[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 42 KB, 340x340, stupid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3493696 No.3493696 [Reply] [Original]

If i call someone stupid, is it stupid relative to me, or relative to the general public?

>> No.3493704

its relative to your concept of "not stupid", which is obviously subjective

>> No.3493729

>>3493704
But my concept of not stupid is relative to my concept of stupid.

>> No.3493745

The way you intend it and your conception of it is irrelevant, the way its understand and carries meaning is defined socially, so general public

>> No.3493742 [DELETED] 

It is stupid relative to you. mfw I consider anyone below a IQ of 120 to be stupid.

>> No.3493750

You are stupid.

I hope this helps clear things up a bit.

>> No.3493753

>>3493696
Its relative to whatever you intend for it to be relative to. Very situational.

>> No.3493752 [DELETED] 

>>3493742
mfw you have no face.
Curiosity, what's your IQ? I'm just trying to figure out your margin between you and your idea of stupid.

>> No.3493758

>>3493742
> Judges intelligence by IQ.
> Admits it on /sci/.
> Expects to be taken seriously.

>> No.3493772

>>3493745
I feel when someone says stupid they are saying relative to themselves, but when someone is called stupid, they think its relative to the general public.

>> No.3493779
File: 25 KB, 350x400, 4045.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3493779

>>3493742

So basically anyone with a lower IQ than you is "stupid". Guess that online IQ test gave you a big head

>> No.3493784

Would it make sense for a genius to call another genius average? It is relative to the culture, not yourself.

>> No.3493789

It is undecidable.

>> No.3493799

>>3493696
Stupid means both lacking intelligence or lacking common sense. You can have intelligence and lack common sense, perhaps you didn't take the multiple meanings of the word into account. You can also refer the term to a specific action and not the person as a whole, even though you use it directed at the person. Everyone does stupid things and when someone sees that they may just call you stupid and not the individual action.

>> No.3493827

>>3493742
>anyone below an IQ of 120 is stupid
>about 90% of all people are stupid

>> No.3493838

Stupid defines actions, not people.

>> No.3493902

>>3493827
I personally find anyone that fully believes in a religion (>90%) stupid. and no I don't find their actions stupid (unless you consider thinking an action), I find them stupid as an individual.
>>3493784
This is a different story. Calling someone average is comparing them to the average (average is including everyone). The question was basically, is stupid the same thing as below average or below me?

>> No.3493903

>>3493838
then why do people always say "you're stupid" and not "what you're saying is stupid" ?

>> No.3493915

>>3493742

...really?

>> No.3493940

Even the most intelligent of humans are still very flawed and capable of mistakes. I'm not a fan of the dunning-kruger effect but this is just how shit be.

>> No.3493959

Op is just butthurt

>> No.3494037

>>3493799

>Stupid means both lacking intelligence or lacking common sense
>Doesnt realize that "common sense" is called "common" because it is a property of common people.
>Doesnt realize that common people are around or under 100 IQ.
>Doesnt realize that universally people under 100 IQ are considered "Stupid".
>Derp

>> No.3494144

>>3493752
Don't know my IQ, don't care. I didn't mean "anyone who doesn't get 120+ on a IQ test is stupid". I meant that 90% of people are stupid.

For me, the world is kind of like the movie Idiocracy. There's no reason the 50% line should be the halfway point between smart and dumb.

>> No.3494245

>>3494144
The world is like that for everyone. Everyone thinks they're of above average intelligence, if you actually are it makes it even worse.

>> No.3494296

>>3494245
amen!

It's like this. If you're intelligent and argue with somebody stupid, then he's ignorant in your opinion because he's ignoring important facts that you name him.

From his poing of view you're just dumb because your arguments just make no sense.
It's a paradoxon. :D

>> No.3494321

stupid because they're religious

>> No.3494375

>>3494321
religious because they're stupid

>> No.3494429

>>3494245
Indeed. This is enough to convince me that 90% of people are dumb
http://professionals.collegeboard.com/profdownload/sat-mathematics-percentile-ranks-2010.pdf

>90% of people score less than 680 on the SAT in math
seriously, I got a 800 first try, absolutely no studying...and it's not like I even feel that I accomplished something spectacular. How anyone could get less than 700 I will never understand.

>> No.3494434
File: 40 KB, 432x432, 1271761274083.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3494434

>>3494375
>>3494321

>> No.3494437

>>3494429
hmmm, what a difficult situation
my hypothesis is that they bubbled in the incorrect answers