/sci/ - Science & Math

Why can't we all just get along in this house?

;_;

lol a fred all about meeee??? awesoms, hun

Well, EK admitted that he posts as Harriet.

>>3183118
no i fucking didn't you troll.

>>3183118
NO I DIDUNT!!!

>>3183112
>>3183116
>>3183118
>>3183123

I'm disappointed in all of you.

Now let's get this shit rolling.

>>3183142
*trolling
>FTFY

>EK GENERAL.

ITT: EK and EK accessories.


Fuck off EK, go shit up other boards with your pseudoscience and metaphysics.

>>3183149
i never posted pseudoscience, come on tell me what pseudoscience am i meant to have posted? oh right none you ass

Just after /sci/ had its sticky.

>"LUL iaM a GUIRL loOk AT MEH hah"

I hate it when some attention whore female tries to enter an only-boys-area, whether its a genre of music, a sport, sciences, games etc and try to get the attention of virgins so hard to feel good about herself.

Fucking attention whore, too long you cancer'd this board, its time that you should be leaving now.
Go socialize, dress slutty to attain your goal.
Stop the self advertisement, please gtfo.

>>3183155
Don't you get refuted on this point every week?

How about when you argued that sex was healthier than masturbation?

There is a reason why you don't post in the actual /sci/ related threads that require even a little bit of logic and knowledge. You leave science to the big boys now, EK.

>>3183155
thats amusing as that is almost identical to the reply i would have said...

>>3183159
this is in no way an all boys area, if it was meant to be so it would be in the rules.
it is mainly guys here, but there are some girls. deal with it.

EK is a worthless tramp that gets boners over camwhores that are smarter and better looking than her.

She has a deep loathing for herself but is happy to put on a brave face, even when she's being cut to the bone.

I hope she fucking dies.

>she's also harriet

>>3183162
that's not pseudoscience, that's just me getting some minor thing wrong occasionally, get over it, troll

>>3183165
ahahha!

>>3183166
are you samefagging the anon you are replying to? i'm getting serious deja vu on the whole conversation you got going on.

>>3183163
>thats amusing as that is almost identical to the reply i would have said...
i know, hun. i know...

>>3183163
If they are other girls here it is because they dont advertise themselves to fulfill their attention-whore needs.

>>3183171
and i dont advertise it, it just occasionally comes up in threads where we discuss gender issues, and people have memory.
go figure.

wtf is this shit.

Just because a needy fem has insecurities about herself doesnt mean that we should make threads about her.

Dem attention whores, they are getting more disgusting by the day.

>>3183172
That's probably because you have a rather limited repertoire.

>>3183172
THAT IS BECAUSE YOU POST THE SAME REPLIES EVERY SINGLE TIME.

Maybe if you actually gained any knowledge ever since you started fucking around on /sci/ you wouldn't be so predictable.

>>3183174
>raging tripfagotry
>unlimited fem reation pics
>constantly reminding us she is female directly or indirectly

=massive attention whore.

Not him, but my problem isn't that you are an attention whore is that you are trying to deny it.
Please accept it, and we'll move on.

I don't care that EK's a girl, and I don't think that EK acts like she's attention whoring or whatever.

I don't like EK for a different reason. That reason is because EK is actually pretty fucking stupid.

>>3183183
You forgot the part where she makes pics about her name and spreads them in /sci/.

And starting threads about herself with another name.

I've known many attention whores, but there is no other dirt whore like this cunt.

>>3183190
im not an attention whore and i dont start threads about myself (why the fuck would i start my own hate thread?)

Hi EK, am a female too.
Why are you trying so hard?
daddy issues? no one gave you attention?
Be like a normal human being and stop making threads about yourself.

And we wonder why men call women whores, because females like you exist.

>>3183192
Cool story, sis.

Oh the drama.

>>3183192
>hurp
>durp
>are you that stupid?
>EK general
>you like attention
>get over it and admit it.
>if you do we'll forgive you for being a stupid whore.

>>3183197
How am i trying so hard? i just post it as i see it.
I didn't make this thread and i'm not a whore. I dont think I make women look bad, i'm just feistier than most.
I get plenty of ettention IRL, i dont need any attention here, and the attention i do get is usually bad hater attention.

>>3183198
that wasnt a thread about me. I was drunk and high when i posted it. it doesnt even mean anything.

>>3183203
OP is anonymous.

>>3183192

Yes you are.

If you're not whoring then turn off the trip and NEVER turn it back on again.

It's not like your name has a reputation for posting quality information that someone can feel reassured of its source.

What's wrong? The attention towards you might stop? bawwww

>>3183204
Man, you babble like a fucking 12 year old.

oh hai, can i start my own thread now?

