[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 371 KB, 633x800, 1b071916916ba4da0fe8375cc0d66ba4..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166675 No.3166675 [Reply] [Original]

Human breast milk instead of cow's milk

Promote an occupation where healthy young women induce lactation and produce milk for processing, pasteurization, sale, and human consumption.

What is wrong with this plan?

>> No.3166680

that would e a fucking shit job. no woman would want to do it.

>> No.3166687

Nothing? Sex makes people uncomfortable when brought to the public light though, and since it could easily be taken in a sexual direction it's not likely to be something that will be adopted by society.

>> No.3166692

>>3166680

Except that there are women that produce far too much milk for their children and want some easy money.

You're a useless fuck anyway so your comments are invalid.

>> No.3166698

>>3166692

+ inducing lactation = free bigger tits

>> No.3166700

>>3166680
Other shit jobs women do
Prostitute, stripper, kindergarten teacher, hotel maid, phone sex line operator, etc

>> No.3166701

>>3166680
Yeah. You disagree with OP's opinion on drinking breastmilk so you are obviously a useless fuck.

>> No.3166705

>>3166698
saggier != bigger

>> No.3166708

>>3166680
I'd suck your breast milk dry.

>> No.3166719

They actually do sell breast milk ice cream in some places. Prudish idiots got it shut down for a while though.

>> No.3166726

>>3166698
I dont get the fucking obsession guys seem to have with big breasts. it doesnt even matter, and i dont see why big is automatically better.

>> No.3166734

I dont get the fucking obsession women seem to have with big penises, it doesnt even matter, and i dont see why big is automatically better.

>> No.3166743

>>3166726
Its based on evolutionary psychology. But why would you care so much unless you have small ones and are jealous?

>> No.3166752

>>3166734
penis is actually used during sex, breasts arn't
if they are, you''re doing it wrong

>>3166743
i'm not even jealous, big ones would just get in the way and weigh me down. mine are average sized anyway, i think.

>> No.3166758

This already happens in hospitals, where breast milk is used for babies whose mother has died.

>> No.3166760

>>3166752
Why do you shit on my /sci/ with your posts? It used to be good.

>> No.3166765

>>3166752

shut up you cunt

>> No.3166769
File: 29 KB, 450x293, 1302629732959.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166769

>>3166765
pin-dicked virgin detected.

>> No.3166772

>>3166752 mine are average sized anyway

too bad they're drowned out by the rest of your fat

>> No.3166777

>>3166726

When I masturbate to thoughts of you wearing nothing other than a labcoat, you always possess rather large, voluminous breasts, with 8mm thick, 12mm long nipples.

>> No.3166778

>>3166769
You should just ignore them. Do not respond.

>> No.3166784

>>3166777
yeh i really dont think i needed to be told that. keep your wank fantasys to yourself.

>> No.3166785

Actually, I'm betting the love for large breasts is at least partially evolutionary.

Similar to the attraction to wide, curvy hips.

(Well fed, healthy - they stand out more, so more noticeable, inspires thoughts of sex, etc.)

>> No.3166789

>>3166752
Not sure how you have sex...

>> No.3166790

>>3166777
Eww! You masturbate to EK?
Thats disgusting.

>> No.3166794

>>3166791
good.

>> No.3166796

>>3166784

>fantasys

>> No.3166799

>>3166789

>implying anything would sex EK

>> No.3166804

>>3166799

I would.

If she has a nice rack.

>> No.3166809

>>3166794

Let guess EK... your bra size is... 36C?

>implying you're not gonna lie even if I got it right on the money

>> No.3166817

>>3166809
im not fucking dicussing my bra size. shut up and get back on topic.

>> No.3166824

>>3166785
Well a popular theory is that because we are upright the buttocks cannot be used as a gauge of fertility from the front so females evolved chest buttocks to trick males into thinking they were fertile.

>> No.3166825
File: 33 KB, 330x250, 1292794392488.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166825

>>3166817

yup, 36C.

>> No.3166829
File: 40 KB, 509x572, upset.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166829

>>3166817

topic is boobs

>> No.3166830

>>3166752
You do know that most people like to play with breasts when they have sex with a girl depending on the position. And many girls and guys enjoy breast jobs or 'mammary intercourse' if you want to be scientific about it.

>> No.3166834

>>3166824
That makes sense.

>>3166825

Well she's kind of chubby, isn't she? C is a reasonable "Average" but if she's a big girl I'm betting on at least a 38C.


http://www.targetmap.com/viewer.aspx?reportId=5285

>> No.3166840

>>3166830
yeh, ive not actually ever done that. it seems wierd.

