/sci/ - Science & Math

>>3361629
> attention whores gonna whore

You do not have to do anything. You are choosing to be irritating.

>mfw I just hide all this spam

bitch please

I have been b& 30 times by now.
And it had better reasons than just spamming.

>>3361674
> tab with EK's facebook
> tab with archive pointing to EK's thread
> google field containing search for EK's archive
> banned for posting about EK
Your obsession with EK has become rather unhealthy. How about going outside for a while?

> Do NOT evade your permanent bans! Doing so will result in...
> Um...
> Please? Don't evade your permanent bans.

>>3361685
> virgins gonna virgin

You have not even stated why you are doing this. I presume it is just because you are a horrible person and you feel like lashing out at innocent people. Has EK actually ever done anything to offend you? Have I ever offended you?

>>3361697
You're a woman. Women ignore him. Therefore, all women are evil. He's simply projecting his frustration on you.

>>3361707
If this is the kind of thing he likes to do in his free time then I can see why they would. I would never like to meet him.

>>3361697

If you didn't attention whore with a trip code in the first place, we wouldn't have to put with op's faggotry either.

You're both failures at life

>>3361697
>Has EK actually ever done anything to offend you?
>EK
>not the worst tripfag ever
>not worse than aether

>>3361718
Dozens of people use tripcodes. One less would make no difference. This spammer would just harass one of the other people who use a name.

>>3361722

At least Aether didn't rely on his trip to troll the board

>>3361726

Their level of attention whoring is no where near what you and EK do.

If you want an internet reputation and white knights, then go to reddit.

I am doing this because i want you and EK to start posting anonymously.
EK seems to be doing it but you refuse.
Once the two of you stop your namefag tripwhoring ways i will stop.
But you refuse becuase you want this board to go to shit don't you?
then i must blame Mod for not giving you and EK a permanent ban.

4chan is supposed to be an anonymous website. There should be no attention whores

>>3361736
If you want us to not use name, why were the two of us selected? Why is it desired that we 'go anonymous' but you are content to leave all the other people who use names alone?

>>3361746
MABY THAT DAY WILL COME. BUT FOR NOW YOU TWO ARE THE WORST.

SO GO ANON OR WATCH THE CANCER SPREAD!

>>3361746
You two are the biggest shit posters.

I actually applaud what op is doing. The mods should ban their trips.

Op is the hero /sci/ deserves

>>3361746
Fuck off Harriet.


>This needs to stop
>Only reasonable solution is to ban EK & Harriet.
>Permban will make /sci/ return to normal, if not better

>>3361759
Out of the dozens of name users on this board, you think I am the worst? What have I ever done to warrant such disapproval?

>>3361746
Because you're a shithead.
And its easier to annoy you now that spammers have your info

>>3361746
You guys happen to be the two biggest trolls on this board. /sci/ has it bad enough we do not need you two ugly whores posting with trips.

BUMP

>>3361815
How am I a troll?

>>3361826
tell me this bitch: Why the fuck do you want to post with a trip?
If you acctually used your brain you would understand that there is no way possible after 7/7/11 that you would ever be able to post in a thread without it getting cancer
The only place left for you is /soc/

>>3361826
Your presence is loathsome, and yet you don't stop tripfagging.

>>3361840
> acctually
> so MAD
> he can't even TYPE!

>>3361840
You still have not explained why we were selected, or what you have against us. You are a horrible person and I pity you. You are immature and I will never submit to your demands.

>>3361848
You're a misinformation spreading ugly little shit head fatty. Go seek validation elsewhere, insecure white trash cunt.

>>3361848
Well then the spamming will continue. you are to blame

>>3361874

>>3361857
Is she actually fat? I only come here with my morning coffee usually, I honestly dont even know who these people are, I generally ignore trips anyways since they are the anonymous bbs version of clowns.

If she is fat why not spam her fatty fatness in every thread until it motivates her to change herself?