>>3183206
Hey look am a tripfag too.
>hes anonymous

Ofc you would post as anonymous, otherwise it would be obvious even to the stupid virgins ITB that you were posting it.

>>3183207
by that logic all namefags are attention whores, and not just me. this issue has been dealt with multiple times, there is a non whorey reason for tripfagging.
http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/3161805#p3161943
read this thread.

>I get plenty of ettention IRL, i dont need any attention here, and the attention i do get is usually bad hater attention.

What?

ITT: People call EK an attention whore. People argue with EK more and more, thus giving her more attention.

>>3183213
i didnt start the thread. if you think i'm a liar then fuck you and get out.

>>3183218
as in hater threads. people who will respond angrily just because i am me, and not respond to the content of the post.

>>3183220
And thereby proving their point.

>>3183215
Actually his logic didn't imply all trip users to be attention whores. The guy implied your repeated use of tripcode do give off an image of being an attention whore.

>>3183227
then all people who repeatedly use a tripcode are attention whores as well. only temporary trips would not be.

>>3183215
Yes they are all whores.

I don't mind Josef tripfagging, I know when I see Josef post it's going to be quality. I like to know it's him posting and not just anon.

I know when I see you post it's going to be worthless shit, I wish you just disappeared into the sea of the other Anons. Nothing of value will be lost.

Why is there a thread just about EK? This is not science.

EK am your mate.

This trip is better

>>3183230
Could be, but you probably are one of the worst.

>>3183232
meh. i know i am helpful and some of my posts are useful. you dont like it, then just ignore me and dont reply to me. better yet, block my tripcode, and you wont have to deal with me ever again.

oh hai

>>3183241
Ignore them, you are my fav internet whore.

>>3183241

Then why not be helpful, without a name, for the sake of being helpful?

You're an attention whore.

>>3183245
im not a whore. if you like me then dont call me that.

>>3183241
Oh shi-. Didn't know you can fucking block a tripcode.

>>3183247
Women can't be helpful without someone praising them.
Selfish beings, only good for fucking.
But yeah.

>>3183241

>meh. i know i am helpful and some of my posts are useful. you dont like it, then just ignore me and dont reply to me. better yet, block my tripcode, and you wont have to deal with me ever again.
>i know i am helpful and some of my posts are useful.
>some of my posts are useful
>useful

>mfw

>>3183251
Cry harder, whore.

>>3183251
Jeez bitch, he was trying to compliment you, you probably have a tight whore vagina.

You shove dragon dildos up there don't you?

>>3183251

Fuck off, cunt.

EK left a thread? This is a victory today.

You are all so rude here. You are hyprocrites if you complain about EK's writing style and then respond to her with such vulgarity yourselves.

>>3183312

Fuck off EK

>>3183306

>victory
>anonymous image board

oh wait

>>3183312
What is the matter EK, it is okay to post rudely as Harriet, we know it is you.

Ever since the oringal EK's trip was exposed i've just assumed "EK" means "anon" nowadays.

>>3183348
what is the code of EK?

>>3183348
this current trip isnt exposed (someone has come close, they have about 6 digits correct)

>>3183330
Now that the real harriet is here, have a look at her tripcode >>3183312
it isnt the same as the fake harriet who called someone a faggot.

>yfw EK made this thread in the first place.

>>3183351

I do not know. But i know somebody found it out.
>>3183353

>this current trip isnt exposed (someone has come close, they have about 6 digits correct)

if you've changed your trip, how are we supposed to know that you're still the same person then?

>i don't know what's real anymore :*(

>>3183358
ive been using this one for months. ive been using the same images and same writing style. no impersonator would put in so much effort and last this long.
old EK tripcode was #taxon.

>>3183354

ACTUALLY good sir I did.

NOW GET BACK TO DISCUSSING SCIENCE.

>>3183155
I think metaphysics is too sophisticated, better stick to sociology

>>3183370

>she will still fuck you're shit up
>you're
>you are
>she will still fuck you are shit up
>fuck you are shit up

que?

Right.

This thread is now about Bose-Einsten Condensates.

Fucking velocity distribution, how does it work?

>>3183383
we cant prove we arnt each others samefag even now.

>>3183392
heheh...it was a common troll i used to pull. grammar nazi's are fun to troll, you i would do it wrong on purpose.

>>3183399

>>3183404
hehhehheh.
lol, whatever.
<<< have another one.

EK is a dude.
and you are pathetic for giving him so much attention

If you want to be helpful, do it without a trip. Your name DOES NOT bring a sense of reassurance that the post will be quality as you postulated in the other thread.
Drop your fucking trip if you want to contribute to this board. Idiot attention whore.

>Ek can't solve 2^x + 3^x = 50 without using a calculator for the answer.