>> No.3166846

>>3166840
Well lots of girls enjoy it, especially ones with large breasts.

>> No.3166847

>>3166830

I prefer the term "Soapy Tit Wank" myself.

>> No.3166848

>>3166840

>implying any guy could fit his penis between your tiny chesticles, or better yet wouldn't even want to

>> No.3166849

>>3166840

lol

foreveralone.avi

>story of EK's life

>> No.3166850

>>3166840
>talking about sex
>"yeh, i've not actually ever done that"
Thought so.

>> No.3166857

>>3166834
Hmm mostly not surprising. Asians are smallest followed by Hispanics/arabaians/Indians/etc then Europeans but why the hell do Russians have an average size larger than D?

>> No.3166871
File: 28 KB, 284x322, 1303555795404.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166871

Oh, and for our american friends out there:
A bra size of 36C in britain is equal to a 36B in america.

And the average american bra size is 36DD, for comparison.

In short, EK's got sum itty bitty titties.

>> No.3166883
File: 1.99 MB, 295x216, 5397.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166883

>>3166871

At least then she ain't fat, right?

>> No.3166884

>>3166849
I have had sex, i have loads of sex. harriets the virgin not me. i just mean ive never given a 'tit job' or whatever they are.

>> No.3166895

>>3166884
nope.jpg
Harriet sounds like a much nicer person than you'll ever be tbh.

>> No.3166902

>>3166884
There is no need to bring me into the discussion.

>> No.3166910

>>3166902
Maybe now you realise where your true friends lie? i.e. not with dumb attention whores like EK?

>> No.3166912

>>3166884

Dogs don't count

>> No.3166920

>>3166884

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fQVPjLAulaM

this is what you sound like EK.

>> No.3166922

>>3166895
Thankyou

>>3166910
She is still a true friend. She is nicer in person than on the internet, I assure you.

>> No.3166928

>>3166857

Diet differences, cold weather leading to slower metabolisms, needing more "insulation" mmm...

Vodka and titties.
Hey EK, get your tits out.

For /sci/ence!

>> No.3166946

>>3166922
So she is a true friend in real life, but on the internet she is a dick? Nice friend you got.

>> No.3166949

>>3166902

I agree that was really uncalled for.

Holy shit EK, you are fucked up.

>> No.3166952

>>3166946
She is a little more cocky and arrogant on the internet. I suppose it is because her actions have no repercussions here.

>> No.3166960
File: 60 KB, 615x720, dirac3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166960

In the midst of all this hate and stuff, EK, I want you to know that I, for one, like you.

>> No.3166965
File: 55 KB, 550x344, internetdickwadtheory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166965

>>3166949
over-reaction much? no1 fucking cares, chill out.

>>3166952
yeh, pretty much.
<<<

>> No.3166970

>>3166952

You both are shit

>> No.3166972

>>3166952
A little more? Implying she already possesses some of those qualities in real life? Interesting, but not unexpected...
So she acts like a moron because her actions have no repercussions here? Behaviour akin to a 12 year old's first foray onto the internet.
EK is a shitty person, I don't know why you defend her.

>> No.3166974
File: 8 KB, 225x252, 1304355004701.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3166974

>>3166960
thanks hun :)
xxx

>> No.3166979

>>3166974
>she thinks he's serious
>laughing-whores.jpg

>> No.3166987

>>3166965

I'm not mad, I just feel bad for harriet.

>> No.3166989

>>3166972
I do not think she acts like a moron. Most of her posts seem rather witty, if a little snide.
She is not a moron. She is very clever I think.

>> No.3166991

>>3166960

I like her too for some reason.

Just 'cause she has breasts and is on /sci/ probably.

(Fapper here.)

>> No.3166996

>>3166987
nah, shes tough. she can take it. dont worry about her.

>>3166989
cleverer than you anyway. =p

>> No.3166997

>>3166989

>Implying you and EK aren't the same person, and half of this thread hasn't been you.

>> No.3166998

>>3166989
Very clever relative to you perhaps, since you are the only person who thinks her posts are witty, haha.

>> No.3167007
File: 2 KB, 112x112, lol..jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167007

>>3166997
ahahaha! want a slice of butthurt to go with your paranoia, garcon?

>> No.3167008
File: 29 KB, 450x610, dirac.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167008

>>3166991

Yeaaah, I have a soft spot for women + science.

Eeehaanyway EK, if it turns out that you're hideous, I wouldn't like you anymore.

Hope that doesn't offend.

