/sci/ - Science & Math

FUCK you.
Don't come back.
Ever.

>>3456418
AWWW SOMEONE'S LITTLE "EVOLUTION" FANTASY GOT CRUSHED?

HOW CUTE.

>>3456427

-5/10

>>3456427
Not sure if trolling or just very naïve and dumb as shit

Can someone explain what "Increase the information of the genom" means?

I should probably learn myself som biology but doesnt "older" unwanted genes disappear while new mutation of these take their places?

lol, has he never heard of XXY syndrome? or the whole bunch of chromosomal mutations like it

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Retrotransposon

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16093661

Troll harder next time.

>>3456442
>doesn't know biology
>accepts evolution anyway

typical atheist blindly following bullshit that is fashionable and fed to him by the lib media

>>3456427
>>3456409

F-

Apply yourself.

>>3456409
Science too hard to understand? Try creationism.

oh religious troll, you so funny

>>3456442
http://forknowledge.wordpress.com/2008/09/26/information-in-the-genome-the-debunking/

/thread

>>3456452
You mean the lib media that actually lets stupid christians say all sorts of bullshit and never calls them on it?

That "Lib" media?

You just dont know how ANYTHING works, do you? Oh well enjoy your angst and job flipping burgers.

blink blink blink blink blink blink

>atheist
>intelligent

mfw evolution is a fact

>>3456479
SHOW ME ONE SCIENTIST WHO SAYS THAT EVOLUTION IS A FACT.

THE REALITY IS THAT THERE ARE MANY HOLES IN THE THEORY AND MOST SCIENTISTS DO NOT AGREE THAT IT IS EVEN A VAILD IDEA.

Awesome /sci/. Keep bumping the thread while providing no additional information and ignoring the few posts that attempt explanation. Instead, it's just a bunch of name-calling.
I butthurt.
I'm going to the gym to work out my aggression.

EK is a zoology major. I think her input would be valuable. EK please appear.

>>3456483

mfw when creationists say things that they think are facts.

>>3456483
mfw 99.85% of scientists in biological fields accept evolution as valid.

>>3456506
[citation needed]

it's very well disputed if u did your research

>>3456512
Shitty troll, but I'll bite. Only about 5% of scientists in ALL fields dispute evolution. Only 0.15% in the life sciences dispute it.

Look it up, troll.

>>3456512

not as disputed as "a wizard did it"

>>3456526
>make crazy claim
>say HURR U LOOK IT UP

typical atheist teen tactic

go fap to more dawkins

FFFFFFFFFF---
Will you please just read what I posted here?
>>3456448

It literally provides one example of how the genome can increase in size. Another great link is here:
>>3456465

OK, now, before I throw my laptop against the wall, I'm leaving. You make me so mad, /sci/, because you turn every biological question into a troll thread. I support HIJACKING TROLL THREADS to have LEGITIMATE SCIENTIFIC DISCUSSIONS and posting pictures with every post for no reason other than each post is an opportunity to post a picture.

>>3456533

>>3456452

What fashion is there about the theory of evolution?
Never said to be an atheist, just not accepting the inconceivable madness of christinsanity and c/o. This is however irrelevant since we are talking about a breeding theory and not something you go to a fucking church to practice.

Just asked a mf question and a big ty to >>3456465 who gave me a little info on the subject.

captcha is going out to you OP:
ingsholi xid
xid on you

My cardiology teacher said in class when he was a graduate it was inadivisible giving congestive heart disease patients beta-blockers. Then the research showed that was completely wrong!
They did exactly what was forbidden! Heretics!
Well I am not an evolutionist:

The Universe was designed to act exactly as it does:
"Yea, the sparrow hath found an house, and the swallow a nest for herself, where she may lay her young, even thine altars, O LORD of hosts, my King, and my God." Psalm 84:3

"Are not five sparrows sold for two pennies? Yet not one of them is forgotten by God." Luke 12:6

"Ancient" C-14 in fossil fuels and diamonds

Fossil fuels have huge amounts of C-14, making uniformitarian theory demand biological contamination:

"This may indicate possible contamination by small amounts of bacteria, underground sources of radiation causing the 14N(n,p) 14C reaction, direct uranium decay (although reported measured ratios of 14C/U in uranium-bearing ores[17] would imply roughly 1 uranium atom for every two carbon atoms in order to cause the 14C/12C ratio, measured to be on the order of 10-15), or other unknown secondary sources of carbon-14 production." http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carbon-14/

>>3456559
i bet your a liberal too

just wake up to the facts that evolution is just a lie, but ur just a dumb kid and will only learn when you get older