/sci/ - Science & Math

It would be like lifting a pen on earth, and thats doesnt get you ripped

you've already made 3 threads with troll science that isn't enough is it?

That would probably be enough for you to maintain your current muscles, the lack of gravity over time tends to make you weaker

You're all retarded I dont see why that wouldn't make sence. I mean they're freakishly heavy weights you dipfuck. Why wouldn't it give you muscles?

>>3638264
I doubt it.
You'd need some form of gravity ot make lifting the weight meaningful.
There is gravity in spece, but it's tiny, and you don't know from which direction it stems.

>>3638264
well at least you don't have to whine about lack of gravity fatso :<

I'd enjoy a dump of good troll physics, but please don't make a new thread for each and every one of them.

>>3638268
I actually don't know for sure if weights will do anything, but I do know that astronauts have to do a lot of exercise.

>>3638286

They use resistance training equipment (large elastic rubber bands) and treadmills, not weights.

Actually, I think the ISS has simulated gravity, so this might be possible.

>>3638278

I would also like a good troll science dump.
Apparently I didn't save that one about how the earth can't be as old as we say/evolution can't be true because we would have used all the water on earth. That one is just hilarious, and I wish I had saved it when it was here every day for a week. I can't believe I didn't.

>>3638320
>>3638320
This one is actually true
an air force pilot used it once
he was crashing with his plane dont know what kind it was but he launched the seat and just before he hit the ground he jumped from the chair and only broke his legs

>>3638329

It's only relatively true. It depends on how much force you can generate by jumping. Then you need to sum the forces. If, for example, you're crashing down with a force of 54N, and you can only jump with a force of 4N, you're still going to crash down with a force of 50N.

Moar physics troll plox

>>3638329

The pic isn't true. If you jumped off a building riding a chair then jumped off the chair, you'd simply be forcing the chair down quicker and only slightly lessen your descent. The chair is just too light. It's how a firearm works. Both you and the bullet experience equal force of propulsion (kick-back), but your mass can withstand the kick while the tiny bullet goes shooting off at a high rate of speed.

>>3638329
then what about inertness?

>>3638349
Well, provided you could kick the chair down hard enough so it has an incredibly high downwards momentum, then by the conservation of momentum you'd gain an equal upwards momentum, no?

But a real chair would break if you kicked it as hard as required, which you couldn't do anyway.

you have it backwards. go to Jupiter, survive the atmospheric pressure, and lift light weights... and progress up to weights that you do on Earth. return to earth (and somehow suspend atrophy for the trip) and be able to bench press a car.

of course this doesn't take into account the fact that ligaments don't really get stronger... the muscles would be moving more weight than the joints could structurally handle. injury city.

>>3638368

Yes, it would work if you could exert a sufficient force onto the chair.