>> No.3167013

>>3167007

I don't mind, your threads are usually interesting.

>> No.3167017

>>3167008
well it probably means you are a shallow fuck, but yeh im not offended.

harriet does psycology, thats barely even science. no soft spot for her. i do real science.

>> No.3167018

>>3166996

I don't care how tough someone is, generally someone's virginity is a personal piece of information.

The fact that she confided in you and you felt it was ok to reveal that without asking her, to me personally, is really fucked up.

She may very well be fine with it, but all I'm saying is if you had betrayed my trust I'd be pissed.

>> No.3167021
File: 29 KB, 425x301, OPisafag.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167021

this almost looks as if Harriet and EK is the same person. If not, hats off to Harriet for defending here in spite of a backstab like this.

Also, y'all nigga's postin' inna troll thread.

>> No.3167033

>>3167017

Not really shallow. Hideous would mean that you would have to be heavily overweight, have stuff on your face that is totally out of proportion and all that. You know, kinda like those people that get used as reaction images. Lol.

What do you study anyway?

>> No.3167036

>>3167018
first of all, i could be lying, you dont know whether she is a virgin at all, all you have is my word.
secondly, why the fuck would she care what some random person on the internet thinks? you can be all like "haha! fucking virgin!" and she probably wont give a fuck and wont even reply.
thirdly, i dont think shes even embarrassed, i shes not bad looking, i rekon she could have had dozens of guys by now if she wanted. she just has some fucked up monogamy fetish and want 'the right guy'
lmao.

>> No.3167037
File: 28 KB, 311x311, 1293220576913.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167037

>>3167017

>male
>mate selection via visual cues
>shallow

I don't think you've been around many guys...

>> No.3167038

>>3167017
>zoology
>real science
HAHAHAH
Stop trolling please

>> No.3167044

>>3167021
>someone compliments/backs up EK
>retard logic: it must be EK samefagging!

when will you faggots learn that everyone just naturally loves me?

>>3167033
zoology.

>> No.3167047

>>3167036

You're an idiot.

>> No.3167052
File: 14 KB, 478x357, 126549.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167052

>>3167047
ahaha! really? which part? care to clarify?

>> No.3167056

>>3167038
Trolls belong on /b/ in case you did not know.

>> No.3167057
File: 33 KB, 320x273, dirac2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167057

>>3167044

Zoology is.. okay, I guess.

(Slightly disappoint.. I was hoping for physics or math)

>> No.3167061

>>3167057
2 of my favourite hobbies!
you_are_less_dissapoint.jpg

>> No.3167069

>>3167061
Kill yourself.

>> No.3167073

>>3167052

Google: ignoramus

Study that word. I mean REALLY understand it.

>> No.3167074
File: 2 KB, 126x104, no u.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167074

>>3167069

>> No.3167077

>>3167044
Well the alternative is that you're a domineering bitch with no regard whatsoever for feelings of people who surround you.But you don't need to feel bad for it. Most people are like that.

>> No.3167078
File: 1.17 MB, 200x147, 1306434864376.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167078

>>3167069

Lol'd.

Relax man. Being angry like this over the internet is NOT good for you.

Same goes for you: >>3167073

>> No.3167082

>>3167077
meh, i dont even care.
she's pretty quiet IRL so i can generaly do whatever the fuck i want and she wont complain.

>> No.3167092
File: 136 KB, 327x459, giants.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167092

>>3167082

Is Harriet like that?

Oh god I don't know who I like most now.

>> No.3167095

>>3167092
quiet and submissive girls turn you on?
lol.
quiet and submissive guys turn me on.

>> No.3167098

>>3167092

I can picture a four nerd double date as quite interesting to observe, if not partake in.

>> No.3167099

>>3167082

I hate you.

This has been a daily reminder.

>> No.3167101

>>3167095
>zoology

i think "lactation" would be a better job than that

>> No.3167103
File: 38 KB, 350x485, giants2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167103

>>3167095

You'd like me then I suppose.

Submissive girls? No. Quiet? Yes.


Also, I am fucking sorry to the rest of /sci/ for this, so for each post I'll be posting a cool pic.

>> No.3167107
File: 162 KB, 700x493, Is-This-Real-Life.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167107

EK and Harriet know each other in real life?

>> No.3167109

>>3167098
well i'm not actually particulary nerdy. i'm clever and scientific, but probably a little more talkative and less socially awkward than most of the guys i date. so it'd be like a 3 nerd and 1 slightly less nerd kind of quadruple date... that sounds fun! i need to find a date for harriet.

