[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/sci/ - Science & Math


View post   

File: 131 KB, 800x504, electrohydrogenesis.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3128614 No.3128614 [Reply] [Original]

Electroyhdrogenesis - producing electricity and hydrogen from biowaste by using GMO'd microbes. Fuel cell tech isn't at the point of being viable for large-scale vehicle implementation, but I think industrial fuel cell plants would do the trick (which could then power electric cars/everything else). So here we go water + sunlight > photosynthesis > food + biowaste. Biowaste > electricity + hydrogen. Hydrogen > electricity + water. Energy crisis solved? Discuss.

Wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electrohydrogenesis

"Sustainable and efficient biohydrogen production via electrohydrogenesis"
http://www.pnas.org/cgi/doi/10.1073/pnas.0706379104

>> No.3128902

HURPA DERP

IT still release CO2 as a byproduct of energy.

This is self defeating

>> No.3128926

>>3128902

Eat shit and die, Al.

>> No.3128941
File: 64 KB, 479x600, 1293934821471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3128941

How about:
>All car makers have to make electric cars by 2035
>LFTRs everywhere for electricity
That was a fair bit easier. And no CO2 emissions besides perhaps the manufacturing process.

>> No.3128945
File: 21 KB, 546x336, growing_gap.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3128945

>>3128902
>derp herp global warming is the only reason to move away from oil as an energy source
>I have dicks in my ass

>> No.3128970

>>3128945

>on /sci/
>disregards the merits of Climate change despite being pretty much unanimously agreed upon from respected scientist in those fields.

>> No.3128973

>>3128945

This graph is quite alarmist, if you don't read it properly. It says >discovery, not >amount.
Just because new oil isn't being discovered as much as it was earlier, doesn't mean that we're running out.
That doesn't mean that I don't agree with you that we do need to free our dependency on crude oil.

>> No.3128977

>>3128970

When did he ever do that?