/sci/ - Science & Math

Your comprehension of evolutionary theory is astonishing.

>one day poof

derp

0/10 faggot

0/10. Back to /b/ faggot

>Then one day

I seem to recall Darwin saying it took 13 day or there abouts. But hey
>its just a theory, a guess

OP is a poof.

sage for ignorance and bad trolling

I honestly don't see how in a period of just several thousand years we expanded our population over the globe with just sticks and stones...

That right there is the real missing link. There is a lack of explanation for the rapid Human expansion that took place less than 40 thousand years ago. It took Dinosaurs something like 100s of thousands. and those things were huge.

It is also peculiar that we are the only special with this level of intelligence. We are self aware and capable of doing things no other species can. What up with that? You cant say its because the meat we ate evolved us faster. Other animals ate meat too. Why are they so late Darwin?

>>3465734

>implying we are the only self aware animal
>implying we only had sticks and stones to move across the Earth with

0/10

To make it more reply worthy you could have tried including other fallacies such as "If we evolved from chimps why are chimps still around"

So I'm afraid I can offer you 0 points

>>3465724
good job

>>3465734
nope.jpg I'm aware I'm responding to a troll, but idc.

Homo erectus migrated out of Africa (according to the out of Africa theory) ~1.5 million years ago and then gradually spread out over Asia and Europe.

>>3465734
do the math youself with four breeding pairs, the known population growth numbers, and 4,500 years.

mfw you get 6 billion people alive today

America!!!!

Australia!!!

I could go on and on and own again!

>>3465779

what

>>3465818
some people believe that Adam and Eve actually populated this world on their own

>>3465691

You fabulous winged faggot!

op is the missing link

>>3465818
adam + eve +lots of fucking = world population before Flood

noah/wife, ham/wife, shem/wife, japeth/wife + lots of fucking = world population after Flood

>>3465901
and then we go and say how bad incest is.... according to bible we are all fucking inbreds

>>3465929
yup, and codes do not get better the more they're replicated; they decay, like everything else

we are less than

why is difficult for people to comprehend that we have evolved higher levels of thought to take on higher problems - hunting strategies, extremely intricate social cues, etc

>>3465779

im actually curious about this. go on?

>>3465779
bwuhahahahaha!!!! something to the 200 power......

vary your 'known' rates by a couple of percentage points and you can get 500,000,000... or 30 billion.....

>>3465691
>Then one day, poof humans all up in dis bitch

>implying you should be classified as human and not some inferior form of life

>>3465779
>known population growth numbers
Population growth numbers are a dependent on number of predators and food sources available. We can populate the way we can because of our modern agricultural ability, and no longer have any natural predators thanks to technology.

>>3465945
What growth rate is needed to get six billion people since the Flood?
It is relatively easy to calculate the growth rate needed to get today’s population from Noah’s three sons and their wives, after the Flood. With the Flood at about 4,500 years ago, it needs less than 0.5% per year growth.6 That’s not very much.

Of course, population growth has not been constant. There is reasonably good evidence that growth has been slow at times—such as in the Middle Ages in Europe. However, data from the Bible (Genesis 10,11) shows that the population grew quite quickly in the years immediately after the Flood. Shem had five sons, Ham had four, and Japheth had seven. If we assume that they had the same number of daughters, then they averaged 10.7 children per couple. In the next generation, Shem had 14 grandsons, Ham, 28 and Japheth, 23, or 130 children in total. That is an average of 8.1 per couple. These figures are consisent with God’s command to ‘be fruitful and multiply and fill the earth’ (Genesis 9:1).

Let us take the average of all births in the first two post-Flood generations as 8.53 children per couple. The average age at which the first son was born in the seven post-Flood generations in Shem’s line ranged from 35 to 29 years (Genesis 11:10–24), with an average of 31 years,7 so a generation time of 40 years is reasonable. Hence, just four generations after the Flood would see a total population of over 3,000 people (remembering that the longevity of people was such that Noah, Shem, Ham, Japheth, etc., were still alive at that time).8 This represents a population growth rate of 3.7% per year, or a doubling time of about 19 years.9

If there were 300 million people in the world at the time of Christ’s Resurrection,2 this requires a population growth rate of only 0.75% since the Flood, or a doubling time of 92 years—much less than the documented population growth rate in the years following the Flood.

>>3466499
6. 6.If r = % rate of growth per year, and the number of years of growth = n, then after n years, the population produced by the eight survivors of the Flood = 8(1+r/100)n. For a more comprehensive formula that takes into account longevity, number of children born and generation time, see Morris,H.M., World population and Bible chronology, Creation Research Society Quarterly 3(3):7–10, 1966.

>>3466499
>>3466503

yes, that's all nice and fancy but 8 people can't repopulate a planet in any scenario.
Their kids would all end up dead, retared and disabled.

>>3465945

You can't take modern growth rates and apply them over an extended period of time, growth rates have a multitude of factors and thanks to modern technologies, we have a much higher potential growth rate than in the past.

>>3466523
i.e., an average 4chan poster

>The Missing Link
I lol'd

>>3466533
who did that?

>>3466540
The kind of people who say: we have an exponential population growth, if you use that information then we can go back to the flood and look, 6 people is about right.

>>3466558
you don't think the human race expands geometrically?

lol

>>3466577
I think every species tends to expand exponentially given the circumstances. What I don't think is the human race always had conditions favorable for an exponential growth rate.