>> No.3167114

>>3167107
She's my housemate. She only started posting here a few weeks ago and that was only because i have been posting here for months, and she's a nosy interfering bitch who copies everything i do, because i am awesome. cant say i blame her, really.

>> No.3167116

>>3167095

>quiet and submissive guys turn me on.

If that's what gets you off, then I'm your guy!

>> No.3167118
File: 50 KB, 345x345, 1293857577442.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167118

>>3167109

>clever and scientific

And yet on a board about science and math you choose to troll and be annoying....

>> No.3167121

>>3167114
You sure are enjoying your internet.

>>3167116
>quiet and submissive guys
She's talking about faggots.

>> No.3167122

>>3167116
mm, scientists tend to be the type. intelligence and quietness seem to go hand in hand. and thats fine by me. its why i hang out with other science majors. people with shit tier majors tend to be frustratingly supid, loud mouthed arrogant jerks. not very datable.

>> No.3167125
File: 38 KB, 300x450, 12219984840O9AU5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167125

>>3167114

>she thinks being abrasive and obnoxious is not socially awkward

>> No.3167128

>>3167122
>loudmouthed
>arrogant jerks
>not very debatable
lookwhostalking.mp4

>> No.3167130

>>3167118
heheh...the biggest thread of the day has been a fucking religion thread, don't pretend theres so much science and maths going on here, because honestly most of the threads are not.

>> No.3167133
File: 19 KB, 400x312, Glaser-Feynman-Bacher-Leighton_CalTech.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167133

>>3167128

I doubt she's really like that irl.

I think I like Harriet more actually. And I haven't seen more than two posts by her.

A proper evaluation cannot be made before I've seen both though.

>> No.3167135

>>3167128
haha, yeh, well i'm not actually so arrogant and annoying IRL. i tone it down a lot.
this, basically: >>3166922

>> No.3167136

>>3167122

Yes, I've noticed that as well.

I suppose it has something to do with generally being more cerebral in general.

>> No.3167141
File: 39 KB, 562x437, 1292559890554.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167141

>>3167122

>intelligence and quietness seem to go hand in hand

>people with shit tier majors tend to be frustratingly supid, loud mouthed arrogant jerks.

HAHAHAHAHAH The zoologist says something right for once.

>> No.3167143

>>3166675
Volume. It can't be profitable on a large scale, and the number of volunteers that don't breastfeed can't be large enough to be economically viable.
Cows, on the other hand, make oodles of milk.

>> No.3167147

>>3167135
Wait, you know you're being arrogant and annoying here?

>> No.3167148
File: 2 KB, 126x126, thefuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167148

>>3167133
>I think I like Harriet more actually.
are you fucking kidding me??
she has either been saging, complaining, or trolling in a religion thread, i hardly see why thats a good reason to like her more than me. i'm the one who fucking called her out for trolling anyway.

>> No.3167152

Gentlemen. I have a guess.

EK and Harriet are simply two sides of the same coin. Establishing with a sage.

>> No.3167153
File: 135 KB, 1600x1200, Heisenberg&#44;W._Wigner&#44;E._1928.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167153

>>3167148

But.. but she's quiet. Is she cute?

If she's cute then yeah, Harriet > you.

>> No.3167154

>>3167147
heheh, of course. If people get pissed of with it, then it amuses me. i'm usually still right, i mean i could answer plainly like "dear OP, 2 + 2 = 4. /thread" but thats not particularly fun, so i tend to go with "OLOLOL! FUCK YOU OP, 2=2 = 4 ONBIOUSLY, YOU FUCKING RETARD, GET A BRAIN MORANS! AHAHHA! FUCK YOU!!!!"

and you are guaranteed far more butthurt responses.

>> No.3167156

>>3167152
She sure has a lot of time.

>> No.3167157

>>3167152

The hypothesis has already been established. The motion did not carry.

There wasn't sufficient evidence to support the claim, and there is evidence directly opposing it.

Any further submissions?

>> No.3167161
File: 78 KB, 462x462, 1306612813975.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167161

>>3167157
>she's my room-mate.

Fuck yeah indeed.

>> No.3167163

>>3167153
EK's tired of posting as Harriet now.

>> No.3167167

>>3167152
what? you another conspiracy theorist?
>"hurr durr, it are same persons!"

she has a completely different posting style to me (ie, a fucking boring one) and has different opinions. (see, religion thread)

>>3167153
so looks are all that are important? i'm definitely smarter than her, that should count for something.
I'd like to think I am prettier, but then my opinion could be biased, so maybe not. i probably am though.