>>3183484
[sarcasm] yeh, you're probably right [/sarcasm]
http://green-oval.net/cgi-board.pl/sci/thread/3085833#p3085911

>>3183511
that is because it will be some horrible decimal somewhere between 3 and 4.

>>3183511
no one can

You just spent over two hours defending yourself on 4chan.

>>3183522
>>3183526

Newton's Approximation Method.

<span class="math">2^x + 3^x = 50[/spoiler]
<span class="math"> x_0 = 3 [/spoiler]
<span class="math">x_{n+1} = x_0 - \frac{f(x_0)}{f'(x_0)}[/spoiler]
<span class="math">x_1 = 3 - \frac{2^3 + 3^3 - 50}{2^3 \log(2) + 3^3 \log(3)} \approx 3.4260[/spoiler]
<span class="math">x_2 = 3.4260 - \frac{2^{3.4260} + 3^{3.4260} - 50}{2^{3.4260} \log(2) + 3^{3.4260} \log(3)} \approx 3.3555[/spoiler]
<span class="math">x_3 = 3.3555 - \frac{2^{3.3555} + 3^{3.3555} - 50}{2^{3.3555} \log(2) + 3^{3.3555} \log(3)} \approx 3.3528[/spoiler]

Check it.

>>3183542
>implying an approximation is a solution

>>3183522

Is that why you keep your trip? So you can search an archive for when you gave someone an answer to some babby physics?

Pathetic

>>3183542
>without using a calculator
nice attempt at showing off though, fucking nerd-assed faggot.

>>3183547
>Retard Detected

>>3183547

>implying all maths isn't a big approximation

>>3183549
lrn2logarithms

>>3183548
haha, nope. Although it does make it quick and easy to find my posts if i have a point to prove.

>>3183542

how did you calculate the logs of 2 and 3 and the 5 sig fig exponents within your newtons method?

show working please.

>>3183554
>implying you can do shit like <span class="math"> x_1 = 3 - \frac{2^3 + 3^3 - 50}{2^3 \log(2) + 3^3 \log(3)} \approx 3.4260 [/spoiler] without a calculator.

>>3183553
see
>>3183551

you obviously know nothing about maths. i mean, you know 1 + 1 isn't approximately 2, it is 2, don't you?

>>3183561
Oh, lordy! They must have never been able to math all the way back in the 40s and 50s without a calculator!

>>3183563
>/sci/
>"trolling and EK"

>>3183551
1st class maths degree from UCL actually

but closed form vs approximate solutions is 1st year shit at university of bangor or some shit hole, so you must be an engineer or 15 yr old, someone that doesn't know what maths is

>>3183569
>UCL

>>3183566
>look at me, i troll so hard and im not a whore

>>3183564
they were extremely limited in numerical methods back then

learn2historyofmath

>>3183574
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_College_London#Rankings

/r/ing the picture source of OP's pic. The one that says omgomgomgomg wait nobody cares

>>3183587

4chan.org

>>3183574
UCL was my back up after cambridge

basically second best maths college in UK

suffice to say i got in to neither

>>3183579
>Retard detected.

>>3183579
>interpolation

>>3183574
MY OLD SCHOOL!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/QS_World_University_Rankings#Top_20_in_the_QS_World_University_Rankings

basically in descending order cambridge harvard yale ucl mit oxford

>>3183590
Piss you.

>>3183586
>Implying Wikipedia is a good source, or UK universities are any better than American community colleges.

>>3183603
AHAHAHAH!
best be fucking trolling.

>>3183592
>child detected

>>3183599
better methods than interpolation go back (as was said) to newton.

many methods have been there since the ancients, but the time factor in using them was not solved until electronics. so they were impractical unless absolutely necessary.

the word "computer" originally meant a person who just did calculations.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Human_computer

>>3183172
So, how's that biology degree working out for you?

>>3183611
>Use Wikipedia Article
>Entire academic faculty laugh

>>3183603
wikipedia just reports.

http://www.topuniversities.com/

cambridge has more nobel prizes than anywhere except columbia

>>3183612
you mean zoology?
Is going well. thanks for asking. )

>>3183615
>comes on 4chan, expects academic levels of evidence. girls and academics whoop with laughter

just follow the external links if you want

>>3183617
>Implying zoology isn't biology

>>3183625
biology is a seperate degree course.

>>3183611
wikipedia is bullshit is the tiresome tail end argument of the proven 4chan retard.

>>3183629
>herf derf

>>3183627
And what school taught you that?

zo·ol·o·gy
noun \zō-ˈä-lə-jē, zə-ˈwä-\
Definition of ZOOLOGY
a branch of biology concerned with the classification and the properties and vital phenomena of animals

>>3183636
its a branch of biology. but straight biology is also a degree course on its own. problem with me correcting you?

>>3183661
>implying you corrected anything.

How is this thread science related?