[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math

File: 11 KB, 265x297, 1252649273590.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

3135825

Anonymous Sat May 28 10:53:46 2011 No.3135825 [Reply] [Original]

A challenge appears!

2(x - 1) + 4x = 3(x + 1) - 4

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 10:54:46 2011 No.3135830 File: 45 KB, 362x389, what.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >Linear equation Are you fucking 11?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 10:57:46 2011 No.3135836 I could tell you the answer but I am not doing grade 9 math.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 10:57:46 2011 No.3135838 File: 146 KB, 802x1300, pedobear.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>3135830

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:01:46 2011 No.3135842 Just being sarcastic. The answer is 1/3 or 0.33 I guess I should take this board more seriously.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:05:46 2011 No.3135850 Underage b&

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:12:46 2011 No.3135863 >>3135830 Linear equation? Looks like elementary algebra to me

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:27:46 2011 No.3135895 so zero multiplied by x will give you an integer? I thought this was an integral domain?

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:32:46 2011 No.3135911 3/1, or 1.3 repeating.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:32:46 2011 No.3135913 2(x - 1) + 4x = 3(x + 1) - 4 2x - 2 + 4x = 3x + 3 - 4 4x - 2 = 3x - 1 7x - 2 = -1 7x = -1 + 2 = 1 x = 1/7

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:34:46 2011 No.3135918 >>3135913 Theres no way I can comprehend the thought process that led to this.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:34:46 2011 No.3135920 >>3135913 hahaha retard

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:35:46 2011 No.3135921 It's (3/1)^-1

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:38:46 2011 No.3135928 2(x - 1) + 4x = 3(x + 1) - 4 2x - 2 + 4x = 3x + 3 - 4 3x - 2 = - 1 3x + 1 x = 1/3 Thanks for the revision there

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:42:46 2011 No.3135938 >>3135863 Elementary? I've been dong this shit since I was in the womb.

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:42:47 2011 No.3135942 Lets do this the retarded midget way 2(x - 1) + 4x = 3(x + 1) - 4 6x-2=3x-1 divide both sides by 3x-1 2 = 1 Therefore you divded by zero, so 3x-1 must be zero so x = 1/3

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:49:47 2011 No.3135952 >That feel when /sci/ will blindly give the solution to any math homework problem no matter how lazy/demanding OP is

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:50:47 2011 No.3135955 >>3135938 >confusing masturbation with linear algebra

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 11:50:47 2011 No.3135961 >>3135942 omgwat. Z or R or C are integer domains. there are no zero divisors so we can apply the zero product property. it isn't that we divided by zero

>>	Anonymous Sat May 28 12:08:47 2011 No.3136007 >>3135961 Idiot. If you have a linear equation, and by dividing you get a false equation, it means you divided by zero.