>> No.3167172

>>3167157

It's fairly obvious, honestly.

EK's grammar and sentence structure normally doesn't fluctuate between "elementary school drop out" to /sci/ resident, while Harriet's has been consistently decent the entire thread.

I propose that the poser (EKarriet) took the easiest route of distinguishing between the two persona they've taken up: By mangling their grammar and posting style in general.

>> No.3167176
File: 57 KB, 840x789, EK.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167176

>>3167167

>prettier

God, I hope not. Harriet would be screwed.

>> No.3167177

>>3167167
EK's unusually energetic today. Did you get laid or something?

>> No.3167180

>>3167163
she isnt me. and wtf, this is like the 4th or 5th different person ive been accused of being. you guys all belong on /x/ or some shit.

i think she's gone. maybe she was more butthurt than i originally thought.

>> No.3167182

>>3167172

>>3167167
>she has a completely different posting style to me (ie, a fucking boring one) and has different opinions. (see, religion thread)


See.

>> No.3167187
File: 13 KB, 482x312, item 001-A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167187

>>3167172

Request to revive motion denied. Insufficient evidence supporting case (read:circumstantial)

Displaying evidence against case: item 001-A

The point of interest on the article is the times.

>> No.3167190

>>3167172
ahahah! the fuck?
my grammar is way better than harriets anyway.

>>3167176
and thats not me either
>ek.jpg
oh fuck you!

>>3167177
haha! yeh i did actually ;)

>> No.3167191

>>3167172
>>3167182
>>3167180

>i think she's gone. maybe she was more butthurt than i originally thought.

So now, with the cat slowly crawling out of the bag, as it were, the extra persona is discarded in favour of what new ruse?


Goddammit, EKarriet.

I can't fap to you if you're not at least more devious minded than I.

>> No.3167194
File: 330 KB, 1700x1200, Moons2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167194

>>3167167

Of course looks count. The classic "looks attract and personality makes you fall in love" thingy is valid in pretty much all cases.

I haven't seen you and I don't really know your personality, so all I go on is the fact that you're on /sci/ and you study zoology, which either means that you're smart, or that you have no life.

>> No.3167195

>>3167167
EK, you are smart but I am no white-knight! *double-standards*

>> No.3167197

>>3167187
ah, we posted at the same time. ha! cool case closed. i cant be her then.
although i love how quickly you delusionals jump to conclusions. every time some anon compliments me they are always accused of being me posting without my trip. i dont post without my trip to compliment myself. i only ever detrip if i'm trolling, and dont want it to appear as me, as it would give the game away.

>> No.3167202

>>3167197
Answer me EK:

What is your degree?

>> No.3167203

>>3167197
You are trolling right now, and everyone's enjoying it.

>> No.3167204

>>3167187
>>3167191

Mmm, you do have a point.

The post timer is a bit of an issue, though I've noticed at times on different (relatively low traffic) boards the spam timer will fluctuate enough to allow one poster to post twice within the same minute.

I'm not sure if /SCI/ is still one of those, but I'm not willing to rule that, or the possibility that they took that into consideration, and that you are in fact, EKarriet as well attempting a devious cover up.

>> No.3167207

>>3167194
i'm smart but i have a very good social life.

>>3167191
wat?

>> No.3167213 [DELETED] 

Post test #1.

>> No.3167219

>>3167202
this post (at the bottom) : >>3167044

>> No.3167220
File: 30 KB, 350x447, 1283262889152.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167220

>>3167187
how is your evidence any less circumstacial?

I refuse to believe a girl, and a self proclaimed friend, would call herself smarter and prettier than this friend.

Unless she's a cunt, of course. Or they're both the same guy.

>> No.3167221 [DELETED] 

#1, part 2!

Captcha cockblock.

>> No.3167222
File: 485 KB, 193x135, 5357.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167222

>>3167220

>Or they're both the same guy.

>> No.3167224

>>3167213
>>3167221

1 minute apart. it probably isnt possible to arrive in the same minute.

>> No.3167223 [DELETED] 

bnasbrt

>> No.3167227

>>3167224

I have before, but it didn't work then.

Probably have to time it just right...

>> No.3167231

>>3167220
well i cant say for sure if i'm prettier, but i am smarter and she knows it. we were in high school together and were still friends back then, so we knew each others grades. i consistently did better than her in pretty much everything. shes not retarded or anything, shes fairly smart i guess, but i was one of the top in the class for a lot of the subjects.

>> No.3167234

>>3167220

Motion to contest the motion at hand, denied.

