/sci/ - Science & Math

bump

about that blacked spot on google sky, wtf is that /sci/ ?

bumping, relevant to my interests

dont believe tho in niburu in that shit

>>3545142
Link?

Honestly, it's just going to be the fact that the database isn't complete.

I mean, really, you think everyone with a telescope is in a vast conspiracy to hide the Truth from you?

>>3545047
Honestly, such a large and nearby celestial body could not exist without being noticed.

And how do the conspiracyfags know about Nibiru? Oh, that's right, NOT from using telescopes and probes. Huh.

The bullshit about planetary alignment gets me the worst. Oh, LOL. There's just no explaining that astrology bullshit on a rational basis.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DUng_AlguFE
Neil deGrasse Tyson up in this shit.

>/sci/ - Science and Math
>Science and Math
>>>/x/

>Piece of the sky missing from an incomplete, free, casual database
>You don't independently find out what's there with a reasonably-powered telescope or even other databases
>IT MUST BE PLANET X/NIBIRU/NEMESIS/ALIENS/CONSPIRACY

3/10 and
>213 posts and 53 image replies omitted.

>>3545193
>>3545184

Why so mad?

>>3545160

Damn, he sweaty. Hardest working man in /sci/ business.

>>3545218
Because i don't want you to find out about the secret planet of the j-oops, nevermind.

>>3545142

It's a chunk of image that wasn't picked up by Google's algorithm when they were collecting the sky maps.

I mean seriously, you can go onto NASA's site and look up the section of sky that's missing. It's not being hidden by some huge great conspiracy.

>>3545248
And even IF such a retardedly huge, all-encompassing, easily exposeable and yet somehow not leaked or invalidated conspiracy were to be real....
Why would there be a blank spot instead of faked data?

> Gravity can't extend that far? Or could it?
Gravity can pull from an infinite distance but its strength decreases with distance

I mean, here's an example. On the right, an image from some on-line sky viewer. There's a big chunk missing, and a bunch of people going 'Hey guyz the government is hiding stuff from us lol'. On the left, the exact same place in the sky pulled directly from a NASA dataset. There's fuck all to hide there.

>>3545270
buit that's cuzz nibiru wusn't there when da first pic wuz taken

now its there and their hiding it

>>3545281
Ah, shit. There's probably someone who would actually believe that.

>>3545270
That doesn't disprove anything.
It'd take a sequence of pictures across a long enough time period to prove Niburu isn't moving towards us or exists.
Not saying I believe in Niburu, just pointing out the flaw in your logic.

This might explain some stuff for you OP:

wwwdotscribd.com/fullscreen/60725711

There is lot's of math for those who don't think this is on the right board.

>>3545286

You mean because it's true? Without a time stamp that image could have been taken years upon years ago. As Nibiru is technically moving closer to us at an exponential rate, it would be in more recent photos, and not past photos.

>>3545301
> As Nibiru is technically moving closer to us at an exponential rate
I laughed.

The second Nibiru gets announced, I'm hopping a same day first class flight to the center of the United states. It's the only safe place once all hell breaks loose (for the US, anyway)

>>3545298

Oh dear god the foreword:

>You'll notice here that I hardly make mention of gravity, if at all. That's because in actuality gravity doesn't really exist. What is known as gravity is actually magnetism, by which heavenly bodies out in space attract and repel each other and establish complex magnetic relationships. On Earth, much of the so-called gravity is simply atmospheric pressure that gives weight to small objects

>>3545303

Because you find yourself in the wrong?

Don't worry, I laughed too.

NIBIRUS HAVE ALREADY ON EARTH!

google maps misses some tiles there - some are even known to be censored intentionally. this is hopefully proof enough for you?!one1

donate your money to charity before the nibirus attack us in 2012 and shift our axises.

>>3545313
>On Earth, much of the so-called gravity is simply atmospheric pressure that gives weight to small objects
Holy shit WHAT?

>>3545047
>>>/x/

>>3545313
They serious?

But no, there's no way some huge planet/celestial body is in space and *nobody* has told us about it. No one i the past, no independent scientists, nobody.

>>3545297

It proves that the missing chunk of image isn't missing because there's something there to hide, and that's frequently the only real piece of evidence they have.

>>3545336
All scientists are part of the conspiracy. Also they put mercury in vaccines to harm our children.

>>3545218
Why you so bumfuck retarded?

>>3545313
You dont' have a curious mind, do you?

>>3545047
>>Gravity can't extend that far
>>Gravity can't extend that far
>>Gravity can't extend that far
>>Gravity can't extend that far
DO NOT GO ON /SCI/ IF YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND NEWTONIAN SHIT

Is it even possible for a mass of significant size (I suppose this thing is what? Mars-sized?) to be present in a solar system with an orbit like that? At first glance it seems pretty impossible that something like this could be stable

>>3545355
>implying he's closed-minded
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=T69TOuqaqXI

>>3545301

I took the image from the catalog of the mission cited by Google as it's source, so it's not going to be an issue of any object having moved in between the two images being taken.

>>3545357

Hey faggot

You see that question mark at the end?

That implies it was a question, not a statement

Maybe you should take an English class before you go quoting Newton.

>>3545364
UNLESS THE SOURCES ARE ALL FALSIFIED

BET YOU DIDN'T THINK OF THAT, HUH

CHECKMATE

>Gravity can't extend that far? Or could it?
Gravity is infinite.

>>3545367
It was an incredibly stupid question that shouldn't have been asked

>>3545383
In a spherical universe an object at the opposite side of the universe won't be effected by gravity at this side of the universe because the forces would balance in all directions...

>>3545367
You just made my day.

>>3545410
>Implying determinism
>Disagreeing with me

I don't get what you're saying.

All the planet's orbits are elliptical, not circular. Also gravity extends out infinitely far, but its force is inversely proportional to the square of the distance from the source of gravity.

>>3545270
Oh shit the obilisk from 2001 is heading towards earth.

>>3545448

What we SHOULD be worried about is Remina showing up and eating the Earth.

>>3545554
If we're going buy 2012 conspiracy theories, I'm of the opinion that 2012 = third impact.

>>3545589
Third? Why third?

>>3545436
Gravity is proposed to extend infinitely. It is a shame that we can't empirically prove this.

>>3545595
Woops, that's right. Forgot we haven't had a second yet....

>>3545554

Junji Ito is cool

>>3545614
Is that from Gyo?

>>3545636
I read Gyo, and I don't think so. It must be one I haven't read. Definitely Junji Ito though.

>>3545636
>>3545649

It was from "long dream"

Whats Gyo? Is that a good one?

>>3545654
I liked it, though I think uzumaki was more disturbing.

Gyo is about undead replicating biomechanical horrors from the ocean.

I can't be the only one who thinks "glyceride" is his scariest work.

>>3545710
Haven't read it. I'll look it up.

And of course there is the classic Enigma of Amigara Fault, though it's pretty short.