This could be a good thing, Post it up. A few thousand times. Come on

>>3361885
Oh she's a plumper alright. Just look at her pics, there's a few of her floating around.

>>3361885
She's a bit fat yea. Her biggest problem is how unfathomably ugly she is. And she can't change that.

> mfw I come here from /b/, hoping to find some intelligent threads but /sci/ turns out to be just the same shit that you get everywhere else on 4chan.

>>3361866
if thats her she doesnt look too fat right now. Thats a fat face in waiting if I've ever seen one though. The total lardass timebomb just waiting to catch some poor shmuck that doesnt notice the fat face and raw dogs it at a bad time and spends the rest of his life as less then a man providing for a tubzilla that moves farther and farther away from looking like a person with every passing year.

I feel so bad for those guys. I can see them eating their own balls when their fatty touches them in public and the dude gets this look on his face because he knows that other people see him and he knows that they know.

>>3361899
B-b-but it's EK's fault that we're shitting on our own board!

>>3361899

Today is a little bit of a special day.

We have the god damn batman, I mean op, here trying to get rid of some of our cancer.

<span class="math">\newcommand{\derp}[1]{{{#1} \atop {#1}{#1}}} \newcommand{\herp}{{{\Delta \atop \Delta \Delta}} } \newcommand{\herpderp}{{\derp{\herp}} } \newcommand{\derpderpderp}{\derp{\herpderp}} \newcommand{\derpderpderpderp}{\derp{\derpderpderp}} \newcommand{\derpderpderpderpderp}{\derp{\derpderpderpderp}} \newcommand{\derpderpderpderpderpderp}{\derp{\derpderpderpderpderp}} \newcommand{\derpderpderpderpderpderpderp}{\derp{\derpderpderpderpderpderp}} \newcommand{\derpderpderpderpderpderpderpderp}{\derp{\derpderpderpderpderpderpderp}} \derpderpderp\derpderpderpderp\derpderpderpderpderp\derpderpderpderpderpderp \derpderpderpderpderpderpderpderp[/spoiler]

>>3361848
>I will never submit to your demands.

We shall see about that

>>3361866
>picrelated

>>3361936

Yikes, you sure know how to triforce my good sir!

>>3361899

Sorry dude. There is some stupid drama about some namefags. There are legitimately intelligent threads from time to time. There has been alot of recent hype about the space shuttle and for the last couple of weeks people have had a fascination with transferring one's consciousness into a robotic shell, as well as discussing artificial intelligence and will power.

>>3361848
> I will never submit to your demands.
Yes you will, or else we'll start pouting harder! We'll continue to buttrage as hard as our assholes allow, and that will show you!

>>3361937

>>3361936

If you indeed intend to "spam", then why dont you invite the "summer" from /b/ with your arcane knowledge of the "Triforce".
Im certain that they would be impressed by your work, and fairly inclined to do what you ask of them, or just follow your example on /sci/.

>>3361962

Lmfao, what an ugly whore.

An hero is clearly your only choice, fat bitch.

-\sum^n_{m=1}
\left(\,\sum^\infty_{k=1} \frac{ h^{k-1} }{\left(w_m-z_0\right)^2}
\right) = \sum^\infty_{k=1} s_k\, h^{k-1}

Could just treat all name/tripfaggot shitposters as "anonymous", except that you use name/trips to connect posts (ie, admitted, intentional samefagging). If you truly hate Harriet/EK this much - you should be happy that they trip - because they're filterable.

But no, instead, let's shit up the board with spam, "dox" and harass some chick for daring to be female and model material on our sacred 4c... Or you could filter her trip and not fucking worry about them. They are irrelevant, by this kind of idiotic shitposting, you're inflating their impact on the board, filter their trip and fuck off, starve them of the attention they (so you say) crave.