Our staff suggests you familiarize yourself with the 4chan website.
We also suggest you make particular note of one's ability, or lack thereof, to make consecutive posts in short periods of time. (read: flood detection)

>> No.3167236

>>3167220

I'm almost 100% certain that EK and Harriet are the same person. "EKarriet" though the timer shot is a problem.

>> No.3167237

>>3167227
wait until the minute just ticks over to the new minute, then make the post. you will have a full 60 seconds to make the next one. come to think of it, it probably is possible.
i'm still not her though.

>> No.3167240
File: 56 KB, 333x500, Qui genus humanum ingenio superavit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167240

>>3167231

>school grades
>linked with being smart

-10 points EK.

>> No.3167243
File: 12 KB, 357x348, 13645647.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167243

>>3167236

i have a tripcode, she doesn't
there is some serious fucking inconsistencies if you think we are the same personality.

>> No.3167246

>>3167231
Stop trolling.

>> No.3167248

>>3167234

Also, if EK is not in fact, Harriet, (which I doubt) I'm calling this poster Harriet.

>> No.3167250

>>3167240
+1

>> No.3167251

>>3167243

I would be disappointed if you admitted it, regardless.

It's more fun this way.

>> No.3167252

>>3167246
oh hey, your back. i'm not trolling and you know it. go on then, reply to this post, out of he 2 of us who is more intelligent? and be honest.

>> No.3167253

>>3167246
She's back, shitstorm's getting stronger.

>> No.3167256

>>3167252

Depends on the definition of 'smart'.

Ultimately, though, I am smarter

>> No.3167260
File: 13 KB, 424x351, 13635748.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167260

>>3167248
so harriet is not me, but she does samefag as anon?
ahaha! wheres your tin foil hat, brah?

>> No.3167262

Hahaha, who's for Harriet?

>> No.3167264

>>3167243
>>3167246

>08:40
>08:41

Perhaps an(other) attempt to "synchronize" the posts, hmm?

>> No.3167265

>>3167256
what!? no you fucking arnt. smarter as in who knows more, who is better at solving puzzles, working things out, and writing essays etc. i am so better than you!
how would you define it?

>> No.3167267

>>3167243

So:
When I pointed out the grammar changes, and the fact that is the easiest way to distinguish between two people (that most won't pay attention to) Harriet "left" the thread for awhile.

Now, she's back.


Harriet, if you're not in fact, EK's alter ego - where were you for the past hour?

>> No.3167271

>>3167264
heheh, harriet. lets solve this once and for all. exactly when the minute flips over to 8:50, we both make a post.
lets prove these faggots wrong once and for all.

>> No.3167273

>>3167265

You might be better at puzzles, but like I definitely have more common sense

>> No.3167275

>>3167271

She's your housemate, why would you post conversational material to her on here, instead of yelling? It's more certain she'll hear it, that way.

Unless of course, that is all part of the "I"m not EKarriet!" ruse.

>> No.3167276

>>3167267
yeh, im curious for this as well. you game for the 8:50?

>> No.3167277

>>3167271

Alright, I'll even make it long enough so people can't say we typed it within the same minute

>> No.3167278
File: 34 KB, 351x282, feynman and dirac2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167278

>>3167273
>but like
>>3167265
>i am so better than you!


Woah. This took a drastically childish turn. I believe none of you are actually very smart... if you are indeed two people.

>> No.3167279

>>3167276

You'll need to synchronize your clocks/PC time.

>> No.3167282
File: 48 KB, 300x329, doublesm00t.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167282

8:50

>> No.3167283

>>3167276

This is my post at 8:50 to confirm different identities of me and EK.

Blah blah blah blah blah blah

I am not EK

>> No.3167284

>>3167277
>>3167276
>>3167282
>>3167283

Confirmed?

>> No.3167286

>>3167283
yeh, that was like 7 seconds at most. certainly not me. thanks for being a sport. :)

>> No.3167293

Thread's becoming dull EK.

>> No.3167294

>>3167273
perhaps...

>> No.3167298

>>3167293
yeh, probably. we strayed off topic but i love a good conspiracy!

>> No.3167302
File: 47 KB, 1188x472, item 002-A.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167302

>>3167286

Actually, I'm head councilman from the Counsel for Reason and Fact.

I was simply proving the organization's case that you are in fact no Harriet, since you would have recognized that we had assumed Harriet's identity.

Displaying: item 002-A

the point of interest is the content of text.

1/2

>> No.3167305
File: 32 KB, 740x308, 1295552712453.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167305

>>3167302

I love you for acting like this. I really do.

