086
>>3688107

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunce

>> No.3688187

>>3688073

lol he mad, alright

>> No.3688196

>>3688008
The dude who did the Stanford experiment is still around doing psychology.
He's a bit of a moron.
Go on TED and find his talk on the decline of men.

Further, neither alchemy nor demonology are subsets of chemistry.
Alchemy is proto-chemistry though, I'll give you that.