<span class="math">-\sum^n_{m=1}
\left(\,\sum^\infty_{k=1} \frac{ h^{k-1} }{\left(w_m-z_0\right)^2}
\right) = \sum^\infty_{k=1} s_k\, h^{k-1}[/spoiler]

I was involved in this intensely over the last two days. Now we know who Harriet and EK are. It's obvious they'll deny it. Of course they only started denying it after they had time to recover and regroup. It's clear they are lying anyway. It's boring now. Best let it pass

<span class="math"> e^(\ix)= cos(x) + \isin(x) [/spoiler]

>>3362013

Or you attention whores could just stop posting with names on an anonymous board.

>>3362013

>daring to be female
>Like they are doing anything as glorifiably martyrish as your describe

>>3362037
'MODEL MATERIAL" HAHAHAHHA

>>3362039
Nothing heroic about being born with a gash. Not sure what you're implying.
>>3362037
It's a board. Anon is anon, name is name, trip is trip. Stop giving the attention whores attention. Stop making threads about them, don't respond to their posts if you wouldn't respond to the same post as anon.

You're feeding the monster, I've watched it happen on other boards, this is one of the very few problems that actually will go away if you (collectively) ignore it. Stop getting suckered in to the faggot parade.

>>3362053
Yeah, missed the "not", thought the message was still clear, my bad.

>>3362013
>model material

So to resume, you are all immature fags.

Love you EK!

>>3362114
At first I saw the pic and thought "not bag, hit it from behind" but then I maximized it and realized that she doesnt stop at the top she is wearing and eeeeeeeewwwwwwwwwwwwwww whyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyyy

and why would you even have that pic saved?

>>3362139
> Love you EK!
Like most of us do. Don't let the loud minority of summerfags tell you otherwise.

>>3362114
See above. God damn I really missed a key word.

Seriously though, this isn't my main board, I've watched tripfag egos/post numbers skyrocket because of hate threads and shit, then people will worship them to be "SO EDGY" because the trip becomes the victim, etc. Just stop. When they shitpost against the rules, report them, and treat them as anon, or filter their trip and ignore them completely. Unless you want this to spiral out of control and turn into a tripfag drama shitstorm board to just watch the world burn - then by all means, carry on. Not like I see a whole lot if relevant science discussion here anyway (although I truly appreciate and value intelligent discussion on here when I see it - seems to happen mostly at odd hours of the night)...

>mfw I've accomplished nothing and will only add to the faggotry
>mfw my phone can't into picture upload, thus I have no face
>mfw I don't want to live on this planet anymore.bat

EK doesnt seem so bad to me, and harriets lovely! You guys are pretty harsh.

>>3362139
>>3362139

>>3362146

Getting closer, Rose.

Alot......alot..... my fucking god people "alot" is not a fucking word, holy fuck! Mother of shit! learn the two separate words "a" and "lot", and realize you look a lot less ignorant when writing if you use "a lot" as opposed to "alot"!

>>3362114

actually her hips are pretty decent.
Her other pictures may be ugly but i'mma fap to that one

this is what 1-2 tripfaggots can do to a board

the power of faggotry, it's stupendous

>>3362114
After much deliberation, would fuck. Still don't like her opinions or general attitude, but I'd hit it.
>>3362139
Not me, obv.

bamp!

OP is a cunt! do not fuck with harriet!

>>3364298

so that is harriet?

>>3364298
Rose why did you constantly say you were much hotter and prettier than Harriet when that is not true?

>>3364311
shes in the thread, im reading it at the moment. Op's being a total dick to her. not sure why this was bumped tho.

>>3364318
Looks are subjective. i dont really know which of us is pretty. she looks okay to me but i dont fancy her.

>>3364326
*prettier

>>3364329
someone stab this cunt already

>>3364326
> thinks looks are subjective
> in 2011
> i seriously hope you guys don't do this

>>3364326

EK

Go and shove a cactus into your rectal cavity.

Sincerely,

/sci/

>>3364326
In this case I think it's pretty objective that Harriet has a nicer face than yours unobfuscated by makeup, unlike yours. Also her natural hair > your shitty dyed hair which you change what every month? Disgusting.

>>3364326

Hey EK.