>> No.3167306
File: 110 KB, 999x559, item 002-B.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167306

>>3167302

Displaying: item 002-B

the point of interest is both EK's post and the Counsel's false identity's post.

2/2

>> No.3167309
File: 15 KB, 489x358, 13635649.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167309

>>3167302
what!? your not the real harriet!?
fuck you! i told her to get a trip, fucks sake.
since when?

>> No.3167311

>>3167231
Ok. Here's the truth you silly girl. I am prettier and smarter. You are ugly. And perhaps a bit better at sewing than I am. But that's all.

And you are black. I am white. That almost says all.

>> No.3167312

>>3167302
Hahahaha. I didn't notice Harriet doesn't post with a trip.

>> No.3167313
File: 37 KB, 400x323, 1305195941415.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167313

>>3167309

confirmed for fake harriet. she isn't even in the fucking house! shes gone out somewhere.

>> No.3167315

>>3167313

HOW DO WE EVER KNOW WHEN THE REAL HARRIET IS TALKING THEN

>> No.3167317
File: 19 KB, 300x309, ang1.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167317

>>3167312
when she gets back i'll slap some fucking sense into her and make her use a trip...

>> No.3167318

>>3167311
I am the real and one and only harrier. And this is now my trip code.

>> No.3167319

>>3167248

Oh hey, I was right!

>> No.3167323

I love this thread.

Oh EKarriet, you so crazy.

>> No.3167324

>>3167318
I know that trip!

Its 'iluvcocks'!

>> No.3167325

>>3167243
this fucking post, i should have realised that you devious fuckers would have gotten an idea from it...

>> No.3167327

>>3167324
trial

did it work?

>> No.3167328

>>3167319

The Counsel for Reason and Fact must regretfully inform you that, although we had temporarily comandeered her identity, there is a different poster to consistently posts under that alias who appears to genuinely know EK.

This has been a PSA by CRF. Thank you.

>> No.3167329
File: 43 KB, 1034x776, fuuckyou.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167329

>>3167318
>she isn't even in the fucking house! shes gone out somewhere.

>> No.3167331

>>3167327
so harrier loves cocks?

>> No.3167332

I am.

>> No.3167338

Gentlemen.

Please.

>> No.3167340

Will the real EKarriet please stand up?

>> No.3167341

>>3167329
oh EK, you so funny when u get mad.

>> No.3167342

A simple solution would be:

For EK and Harriet (either incarnation) to write "EK" or "Harriet" on the palm of their hand and post a timestamp. (Needs to be on skin, though instead of cheating and using paper.)

>> No.3167343
File: 174 KB, 600x450, 1304287298598.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167343

ITT: faggotry everywhere.

although I guess that if EK and Harriet were indeed separate entities, we could agree that Harriet is a much better person.

>> No.3167345

Hey guys, what's going on in this thread?

>> No.3167348
File: 119 KB, 390x390, dawkinsrly.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167348

>>3167342
anyone can fucking do that, you fuck.

>> No.3167349

>>3167342

Simple as this really.

>> No.3167350

>>3167342
No tits?

Amazing!

>> No.3167352

>>3167341
>judas EKarriet

lol'd

>> No.3167355

>>3167348

It would be obvious if:

One was black, one white - or if both were female hands, or male.

>> No.3167357

>>3167355

And the trips..

or if they did it standing close to eachother. I dunno.

>> No.3167358

>>3167355

If there are two timestamped, female hands in a /sci/ thread with their posters' names on them, I'd happily call Mythbusted.

>> No.3167359

>>3167355
we have similar coloured skin (both white)
and i'm not sure i could even tell a persons hand apart from someone elses.

>> No.3167360

She's gone hahaha.

>> No.3167363

>>3167348
EK, please fuck off. You didn't get janitor pw and now you're pissed and angsty, deal with it and move on. Seriously, bro.

>> No.3167364

>>3167358
well i thought the 8:50 idea would be enough to call it mythbusted, but apparently it wasnt even the real harriet so it is totally invalidated.

>> No.3167369

>>3167364
Do it faggot.

>> No.3167373

>>3167369
nah, i'll just have her use a trip. thats far easier. stubborn bitch should have got one ages ago, i told her like 3 times.

>> No.3167379

>>3167373

timestamped pic now, EK. Simple as that.

>> No.3167381

EK is the homosexual fantasy of the faggot EK. Problem tripfaggot?

>> No.3167385

>>3167364

You don't have to expose yourself, or anything identifying, other than a strip of skin large enough to write "EK" on, nails visible is a plus. (Palm would be easiest, just stick it right up to the camera.)

