/sci/ - Science & Math

nope

my gf is religious. i don't mind

Probably not.

>>3321763
It really depends on what sphere of knowledge it stems from.

Stop being such a condescending ass OP.

Only if she was hot as caprica six.

I only date women who are pro-choice.

>>3321793
>Stop being such a condescending ass /sci/

fix'd

if they weren't a YEC then maybe, but only if they were extremely sexy and nice and gave me my damn space. if they had any deficiencies theyd be gone.

If she's just "religious" in the sense that she believes in all the afterlife stuff, but doesn't actually act on the religion, then sure.

If she actively went to church and such, then probably not.

>>3321799
Most chicks look hot when their tits are hanging out.

I only date women that are as intelligent as I am.
Oh shit, there are none.

>>3321814
yeah, no one can be as dumb as you.

oh wow, another religion vs science thread

http://www.4chan.org/rules#sci

>>3321793

Oh? The religious can dish out this shit but can't take it?

Fuck off.

>>3321827

You just let 10,000 religious threads go on praising the oh holy God and then get all pissy when an atheist fights back?

These mods are nut jobs. Go to hell ;-).

>>3321844

It's called taking the high road. You'll lean about it when you're older.

I can fuck a religious person. I can be friends with a religious person. But no, I don't think I could date a religious person.

>>3321813
this is true. so my answer is, if she's naked, i can stand all the god talk

>>3321850

It's called being a pussy. There is no high road on 4chan. If you have half a brain, you will figure that out one day.

I have an IQ of 130. So for me to date someone of normal intelligence is like if someone of normal intelligence was dating a retard. They wouldn't do it, so why would I?

Yes because atheist women are invariably whores.

>>3321849

People expect better behavior from reasonable people.

Only if she didn't let it rule her life, try to convert me over, and could withstand me making jabs at her every now and then for partaking in it.

Honestly, it's pretty much the same answer as if you had asked "Could you ever bring yourself to date someone who had a subscription to O magazine" or "watched Real Housewives". Gotta learn to be more accepting of other people's interests bro.

>atheist
>females

enjoy your feminazis and new age hippies.

>>3321910

I get that, but then they let unreasonable people drown good ideologies out.

Thus, we have the Republican party in America.

>>3321910
>people who claim to be reasonable

or in other words

>we expect reasonable behavior from people who claim to be reasonable

>we expect rational behavior from people who claim to be rationale

Oh the dissonance in action versus words is always so disturbing.

>>3321849
No, I report them as well.

>>3321921

No, the secret is to go for those border line Catholics and then convert them over by telling them a few facts about reality.

>>3321928

Okay. Well, thank you.

Girlfriend is religious. Not extremely so, but she is a Christian. It bothers me sometimes, but then I realize she's intelligent in other areas and arguing about it wont change her mind.

the options within my sphere have become pretty bad lately, so who knows. probably wouldn't date someone who interprets the bible literally (i.e. a creationist, actually makes me a little sick just thinking about it), but maybe a follower of another (esp. eastern) religion.

If she's vaguely religious and don't go on about it in conversations I'd be fine with it. I'll admit I'm the kinda guy who loves to talk about academics in my spare time (currently studying astrophys), have been into cosmology a lot in the past as well, so I would probably get on her nerves if she didn't really share belief in how stuff started.

I would rape a Christian.

>implying anyone would allow me to date them

>Could you ever bring yourself to date someone

Stopped reading here. The answer is no.

No.

But it's not a problem, most people here are not religious (I don't live in a theocracy like Murrikans).

>>3321879
*oh wow your IQ is high, I'm so impressed*
stop acting like you are different from most ppl, having a high IQ is anything but helpful with social skills but use that fucking intelligence to socialize (it can help you to blend in and feel normal)
oh, and btw my IQ is 146 so I was on the same boat

>>3321996
My gf is blonde and plays chess just fine...

depends on how obnoxious they are, and how good the sex is.

A christian just told me that economics is based on emotion and psychology. I nearly vomited...I would marry em yeah sure, get my fuck on then strangle them out of frustration...

I don't really care as long as she doesn't let it effect me.

>>3322295
>Can't tell if poe.

>>3322295

>A christian just told me that economics is based on emotion and psychology. I nearly vomited

Well to be fair he's right.

>>3322295
Do you also get mad when someone tells you pi is 3.14?

>>3321763
Being religious does not mean that one is stupid. Of course I would date someone who was religious. It would not matter to me.

>>3322320
NO NO NO YOU IDIOT.

PI IS ATLEAST 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706
7982148086513282

>>3321850
Considering what taking the high road has cost us.
Fuck the high-road.

>>3322354
What is the cost?

>hurr im so edgy for being atheist, anyone who point out I'm acting like a twat is a secret christian fundy durr derp im so smart and special

So fuck game theory, right? To say economics economics is solely based on psychology and emotions is ignorant of the fact that the field is heavily based on mathematics. It's a social science insofar as people effect economic systems to an extent.

>>3322360
Scientific denialism is an accepted position.
Atheism is viewed as a fringe belief, and the ones who defend it are considered the strange ones.
Laws are still being made due to religious dogma.
etc. etc. etc.

All shit that could have been prevented if we just went "NO, this is retarded" in unison

>>3322371
NO NO NO
PI IS 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937510582097494459230781640628620899862803482534211706
7982148086513282306647093844609550582231725359408128481117450284102701938521105559644622948954930381
9644288109756659334461284756482337867831652712019091456485669234603486104543266482133936072602491412
7372458700660631558817488152092096282925409171536436789259036001133053054882046652138414695194151160
9433057270365759591953092186117381932611793105118548074462379962749567351885752724891227938183011949
1298336733624406566430860213949463952247371907021798609437027705392171762931767523846748184676694051
3200056812714526356082778577134275778960917363717872146844090122495343014654958537105079227968925892
3542019956112129021960864034418159813629774771309960518707211349999998372978049951059731732816096318
5950244594553469083026425223082533446850352619311881710100031378387528865875332083814206171776691473
0359825349042875546873115956

>>3322368

> Implying the picture represents the majority of atheists

A study by Ken Ferraro of Purdue University, published recently in the Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion (nope, that title is not an oxymoron!), found that 27% of Baptists and 20% of other fundamentalist Protestants are obese. Those figures contrast sharply with only 1% obesity among Jews, Muslims and secular people.

>>3321763
No. Same goes for friends, only rational atheists please. That is fortunately easy to accomplish considering I live in Scandinavia.

>>3322402
>where race is greater than religion