Just popping by again for two things.
1. I don't mind you.
2. Did you tell Harriet that she is gorgeous from me yet?

>>3364335
post harriets face

>>3361848
Ha! you go girl!

>>3361726

I visit /sci/ quite a lot, though not as much recently. I have never seen your trip before this thread, and I must say I have NO sympathy for you -- whatever it is that's going on here because there is literally NO reason to use a trip unless YOU'RE LOOKING FOR ATTENTION. Same goes to EK and every other tripfag out there.

It's an anonymous board, anyone that actually uses a tripcode other than in the occasional thread where it is necessary, you're basically a piece of shit.

>>3364341
Keep bumping troll EK threads which you claim to hate, referencing hour-old posts.
Stay classy Rose.

>not filtering shitty attention whores and meta threads
>2764 AUC

>>3364340

>>3364334
you just stole that cactus line from me, when i posted in the triangle thread you unoriginal quote-stealing cunt!

>>3364341
>implying harriet is not your alter ego

>>3364347

>implying it hasn't been an overused meme on /b/ for over a year now

Cool hypocrisy, bro.

>>3364347
>implying he doesn't know that
God you are so fucking stupid Rose. Maybe I'll copy down this and some of your other quotes and send them to mummy so she can see the disgrace she brought up?

Why does EK have such a hard on for that Facts Vs. Religion, bitch? I've been in Skype conversations with her and she's pretty obnoxious and stupid.

>>3364378
Birds of a feather...

Three weeks ago I was generating trips that emulated EK, and posted them here. Now you have actually made me side with her. By pissing off the rest of the board, you are not helping, and any effect EK had was nowhere near this awful.

Care to tell us why you're doing this?

>>3364378
Oh wait, I see now.

>>3364378

you got the QUEEN's skype id?!??!!

>>3364347
Were you born a stupid bitch or did you pick it up along the way?

>>3364400
No, I was just in a few skype calls with FvR through Thundercunt.

>>3364387
Someone reply to this.

>>3364387
old thread is old,
OP has probably left. I wasnt even here when this was happenening. he was just harrassing harriet, who has never done anything bad to anyone

>>3364443
You were pretty annoying. I definitely get people not liking you, and I still don't. It's just the disproportionate response is significantly worse.

>>3364455
i dont expect to be nice. i could act sweet and charming towards everyone if i wanted, in fact IRL i tend to, people reciprocate and fate plays out well...

but here, thats just not really me. they might well find me annoying, but they'll have to deal with it.
as for the spammer, he's clearly a cunt, but i give a relatively low number of fucks. he'll get bored eventually.

>>3364476
*I dont expect to be liked

>>3364476
It's not that you're not polite, it's that you post here when you're fucked up and ruin good threads.

>>3364481
fucked up?

Where is said spam anyway? Was this guy actually posting spam proper or was he just \newcommand-ing?

>>3364500
harriet said he was just relentless posting pictures of some girl off facebook here coupled with expletives written over and over again to fill up big blocks of text.

>>3364511
we know it was you.

>>3364488
When High/Schizoid.

>>3364524
what was?

EK you seem like a redditor, what subreddits do you frequent?

>>3364476
These are words I'd expect from a 13 year old not from an adult. You fucking disgust me. Act civilly in order for us to have decent discussions which is the whole point of the board. Fucking bipolar retard bitch.

>ib4 LOL HIPPOCRITE 1!!1 111
Stfu. I treat 13 year old fat ugly whores as they're meant to be treated.

>>3364553
harsh on reddit much?
>>3364562
in during LOL HIPPOCRITE 1!!1 111
Don't call people out on being immature while acting immature, it gives you no credibility whatsoever.

>>3364476
>so edgy dark cynical and misanthropic xD so c00l!

>>3364553
hmm, a chance to disclose moar information on /sci/?

>>3364577
More information implies you have already given us some. This implies that Rose is you.
Checkmate stoopid bitch.

>>3364584

>This implies that Rose is you.

Nope.jpg