>> No.3167388

>>3167379
for what? sorry, what are we trying to prove? are we even talking about the same thing?
i just need her to trip so she can't be impersonated. I see no point in timestamping anything, that doesn't help my problem. i aready know what harriet looks like, i fucking live with her, so a timestamp and picture doesn't help me at all.

>> No.3167396

>>3167388

It would clear up a few things, e.g are you a hambeast or not?

Since you're on 4chan, /sci/, with a trip, people naturally think you must be one of the ugliest bitches to live on this planet, and people will treat you as such (hence all the hate).

Give the people what they want, and prove that you are, in fact, not a fat hambeast.

>> No.3167406

>>3167388

She's avoiding it.

EK confirmed for Harriet.

>> No.3167410
File: 50 KB, 420x420, imout.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167410

>>3167396
oh, that again? well that has nothing to do with my little problem, and zero fucks are given.
you think i get the hate because of the possibility i am an ugly hambeast? lol, i know im not ugly, and if fucking superficial shallow cunts think like that then i would prefer to be hated than to be liked by them anyway.
i'm not proving anything. no pics. ever. umad?
/thread,
i'll show harriet the thread when she gets back, that will be enough to convince her to trip.
cya.

>> No.3167419

>>3167410

>claiming not to be ugly
>disdaining men who find attractiveness visually

Classic rationalization. I can't wait for Harriet to see this thread. She's a psychologist. She'll known what I'm talking about.

EK confirmed for hambeast.

>> No.3167420

>>3167410
Goodbye. Thanks for derailing another thread. Cool dynamic IP bro, don't think this hasn't gone unnoticed.

>> No.3167422

>>3167419

know*

>> No.3167440

Eh I don't care that she's fat.

But I'm disappointed that she is actually Harriet.

>> No.3167445
File: 30 KB, 841x367, lolfuckthat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167445

>>3167420
>Cool dynamic IP bro, don't think this hasn't gone unnoticed.
how would you know that unless you are the fucking mod who banned me?
gonna give a proper reason this time, or just going to abuse your power further?
unless i'm breaking rules, you have no right. trolling on its own isn't good enough.

>> No.3167455

>>3167445

reported for ban evasion.

Enjoy your perma ban.

>> No.3167463

>>3167455
Won't she just evade that as well?

>> No.3167470

>>3166752
Titty fuck.
I am doing it right.

>> No.3167475

>>3167445
HA. oh wow, I fucking love her.

>> No.3167477

Hey mod

Is Harriet and EK the same IP?

>> No.3167491

>>3167445
Why would anyone ban you EK? All you do is troll relentlessly and reboot your router/modem.End of.

>> No.3167493

>>3167440
Were you not paying attention? read the thread, they are different people. someone trolled EK by pretending to be Harriet. It wouldn't be possible if they were the same person.

>> No.3167496

>>3167477
yes

>> No.3167500

>>3167496
really?
So they are the same person then or not?
If they are housemates they might share an IP address anyway, so it might still be different people.
Aww, I feel sorry for Harriet. Every time EK gets banned it will ban Harriet as well.

>> No.3167517

>>3167496

Thanks!

>> No.3167523

>>3167496

reported for impersonating a mod

Enjoy your ban

>> No.3167526

>>3167523
how do you know? are you the mod? can you anwer this please? >>3167477

>> No.3167529

>>3167523
+1

>> No.3167535
File: 23 KB, 311x306, 1294306032708.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3167535

>>3167526

LOLOLOLOL

>> No.3167593

>>3167500

I'm on a college network, myself, and I get banned a few times every year because some tool uses our IP address to do stupid shit. If you think it'd be bad with two people, think about dozens of people sharing the same IP.

>> No.3167605

>>3166752
Breast aren't use during sex.


Holy fuck. so much wrong with this statement.

>> No.3167620

>>3166675
I don't see a problem with this as long as it's regulated and there's the appropriate form of standardisation involved. Unfortunately, after childhood, people are weird out by drinking something that came from an unknown human beings (but they're okay with drinking stuff from animals as well as drinking human semen and occasionally urine). The aversion to human breast milk isn't rational but it is wide spread and it would take a substantial cultural shift to change that.

it's well known that cow's milk isn't actually optimal for human consumption. I believe goat's milk or something else is considered better. Human milk would probably be even better if it's processed in the same manner.


Other than the cultural aversion, the main drawback would be economic. Women would demand much higher maintenance than cows or goats.