/sci/ - Science & Math

The ocean; it will cause nasty tsunamis and freeze quite a bit of ocean life to death.

I'd take water in my bed over an atmosphere full of dust any day.

>>3451964
Depends. One hitting water near major cities would be worse than the whatever which hit Tunguska, of the same size.

Water, since meteors are mostly ice, it'd freeze a bunch of water around it and change the climate/kill many animals.

Well...

lands in ocean: massive tsunami in all directions destroying coastal cities, island habitats, and other low-lying areas

lands on land: shock wave destroys cities near landing point, throws up a lot of dust into the air and atmosphere.

>freeze quite a bit of ocean life to death.

huh? (serious question)

Ocean

there are a lot of chemicals absorbed into ocean water and settled in sea floor sediments. If these were released it would be disasterous.

>>3451980
Nevermind, question answered.

On the ocean is better, because there are no people there.

best scenario: meteor hits a small uninhabited island. that'd be sweet

>>3451980
>implying they won't be super fucking hot when they enter our atmosphere

>>3451994
There's no friction in space you idiot, which doesn't allow the meteor to heat up, you fucking idiot. There are only three things in space: Light, gravity and dark energy.

>>3451997
You best be trollin', son.

>>3451997
>implying no matter in space
>implying gravity is in space
>rather than a result of space itself
>mfw

>>3451997
>There are only three things in space: Light, gravity and dark energy

>>3452007
You all must be new here.

There are two /sci/ threads you should never forget: Questions for EK and this legendary meteor shit courtesy of Teacup

>>3452018
What the fuck are you talking about? Stop being full of shit.

>>3452038

>>3452051
>got trolled hard

>>3451980
are you retarded or trolling?

>>3452149

trolled roughly